Search This Blog

Showing posts with label property ownership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label property ownership. Show all posts

Sunday, May 5, 2013

IN DEFENSE OF RURAL AMERICA - 5 MONTHS FOR CLEANING OUT A DITCH! AND AN INTERESTING SEGUE TO A CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEM IN MONTANA


Jailed For 5 Months For Cleaning Out a Ditch!
Posted By Sharon Rondeau On Sunday, May 5, 2013 @ 8:37 AM In Editorials | No Comments

“IN DEFENSE OF RURAL AMERICA”

by Ron Ewart, ©2013
This article can also be viewed at:
http://www.narlo.org/idarchives/050513.html
(May 5, 2013) — It is true that we can’t pick our relatives and most times we can’t pick our neighbors, but many times either can bring us grief beyond belief.  And such was the case for John (not his real name as he requested anonymity) who owned a few acres of land in a rural area of America, about a half hour’s drive from a big city.  Unfortunately, the government has passed so many laws that neighbors never settle their differences face-to-face or in the courts any more.  One neighbor just calls the government and files a complaint on his neighbor, which the government is honor-bound to investigate, whether the complaint is valid or just neighbor revenge. 
Government laws have turned many Americans into sniveling snitches.  In one county we know, the local land use authorities were holding seminars for landowners, teaching them how to rat on their neighbors if they suspect their neighbor was doing something without benefit of a permit.  That is what we have come to from passing millions of laws that nobody knows, which leads to the government pitting neighbor against neighbor.
From what we understand, John’s neighbor had a minor grievance with John over some work along a common boundary, and instead of working it out man-to-man, the neighbor called the county land use authorities (CLUA) and filed a complaint.  The CLUA comes out, looks at what John is doing and says they didn’t see any problem; John didn’t need a permit and went away.  That wasn’t good enough for John’s neighbor and he kept bugging CLUA until they came out to the property and told John that he needed to cease and desist.  But John had already ceased and desisted with whatever he had been doing.  That wasn’t good enough for CLUA, thanks to continued bugging by John’s neighbor, and CLUA finally filed misdemeanor charges against John for continuing to do alleged illegal work that John had already stopped.  Essentially John’s activities consisted of cleaning out some areas around a ditch and burning the slash, for which John had gotten a burning permit.
John ignored their warnings for several months and thought the whole issue had gone away.  But behind the scenes John’s neighbor kept pressuring CLUA and the county prosecutor to “get” John.
CLUA and the county prosecutor dragged John into District Court on misdemeanor charges for filling a wetland and John elected to represent himself for what he thought was just a minor land use violation that he could make go away.  No such luck.  The prosecutor and the District Court judge decided to make an environmental example out of John by thwarting every legal attempt John made to defend himself, to the point that the judge found John in contempt of court and sentenced him to 150 days in jail on a full cash bond of $20,000 each, for five separate contempt of court charges.  Not having $100,000 to pay the court, John was forced to sit in jail with thieves and murderers for over 60 days before a third party filed a writ of Habeas Corpus in Superior Court and had to fork over $20,000 in cash to get John out of jail on appeal. 
Oh, did we tell you that the wetland charge was made by creating the wetland AFTER John had done his clearing and burning?  There was no wetland designation in the area anytime before John did his work.  In other words, the prosecutor drummed up the charges by creating a wetland violation after the fact.  That’s how they “got” John.
While out on appeal John used every legal trick he knew to get the case dismissed but the court clerk would fail to file and record his motions.   Some motions were lost, others ignored.   The District Court judge literally thumbed his nose at all of John’s efforts.  When John filed a motion to get his case elevated to Superior Court because according to the state Constitution, the lower court has no jurisdiction in real estate cases, the District Court judge de-railed that, too.
John filed motions in Superior Court to get the lower court decision rescinded.  The Superior Court would hear none of it either.  We not only read the transcripts of the lower court record but also attended the District Court and Superior Court hearings.  The transcript screamed of the District Court judge’s environmental bias against John and he was going to “get” John any way he could.  We even filed written complaints with the District Court and the Superior Court, signed by several landowners.   We wrote articles about John’s case that appeared in local venues.  The District Court judge wouldn’t let go.
Finding no help in the two lower courts, John filed motions with the state appellate court.  No help there, either.  John went to the State Supreme Court.  They refused to hear the case. 
Finally, just days before the District Court’s order to send John back to jail for another 90 days and pay a fine of another $1,000, John filed for clemency with the Governor of the state.  The Governor ignored John’s plea.  John tried to get the District Court to give him credit for time served and for good behavior while in jail for the first 63 days.  The District Court judge said emphatically, NO! and John went back to jail to sit with thieves and murderers again, essentially for doing maintenance on HIS property. 
Some of us tried to help John but our efforts fell on deaf ears.  John was forced back to jail for another 90 days for a charge of clearing out a wetland that didn’t exist before the act of clearing.   John became a sacrificial lamb in the name of radical environmentalism.  You have to steal a car seven times before you go to jail, but woe be to the landowner who dares to violate a sacred environmental ordinance, for he shall be sacrificed on the alter of Gaia, the God of Earth.
Perhaps, in hindsight, John should have hired a land use attorney and made the charges against him go away.  But he chose to defend himself as a proud American.  Perhaps that was an error in judgment on John’s part, but he and we will never know.  Whether defending yourself, or with a lawyer, going into court is a gamble at best and any good lawyer will admit it.   Court rules are voluminous and can easily trip up the unwary who dares to defend him- or herself in court.  It is a closed, elite club of judges, lawyers, clerks and the state bar association and they rule the “Club.”  They don’t like people defending themselves because it messes up their neat little kingdom.  Judges legislating from the bench are as common as houseflies.  Oversight of courts is tantamount to the Fox guarding the Hen House.  But all that is moot now for John.
(We have had our own sad experiences with the court system.  One of those experiences cost us $35,000 in attorney’s fees for what was blatantly a frivolous lawsuit.)
John has been out of jail now for several years but the experience has left him emotionally, if not financially drained.  We haven’t talked to him in those intervening years and we don’t even know if he still resides on his land.
If you don’t think that what happened to John can happen to you, think again.  It is happening all over America.  Every week we get one or more e-mails or phone calls from landowners who are in trouble with government.  Most of them are desperate because they have let their situation go too far where the government has the landowner by the throat and the fines and penalties are mounting up.  Some are facing jail time.
So, ladies and gentlemen, do you have a neighbor who has it in for you?   Will he work it out with you personally, or will he call the government?  Odds are he will call the government because he is a coward and it is easier than facing you.  When he does call the government, you are going to find yourself in a world of hurt because the code enforcement officer they send out WILL find something wrong on your property and they WILL fine you or tell you that you have to restore your property to its original condition, which will cost you a bundle.   They may even haul you off to jail as they did John.
We can help some landowners with some of the tools on our website.  Unfortunately, there are many we can’t help because the government has the law on their side and they have the money(our money) and their own attorneys to thwart any efforts you may attempt to defend yourself.  It’s a stacked deck at best.


Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America,” is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) (www.narlo.org) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State and dedicated to restoring, maintaining and defending property rights for urban and rural landowners.  Mr. Ewart can be reached for comment at ron@narlo.org, or 1 800 682-7848
© 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.

Article printed from The Post & Email: http://www.thepostemail.com
URL to article: http://www.thepostemail.com/2013/05/05/jailed-for-5-months-for-cleaning-out-a-ditch/


Last year, Joel Boniek of Park County, MT, ex-State Representative and Oathkeeper, was arrested by the US Forest Service for daring to ignore  Forest Service personnel's orders prohibiting him access to his own property in order to save/protect what he could during a forest fire.  After two appearances at which he proceeded to defend himself (pro se), his references to the Constitution were labeled "seditious".  He was supported by many neighbors, friends and patriots.

His trial commences on Friday.  But here are interesting "coincidences".

 Add to this, the information at this link:  http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/atf-offers-reward-in-red-lodge-explosives-theft/article_ed989256-9bbf-5f2e-b5b4-5fc7bd513532.html

If this is a coincidental incident or treacherous false flag, it matters that people know about it beforehand, and that if it is just a coincidence, Joel Boniek's rights in a courtroom in Montana need to be upheld.  No one should be railroaded like he's been.



The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Nuclear Incident drills in Montana starting Monday
Date: Saturday, 4-May-2013 15:56:35
If a nuclear incident happened in Montana, key officials don’t want to be meeting each other for the first time.
Military personnel at Malmstrom Air Force Base have regular exercises to test their response procedures and make sure everyone knows what to do and when.
But starting Monday, their training will go to a higher level.
A national exercise, known as NUWAIX 2013, which is executed by U.S. Northern Command and sponsored by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, will bring about 1,000 people to Montana throughout the exercise. The exercise isn’t expected to disrupt the community, but locals may notice additional vehicle traffic in and out of the base, increased helicopter activity and some personnel in hazmat suits or “tent cities” at some of the exercise sites. The majority of the exercise will be contained at Malmstrom and Fort Harrison in Helena.
Personnel from a variety of local and federal agencies, primarily the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Energy, Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VIII, will augment Malmstrom and other Air Force participants.
The exercise will be scenario based, and participants will respond to a nuclear incident, which could be a DOE shipment in the state, an attack on a nuclear missile site, hostile action on base or the missile field or a range of scenarios.
"A range of scenarios..?" Like some stolen explosives from nearby Red Lodge, MT being used to make the drill go live? [Why Red Lodge- and it is not "nearby" But yes, fear a false flag...- BF]
  1. There has been 559 lbs of explosives stolen in Red Lodge, MT from the Forest Service.  Some are of the emulsion type specific for mines because they have little backblast.
  2. They will be having a nuke exercise across the state starting on Monday running all week, that will ensure DHS, FEMA, FBI, DOD will be in the state
  3. Boniek's trial is on Friday, where he has been told he cannot stand on the Constitution and that will draw MT. patriots from all over the state into one location.
NO AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD FEAR THE STATE OR THE COURT.  DENIAL OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF EVERY AMERICAN CANNOT AND WILL NOT BE  TOLERATED ANY LONGER IN THE REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!  

Monday, February 25, 2013

QUOTE OF THE DAY ON LIFE, LIBERTY AND PROPERTY

Life, Liberty and Property. .
“Citizens choose your sides. You who are for French notions of government; for the tempestuous sea of anarchy and misrule; for arming the poor against the rich; for fraternizing with the foes of God and man; go to the left and support the leaders, or the dupes, of the anti-federal junto. But you that are sober, industrious, thriving, and happy, give your votes for those men who mean to preserve the union of the states, the purity and vigor of our excellent Constitution, the sacred majesty of the laws, and the holy ordinances of religion.” - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - A New York Federalist Newspaper (Spring of 1800)

EXTORTION 101 COMING TO A STATE NEAR YOU!

http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/extortion-101-coming-to-a-state-near-you/

Sunday, October 7, 2012

TP FRIENDS IN MT SENT THIS: YOUR RIGHT TO RESELL YOUR OWN STUFF IS IN PERIL!

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/your-right-to-resell-your-own-stuff-is-in-peril-2012-10-04

Your right to resell your own stuff is in peril!


CHICAGO (MarketWatch) — Tucked into the U.S. Supreme Court’s agenda this fall is a little-known case that could upend your ability to resell everything from your grandmother’s antique furniture to your iPhone 4.

At issue in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons is the first-sale doctrine in copyright law, which allows you to buy and then sell things like electronics, books, artwork and furniture, as well as CDs and DVDs, without getting permission from the copyright holder of those products.

Under the doctrine, which the Supreme Court has recognized since 1908, you can resell your stuff without worry because the copyright holder only had control over the first sale.

Put simply, though Apple Inc. AAPL -2.13%  has the copyright on the iPhone and Mark Owen has it on the book “No Easy Day,” you can still sell your copies to whomever you please whenever you want without retribution. 

That’s being challenged now for products that are made abroad, and if the Supreme Court upholds an appellate court ruling, it would mean that the copyright holders of anything you own that has been made in China, Japan or Europe, for example, would have to give you permission to sell it.

“It means that it’s harder for consumers to buy used products and harder for them to sell them,” said Jonathan Band, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University Law Center, who filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of the American Library Association, the Association of College and Research Libraries and the Association for Research Libraries. “This has huge consumer impact on all consumer groups.” 

Another likely result is that it would hit you financially because the copyright holder would now want a piece of that sale.

It could be your personal electronic devices or the family jewels that have been passed down from your great-grandparents who immigrated from Spain. It could be a book that was written by an American writer but printed and bound overseas, or an Italian painter’s artwork.

There are implications for a variety of wide-ranging U.S. entities, including libraries, musicians, museums and even resale juggernauts eBay Inc. EBAY -1.54%  and Craigslist. U.S. libraries, for example, carry some 200 million books from foreign publishers.
“It would be absurd to say anything manufactured abroad can’t be bought or sold here,” said Marvin Ammori, a First Amendment lawyer and Schwartz Fellow at the New American Foundation who specializes in technology issues.

The case stems from Supap Kirtsaeng’s college experience. A native of Thailand, Kirtsaeng came to America in 1997 to study at Cornell University. When he discovered that his textbooks, produced by Wiley, were substantially cheaper to buy in Thailand than they were in Ithaca, N.Y., he rallied his Thai relatives to buy the books and ship them to him in the United States.

Better made in the U.S.A.

While American men's brands once prized European craftsmanship or appreciated low-cost production from the Far East, some of the best fashion now is made right here in the U.S. Martin Marks talks menswear. He then sold them on eBay, making upward of $1.2 million, according to court documents. Wiley, which admitted that it charged less for books sold abroad than it did in the United States, sued him for copyright infringement. Kirtsaeng countered with the first-sale doctrine.




Tuesday, August 7, 2012

FLORIDA: THE SEPTIC TANK BILL IS COOKING AGAIN IN SECRET: HERE'S MY LETTER OF THIS A.M. TO ALL CANDIDATES AND TO THE "LYING, SCHEMING, BASTARD POLITICIANS" WHO TRIED TO HIDE IT!

http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Bills/billsdetail.aspx?BillId=48529

The lying, scheming bastard politicians in our Florida House and  blessed by the Florida Senate have included HB550 language into this new bill, so the septic tank bill is alive and well.

We have first magnitude springs and Bay County can opt out.

It is imperative before the elections that every single candidate running for election or re-election  for Bay County Commission or any County Commission, the House and Senate  answer to the public in formal statements we can understand,  as to what they will do with this issue - support it or vote to repeal it.  No hiding it under "repeal of the mandate".   If they support it, we practice our right of censure in the form of a no vote on our ballots.  It's time to hold them accountable for daring to take our private property rights away.

One hundred and sixty one pages!

Thank you Richard Harrrison of Marianna for alerting us all through the News Herald this morning.

May

Sunday, October 30, 2011

CLARICE RYAN OF MT, SENDS THIS - AN SOS FOR A LAND GRAB OF HUGE PROPORTIONS THAT INCLUDES THE BAKKEN OIL FIELD AND WILLISTON BASIN. WORRY ABOUT THIS.

Subject: ALARMING! State land Board Intends to LOCK UP SCHOOL TRUST LAND USE and more
Are MONTANA citizens saying bye, bye to our natural resources: oil, gas, minerals, timber, water, LAND ?????????


WAKE UP FOLKS, IT IS TIME TO PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT IS HAPPENING.
A LOT HAS ALREADY HAPPENED AND MORE IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN ! !

It is an "off " year for our Legislature ! Holiday Season is upon us ! The time is right for the death blow !
Will we welcome in the UNHAPPY NEW YEAR - INSECURE & POVERTY STRICKEN ????? ACTION IS NEEDED URGENTLY! NOW !


The MT State Land Board composed of state elected officials including the Governor and the Attorney General have been working diligently in combination with the Nature Conservancy to lock up the use of our state's natural resources. It is all under goals and objectives of the environmental movement and its misguided supporters who have gradually been gaining control of policy making and operations of all levels of our government,: city, county, state and federal.

Through this here in Montana they have both been active in placing use restrictions on our land and property converting it to non-productive uses: Federal lands such asForest Service, BLM, wetlands, Glacier Park, Crown of the Continent, Blackfoot Challenge, Forest Legacy, wilderness areas, stream set-backs, the new Baucus Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act, and on and on.
(Refer also to Kalispell Daily Interlake, Sept. 8. 2011, " Governor Mulls Land Swap with Feds " )

The Nature Conservancy (TNC) has not only been acting as an unlicensed real estate agent FOR the federal government, but has also been enticing private property owners using our own tax dollars as a benefits enticement, to gain control and limit the use and value of all land in PERPETUITY (FOREVER) .
TNC uses an assortment of tactics in addition to conservation easements, including outright purchase of private property which they in turn dedicate to an assortment of land lock-ups under various appealing labels to supposedly protect the environment. ALL OF THIS ASSURES THE ELIMINATION OF ANY FORM OF MINING, DRILLING FOR OIL OR GAS, AND ACCESS TO RARE MINERALS as well as the TIMBER HARVEST ALREADY LOST !!
Growth policies and other protections will prevent people from even LIVING on "open space" and restricted lands like the future "buffalo commons".

For heavens sake, just what does the pet term really mean? "Preserving it for future generations" These people are committing our children, grandchildren and all future generations to poverty. They are stealing from us the wealth of our beautiful state of Montana which belongs to its citizens. We must protect it from environmentalists who are unconstitutionally grabbing our land, its resources, its use and enjoyment, and giving it to THEMSELVES POSING AS "PROTECTORS" !

READ OUR OWN STATE CONSTITUTION as well as the U.S. CONSTITUTION which were established to protect citizens from exactly this sort of atrocity.

Clarice Ryan



PLEASE keep in mind my previous articles pointing out the expanse of BLM land in the north east corner of MT that is interspersed with DNRC School Trust Lands. Checkerboard lands will automatically become part of federal lands bordering them, whether by swap and trade, selling to govt. or declared ESA Habitat.

THIS IS THE AREA OF THE BAKKEN OIL FIELD AND WILLISTON BASIN. Will this also fall in the 100 mile buffer zone of the proposed SB1505 Homeland Security bill? cr

From: LeeF Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 10:22 AM
Subject: More road blocks coming to forest management State land Board

Take a minute to read more regulation coming and look who supports the current State land board, Defenders of Wildlife and others. Everyone of these top 5 on the Land board need to be replaced.

Montana’s wildlife need your help.
The State Land Board will vote early this Fall on a multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan
(HCP) that the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) has
been developing for nearly eight years. This HCP covers five threatened and endangered
species including grizzly bears, Canada lynx, and bull trout. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires DNRC to develop an HCP in order to receive a permit to conduct management activities such as logging impact endangered species. Under the ESA, DNRC’s plan must minimize impacts to these species to the “maximum extent practicable.”

The HCP would guide DNRC’s land management activities
on 500,000 acres of forested State School trust lands for the
next 50 years. And, according to DNRC the plan would set a
precedent for future habitat conservation agreements on both
public and private land. The HCP’s large geographic scope
and long duration make it critical that it follow ESA guidelines
to protect species and their habitats. Unfortunately, DNRC’s
proposed HCP prioritizes timber harvesting over wildlife, and
will almost certainly diminish habitat for species over time.
The long process is almost complete, but it is not too late to
contact Land Board members. Ask them to require DNRC to
make changes:

Cap road densities miles of road per square mile of land.
Widen the streamside buffers beyond 50-foot no-cut
buffer by at least 100 feet, and eliminate the numerous
exemptions for logging, road building, and gravel mining.
Maintain or increase grizzly bear “core security” habitat.
The current plan replaces core security areas with much
weaker “quiet” areas where roads and other human
disturbances would be allowed.

Develop an adaptive management strategy to adequately
describe threats to species posed by climate change, and
identify how DNRC will adjust its management activities
based on potential impacts.

Require a thorough technical and scientific review of the HCP after 25 years to see if management strategies have been biologically effective.

Contact Land Board Members: www.leg.mt.gov

Governor Brian Schweitzer: governor@mt.gov
Attorney General Steve Bullock: contactdoj@mt.gov
State Auditor Monica Lindeen: stateauditor@mt.gov
Sup. of Public Instruction Denise Juneau: OPISupt@mt.gov
Secretary of State Linda McCulloch: sos@mt.gov

Montana Conservation Voters
endorsed and helped elect the
current Land Board, the state’s top
five elected officials. We track the
Board’s votes and decisions affecting
the air we breathe, our clean, cold
water, protection of public lands and
abundant wildlife. MCV works with
conservation groups who identify
common policy priorities, coordinating
our common work to develop and
advocate for strong policies to
protect Montana’s outdoor heritage.
In that spirit, MCV is advocating a
strong Habitat Conservation Plan
that protects our treasured wildlife
resources. Allies with whom we are
working on this campaign include
Defenders of Wildlife, the Earth
Justice Legal Defense Fund, Friends of
the Wild Swan, Montana Audubon,
Montana Environmental Information
Center, and the Natural Resources
Defense Council.


CALL TOLL-FREE 866-220-0044 OR 866-338-1015 TO BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS

All of in the USA need to understand that this will eventually creep into our states, but Montana's Bakken and Williston Basin is crucial to our energy resources, our fuel and gas, to our very survival. We cannot, as Americans, let that be taken from us. BY ANYONE!

Monday, August 29, 2011

HURRICANE IRENE WASN'T ALL THAT...FROM CATO INSTITUTE

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/irene-wasnt-all-that/#utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Cato-at-liberty+%28Cato+at+Liberty%29

And in case YOUR neighbor's tree fell into your yard and caused damage and you happen to live in New Jersey, let my friend tell you what happens next because of Irene:


Hey folks... file this one away for future reference... My neighbor's trees (3 biggies... 75 ft. at least 2-3 ft. diam trunks) fell on my property in the hurricane... stumps are still on his land, 90% of trees on my property... spoke to his and my insurance companies.. both said the same thing... I'm responsible for removal, and damage to my property, etc. Tree owner's responsibility ENDS AT HIS PROPERTY LINE. Sure surprised me. This is because our insurance laws are based on English Common Law, which in this case is stupid, in my opinion... something about "a man's home is his castle, responsibility of which ends at his property line". If a homeowner has a big old tree... in poor condition... etc.. and it falls and crushes your house and car... you're responsible, not him... he has zero responsibility for anything beyond his property line. What kind of dopey people would think that is a fair and just law? Anyway, I'm gonna try to tactfully convince my neighbor to split the cost for removal.. probably will be a few thousand $$$. If he won't, I'll do it cheapest way possible.. I'll have my tree guy chop them in big pieces (up to my property line), and just dump all the pieces on his property... no removal, no wood chipping, no nuthin'. I'll just give him back his tree.


Monday, July 25, 2011

Sunday, December 19, 2010

72 YEAR-OLD MAN FORCED TO LEAVE HIS LAND BECAUSE HE WAS LIVING SUSTAINABLY




Someone ratted him out for trying to live his own, private life. There are other videos on him with other versions of this. He had some livestock. So what if he didn't have a sewer/septic hookup? And why can't you live in a travel trailer permanently, on your own land? Private property rights. Whatt's the matter with people!? Your neighbor demands the same privacy as you do.

He lives quietly on his own land; expects nothing but to be left to live his self-directed life, affordably.

Get used to it America. Hard times are coming for all of us. We will be reduced to the least common denominator. There will only be two classes. Rich and poor. Those that "have" now will not "have" in the future.

The middle class is an endangered species.

YOU may have to live in a trailer, a motor home, a mobile home in the near future - or even in a recycled freight container. And soon.