Writing,poetry,photography, animals,nature,politics and the vagaries of a wandering mind.
Showing posts with label Gun rights and Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gun rights and Obama. Show all posts
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Friday, May 17, 2013
Saturday, April 27, 2013
WHAT'S CURRENTLY BEING DONE TO REMOVE OUR SECOND AMENDMENT THROUGH A GOOGLE ALERT
| Senators
Quietly Seeking New Path on Gun Control New York Times WASHINGTON — Talks to revive gun control legislation are quietly under way on Capitol Hill as a bipartisan group of senators seeks a way to bridge the differences that led to last week's collapse of the most serious effort to overhaul the country's ... See all stories on this topic » |
||
|
||
|
||
| Gun
Control and Gun Rights Advocates Ready to
Continue Their Fight PBS NewsHour (blog) Watch the NewsHour Thursday for a look at the evolution of gun lobbying efforts on both sides. Exuding a sense of impenetrable power, the headquarters of the National Rifle Association makes a big footprint along Interstate 66 in Northern Virginia. See all stories on this topic » |
||
| Belmonte:
Gun control to be taken up in 16th Congress Philippine Star MANILA, Philippines - After a recent survey showed that 3 out of 4 Filipinos support a gun control policy, Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. said on Friday that the issue would be taken up in the next Congress. Reiterating his call for a strict gun ... See all stories on this topic |
Thursday, April 11, 2013
PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE NEWS COMING OUT OF DC TODAY. WE'RE ABOUT TO BE SOLD OUT!
IF THEY CAVE, THERE'S GOING TO BE HELL TO PAY...BOTH SIDES!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 10, 2013
From Alan Korwin
Full contact info at end
NOTE: Two senators announced today (April 10, 2013) they have reached a "compromise" on so-called "universal background checks." This is a code word for universal gun registration.
A press announcement and the wording of a long new gun law are not the same thing. DO NOT BELIEVE any news media that treat them as the same.
I will read the bill when it is released. It has NOT been released. NO ONE knows what it says. "News" reports are blowing smoke at you. They have no idea what's in the bill, drafted in secret.
When senator Schumer recently said his background bill "explicitly" states no registration he lied. It said no such thing. The Associated Press quoted him anyway. The "news" media in general has become a direct enemy of gun rights in this country. They violate every ethical principle there is when dealing with this subject.
I'm working on a report about the current background check system. It denies people the right to obtain firearms without a trial or due process. Despite more than one million supposedly legitimate denials, less than 150 were prosecuted in a two-year period according to the government's own numbers, with an unknown number of convictions. Who are these people? A bureaucracy set up to deny rights with little oversight and virtually no results is extremely suspect. More later.
For now, look what is happening in this legislation just enacted.
Consider the goal. Will this save children in kindergarten classes?
Or is something more sinister at work?
--
CONNECTICUT DRAFTS GUN LAW IN SECRET
Bans Firearms Public Already Owns
State retains power to own all especially deadly guns
Forces federal agents to either violate state law or deny civil rights
Effectively immediately
That's not the way networks covered it, is it, but it's the identical story
by Alan Korwin, Author
Gun Laws of America
GunLaws.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 10, 2013
From Alan Korwin
Full contact info at end
NOTE: Two senators announced today (April 10, 2013) they have reached a "compromise" on so-called "universal background checks." This is a code word for universal gun registration.
A press announcement and the wording of a long new gun law are not the same thing. DO NOT BELIEVE any news media that treat them as the same.
I will read the bill when it is released. It has NOT been released. NO ONE knows what it says. "News" reports are blowing smoke at you. They have no idea what's in the bill, drafted in secret.
When senator Schumer recently said his background bill "explicitly" states no registration he lied. It said no such thing. The Associated Press quoted him anyway. The "news" media in general has become a direct enemy of gun rights in this country. They violate every ethical principle there is when dealing with this subject.
I'm working on a report about the current background check system. It denies people the right to obtain firearms without a trial or due process. Despite more than one million supposedly legitimate denials, less than 150 were prosecuted in a two-year period according to the government's own numbers, with an unknown number of convictions. Who are these people? A bureaucracy set up to deny rights with little oversight and virtually no results is extremely suspect. More later.
For now, look what is happening in this legislation just enacted.
Consider the goal. Will this save children in kindergarten classes?
Or is something more sinister at work?
--
CONNECTICUT DRAFTS GUN LAW IN SECRET
Bans Firearms Public Already Owns
State retains power to own all especially deadly guns
Forces federal agents to either violate state law or deny civil rights
Effectively immediately
That's not the way networks covered it, is it, but it's the identical story
by Alan Korwin, Author
Gun Laws of America
GunLaws.com
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Friday, April 5, 2013
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Monday, April 1, 2013
EXCUSE ME! WHO MADE MARK KELLEY THE NEW GODFATHER OR MAYBE UNCLE OF GUN CONTROL?
https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&search=search#hl=en&site=search&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=mark+kelley+gun+control&oq=mark+kelley+gun+control&gs_l=hp.3..0i10l4.3420.12875.0.13132.27.25.2.0.0.0.225.3592.0j23j2.25.0...0.0...1c.1.7.psy-ab.vsHOzv59efc&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.44442042,d.eWU&fp=742c113135fff5b3&biw=1024&bih=564
Hey, Mark. Shut up.
We need whatever we want and we will buy whatever we want under the Constitution. The intent was to defend our rights against a dictator. There's one in the White House, dontcha know? It is explicit in its wording...and your name does not appear there that I see.
You got your weenie whacked when you ordered that weapon and the store refused you.
Go play with your daughter's pit bull.
Hey, Mark. Shut up.
We need whatever we want and we will buy whatever we want under the Constitution. The intent was to defend our rights against a dictator. There's one in the White House, dontcha know? It is explicit in its wording...and your name does not appear there that I see.
You got your weenie whacked when you ordered that weapon and the store refused you.
Go play with your daughter's pit bull.
Friday, March 29, 2013
MT GOVERNOR LIES AB OUT THE CONSTITUTION, VETOES 2ND AMENDMENT PROTECTION BILL - (HEY STEVE, YOU WON'T BE RE-ELECTED 'CAUSE MY FRIENDS WILL NEVER LET YOU FORGET ABOUT THIS!)
Montana Governor Lies About the Constitution, Vetoes 2nd Amendment Protection Bill
Here's
a surprise for you; some Governors have absolutely zero understanding
of the Constitution. None, whatsoever. Montana Governor Steve Bullock
seems to fit that description quite nicely.
Yesterday, he vetoed Montana House Bill 302 (HB302).
The bill would require the state to refuse to enforce or assist the
enforcement of any federal bans on semiautomatic weapons or large
capacity magazines. The bill states, in part:
A
peace officer, state employee, or employee of any political
subdivision is prohibited from enforcing, assisting in the enforcement
of, or otherwise cooperating in the enforcement of a federal ban on
semiautomatic weapons or large magazines and is also prohibited from
participating in any federal enforcement action implementing a federal
ban on semiautomatic weapons or large magazines.
Here's why Bullock is clueless about the Constitution. In his veto message
he wrote that the bill would put "law enforcement in the position of
violating laws they have sworn to uphold" and "subject our peace
officers to criminal sanctions for upholding the oath we ask that they
take."
Here's a message for you, Steve. You're a liar, and we know it.
There
is absolutely ZERO serious discussion from anyone beyond a 4th grade
education about the fact that the federal government cannot
"commandeer" the states to carry out its laws. None.
Even the Supreme Court has affirmed this multiple times.
In
the 1992 case, New York v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that
Congress couldn't require states to enact specified waste disposal
regulations.
In
the 1997 case, Printz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that
the federal government could not command state law enforcement
authorities to conduct background checks on prospective handgun
purchasers.
In
the 2012 case, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius,
the Supreme Court ruled that a significant expansion of Medicaid, was
not a valid exercise of Congress's spending power, as it would coerce
states to either accept the expansion or risk losing existing Medicaid
funding.
In
each of these cases, the Supreme Court made is quite clear that their
opinion is that the federal government cannot require the states to
act, or even coerce them to act through a threat to lose funding.
Their opinion is correct. If the feds pass a law, they can sure try
to enforce it if they want. But the states absolutely do NOT have to
help them in any way. This is really basic stuff that no one disagrees with, except people like Steve Bullock when their trying to mislead people.
So
to say that Montana law enforcement would be "violating laws" or
"subject...to criminal sanctions" for not carrying out federal law FOR
the feds is a bald faced lie. And Steve Bullock knows it.
The people of Montana should be disgusted.
On
the right, those who support the right to keep and bear arms know that
no matter what gun laws are ever passed in DC - this year or in the
future - Steve Bullock will require the state of Montana to enforce
them.
On
the left, those who support the medical marijuana program that voters
approved years ago, know that Bullock will continue to be an
embarrassment to progressives, requiring local law enforcement to
continue working with the DEA when they don't even have to.
Now
if Bullock would have skipped this part of the veto message and just
focused on the political statement that he also included, that would be
more...acceptable. Still wrong-headed and dangerous, but not as bad
as his lie that the state needs to carry out and enforce every federal
law. He wants your local law enforcement to take all the risk, and to
bear all the cost, while the feds sit back and do nothing or take the
credit where the local law enforcement carries all the water.
His veto message continues:
Further,
HB 302 is unnecessary. To date, there has been no action in Congress
to enact a ban on semiautomatic weapons. Moreover, recent news reports
have indicated that a majority of Congress does not support such
legislation.
That
may be the case for 2013, and it's certainly decent news for the short
term. But, anyone thinking that this is over with because it won't
pass in 2013 is mistaken. Anyone saying "there's nothing to worry
about" is a liar. If you don't believe me, maybe you'll believe Joe
Biden:
"Let
me say this as clearly as I can: this is just the beginning," he said
just this week. "We believe that weapons of war have no place on our
streets. That's the message that retired admirals and generals have
spoken to us about. The comment one of them used was if you want to
learn how to use a semiautomatic weapon, join the United States
military. But these are weapons of war."
The
attempts to ban semiautomatic weapons and high capacity magazines are
just beginning and making sure that the federal government knows that
they'll get no support enforcing such a ban from the State of Montana,
is a good first step in rendering any such ban ineffective.
As
Judge Andrew Napolitano has said recently, such widespread
noncompliance can make a federal law "nearly impossible to enforce."
Steve
Bullock is a joke, and while we realize that no one is going to vote
this bum out of office anytime soon, the People of Montana can
certainly pressure their state senators and representatives to override
his veto and render worthless his constitutional-idiocy.
For Bullock to say such garbage about Montana being required to enforce federal law, we say "Bollocks!"
ACTION ITEMS for Montana
1. Contact your state representative. Strongly, but respectfully urge him or her to OVERRIDE the Veto on HB302
Contact info here:
2. Contact your state senator. Strongly, but respectfully urge him or her to OVERRIDE the Veto on HB302
Contact info here:
Thursday, March 28, 2013
BIDEN - HAIR PLUGS AND HORNS - ON GUN CONTROL: LET ME SAY THIS AS CLEARLY AS I CAN, THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/27/joe-biden-on-gun-control-let-me-say-this-as-clearly-as-i-can-this-is-just-the-beginning/
The devil made him do it. Really.
This man should be in jail, pounding sand into rocks for eternity.
With his boss buddy, and Hillary and the murderers at the DOJ, Napolitano and Pistole.
I can think of more.
How about you?
The devil made him do it. Really.
This man should be in jail, pounding sand into rocks for eternity.
With his boss buddy, and Hillary and the murderers at the DOJ, Napolitano and Pistole.
I can think of more.
How about you?
Monday, March 25, 2013
HARRY REID THAT COMMUNIST, BEEFS UP "BASE BILL" TO DESTROY GUN OWNERSHIP". UNHOLY ALLIANCES COULD BECOME A CONCERN
| Gun Owners of America | |||||||
Sen. Reid Beefs up “Base Bill” to
Destroy Gun Ownership
"Unholy alliances" could become a concern
We now know a lot more about what's going to happen with gun control legislation than we did a few days
ago.First, the number of the bill we are fighting is S. 649. Harry Reid introduced it on Thursday and brought it directly onto the Senate calendar. This means the bill can now come up at any time — probably soon after the Easter recess is over. Second, the bill is a lot worse than even we anticipated. We expected it to contain the Veterans Gun Ban, which would mean that you would sell, gift, or raffle a gun in America at the risk of a 15-year prison sentence because of something you didn't know about the veteran/buyer. But, surprisingly to us, the Far Left has convinced Reid to include the original Schumer version of the Universal Registry Bill. This would ban private sales of firearms, unless purchasers first get the permission from the government. If Senators can pass this de facto registration bill, they will be well on the way to confiscation (see, for example, Governor Andrew Cuomo in New York, who has a gun owner registry and has called for gun confiscation). If this bill is passed, Senators will claim that they "broke the back" of gun owners in America. Third, there is still every evidence that Reid will move to proceed to the bill under "regular order," which means he will need 60 votes to advance to the "gun control buffet." GOA has been talking and making our case with a host of Senate Republicans, and we would hope that everyone in the Senate understands the importance of stopping the "motion to proceed" to Reid's gun control legislation. Fourth, as we predicted, anti-gun zealots have begun to use the "ObamaCare Paradigm" to threaten, bribe, and coerce senators into submission on the most far-reaching aspects of gun control, including Feinstein's proposal to ban shotguns, rifles and handguns that millions of Americans legally own. So if the "motion to proceed" to S. 649 is adopted with 60 votes, then Feinstein's ban could be passed in the Senate with only 50 votes (plus Biden). Click here for a more technical explanation as to how this would occur. Already, articles are being published to intimidate any Democratic Senator who votes against any gun control and threatening them with the prospect of facing an anti-gun primary challenger — just like we saw on ObamaCare. Fifth, there may be unholy alliances at work which could succeed in achieving a dangerous gun control compromise. One Capitol Hill newspaper is now reporting that "Sen. Joe Manchin and the National Rifle Association are quietly engaged in private talks on a proposal to broaden background checks on purchasers of firearms." We hope this is not true, however you should be aware of this report and use whatever contacts you have to prevent this from happening. Be assured, you can rely on Gun Owners of America to never engage in any compromises! ACTION: The strategy remains: We need to defeat this bill by filibustering and voting down the "motion to proceed" to S. 649. Please contact your senators and distribute this alert far and wide. Show up at their offices with a delegation during the congressional recess. Rally and conduct demonstrations and call-a-thons and writing campaigns. Know that the anti-gun Left will be doing the same. | |||||||
| |||||||

Only $5 with free shipping
DHS TO BUY 360,000 MORE ROUNDS OF FLESH-DISINTEGRATING HOLLOW POINT AMMO - YOU REALLY WANT TO DIE AT THE HANDS OF BIG SIS IN HER SENSIBLE SHOES? IF HER ARMY IS CAREFUL, MAYBE WE'LL COME BACK AS LAMPSHADES!
http://www.infowars.com/dhs-to-buy-360000-more-rounds-of-hollow-point-ammunition/
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1120&bih=572&q=WOUNDS+MADE+BY+40+CAL+HOLLOW+POINT+BULLETS&oq=WOUNDS+MADE+BY+40+CAL+HOLLOW+POINT+BULLETS&gs_l=img.3...5257.19636.0.19790.44.8.1.35.36.0.180.1121.2j6.8.0...0.0...1ac.1.7.img.ZnQvr-Cs3oo
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/skin.html
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1120&bih=572&q=WOUNDS+MADE+BY+40+CAL+HOLLOW+POINT+BULLETS&oq=WOUNDS+MADE+BY+40+CAL+HOLLOW+POINT+BULLETS&gs_l=img.3...5257.19636.0.19790.44.8.1.35.36.0.180.1121.2j6.8.0...0.0...1ac.1.7.img.ZnQvr-Cs3oo
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/skin.html
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
DISARMING AMERICANS OBAMASTYLE
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/53879?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=d97a9cb884-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email
Some of us are such gullible, ignorant suckers... :c(
Some of us are such gullible, ignorant suckers... :c(
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Monday, March 4, 2013
OBAMA PUSHING "MOST ANTI-SECOND AMENDMENT NOMINEE" IN RECENT HISTORY - CONTACT YOUR SENATORS RIGHT AWAY
|
|||||||||||
|
If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here. |
|||||||||||
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
