REID THE MADMAN - SAYS MORE FUNDING IS NEEDED TO PREVENT HEALTHCARE LAW FROM BECOMING A FUCKING TRAIN WRECK! MAYBE HE SHOULD HAVE...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/297333-reid-says-more-funding-is-needed-to-prevent-healthcare-law-from-becoming-a-train-wreck


READ  THE  FUCKING  BILL, RIGHT PELOSI, YOU GAPING PIECE OF PLASTIC?
(THAT'S REALLY NOT WHAT I WANTED TO SAY - IT WAS A LOT WORSE)

AND MAX BAUCUS - YOU'D BETTER NOT GO HOME TO MONTANA - THOSE BOYS KNOW HOW TO SKIN A PREDATOR AND WHAT ELSE DO YOU CALL THIS BILL BUT PREDATION ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY FORCE!?????

FROM PATRIOT POST TONIGHT - THE E-TAX SCAM AND THE REPUBLICAN MORONS ARE BACKING IT, TOO!

I'm so happy I have left the Republican Party.  It turns my stomach to think I thought they were different from Democrats.  No choice now but two parties, the Constitution or the Libertarians...the Greenies are hopeless ignoramuses.

Alexander's Column The e-Tax Scam Republicans Back Colossal e-Commerce Tax Scheme By Mark Alexander · April 25, 2013       "We may be assured by past experience, that such a practice [as some states charging high taxes on goods from other states] would be introduced by future contrivances..." --James Madison (1788) Executive Summary: Senate Democrats and Republicans voted 74-20 in a cloture to move S743, the "online sales tax," to the Senate floor for a vote early next week. This huge tax collection scheme will stifle product and market competition, and innovation and entrepreneurship. That is precisely why, in addition to the Obama administration, mega-retailers like Walmart back this oppressive legislation, and why all advocates of free enterprise need oppose it. The relentless 24-hour news cycle coverage of the Boston bombers eclipsed last week's Beltway gun-battle in the Senate, where Democrats shelved the so-called "assault weapons" ban in anticipation of the next mass murder, at which point Democrats will take immediate advantage of emotionally charged populist appeal. Barack Hussein Obama has, of course, mastered this cynical appeal to raw emotion. As Obama lamented last week during his much-publicized tantrum, "Their emotions are ... relevant to this debate." Fortunately, given the legislative delay, emotions yielded to reason -- this time. Obama's gun-ban legislation itself overshadowed another piece of leftist legislation, rushed through a Senate cloture vote with the support of many Republicans in order to put it before the full Senate as early as next week. I'm referring to the laughably euphemistic "Marketplace Fairness Act," a behemoth Internet sales tax collection scheme on interstate sales, which would be more aptly named the "Mega-Retailer Protection Act." This legislation was formerly designated S. 1832 when backed last year by the Internet Tax Tag Team of Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lamar Alexander (R-TN.) Alexander and other backers of this tax collection scheme argue that Internet sales are driven by the avoidance of state and local sales tax. Apparently he forgot that online sales include shipping charges, which often exceed the cost of sales taxes. (Have any of these politicos ever personally completed an online transaction?) Fact is, e-commerce is driven by product selection, retail price comparison and convenience -- old-fashioned free-enterprise competition -- not the avoidance of local sales tax. Additionally, many items purchased on the Internet may not be available in a local market, and, much to the shock of some Beltway dwellers, not everyone in America lives next to a mall, or wants to burn up time and fossil fuels in search of a higher priced and lower quality product from a Walmart, K-Mart or Sears. Some otherwise erudite Republican senators joined Alexander, supporting this tax legislation, suggesting that if on board, they can amend it in order to ease the pain on small online businesses -- recalling that most job creation takes place in small companies. For the record, I do not consider that to be legitimate justification for backing this measure. As Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) has concluded, "There is absolutely nothing conservative about this proposal because, again, what this is about is officials in cash-strapped states across the country looking for new ways to plug their budget holes." Predictably, Senate backers are attempting to cover their posteriors with this little nugget in section 3(d) of the bill: "[N]othing in this Act shall be construed as encouraging a State to impose sales and use taxes on any goods or services not subject to taxation prior to the date of the enactment of this Act." In other words, they can point their fingers at the states when the massive impact of this legislation pounds consumers and the economy. Post Your Opinion In effect, this legislation overrides the Supreme Court's landmark 1992 ruling in Quill Corporation v. North Dakota, in which the Court determined that, in the case of interstate sales, a seller in one state cannot be forced to collect taxes from a buyer in another state and remit those taxes to the buyer's state. Not only did the Court uphold the historic prohibition on interstate sales tax collections (in this case retail catalog sales), but also given the advent of e-commerce, nonexistent in 1992, there are now millions of small businesses that depend upon online sales. Based on the "logic" of those arguing for the e-tax, if I travel across a state line to make a purchase in Georgia, which is only a mile away from our Tennessee home, that purchase should be subject to the state and local sales tax where I reside, not Georgia taxes, and the Georgia seller should have to collect and remit it to Tennessee. Many states, which depend in part on sales taxes, have already legislated that residents of their states remit sales taxes annually on any and all out-of-state purchases. This existing legislation is intrastate, between the voters and their state representatives, exactly where it belongs in a federalist system. Requiring a seller in one state to collect and remit sales tax on behalf of another state is tantamount to "taxation without representation," according to Heritage Foundation President Jim DeMint. The former South Carolina senator notes correctly that the mega-retailers "are in favor of the Internet sales tax, because online retailers are competitors. But the other big proponents of the tax are state governments, which would be able to reach into other states for revenue. Politicians want this bill passed to raise new tax revenue for broken state governments facing budget shortfalls. But legislators in state capitals don't want to make the hard decisions to cut spending or raise taxes on their constituents -- they fear the voter backlash. So they'd like their allies in Washington to make it legal for them to tax people who can't vote against them." Political analyst Jeff Jacoby asserts, "States must not be allowed to reach beyond their borders, imposing tax obligations on retailers who had no vote or voice in creating those obligations, no political recourse, no opportunity to be heard. Against such unfairness, Americans once fought a revolution. A craving for revenue is no reason to forget that." Of course, the National Retail Federation, which represents huge sellers like Walmart and Amazon.com, backs Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's effort to quickly vote on this legislation before American consumers figure out its implications. But why would an online seller like Amazon support this measure? Because Amazon already has warehouse and shipping facilities in most states, and has already cut tax-break deals with those states. Moreover, for millions of small online businesses, our own Patriot Post Shop being one, determining, collecting and remitting state and local sales taxes on every purchase massively increases transactional overhead. So Amazon and other mammoth e-commerce sellers are now positioning themselves to "rescue" poor little "mom and pop" online sellers by offering to process all of their transactions -- in return for a substantial fee... If passed, the e-Tax not only will stifle the very product and market competition, innovation and entrepreneurship that drive our economic growth, it most assuredly will force small businesses "under the protective wing" of big transaction clearinghouses, because in addition to state taxes, there are now more than 9,500 regional and local tax jurisdictions in the United States, with, as Jacoby writes, "an ever-shifting kaleidoscope of sales-tax rates, definitions, exemptions, and deadlines." All of them would have their hand out for every out-of-state sale. Post Your Opinion John Donahoe, president and CEO of eBay, which is the selling arm of millions of small business entrepreneurs, notes, "This isn't a debate pitting the Internet against Main Street. This is about big retailers, like Amazon, trying to undermine small online businesses." Needless to say, the e-Tax has the full support of the Obama administration, which should give prima fascia pause to any Republican and every conservative. The administration's statement noted that it "strongly supports S. 743, which will level the playing field for local small business retailers that are in competition every day with large out-of-state online companies. ... This bill would eliminate the unfair advantage currently enjoyed by big out-of-state online companies over local neighborhood-based small businesses." Now that's a load of bull pucky! This legislation will in no way "level the playing field" for small retailers. Walmart and other mega-retailers backing this measure have already put most small local American retailers out of business -- with the help of their Chinese producers and sweatshops around the globe. Of course, I support free enterprise and free markets. But the fact is, small online retailers are doing to Walmart and other mega-retailers what the latter did to small local retailers! The bottom line is this: State legislators already have the ability to require interstate sales taxes payment by their constituents. They just want to avoid the accountability associated with having to collect those taxes -- especially when they're up for re-election. If the "Mega-Retailer Protection Act" does pass, every governor and state legislator should be held accountable to ensure it is revenue neutral -- meaning state sales taxes should be reduced by the same amount of new sales taxes collected -- lest those collections would be a windfall to increase the size and scope of state governments -- which is, in large measure, the underlying motivation for this tax collection charade. I'll close with some wise words from former Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, which are as true today as they were in 1819: "An unlimited power to tax involves, necessarily, a power to destroy; because there is a limit beyond which no institution and no property can bear taxation." Pro Deo et Constitutione — Libertas aut Mors Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis Mark Alexander Publisher, The Patriot Post

*PUBLIUS* The Patriot Post is protected speech pursuant to the "unalienable rights" of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. In God we trust. Copyright © 2013 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved. REPRINTING, FORWARDING AND POSTING: Subscribers may reprint, forward or post original content from The Patriot Post, in whole or part, in accordance with our Terms of Use, with the following citation: "The Patriot Post (www.patriotpost.us/subscribe/ )" You have received this email because you are subscribed to The Patriot Post. To manage your subscription or to unsubscribe, link to http://patriotpost.us/manage/.

THE IMF WANTS THE USA TO CHARGE $1.40 FOR ADDITIONAL GAS TAX

floydreports.us1.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=3668d6dcdf76634e54cc134ed&id=f197dc7348&e=4f22bb8514

That will eliminate a lot of jobs; keep us from traveling freely; the ethanol will destroy all gas engines, we won't be able to afford to replace all those engines - from lawnmowers to trucks which deliver our food.  What about farm equipment?  No wonder like was entered here last night there will be a farm bubble soon!
No one will be able to farm!  It will force you into cities, raise the price of your food, home heating, energy,
all the things Obama promised are coming to an end.  Forget college for your kids.  Concentrate on feeding them.

Wake up Suckers!

If you voted for Obama, you should be scared to death!


WELCOME TO THE THIRD WORLD - OBAMA'S EVIL GIFT!

EUROPE ATTEMPTS TO TAX BANK ACCOUNTS IN CYPRUS - IS AMERICA NEXT?

http://pjmedia.com/blog/europe-attempts-to-tax-bank-accounts-in-cyprus-is-america-next/

OBAMA'S ADVISORS: DISARM AMERICA THROUGH TAXATION

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/obamas-advisors-disarm-america-through-taxation/

A DEMONRAT HAMBURGER TAX - OBEY YOUR SOCIALIST MASTERS. MICHELLE MUST BE OBEYED.

http://thefederalist-gary.blogspot.com/2013/02/a-democrat-hamburger-tax-obey-your.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheFederalist+%28The+Federalist%29

If we are what we eat, then we are socialist robots.

YOU ARE BEING TOLD WHAT TO EAT OR BE TAXED AGAINST YOUR WILL.

ARE YOU WILLING TO DO THIS?  WHAT ABOUT THE RESTAURANTS WHO ARE GOING TO GO UNDER AND THE PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR THEM.

obama HAS TAKEN THE LAND OF THE FREE AND PUT HER IN CHAINS - HE IS THE MONSTER UNCHAINED..AM I SITTING HERE FOR NOTHING?

Issues Bring the Monster Out January 25, 2013 by Robert Owens When taxes become destructive they surpass the consent of the governed bending to the will of tyranny.  When regulations strangle competition instead of securing it from evil combinations they become counterproductive and defeat the very purpose for which they were proposed.  When foreign entanglements bleed the nation but do not secure the peace or defeat the enemy they become interventionist vehicles for vested interests.  When spending becomes a hemorrhaging of assists leading to national bankruptcy those who continue to pile debt upon debt seek not the good of the nation but instead its destruction.  When leaders selected to unite instead do all they can to divide they no longer advance the interest of the whole and are instead partisan leaders in a factional fight. A social contract is one made between a people and their government.  It is an agreement whereby the people surrender certain aspects of their independence for the guarantee of corporate security and the enjoyment of a general welfare.  In the case of most countries this is an unwritten and unconscious arrangement built upon tradition and precedent as in the case of England.  However in the United States we have an actual contract: the Constitution.  This was ratified by the original states, and the subsequent states were formed under it and admitted as full partners to it. All contracts may be legitimately changed over time as long as there are mechanisms either within the document or established by the document to do so.  Within our Constitution there is an amendment process, and it has been amended twenty seven times so far.  Whether we agree with those amendments or not they have been legally ratified and accepted becoming part of the document.  However, over the years our government structure has been changed, and our manner of life transformed more by the informal changes of passing generations and subsequent precedent than by the formal amendment process. Nowhere in the Constitution is the central government given the power to wage unending undeclared war.  Nowhere is the central government given the right to ignore the requirement to protect the states from invasion.  Nowhere is there found any basis for executive orders, signing statements, or bureaucratic regulations having the force of law without legislative action by Congress. Well-connected rabble rousers now say equality will not be achieved until everything is equal in everybody’s house.  Leveling the playing field has finally thrown off its cloak of deceit and exposed itself as from each according to their ability to each according to their need.  The professional civil rights entrepreneurs who’ve extorted vast amounts of personal wealth with threats of boycotts and demonstrations have been unmasked as the true purveyors of prejudice seeking to keep race and gender differences alive for their own benefit.  Union bosses build political empires using the legally forced dues of members with more money spent on political activity than on member service.  The union bosses ride in limousine comfort from board meetings to political rallies while their members lose jobs.  The pensions of the bosses are golden parachutes while the pensions of the members are underfunded. The Land of the Free is held captive, locked in a two party system where both parties are merely two heads on the same bird of prey.  Both parties are dedicated to more spending and bigger government.  Both parties exploit gerrymandering of districts and overwhelming corporate donations to ensure a hierarchy of the perpetually re-elected using a seniority system to enhance their power.  Legal barriers exist at every turn to stop any new parties from gaining access that might deflect the central government from its ever increasing growth towards totalitarianism. When will enough be enough?  When will citizens rise in their righteous indignation and demand not a New Deal, not a Great Society, a New Frontier or a Fundamentally Transformed America but instead their original deal.  The one we wrested from the hands of the tyrant King George.  The one we’ve fought to establish and defend from Yorktown to Kandahar, and the right of a free people to live as they choose, to work for their own benefits, and choose their own destiny.  Free from the smothering governmental control which has been the lot of most people in most places since the beginning of time.  When will the yoke of tyranny become too heavy to be borne?  What will be the spark that lights the torches and brings the incensed villagers to the gate of the castle demanding, “Bring the monster out!” so that a stake can be driven through the heart of tyranny and freedom can return to the land? When that day comes what will we the people do?  Will we try to resurrect the government of old that ultimately brought us full circle, or will we be bold enough to forge anew the social contract and design better ways to ensure the beast of tyranny doesn’t once again break the chains of restraint?

HERE'S THE REACTION TO TAX INCREASES - H/T TO JD

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2266331/Nicolas-Sarkozy-Carla-Bruni-dodge-new-French-tax-hike-moving-London-setting-1billion-fund.html

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/21/fed-up-phil-popular-golfer-mickelson-says-high-taxes-are-going-to-force-him-into-drastic-changes-could-he-retire/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/9811764/Gerard-Depardieu-building-a-wooden-house-so-he-can-go-fishing-in-Russia.html

http://www.ibtimes.com/denise-rich-gives-us-citizenship-saving-millions-taxes-721896

OBAMA'S ILLEGAL HEALTH CARE TAXES...YOU WANTED HIM (OR MAYBE IT WAS JUST YOUR NEIGHBORS)

http://www.cato.org/blog/obama-administrations-illegal-health-care-taxes-update?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Cato-at-liberty+%28Cato+at+Liberty%29

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-taxes-2013-recession/2013/01/07/id/470418?s=al&promo_code=11A3E-1

Then read this:

January 7, 2013 by Tim Brown

Democrat Leaders: We Aren’t Done Taxing Americans

After the fiscal cliff deal was done, imposing higher taxes this year on all those making $40,000 per year or more, three different Democrats took to three different Sunday shows to push for more taxation on the American people.

First up was Democrat House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). She appeared on CBS’ Face the Nation and Bob Schieffer asked her if the “revenue side” of the fiscal cliff is complete. For Democrats, revenue means taxes.

“No, no, it is not,” Pelosi replied. “I mean, the president had said originally he wanted $1.6 trillion in revenue. He took it down to $1.2 as a compromise. In this legislation (fiscal cliff) we had $620 billion, very significant, high-end tax — changing the high-end tax rate to 39.6 percent. But that is not enough on the revenue side.”

“Are you talking about more taxes?” Schieffer asked.

“We’re talking about looking at the tax code, putting everything on the table from the standpoint of closing loopholes… and we know that we can do that… special subsidies for big oil, for example, $38 billion right there,” Pelosi said. Which was a long answer for, “Yes we are talking about more taxes.”

“But again, not to take things in isolation, just to say, OK, well, how much more revenue can we get as we go forward?” Of course this is isolated. It’s exactly what she and her accomplices in Washington are saying and doing across the board.

When Schieffer asked if the Democrats wanted to eliminate tax deductions, Pelosi replied, “My idea of tax reform is to have a comprehensive view. We’ve talked about tax simplification and fairness as something that we should be engaged in all along — long before these fights came along. And now we have a chance to do that with I’d say a heightened awareness by the public on why we need to do certain things.”

“So let’s, you know, put on the table what it is that we can, in order to increase revenue,” Pelosi said. “We’ve changed the rate, the high-end tax rate, (to) 39.6 percent, a very important step. And again, there’s much more that we can do by just subjecting it to the scrutiny of what is bringing in revenue, what is creating growth. And we don’t want to hurt that if there’s some tax provisions that create growth. We want to support that.”

While she attempted to talk about not raising taxes on those in the middle class, sort of like they did with the previous deal and then taxed us, she used the same rhetoric as before stating that taxing those in higher income brackets was “not off the table.”

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D_MD) appeared on Fox News Sunday and echoed the talking points that Pelosi put forward. When asked about Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s statement that there would be no more tax hikes, Van Hollen replied, “Well, if Mitch McConnell is going to draw the line in the sand, it’s going to be a recipe for more gridlock. We have to take a balanced approach to long-term deficit reduction — meaning additional (spending) cuts.”

For Democrats “balanced” means getting all they want and giving nothing in return, like real spending cuts, for example.

Van Hollen told a lie of about $110 billion concerning the fiscal cliff deal. He said, “”We raised $730 billion in revenue from very high income individuals. As we go forward, we need to adopt the same framework as the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission, meaning a combination of cuts and revenue.” Actually Congressman you guys might raise $620 billion, if you are lucky. That’s peanuts in the big scheme of things. Obviously the Maryland congress man needs a course in economics as he referenced “closing tax loopholes” and declared, “So, through tax reform, we can raise more revenue matched by additional cuts to address the sequester issue and long-term deficit.” Raising taxes produces less revenue. It always has and everyone knows you don’t do that when the economy is in the toilet.

Finally, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) appeared on CNN’s State of the Union and continued with the whole “close the loopholes” rhetoric. “I can tell you that there are still deductions, credits, special treatments under the tax code which ought to be looked at very carefully,” he said. “We forgo about $1.2 trillion a year in the tax code, money that otherwise would go to the government, and when you look closely, some of those things are near and dear to us individually and to the economy — the mortgage interest deduction, charitable deductions, deductions for state and local taxes, but beyond that, trust me, there are plenty of things within that tax code, these loopholes where people can park their money in some island offshore and not pay taxes, these are things that need to be closed. We can do that and use the money to reduce the deficit.”

Host Candy Crowley asked him, “So there are other taxes that you believe that you can, however you want to put them, raise, retrieve, whatever, from the wealthy?” Note his response.

“Absolutely,” replied Durbin. “And I’ll also tell you that I think we need to open our minds to our tax revenue. You know, we’ve had conversations about an infrastructure fund that will really start America building again, for the highways and airports and locks and dams and things like that…I believe we should have energy taxes that really fund infrastructure investment.”

“Open our minds” is code for steal from the American people’s wallets. He’s talking about the same “infrastructure” that Barack Obama talked about in 2008 and threw hundreds of thousands of dollars at that apparently still didn’t get things fixed as he made that a part of his 2012 campaign also.

Oh I almost forgot, Durbin also thinks that raising gas taxes should be raised too, as well as, higher taxes on electricity. Tell me, just who are those taxes affecting? It isn’t just the rich!

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/01/democrat-leaders-we-arent-done-taxing-americans/#ixzz2HOXXomL6

TAX THE RICH THROWN OUT IN SOCIALIST FRANCE - IT'S UNFAIR!

http://www.trevorloudon.com/2012/12/tax-the-rich-thrown-out-in-socialist-france-its-unfair/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NewZeal+%28New+Zeal+Blog%29

OBAMA AND CONGRESS TO PUT THOUSANDS OF CHARITIES OUT OF BUSINESS - WHO VOTED THESE DEMONRATS IN? WASN'T ME.

http://godfatherpolitics.com/8437/congress-and-white-house-to-put-thousands-of-charities-out-of-business/

This is just God-awful! 

And just in time for Christmas, too.

Our country is being turned upside down and shaken by one man in particular, and the Demons who sit happily grinning on both right and left hands.

We'd better start to turn things around and fast.

THE TEA PARTY NO NEW TAXES PETITION - SIGN IT FOR FREE

http://act.theteaparty.net/8223/no-new-taxes/

18.4 CENTS A GALLON FEDERAL GASOLINE TAX - YES, IT'S ON THE TABLE

http://minutemennews.com/2012/11/the-18-4-cent-a-gallon-federal-gasoline-tax-yes-its-on-the-table/

OBAMA CONSTITUENTS TO BE HIT HARDEST BY TAX INCREASES - THEN WHOOYA GONNA CALL ON YOUR OBAMAPHONE?

http://godfatherpolitics.com/8228/obamas-constituents-to-be-hit-hardest-by-tax-increases/

AMERICAN FARMERS AND RANCHERS BRACE FOR DEATH TAX IMPACT -

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/16/ranchers-farmers-brace-for-death-tax-impact/?intcmp=trending

How do you like redistribution of wealth, America?

You elected a rabid Marxist/communist, and you just wait till you see the demise of the family farm, the hobby farm, because this will be the death knell.  Your food prices will go up exponentially, and you'll not be able to make those food stamps stretch.

Guess you're going to lose some weight.

Empress Michelle, however, will dine on big ole fat-drippin' cheeseburgers and let you eat lettuce IF you can find a head.

OBAMA AIDES OWE $833,970 IN BACK TAXES - WHY IS THE MEDIA SILENT?

http://patriotupdate.com/32916/36-obama-aides-owe-833970-in-back-taxes-media-silent

THE OBAMACARE SURCHARGE CAUSING PRICES TO RISE

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-obama-surcharge.html

READ CNS NEWS TODAY - I MADE IT EASY FOR YOU

Today's Headlines:  Thursday, November 15, 2012

Rep. Gohmert Nominated Newt Gingrich to Replace John Boehner as Speaker Mark Levin on Lessons Learned in Presidential Election: ‘We Ought to Nominate a Conservative’

Obama: Voters Reelected Me to Make Sure Wealthy Pay More Taxes

Only CNSNews.com brings you the news the liberal media ignores! Please help us with a tax deductible gift today.

Obama Administration Gave Petraeus's Wife a $187,605-Per-Year Job
Rep. Gohmert: Name Independent Counsel to Investigate Obama on Benghazi

Senators Hit Back at Obama Over Rice, Benghazi: ‘You Failed as Commander in Chief’

Obama: Hurricane Sandy Response 'How I Want the Federal Gov't to Operate Generally'

Obama Says He Doesn't Know If FBI Should Have Informed Him of CIA Director’s Affair
New Mexico Not Waiting for Feds to Boost Mental Health Services for Returning Veterans
Pelosi: 'My Conversations With The President Are Not Ones That I Share'

Obama on Not Being Informed of Affair: ‘We’re Not Supposed to Meddle in Criminal Investigations’

Rep. Steve King: Fire Eric Holder
Ayotte: ‘Outrageous’ That Holder Knew of Petraeus Affair for Months Before Obama Was Informed

Billions in Education Stimulus Funding Produces 'Fuzzy' Job-Creation Picture

U.S., Australia Make ‘A Major Leap Forward’ on Space Surveillance
Obama: I Predicted ‘Strong’ Latino Turnout Would Cause GOP to Reflect on Immigration Reform

COMMENTARY:

Sex Beats Benghazi
By Ben Shapiro
Here's the brutal truth: The American people seem far more interested in what happens in the bedroom than they do what happens on the battlefield. How else to explain the media's fascination with CIA Director David Petraeus' steamy sex scandal, even as they ignore the ramifications for the investigation of four murdered Americans in Benghazi?

NEWSPAPER ROUNDUP:

Jindal rebukes Romney for saying Obama owes reelection to "gifts" he gave out
Hostess tells striking workers: back to work or company liquidates; 18,000 jobs at stake
Obama defends Rice on Benghazi, says critics 'should go after me'
Sebelius subpoenaed over efforts to promote healthcare reform
Warren Buffett backs Hillary Clinton for 2016
Paula Broadwell abandoned her bid for a Harvard doctorate in 2007
BP in “advanced discussions” to settle criminal penalties in Gulf disaster
Newark teachers union approves landmark contract offering merit pay bonuses
Emanuel seeks to make city vending machine fare healthier

CNSNewsTV: Check out our latest videos!

Visit our website at www.CNSNews.com | Advertise on CNSNews.com E-brief

Follow us on Twitter | Follow us on Facebook

LET'S CALL TAXATION WHAT IT REALLY IS: THEFT

http://godfatherpolitics.com/8066/lets-call-taxation-what-it-is-theft/