Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Fourth Amendment violation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fourth Amendment violation. Show all posts

Friday, May 17, 2013

OBAMA RECYCLES ANOTHER CROOK IN DC - IRS OFFICIAL WHO OVERSAW UNIT TARGETING TEA PARTY NOW HEADS OBAMACARE OFFICE

http://cowboybyte.com/21585/irs-official-who-oversaw-unit-targeting-tea-party-now-heads-obamacare-office/

BUT NOW WE KNOW, YOU SNEAK.  MAYBE YOU THOUGHT WE WERE STOOPID?  YOU'D BETTER RESIGN BEFORE YOU'RE PUT IN JAIL.  MICHELLE WON'T LIKE THAT.  NO MORE VACATIONS.  MAYBE THEY'LL LET YOU AT BEST, PRACTICE HOOPS FOR AN HOUR.

AND IF CONGRESS WAS SMART, YOU'D BE JOINING YOUR BRETHREN IN GITMO!

Sunday, May 5, 2013

IN DEFENSE OF RURAL AMERICA - 5 MONTHS FOR CLEANING OUT A DITCH! AND AN INTERESTING SEGUE TO A CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEM IN MONTANA


Jailed For 5 Months For Cleaning Out a Ditch!
Posted By Sharon Rondeau On Sunday, May 5, 2013 @ 8:37 AM In Editorials | No Comments

“IN DEFENSE OF RURAL AMERICA”

by Ron Ewart, ©2013
This article can also be viewed at:
http://www.narlo.org/idarchives/050513.html
(May 5, 2013) — It is true that we can’t pick our relatives and most times we can’t pick our neighbors, but many times either can bring us grief beyond belief.  And such was the case for John (not his real name as he requested anonymity) who owned a few acres of land in a rural area of America, about a half hour’s drive from a big city.  Unfortunately, the government has passed so many laws that neighbors never settle their differences face-to-face or in the courts any more.  One neighbor just calls the government and files a complaint on his neighbor, which the government is honor-bound to investigate, whether the complaint is valid or just neighbor revenge. 
Government laws have turned many Americans into sniveling snitches.  In one county we know, the local land use authorities were holding seminars for landowners, teaching them how to rat on their neighbors if they suspect their neighbor was doing something without benefit of a permit.  That is what we have come to from passing millions of laws that nobody knows, which leads to the government pitting neighbor against neighbor.
From what we understand, John’s neighbor had a minor grievance with John over some work along a common boundary, and instead of working it out man-to-man, the neighbor called the county land use authorities (CLUA) and filed a complaint.  The CLUA comes out, looks at what John is doing and says they didn’t see any problem; John didn’t need a permit and went away.  That wasn’t good enough for John’s neighbor and he kept bugging CLUA until they came out to the property and told John that he needed to cease and desist.  But John had already ceased and desisted with whatever he had been doing.  That wasn’t good enough for CLUA, thanks to continued bugging by John’s neighbor, and CLUA finally filed misdemeanor charges against John for continuing to do alleged illegal work that John had already stopped.  Essentially John’s activities consisted of cleaning out some areas around a ditch and burning the slash, for which John had gotten a burning permit.
John ignored their warnings for several months and thought the whole issue had gone away.  But behind the scenes John’s neighbor kept pressuring CLUA and the county prosecutor to “get” John.
CLUA and the county prosecutor dragged John into District Court on misdemeanor charges for filling a wetland and John elected to represent himself for what he thought was just a minor land use violation that he could make go away.  No such luck.  The prosecutor and the District Court judge decided to make an environmental example out of John by thwarting every legal attempt John made to defend himself, to the point that the judge found John in contempt of court and sentenced him to 150 days in jail on a full cash bond of $20,000 each, for five separate contempt of court charges.  Not having $100,000 to pay the court, John was forced to sit in jail with thieves and murderers for over 60 days before a third party filed a writ of Habeas Corpus in Superior Court and had to fork over $20,000 in cash to get John out of jail on appeal. 
Oh, did we tell you that the wetland charge was made by creating the wetland AFTER John had done his clearing and burning?  There was no wetland designation in the area anytime before John did his work.  In other words, the prosecutor drummed up the charges by creating a wetland violation after the fact.  That’s how they “got” John.
While out on appeal John used every legal trick he knew to get the case dismissed but the court clerk would fail to file and record his motions.   Some motions were lost, others ignored.   The District Court judge literally thumbed his nose at all of John’s efforts.  When John filed a motion to get his case elevated to Superior Court because according to the state Constitution, the lower court has no jurisdiction in real estate cases, the District Court judge de-railed that, too.
John filed motions in Superior Court to get the lower court decision rescinded.  The Superior Court would hear none of it either.  We not only read the transcripts of the lower court record but also attended the District Court and Superior Court hearings.  The transcript screamed of the District Court judge’s environmental bias against John and he was going to “get” John any way he could.  We even filed written complaints with the District Court and the Superior Court, signed by several landowners.   We wrote articles about John’s case that appeared in local venues.  The District Court judge wouldn’t let go.
Finding no help in the two lower courts, John filed motions with the state appellate court.  No help there, either.  John went to the State Supreme Court.  They refused to hear the case. 
Finally, just days before the District Court’s order to send John back to jail for another 90 days and pay a fine of another $1,000, John filed for clemency with the Governor of the state.  The Governor ignored John’s plea.  John tried to get the District Court to give him credit for time served and for good behavior while in jail for the first 63 days.  The District Court judge said emphatically, NO! and John went back to jail to sit with thieves and murderers again, essentially for doing maintenance on HIS property. 
Some of us tried to help John but our efforts fell on deaf ears.  John was forced back to jail for another 90 days for a charge of clearing out a wetland that didn’t exist before the act of clearing.   John became a sacrificial lamb in the name of radical environmentalism.  You have to steal a car seven times before you go to jail, but woe be to the landowner who dares to violate a sacred environmental ordinance, for he shall be sacrificed on the alter of Gaia, the God of Earth.
Perhaps, in hindsight, John should have hired a land use attorney and made the charges against him go away.  But he chose to defend himself as a proud American.  Perhaps that was an error in judgment on John’s part, but he and we will never know.  Whether defending yourself, or with a lawyer, going into court is a gamble at best and any good lawyer will admit it.   Court rules are voluminous and can easily trip up the unwary who dares to defend him- or herself in court.  It is a closed, elite club of judges, lawyers, clerks and the state bar association and they rule the “Club.”  They don’t like people defending themselves because it messes up their neat little kingdom.  Judges legislating from the bench are as common as houseflies.  Oversight of courts is tantamount to the Fox guarding the Hen House.  But all that is moot now for John.
(We have had our own sad experiences with the court system.  One of those experiences cost us $35,000 in attorney’s fees for what was blatantly a frivolous lawsuit.)
John has been out of jail now for several years but the experience has left him emotionally, if not financially drained.  We haven’t talked to him in those intervening years and we don’t even know if he still resides on his land.
If you don’t think that what happened to John can happen to you, think again.  It is happening all over America.  Every week we get one or more e-mails or phone calls from landowners who are in trouble with government.  Most of them are desperate because they have let their situation go too far where the government has the landowner by the throat and the fines and penalties are mounting up.  Some are facing jail time.
So, ladies and gentlemen, do you have a neighbor who has it in for you?   Will he work it out with you personally, or will he call the government?  Odds are he will call the government because he is a coward and it is easier than facing you.  When he does call the government, you are going to find yourself in a world of hurt because the code enforcement officer they send out WILL find something wrong on your property and they WILL fine you or tell you that you have to restore your property to its original condition, which will cost you a bundle.   They may even haul you off to jail as they did John.
We can help some landowners with some of the tools on our website.  Unfortunately, there are many we can’t help because the government has the law on their side and they have the money(our money) and their own attorneys to thwart any efforts you may attempt to defend yourself.  It’s a stacked deck at best.


Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America,” is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) (www.narlo.org) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State and dedicated to restoring, maintaining and defending property rights for urban and rural landowners.  Mr. Ewart can be reached for comment at ron@narlo.org, or 1 800 682-7848
© 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.

Article printed from The Post & Email: http://www.thepostemail.com
URL to article: http://www.thepostemail.com/2013/05/05/jailed-for-5-months-for-cleaning-out-a-ditch/


Last year, Joel Boniek of Park County, MT, ex-State Representative and Oathkeeper, was arrested by the US Forest Service for daring to ignore  Forest Service personnel's orders prohibiting him access to his own property in order to save/protect what he could during a forest fire.  After two appearances at which he proceeded to defend himself (pro se), his references to the Constitution were labeled "seditious".  He was supported by many neighbors, friends and patriots.

His trial commences on Friday.  But here are interesting "coincidences".

 Add to this, the information at this link:  http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/atf-offers-reward-in-red-lodge-explosives-theft/article_ed989256-9bbf-5f2e-b5b4-5fc7bd513532.html

If this is a coincidental incident or treacherous false flag, it matters that people know about it beforehand, and that if it is just a coincidence, Joel Boniek's rights in a courtroom in Montana need to be upheld.  No one should be railroaded like he's been.



The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Nuclear Incident drills in Montana starting Monday
Date: Saturday, 4-May-2013 15:56:35
If a nuclear incident happened in Montana, key officials don’t want to be meeting each other for the first time.
Military personnel at Malmstrom Air Force Base have regular exercises to test their response procedures and make sure everyone knows what to do and when.
But starting Monday, their training will go to a higher level.
A national exercise, known as NUWAIX 2013, which is executed by U.S. Northern Command and sponsored by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, will bring about 1,000 people to Montana throughout the exercise. The exercise isn’t expected to disrupt the community, but locals may notice additional vehicle traffic in and out of the base, increased helicopter activity and some personnel in hazmat suits or “tent cities” at some of the exercise sites. The majority of the exercise will be contained at Malmstrom and Fort Harrison in Helena.
Personnel from a variety of local and federal agencies, primarily the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Energy, Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VIII, will augment Malmstrom and other Air Force participants.
The exercise will be scenario based, and participants will respond to a nuclear incident, which could be a DOE shipment in the state, an attack on a nuclear missile site, hostile action on base or the missile field or a range of scenarios.
"A range of scenarios..?" Like some stolen explosives from nearby Red Lodge, MT being used to make the drill go live? [Why Red Lodge- and it is not "nearby" But yes, fear a false flag...- BF]
  1. There has been 559 lbs of explosives stolen in Red Lodge, MT from the Forest Service.  Some are of the emulsion type specific for mines because they have little backblast.
  2. They will be having a nuke exercise across the state starting on Monday running all week, that will ensure DHS, FEMA, FBI, DOD will be in the state
  3. Boniek's trial is on Friday, where he has been told he cannot stand on the Constitution and that will draw MT. patriots from all over the state into one location.
NO AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD FEAR THE STATE OR THE COURT.  DENIAL OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF EVERY AMERICAN CANNOT AND WILL NOT BE  TOLERATED ANY LONGER IN THE REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!  

Saturday, April 27, 2013

AWWW...THE PATRICK ADMINISTRATION (BOSTON) REFUSES TO RELEASE TSARNAEV BROTHERS WELFARE INFO CITING PRIVACY

http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/04/patrick_administration_refuses_to_release_tsarnaev_brothers

Do you not, Boston, have the collective IQ of a gnat that you will let this go?  We paid for terrorists to commit a crime and let private citizens cower like cornered dogs at paramilitary law enforcement in a 100 square mile radius, get frisked at gunpoint forced out of their homes?  This is your insanity!  The federal government is financing people like this through the welfare system.  And instead of you screaming WTF HAPPENED TO MY RIGHTS, AND RESISTING THIS INVADING FORCE WITH NO AUTHORITY, YOU JUST BECAME MELTING ICE CREAM CONES. 

Where's your outrage? 

Had this happened in my neck of the woods, the remaining Tsarnaev would have been shot, no questions asked saving time and money.  You are fools and cowards.


Thursday, March 21, 2013

CIA TO KEEP YOUR INFORMATION "FOREVER" - FROM ICH

CIA Plans to Keep Your Information 'Forever'
By RT
Chief technology officer admitted that the agency is trying to amass as much data as it can, hold it indefinitely and use it for analysis in the future.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34368.htm

Saturday, February 16, 2013

A CURE FOR THE COMMON CORE (EDUCATION SOCIALIST/PROGRESSIVE/COMMUNIST STYLE)

RESOLUTION 1
Retain Local Control of K-12 Education by Parents and States

WHEREAS, parents will lose control of their children’s K-12 education under the Common Core State Standards Initiative (Common Core), and this overhaul of Alabama’s education system will be completed by 2014;

WHEREAS, most parents remain unaware specific details of Common Core and will be virtually unable to change programs or correct problems since education decisions will ultimately be mandated by unaccountable bureaucrats and special interests in Washington, D.C.;

WHEREAS, Common Core invades students’ privacy by requiring the collection of personal, non-academic information, which will be shared with the federal government and private organizations without parents’ permission;

WHEREAS, Common Core requires that students be tracked from preschool through their careers, and the collection of Alabama student data has already started and will become part of a national database;

WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Education is funding the development of national curriculum guidelines, modes, and materials, as well as national assessments based on the Initiative’s standards, which creates a national curriculum and testing system;

WHEREAS, The U.S. Department of Education is violating multiple federal laws that specifically prohibit any federal direction, control, or supervision of curricula, programs of instruction, and instructional materials in the elementary and secondary schools, and this is an invasion of states’ rights;

WHEREAS, Common Core de-emphasizes classical literature and American history, and will replace literary works about Western Civilization with informational texts such as executive orders and work manuals, which will further diminish students’ knowledge of the moral, historical and cultural foundations of our country;

WHEREAS, Common Core violates the founding principle that parents and states, not federal government, control local education, as well as the Alabama State Constitution of 1901, Article I, Section 35, which states that “the sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the citizens in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property, and when the government assumes other functions it is usurpation and oppression;

WHEREAS, implementation of Common Core will cost Alabama taxpayers many millions of dollars to revamp state education systems, although they had no voice or vote in the matter; and

WHEREAS, it is urgent that the Alabama Legislature exercise its constitutional authority and duty to protect its citizens against an overzealous federal government and keep education decisions local by protecting state education sovereignty, since next year will be too late; now therefore

BE IT RESOLVED BY the Alabama Republican Party Executive Committee that we request the Alabama Legislature to (1) repeal and defund Common Core, (2) prohibit the collection and sharing of non-academic information on students by Alabama schools that is inconsistent with the 1974 Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERP) or any update approved by Congress so as to protect the privacy of students, and (3) require that any new or revised statewide educational standards that vastly change the education system to be extensively publicized to ensure that members of the public, including representatives of political, education, faith organizations and non-partisan policy institutes are informed and have ample opportunity to comment before any decision is made.

Submitted by:  Elois Zeanah, Alabama Federation of Republican Women

This was sent to me by a friend in Alabama.  If you know anything about Common Core and understand its purpose, you will make your changes accordingly,  add your own concerns and bring it to the attention of the party of your choice.  This Common Core method of teaching is very dangerous to the family and to the student. I hope you will use this as a tool to defeat Common Core in American public schools.



Wednesday, February 13, 2013

THE GOLD POLICE HAVE ARRIVED

http://dailybail.com/home/red-alert-the-gold-police-have-arrived.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheDailyBail+%28The+Daily+Bail%29

OBAMA'S DRONES - COMING TO A WINDOW NEAR YOU FROM THE SOVEREIGN INVESTOR

Obama’s Drones – Coming to a Window Near You!
By Bob Bauman, Offshore and Asset Protection Editor

Dear Sovereign Investor Subscriber,

There are two Capitol Hills in America and last week they seemed far apart on one issue.

The better known hill is in Washington, D.C., which has served as American media shorthand to describe the U.S. Senate and House ever since congressmen first met in sessions on the Hill in 1800.

The other Capitol Hill is exactly 2,323 miles to the northwest. A charming, densely populated residential district in Seattle, a city known for its liberal politics in the State also named for our first president. Their Capitol Hill is the city’s gay and counterculture district.

Last week, both Capitol Hills were caught in the Great Drone Debate.


Advertisement
World’s Simplest Trading System?

Respected trader gets scathing letter from frustrated newbie, giving him an impossible challenge.
A really simple trading system? Less than 10 min a day? And for under $300?
Can he do it? Click here to read the letter and find out!

On Wednesday, a Seattle City Council committee held a hearing to regulate unmanned police surveillance drones. The local Police Department already had two Draganflyer X6 Helicopter Tech drones bought with taxpayer money. A crowd of angry opponents, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), voiced spirited opposition to these spy drones, concerned about privacy.

Council members were accused of being “… more dangerous than Nazis... than Communists… than the Gestapo… than then KGB.” One citizen said the council was creating “a police state.”

By Sunday, the resulting city-wide uproar prompted Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn, down in local polls, to ground the drones, which were subsequently returned to the sellers, along with the demand for a refund.

Also last week, Charlottesville, Va., imposed a two-year moratorium on the use of unmanned surveillance drones, the first U.S. city to do so.

News reports indicated that Seattle City Council, hearing citizens from across the political spectrum, were roused in common cause by what they saw as a threat to their personal privacy – police eyes in the sky peering into their vehicles, yards, homes, bedrooms – looking for what?

That unity is an example for us all.

The Slippery Slope

Now put aside for a moment the lethal aerial drones Obama uses to destroy annoying human beings he judges to be imminent threats to Americans (whatever that means in a point of time).
How long will it be before the president and his lapdog attorney general conclude that Citizen X or Citizen Y are engaged in some nefarious actions that must be stopped, such as tax evasion or others offenses, such as hoarding precious metals or hiding unreported cash offshore.
Why waste time with due process and antiquated conventional investigative means? A tech-savvy, drone-happy president can order aerial surveillance of suspect groups or persons using a drone equipped with DARPA's surveillance video camera, ARGUS-IS (see demo), that at 15,000 feet over a small city can see and record movements as small as a human hand or the wagging of a dog’s tail. Arrest and confiscation of assets follow within minutes.

To target a suspect’s home or business, the president can order up a fleet of half-ounce Black Hornet Nano miniature surveillance helicopters, drones so small they can fit in the palm of your hand. Fitted with a tiny camera they relay still images and video to a remote video terminal manned by a police agent. The Nanos are so tiny a flock easily can hover outside your bedroom window like humming birds.

Surveillance drones already are used to patrol U.S. borders and by some U.S. police departments, but a year ago the U.S. Congress also got drone happy. Over little opposition or showing no concern about privacy, the politicians on the Hill ordered the Federal Aviation Administration to promote wider government, police and commercial drone use by September 30, 2015.

Congress ignored warnings about warrantless surveillance violations of the Fourth Amendment, police drones armed with tear gas and rubber bullets, which some departments want to use, and U.S. military drones in the U.S. sharing data with domestic law enforcement.

But the heart of the matter was summed up by Glenn Greenwald, a respected constitutional lawyer, who said about the leaked DOJ memo: “If you believe the president has the power to order U.S. citizens executed far from any battlefield with no charges or trial, then it’s truly hard to conceive of any asserted power you would find objectionable.”

Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely

That is exactly the point – and why we should all be worried – why we should all be actively protesting the spreading use of drones as a potential means to violate all our constitutional rights.
If an omnipotent president can claim a general right to kill Americans whom he defines as “terrorists,” who and what will be on his terrorist list in the future?
Remember the 2001 PATRIOT Act adopted sight-unseen by Congress? Its broad definition of terrorism has been used to justify radical government actions, most kept secret as the Act permits.
Arial drones, unseen at great heights, can track your every move. Combine that all-seeing eye with GPS trackers on your cars, RFID chips in your IDs, wiretapping, Internet surveillance, passport control and FATCA.
Friends, plain clothed officers and unmarked police cars are relics of the past.
Yes indeed, the Constitution of the Unites States guarantees that we shall not be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” that we have a right to trial and to be charged with a crime.
But if the president of the United States, as a Columbia Law School professor described President Obama’s actions a few days ago, “is acting as judge, jury and executioner,” how are we to defend ourselves?
We can at least start by demanding that Capitol Hill outlaw the use of surveillance drones against the 315,279,355 presumed innocent Americans now living in the United States.

Faithfully yours,

Bob Bauman
Chairman, Freedom Alliance

P.S. As you know, the American financial system is falling apart. But you can protect yourself from this collapse. With 40 years uncovering wealth protection secrets the Washington, D.C. gang doesn’t want you to know about, I can help you combat inflation, protect your hard-earned dollars, and live a richer, freer life, no matter what the U.S. government is trying to do to you. I’m revealing these secrets today. For full inside details, click here.

Related Reading:

One of the main reasons the United States was founded was so that there would be a land where people were free, governed by the rule of law, not by the whims of men. It’s why this country used to be called the “land of the free.”

Unlike almost every other major nation, U.S. taxes follow American citizens wherever in the world they go. Most other nations only tax the income of their citizens from sources within their borders.

Friday, February 8, 2013

FOR THOSE OF YOU CONCERNED WITH THE GROWING PROBLEM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT KILLING FAMILY DOGS, HERE'S A NEW BLOG FOR YOU.

http://dogmurders.wordpress.com/

I hope this, coupled with Google alerts will compel you to act for these animals.  Police brutality to humans and non-humans is a growing problem.  Now it is on our shoulders to do something about it.