Search This Blog

Showing posts with label dangerous illegal aliens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dangerous illegal aliens. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

VIDEO: DISGUSTED ICE HEAD FINALLY FACES DOWN GANG OF 8 AND THAT DAMNABLE GANG SHOULD BE SO ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES - THEY ALL NEED TO BE FIRED!

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/04/23/video-disgusted-ice-head-finally-faces-down-gang-of-8-64127

Thank you, Derrell Day for including this as the last audio on your program this morning.  This is incredible...that this bill, conceived in secret by the Gang of 8 senators, Janet Incompetano, and various pro-illegal groups, should ever have seen the light of day, fast tracked by the fraud presidente in the White House.  It does nothing to protect Americans, their jobs, their safety, the security of the nation - but the Senators will probably be paid a vast sum of money by those groups of lobbyists who helped them.

This is DISGUSTING!  I want to vomit with rage.

Thursday, August 23, 2012

ICE AGENTS TAKE JANET NAPOLITANO'S DREAM ANMESTY DIRECTIVE TO COURT! YOUR HELP IS NEEDED!

All summer, citizens have been crying out, 'Why doesn't somebody take this to court!' over Janet Napolitano's Dream amnesty directive.
THIS MORNING, ICE AGENTS DID . . . with the promise of help from NumbersUSA members!
In the last hour, a group of 10 federal immigration-enforcement agents -- including the president of the agents' union -- filed suit against Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano and ICE Director John Morton.
The suit seeks an injunction against Napolitano's June 15 directive that includes issuing work permits to a whole class of illegal aliens, estimated at 1.7 million, under the age of 31. The 10 agents of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) section of DHS contend that the directive for the amnesty that DHS began to hand out on Aug. 15 is "unlawful and unconstitutional."
Kris Kobach, the nation's best-known immigration litigator, is leading the agents' legal team.
Chris Crane, president of the ICE Agents' Union, AGFE Council #119, is the public spokesman for the plaintiffs.
NumbersUSA, the nation's largest pro-enforcement grassroots organization, is underwriting the suit, based on the expectation of raising the necessary funds from our 1.3 million on-line activists.
The suit was filed this morning in Dallas, in the federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, which is in the 5th Circuit. (The majority of the ICE agent plaintiffs, including one in Dallas, reside and work in Texas.)
The court action comes just one week after the ICE agents' union courageously set up an on-line petition to protest their bosses' orders to violate U.S. immigration laws (find the link in the box below).
What is at stake for ICE agents is stated plainly in the lawsuit:
This lawsuit seeks to prevent law enforcement officer Plaintiffs from being forced to either violate federal law if they comply with the unlawful Directive or risk adverse employment action if they disobey the unlawful orders of the DHS Secretary. This lawsuit also seeks to preserve the balance of legislative and executive powers established by the United States Constitution.
 Actions You Can Take
LEGAL TEAM TO BE FUNDED ENTIRELY BY NUMBERSUSA MEMBER CONTRIBUTIONS
ACTION 1:
Be sure you and all of your friends sign the petition to ICE Director John Morton to show DHS that you support the ICE agents whose union has been urging that they be allowed to enforce the immigration laws passed by Congress:
 Sign the Petition
or click http://petitions.iceunion.org
ACTION 2:
You'll want to go to your NumbersUSA Action Board and send new faxes to your 3 Members of Congress that we've just now posted there. Tell them about the lawsuit and ask them to issue public statements showing their own support for protecting ICE agents' ability to enforce immigration laws without fear of disciplinary action and firing. (Some Senators and Representatives already have released statements of support. Their names won't show up on your fax.)
 Send Faxes on Action Board
or click https://www.numbersusa.com/actionbuffet
ACTION 3:
Think about every time you blew a fuse this summer upon hearing about the Administration's decision to go around Congress and just order an amnesty on its own. At those times, would you have been willing to send a $10, $20, $50 or $100 donation to anybody willing to stand up and challenge the legality in court?
When we saw the ICE agents' union in July publicly protesting Napolitano's amnesty order, we felt on the basis of hearing our members pleading all summer for somebody to take the order to court that we could -- and should -- step out on faith. We pledged the financial support that was needed for the agents to file its suit effectively and expeditiously -- and take it through the court system as far as it can go.
We did this even though we had no money for such an action in our budget. But users of NumbersUSA's activist tools have stepped up to finance every major anti-amnesty effort we've mounted (AND WON) in the past. All of you together have always been a citizen movement at its finest. Please click on the red button to find the many ways you can make your tax-deductible contribution.
 Give to Lawsuit
or click https://www.numbersusa.com/donate
WAGES & LIVELIHOODS OF AMERICAN WORKERS DEPEND ON ICE AGENTS WHO ARE ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAWS
We have argued since Napolitano's amnesty order on June 15 that adding 1.7 million illegal aliens to the legal work force -- especially without offsetting cuts in green card programs and without passage of mandatory E-Verify to stop most future illegal immigration -- is an assault on the 20 million Americans who want a full-time job but can't find one.
But by tying the hands of ICE agents, the directive poses an even greater threat to American workers because it sends a signal to millions more workers worldwide that it may be worth taking the risks to become an illegal alien in this country.
Polling indicates hundreds of millions of workers around the world who say they would like to seek a job in the U.S. What keeps most of them from coming illegally to compete for jobs?
Every year, some 45 million foreigners visit the U.S. on short-term visas. What keeps most of them from over-staying their visas and competing for jobs?
The answer to both questions is that most of those millions of foreign workers stay home or go back home because they expect that U.S. immigration officials will enforce U.S. immigration laws.
The Napolitano directive sends a global message to expect something different.
Here is my statement just sent in a press release to the nation's news media:
Any threat of harm to our nation's immigration officers for enforcing the law is a threat against the livelihoods of average American workers.

Congress passes laws to determine how many and which citizens of other countries are allowed to enter U.S. job markets to compete with American workers. Fortunately during this long period of high unemployment, Congress has refused to add further competition through amnesties that would give millions of illegal aliens access to the legal U.S. job market.

But the Napolitano amnesty directive does the opposite. If immigration agents are not allowed to enforce the laws as decided by Congress, the wages and jobs of American workers are at risk.
You can read the press release at this link.
Read the entire Complaint filed in court today at this link.
Our home page is full of background information and will continually post the latest breaking news surrounding this bold action by ICE agents on behalf of them and their fellow officers and for the benefit of the American people. We'll also be sending you email updates.
THANKS FOR SUPPORTING THE AGENTS WITH AS MANY OF THE ABOVE ACTIONS AS POSSIBLE,
roy
beck
Moved? Update your address information.

Switched to another e-mail address? Change your e-mail address online.
Sign up for text message action alerts, and you'll receive a text message with instructions for action only when an urgent action is needed.
Take our interests survey. Let us know what you're interested in so we can customize actions and other information to meet your needs.

Copyright © 2012 NumbersUSA. 1601 N Kent

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Sunday, October 2, 2011

I.C.E. ARRESTS 2,900 CONVICTED ILLEGAL ALIEN CRIMINALS

http://www.newswithviews.com/Cutler/michael196.htm


Did anyone tell you this before? Why don't you tell the Mr. Kool in the White House you don't think amnesty is a good idea?

And by the way, Sotomayor and Big Sis might want to know, too.

Friday, July 8, 2011

OBAMA AND THE RAPIST MURDERER, HUMBERTO LEAL

Cliff Kincaid
President.
America's Survival, Inc.
www.usasurvival.org
www.stopglobaltaxes.org




Obama Fails in effort to save Illegal Alien Convicted Killer-Rapist; Goal Was to Subvert U.S. Law in Favor of International Law and U.N. Treaties

“Mr. Leal, convicted of murder during a sexual assault, had grossly incompetent legal representation. If he had been given access to a Mexican diplomat, he would have had a chance at better counsel and likely the opportunity to strike a plea deal, avoiding the death penalty.”

So said The New York Times in a June 17 editorial about convicted rapist-murderer Humberto Leal.

Just before his execution, the Times quoted the Associated Press as saying, “In his last moments, Mr. Leal repeatedly said he was sorry, and shouted twice, ‘Viva Mexico!’”

What the AP reported was that he said, “I have hurt a lot of people. ... I take full blame for everything. I am sorry for what I did.”


Humberto Leal: Now Six Feet Under

So, in other words, he was guilty as hell. But this had been proven beyond any doubt. Nevertheless, for Leal to shout this from his death bed was extremely newsworthy and egg in the face of those in the media who had designed their coverage in a manner sympathetic to his well-deserved plight.

The Times story was headlined, “Mexican Citizen Is Executed as Justices Refuse to Step In.” In fact, he was an illegal alien in the U.S., as the shouts of “Viva Mexico!” attest. He was executed in the U.S. not because he was here illegally, but because his crimes were committed here.

This is the killer that the Times wanted to be able to avoid the death penalty. His victim was a 16-year-old girl, Adria Sauceda. He raped and killed her, obliterating her face and head with a chunk of asphalt, and then left a large stick in her that he had used to sexually assault her.

The Obama Administration intervened to save his life, calling it a “stay of execution.” It wanted the Supreme Court to let him live at least until Congress decided to pass Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy’s bill, the Consular Notification Compliance Act. The copy of the bill on Leahy’s website didn’t even have a number, meaning that it was not a serious piece of legislation. Not even listed on the “legislation” page of Leahy’s website, it was subsequently assigned S. 1194 and has no co-sponsors. Clearly, he introduced the bill in order to facilitate the activities of the left-wingers anxious to exploit the case for the purposes of creating a massive miscarriage of justice.

Incredibly, in a move that is even more questionable than the jury verdicts in the Casey Anthony case, the Obama Administration asked for the killer’s life to be spared so that the Supreme Court could preserve “its potential future jurisdiction” in the case. This is actually in the brief.

The Supreme Court ruled against Obama. It said that “€¦we are doubtful that it is ever appropriate to stay a lower court judgment in light of unenacted legislation. Our task is to rule on what the law is, not what it might eventually be.”

So why would the Obama Administration go to such drastic and absurd lengths to save the life of an illegal alien killer?

The answer provided by crime blogger Tina Trent, an advocate of victims’ rights, is that Obama’s constituency demanded it. This is the part of the story the Times, The Washington Post, and other liberal media refuse to tell. These “progressives,” many funded by George Soros as part of the “anti-incarceration” movement, believe criminals are the real victims and that international law should supersede national law.

As Trent revealed, Leal’s attorney, Sandra Babcock, has been funded by the government of Mexico and works at Northwestern University Law School with former communist terrorist Bernardine Dohrn.

Dohrn had participated in a 2003 conference, sponsored by all of the major liberal groups, on how to force U.S. courts to use international law and U.N. treaties in place of laws passed by Congress and state legislatures.

Incredibly, the bomber Dohrn, a friend of Obama’s and former fundraiser for him, is now accepted by the progressive community as an advocate for families and children and spoke on this subject at the conference. They raised a child, Chesa Boudin, whose parents, fellow members of the Weather Underground, went to prison for murder. He became a cheerleader for the Hugo Chavez regime in Venezuela and took Dohrn and her husband, fellow terrorist Bill Ayers, on “educational” tours of Venezuela.

The treaty at issue in the Leal case had never been implemented by the Congress. The Obama Administration argued that the treaty should be observed because legislation to implement it might be passed by Congress, even though the Leahy bill to do so, introduced on June 14, had no co-sponsors. This would be comical were it not so tragic. It was a fraud on the courts.

One of the participants in that conference, with Dohrn, was Harold Koh, whose name appears on the cover of the Obama brief in the Leal case. Koh is now the State Department legal adviser.

The story is not a “Mexican national” being executed in violation of a treaty that has never been implemented. That is a bad enough version of the story. The story is that the “progressive” community, with some Republican dupes, wanted to have the courts implement a treaty, in the absence of congressional action, so that international lawyers and their media allies could use Leal to press their ultimate objective€”abolition of the death penalty in the U.S. I wrote about this campaign over 10 years ago, in a report entitled, “Saving the Lives of Killers, Traitors, and Spies.”

And yet the Supreme Court rejected this ploy only by a 5-4 vote. This is as shocking as Leal’s in-your-face acknowledgement of his crimes and tribute to Mexico


For America's Survival,


Cliff Kincaid, President