http://12160.info/forum/topics/femo-hiring-actors-to-run-live-terror-drills-nevada-governor
Writing,poetry,photography, animals,nature,politics and the vagaries of a wandering mind.
Showing posts with label Sen Harry Reid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sen Harry Reid. Show all posts
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
REID THE MADMAN - SAYS MORE FUNDING IS NEEDED TO PREVENT HEALTHCARE LAW FROM BECOMING A FUCKING TRAIN WRECK! MAYBE HE SHOULD HAVE...
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/297333-reid-says-more-funding-is-needed-to-prevent-healthcare-law-from-becoming-a-train-wreck
READ THE FUCKING BILL, RIGHT PELOSI, YOU GAPING PIECE OF PLASTIC?
(THAT'S REALLY NOT WHAT I WANTED TO SAY - IT WAS A LOT WORSE)
AND MAX BAUCUS - YOU'D BETTER NOT GO HOME TO MONTANA - THOSE BOYS KNOW HOW TO SKIN A PREDATOR AND WHAT ELSE DO YOU CALL THIS BILL BUT PREDATION ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY FORCE!?????
READ THE FUCKING BILL, RIGHT PELOSI, YOU GAPING PIECE OF PLASTIC?
(THAT'S REALLY NOT WHAT I WANTED TO SAY - IT WAS A LOT WORSE)
AND MAX BAUCUS - YOU'D BETTER NOT GO HOME TO MONTANA - THOSE BOYS KNOW HOW TO SKIN A PREDATOR AND WHAT ELSE DO YOU CALL THIS BILL BUT PREDATION ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY FORCE!?????
Friday, April 19, 2013
Friday, April 12, 2013
MARK LEVIN WENT NUCLEAR WHEN HE KNEW UP/DOWN VOTE ON SECOND AMENDMENT WAS TAKEN -UNCONSTITUTIONAL
AND REID AND THE RINOS, AND ALL THE REST OF THEM WHO ALLOWED IT SHOULD BE JAILED AND TRIED FOR TREASON AND TRYING TO OVERTHROW THIS GOVERNMENT. THIS IS WHOLLY ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND AGAINST THE RULE OF LAW FOR THIS COUNTRY!!!! DOESN'T ANYONE REALIZE THIS?
WHO THE FLUCK VOTES FOR AN UNWRITTEN BILL? DOESN'T THAT BOTHER YOU?
Mark Levin goes NUCLEAR: An up and down vote on the 2nd amendment is UNCONSTITUTIONAL! 4 9 2013
Mark
Levin says that on Thursday the Senate intends to vote to change the
2nd amendment without any pretense of going through the amendment
process, on a bill that hasn’t even been written yet. He says that this
isn’t republicanism, it’s democratic tyranny. And the senators arguing
to filibuster are being demonized, but Levin says that an up and down
vote on the 2nd amendment is unconstitutional, that there is no up and
down vote on the Constitution.
This is a must listen:
Victoria Baer
4320 Deerwood Lake Pkwy #101-222
Jacksonville, FL 32216
904.982.1734 PH
904.996.1510 FAX
Give your business the Competive Edge…
When
the defense of liberty becomes a crime, tyranny is already in force. At
that point, failure to defend liberty makes slavery a certainty.
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
US CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE II, SECTION 4 - IMPEACHMENT - ASK YOUR REPS AND SENATORS IF THEY'VE EVER READ THIS
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&sqi=2&ved=0CEIQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Flaw.umkc.edu%2Ffaculty%2Fprojects%2Fftrials%2Fimpeach%2Fconstitution.html&ei=61RkUcOMMYmg9QTiwYDACQ&usg=AFQjCNH3puE1fxKffGFtlJmR2n2ihnaDBA&sig2=vUIcgvDTEVORPtSA1M1t9g&bvm=bv.44990110,d.eWU
Here is the remedy for the deaf eared assholes we elected to the House and the Senate.
Here is where the US CONSTITUTION DEMANDS THE SENATE TO HEAR THE MISDEMEANORS AND HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS AND TO REMOVE THE PRESIDENT, THE VICE PRESIDENT, ETC. FROM OFFICE.
CALL THEM.
EMAIL THEM.
FAX THEM.
AND WHEN YOU GET TO BOEHNER'S SMARMY GUYS, MAKE THEM READ IT, TOO. OUT LOUD AND TO YOU.
(Dereliction of duty is a misdemeanor. That lowlife in the White House, had the nerve to have
another party while N. Korea's madman threatens nuclear strikes!)
Here is the remedy for the deaf eared assholes we elected to the House and the Senate.
Here is where the US CONSTITUTION DEMANDS THE SENATE TO HEAR THE MISDEMEANORS AND HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS AND TO REMOVE THE PRESIDENT, THE VICE PRESIDENT, ETC. FROM OFFICE.
CALL THEM.
EMAIL THEM.
FAX THEM.
AND WHEN YOU GET TO BOEHNER'S SMARMY GUYS, MAKE THEM READ IT, TOO. OUT LOUD AND TO YOU.
(Dereliction of duty is a misdemeanor. That lowlife in the White House, had the nerve to have
another party while N. Korea's madman threatens nuclear strikes!)
Monday, April 8, 2013
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
YOU BETCHA THEY'RE BRAVE! SENATORS PAUL, CRUZ AND LEE TO LEAD FILIBUSTER OF REID'S GUN CONTROL BRIBE-O-THON! REMEMBER THAT WHEN AT ELECTION TIME. HEY - WHERE IS YOUR SENATOR? AND MINE (HA! BILL NELSON - WHAT A FOOL YOU BE!)
|
|||||||||||
|
If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here. |
|||||||||||
Monday, March 25, 2013
HARRY REID THAT COMMUNIST, BEEFS UP "BASE BILL" TO DESTROY GUN OWNERSHIP". UNHOLY ALLIANCES COULD BECOME A CONCERN
| Gun Owners of America | |||||||
Sen. Reid Beefs up “Base Bill” to
Destroy Gun Ownership
"Unholy alliances" could become a concern
We now know a lot more about what's going to happen with gun control legislation than we did a few days
ago.First, the number of the bill we are fighting is S. 649. Harry Reid introduced it on Thursday and brought it directly onto the Senate calendar. This means the bill can now come up at any time — probably soon after the Easter recess is over. Second, the bill is a lot worse than even we anticipated. We expected it to contain the Veterans Gun Ban, which would mean that you would sell, gift, or raffle a gun in America at the risk of a 15-year prison sentence because of something you didn't know about the veteran/buyer. But, surprisingly to us, the Far Left has convinced Reid to include the original Schumer version of the Universal Registry Bill. This would ban private sales of firearms, unless purchasers first get the permission from the government. If Senators can pass this de facto registration bill, they will be well on the way to confiscation (see, for example, Governor Andrew Cuomo in New York, who has a gun owner registry and has called for gun confiscation). If this bill is passed, Senators will claim that they "broke the back" of gun owners in America. Third, there is still every evidence that Reid will move to proceed to the bill under "regular order," which means he will need 60 votes to advance to the "gun control buffet." GOA has been talking and making our case with a host of Senate Republicans, and we would hope that everyone in the Senate understands the importance of stopping the "motion to proceed" to Reid's gun control legislation. Fourth, as we predicted, anti-gun zealots have begun to use the "ObamaCare Paradigm" to threaten, bribe, and coerce senators into submission on the most far-reaching aspects of gun control, including Feinstein's proposal to ban shotguns, rifles and handguns that millions of Americans legally own. So if the "motion to proceed" to S. 649 is adopted with 60 votes, then Feinstein's ban could be passed in the Senate with only 50 votes (plus Biden). Click here for a more technical explanation as to how this would occur. Already, articles are being published to intimidate any Democratic Senator who votes against any gun control and threatening them with the prospect of facing an anti-gun primary challenger — just like we saw on ObamaCare. Fifth, there may be unholy alliances at work which could succeed in achieving a dangerous gun control compromise. One Capitol Hill newspaper is now reporting that "Sen. Joe Manchin and the National Rifle Association are quietly engaged in private talks on a proposal to broaden background checks on purchasers of firearms." We hope this is not true, however you should be aware of this report and use whatever contacts you have to prevent this from happening. Be assured, you can rely on Gun Owners of America to never engage in any compromises! ACTION: The strategy remains: We need to defeat this bill by filibustering and voting down the "motion to proceed" to S. 649. Please contact your senators and distribute this alert far and wide. Show up at their offices with a delegation during the congressional recess. Rally and conduct demonstrations and call-a-thons and writing campaigns. Know that the anti-gun Left will be doing the same. | |||||||
| |||||||

Only $5 with free shipping
Monday, January 21, 2013
BREAKING: BLACK DEMOCRAT (NV) ASSEMBLYMAN THREATENS WHITE SPEAKER ELECT WITH LOADED GUN - HEY, HARRY, REV. AL AND REV. JESSE - WHAT'S UP WITH THIS? A DEMOCRAT WITH A LOADED GUN?
http://clashdaily.com/2013/01/breaking-black-democrat-assemblyman-threatens-white-speaker-elect-with-loaded-gun/
Just goes to show ya'll, that a Democrat with a gun is a really dangerous thing. They have no self control.
Just goes to show ya'll, that a Democrat with a gun is a really dangerous thing. They have no self control.
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Friday, January 4, 2013
Thursday, January 3, 2013
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE FEDS CONFISCATE GUNS?
- UrbanGrounds - http://urbangrounds.com -
What Would Happen if the Government Banned Firearms and Tried to Confiscate Our Guns?
Posted By Robbie Cooper On 1/1/2013 @ 5:13 pm In 2nd Amendment | 29 Comments
If you read the summary of Sen. Diane Feinstein’s proposed assault weapons ban (read it here on her Senate page [1])
it’s very clear that — despite having no idea what an assault weapon
actually is, or how it differs from a semi-automatic hunting rifle
(hint: it doesn’t) — Feinstein’s ultimate motive is no different than
it was back in 1995 [2] when she was for the complete ban and confiscation of ALL weapons from American citizens:
Dianne Feinstein: “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up [every gun]… Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in.”
I was discussing Feinstein’s newest assault on our second amendment rights last night with some neighbors — men who have spent more hours hunting and shooting guns than most people spend watching television. Then I brought up this 1995 video. Our conversation naturally turned to “what if…” scenarios and how they would unfold.
As in, “What if…the government banned all semi-automatic weapons and
ordered them be turned in or confiscated from US citizens who would not
do so voluntarily?”
We all quickly agreed a violent revolution and rebellion would occur almost immediately. Most, if not all, members of Congress who voted for the ban/confiscation would be assassinated. In fact, what Bob Owens describes in this post “What You’ll See At the Revolution” [3] is exactly what we described would happen.
And the very first prey that would find themselves in the scopes of the rebels would be the members of Congress who passed this ban and the members of the media who have been their willing mouthpieces and agents of propaganda.
You bed-wetting, pantie-wearing effeminate femboy Liberals might think this is a lot of swagger and bravado, and that no way would citizens be able to rise up and violently over-throw a tyrannical government — that’s because you don’t understand or know men that grew up hunting; inherited the rifles and handguns that were handed down from their grandfathers to their fathers and who are teaching their own sons how to hunt and shoot; men who spent a part of their life in uniform, learning military tactics while promising to defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic.
But I have zero doubt that the scenarios described by both Bob Owens and Matt Bracken would unfold eerily close to as described. And I can promise you that I would not obey any order that required me to register, insure, or turn in my guns. And I would join my neighbors and community in any uprising to defy this usurpation, as instructed by our own Declaration of Independence:
But, go ahead, Ms. Feinstein, just go ahead and try to confiscate the guns of tens of millions of law-abiding, freedom-loving citizens. I just hope you’ve seriously considered the consequences.
UPDATE: MARINE TELLS FEINSTEIN, “I WILL NOT BE DISARMED” [5]
Dianne Feinstein: “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up [every gun]… Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in.”
I was discussing Feinstein’s newest assault on our second amendment rights last night with some neighbors — men who have spent more hours hunting and shooting guns than most people spend watching television. Then I brought up this 1995 video. Our conversation naturally turned to “what if…” scenarios and how they would unfold.
A rifle behind very blade of grass. And blending into every tree.
We all quickly agreed a violent revolution and rebellion would occur almost immediately. Most, if not all, members of Congress who voted for the ban/confiscation would be assassinated. In fact, what Bob Owens describes in this post “What You’ll See At the Revolution” [3] is exactly what we described would happen.
Tens of millions of Americans will refuse to comply with an order that is clearly a violation of the explicit intent of the Second Amendment. Among the most ardent opposing these measures will be military veterans, active duty servicemen, and local law enforcement officers. Many of these individuals will refuse to carry out what they view as Constitutionally illegal orders. Perhaps 40-50 million citizens will view such a law as treason. Perhaps ten percent of those, 4-5 million, would support a rebellion in some way, and maybe 40,000-100,000 Americans will form small independently-functioning active resistance cells, or become lone-wolves.Which very closely follows the thoughts described in this oft-linked and -discussed post: “What I Saw At The Coup” [4].
They will be leaderless, stateless, difficult to track, and considering the number of military veterans that would likely be among their number, extremely skilled at sabotage, assassination, and ambush.
After a number of carefully-planned, highly-publicized, and successful raids by the government, one or more will invariably end “badly.” Whether innocents are gunned down, a city block is burned to ash, or especially fierce resistance leads to a disastrously failed raid doesn’t particularly matter. What matters is that when illusion of the government’s invincibility and infallibility is broken, the hunters will become the hunted.
And the very first prey that would find themselves in the scopes of the rebels would be the members of Congress who passed this ban and the members of the media who have been their willing mouthpieces and agents of propaganda.
You bed-wetting, pantie-wearing effeminate femboy Liberals might think this is a lot of swagger and bravado, and that no way would citizens be able to rise up and violently over-throw a tyrannical government — that’s because you don’t understand or know men that grew up hunting; inherited the rifles and handguns that were handed down from their grandfathers to their fathers and who are teaching their own sons how to hunt and shoot; men who spent a part of their life in uniform, learning military tactics while promising to defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic.
But I have zero doubt that the scenarios described by both Bob Owens and Matt Bracken would unfold eerily close to as described. And I can promise you that I would not obey any order that required me to register, insure, or turn in my guns. And I would join my neighbors and community in any uprising to defy this usurpation, as instructed by our own Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.The oath I took as a Soldier to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…did not end when I left the military.
But, go ahead, Ms. Feinstein, just go ahead and try to confiscate the guns of tens of millions of law-abiding, freedom-loving citizens. I just hope you’ve seriously considered the consequences.
UPDATE: MARINE TELLS FEINSTEIN, “I WILL NOT BE DISARMED” [5]
Boston informed Sen. Feinstein that he will not register his weapons nor does he believe the Senator or anyone else in government has the right to require him to do so. Boston also scoffed at someone proclaiming “the evil of an inanimate object” even as she bestows upon herself the ability to carry a gun in contravention to her own proclamations.
“I am not your subject,” Boston insists. “I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.” I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.
Tweet [7]
Article printed from UrbanGrounds: http://urbangrounds.com
URL to article: http://urbangrounds.com/2013/01/what-would-happen-if-the-government-banned-firearms-and-tried-to-confiscate-our-guns/
URLs in this post:
[1] here on her Senate page: http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/assault-weapons
[2] back in 1995: http://www.infowars.com/video-dianne-feinstein-says-prepare-to-turn-in-your-guns/
[3] “What You’ll See At the Revolution”: http://www.bob-owens.com/2012/12/what-youll-see-in-the-rebellion/comment-page-1/
[4] “What I Saw At The Coup”: http://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/what-i-saw-at-the-coup/
[5] MARINE TELLS FEINSTEIN, “I WILL NOT BE DISARMED”: http://patdollard.com/2013/01/marine-tells-feinstein-i-will-not-be-disarmed/
[6] 2: http://urbangrounds.com/2013/01/what-would-happen-if-the-government-banned-firearms-and-tried-to-confiscate-our-guns/2/
[7] Tweet: http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Furbangrounds.com%2F2013%2F01%2Fwhat-would-happen-if-the-government-banned-firearms-and-tried-to-confiscate-our-guns%2F&via=robbiecooper&text=What%20Would%20Happen%20if%20the%20Government%20Banned%20Firearms%20and%20Tried%20to%20Confiscate%20Our%20Guns%3F&related=&lang=en&count=horizontal&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Furbangrounds.com%2F2013%2F01%2Fwhat-would-happen-if-the-government-banned-firearms-and-tried-to-confiscate-our-guns%2F
Click here to print.
Copyright © 2009 UrbanGrounds. All rights reserved.
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
GOA ALERT: HARRY REID PREPARES TO ANNIHILATE THE SECOND AMENDMENT...THIS IS SO SERIOUS, FOLKS, THAT THE UK AND PRAVDA HAVE SAID WITHIN A WEEK - 'AMERICA: DON'T GIVE UP YOUR GUNS"!
|
|||||||||||
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
GOA: STOP DIRTY HARRY FROM RAMMING GUN CONTROL DOWN OUR THROATS - WE HAVE THE GUARANTEE OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS WHICH MAY NOT BE INFRINGED
|
||||||||||
Sunday, November 18, 2012
HERE'S TONIGHT'S RESPONSE BEACON...THERE ARE THINGS YOU SHOULD READ - LIKE SHITHEAD REID REFUSING SENATE INVESTIGATION PANEL FOR BENGHAZI AND OTHER THINGS OF INTEREST TO YOU
Saturday, November 10, 2012
YOU NEED TO READ COWBOY BYTE TODAY - LIKE REID RAISING THE DEBT CEILING AND OBAMA STANDING FIRM ON HIGH TAX RATES
http://sm.responsebeacon.com/track?t=v&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWlkPTE2MTYxNiZtc2dpZD0xNDAwMDcmZGlkPTUzMDEmZWRpZD01MzAxJnNuPTE2Nzg4NjY2JmVpZD1pbmtzbGluZ2VyQGJlbGxzb3V0aC5uZXQmZWVpZD1pbmtzbGluZ2VyQGJlbGxzb3V0aC5uZXQmdWlkPTFfMTE5ODkxJnJpZD0xMTk4OTEmZXJpZD0xMTk4OTEmZmw9Jm12aWQ9JnRnaWQ9JmV4dHJhPQ==&&&2039&eu=1101&&&
Monday, November 5, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

