Search This Blog

Showing posts with label wetlands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wetlands. Show all posts

Sunday, May 5, 2013

IN DEFENSE OF RURAL AMERICA - 5 MONTHS FOR CLEANING OUT A DITCH! AND AN INTERESTING SEGUE TO A CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEM IN MONTANA


Jailed For 5 Months For Cleaning Out a Ditch!
Posted By Sharon Rondeau On Sunday, May 5, 2013 @ 8:37 AM In Editorials | No Comments

“IN DEFENSE OF RURAL AMERICA”

by Ron Ewart, ©2013
This article can also be viewed at:
http://www.narlo.org/idarchives/050513.html
(May 5, 2013) — It is true that we can’t pick our relatives and most times we can’t pick our neighbors, but many times either can bring us grief beyond belief.  And such was the case for John (not his real name as he requested anonymity) who owned a few acres of land in a rural area of America, about a half hour’s drive from a big city.  Unfortunately, the government has passed so many laws that neighbors never settle their differences face-to-face or in the courts any more.  One neighbor just calls the government and files a complaint on his neighbor, which the government is honor-bound to investigate, whether the complaint is valid or just neighbor revenge. 
Government laws have turned many Americans into sniveling snitches.  In one county we know, the local land use authorities were holding seminars for landowners, teaching them how to rat on their neighbors if they suspect their neighbor was doing something without benefit of a permit.  That is what we have come to from passing millions of laws that nobody knows, which leads to the government pitting neighbor against neighbor.
From what we understand, John’s neighbor had a minor grievance with John over some work along a common boundary, and instead of working it out man-to-man, the neighbor called the county land use authorities (CLUA) and filed a complaint.  The CLUA comes out, looks at what John is doing and says they didn’t see any problem; John didn’t need a permit and went away.  That wasn’t good enough for John’s neighbor and he kept bugging CLUA until they came out to the property and told John that he needed to cease and desist.  But John had already ceased and desisted with whatever he had been doing.  That wasn’t good enough for CLUA, thanks to continued bugging by John’s neighbor, and CLUA finally filed misdemeanor charges against John for continuing to do alleged illegal work that John had already stopped.  Essentially John’s activities consisted of cleaning out some areas around a ditch and burning the slash, for which John had gotten a burning permit.
John ignored their warnings for several months and thought the whole issue had gone away.  But behind the scenes John’s neighbor kept pressuring CLUA and the county prosecutor to “get” John.
CLUA and the county prosecutor dragged John into District Court on misdemeanor charges for filling a wetland and John elected to represent himself for what he thought was just a minor land use violation that he could make go away.  No such luck.  The prosecutor and the District Court judge decided to make an environmental example out of John by thwarting every legal attempt John made to defend himself, to the point that the judge found John in contempt of court and sentenced him to 150 days in jail on a full cash bond of $20,000 each, for five separate contempt of court charges.  Not having $100,000 to pay the court, John was forced to sit in jail with thieves and murderers for over 60 days before a third party filed a writ of Habeas Corpus in Superior Court and had to fork over $20,000 in cash to get John out of jail on appeal. 
Oh, did we tell you that the wetland charge was made by creating the wetland AFTER John had done his clearing and burning?  There was no wetland designation in the area anytime before John did his work.  In other words, the prosecutor drummed up the charges by creating a wetland violation after the fact.  That’s how they “got” John.
While out on appeal John used every legal trick he knew to get the case dismissed but the court clerk would fail to file and record his motions.   Some motions were lost, others ignored.   The District Court judge literally thumbed his nose at all of John’s efforts.  When John filed a motion to get his case elevated to Superior Court because according to the state Constitution, the lower court has no jurisdiction in real estate cases, the District Court judge de-railed that, too.
John filed motions in Superior Court to get the lower court decision rescinded.  The Superior Court would hear none of it either.  We not only read the transcripts of the lower court record but also attended the District Court and Superior Court hearings.  The transcript screamed of the District Court judge’s environmental bias against John and he was going to “get” John any way he could.  We even filed written complaints with the District Court and the Superior Court, signed by several landowners.   We wrote articles about John’s case that appeared in local venues.  The District Court judge wouldn’t let go.
Finding no help in the two lower courts, John filed motions with the state appellate court.  No help there, either.  John went to the State Supreme Court.  They refused to hear the case. 
Finally, just days before the District Court’s order to send John back to jail for another 90 days and pay a fine of another $1,000, John filed for clemency with the Governor of the state.  The Governor ignored John’s plea.  John tried to get the District Court to give him credit for time served and for good behavior while in jail for the first 63 days.  The District Court judge said emphatically, NO! and John went back to jail to sit with thieves and murderers again, essentially for doing maintenance on HIS property. 
Some of us tried to help John but our efforts fell on deaf ears.  John was forced back to jail for another 90 days for a charge of clearing out a wetland that didn’t exist before the act of clearing.   John became a sacrificial lamb in the name of radical environmentalism.  You have to steal a car seven times before you go to jail, but woe be to the landowner who dares to violate a sacred environmental ordinance, for he shall be sacrificed on the alter of Gaia, the God of Earth.
Perhaps, in hindsight, John should have hired a land use attorney and made the charges against him go away.  But he chose to defend himself as a proud American.  Perhaps that was an error in judgment on John’s part, but he and we will never know.  Whether defending yourself, or with a lawyer, going into court is a gamble at best and any good lawyer will admit it.   Court rules are voluminous and can easily trip up the unwary who dares to defend him- or herself in court.  It is a closed, elite club of judges, lawyers, clerks and the state bar association and they rule the “Club.”  They don’t like people defending themselves because it messes up their neat little kingdom.  Judges legislating from the bench are as common as houseflies.  Oversight of courts is tantamount to the Fox guarding the Hen House.  But all that is moot now for John.
(We have had our own sad experiences with the court system.  One of those experiences cost us $35,000 in attorney’s fees for what was blatantly a frivolous lawsuit.)
John has been out of jail now for several years but the experience has left him emotionally, if not financially drained.  We haven’t talked to him in those intervening years and we don’t even know if he still resides on his land.
If you don’t think that what happened to John can happen to you, think again.  It is happening all over America.  Every week we get one or more e-mails or phone calls from landowners who are in trouble with government.  Most of them are desperate because they have let their situation go too far where the government has the landowner by the throat and the fines and penalties are mounting up.  Some are facing jail time.
So, ladies and gentlemen, do you have a neighbor who has it in for you?   Will he work it out with you personally, or will he call the government?  Odds are he will call the government because he is a coward and it is easier than facing you.  When he does call the government, you are going to find yourself in a world of hurt because the code enforcement officer they send out WILL find something wrong on your property and they WILL fine you or tell you that you have to restore your property to its original condition, which will cost you a bundle.   They may even haul you off to jail as they did John.
We can help some landowners with some of the tools on our website.  Unfortunately, there are many we can’t help because the government has the law on their side and they have the money(our money) and their own attorneys to thwart any efforts you may attempt to defend yourself.  It’s a stacked deck at best.


Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America,” is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) (www.narlo.org) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State and dedicated to restoring, maintaining and defending property rights for urban and rural landowners.  Mr. Ewart can be reached for comment at ron@narlo.org, or 1 800 682-7848
© 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.

Article printed from The Post & Email: http://www.thepostemail.com
URL to article: http://www.thepostemail.com/2013/05/05/jailed-for-5-months-for-cleaning-out-a-ditch/


Last year, Joel Boniek of Park County, MT, ex-State Representative and Oathkeeper, was arrested by the US Forest Service for daring to ignore  Forest Service personnel's orders prohibiting him access to his own property in order to save/protect what he could during a forest fire.  After two appearances at which he proceeded to defend himself (pro se), his references to the Constitution were labeled "seditious".  He was supported by many neighbors, friends and patriots.

His trial commences on Friday.  But here are interesting "coincidences".

 Add to this, the information at this link:  http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/atf-offers-reward-in-red-lodge-explosives-theft/article_ed989256-9bbf-5f2e-b5b4-5fc7bd513532.html

If this is a coincidental incident or treacherous false flag, it matters that people know about it beforehand, and that if it is just a coincidence, Joel Boniek's rights in a courtroom in Montana need to be upheld.  No one should be railroaded like he's been.



The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Nuclear Incident drills in Montana starting Monday
Date: Saturday, 4-May-2013 15:56:35
If a nuclear incident happened in Montana, key officials don’t want to be meeting each other for the first time.
Military personnel at Malmstrom Air Force Base have regular exercises to test their response procedures and make sure everyone knows what to do and when.
But starting Monday, their training will go to a higher level.
A national exercise, known as NUWAIX 2013, which is executed by U.S. Northern Command and sponsored by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, will bring about 1,000 people to Montana throughout the exercise. The exercise isn’t expected to disrupt the community, but locals may notice additional vehicle traffic in and out of the base, increased helicopter activity and some personnel in hazmat suits or “tent cities” at some of the exercise sites. The majority of the exercise will be contained at Malmstrom and Fort Harrison in Helena.
Personnel from a variety of local and federal agencies, primarily the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Energy, Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VIII, will augment Malmstrom and other Air Force participants.
The exercise will be scenario based, and participants will respond to a nuclear incident, which could be a DOE shipment in the state, an attack on a nuclear missile site, hostile action on base or the missile field or a range of scenarios.
"A range of scenarios..?" Like some stolen explosives from nearby Red Lodge, MT being used to make the drill go live? [Why Red Lodge- and it is not "nearby" But yes, fear a false flag...- BF]
  1. There has been 559 lbs of explosives stolen in Red Lodge, MT from the Forest Service.  Some are of the emulsion type specific for mines because they have little backblast.
  2. They will be having a nuke exercise across the state starting on Monday running all week, that will ensure DHS, FEMA, FBI, DOD will be in the state
  3. Boniek's trial is on Friday, where he has been told he cannot stand on the Constitution and that will draw MT. patriots from all over the state into one location.
NO AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD FEAR THE STATE OR THE COURT.  DENIAL OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF EVERY AMERICAN CANNOT AND WILL NOT BE  TOLERATED ANY LONGER IN THE REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!  

Saturday, June 9, 2012

BLOCK EPA & CORPS WETLANDS JURISDICTION OVER YOUR WATER AND LAND

Land Rights Network
American Land Rights Association
PO Box 400 – Battle Ground , WA 98604
Phone: 360-687-3087 – Fax: 360-687-2973
E-mail: alra@pacifier.com
Web Address: http://www.landrights.org
Legislative Office: 507 Seward Square SE – Washington , DC 20003
* *
Block EPA & Corps Wetlands Jurisdiction Over Your Water & Land

*Do You Want The EPA &Corps In Your Backyard?*

Do you want the EPA & Corps jurisdiction over all forest roads?

If Not, Here’s Why You Need The
*“Preserve The Waters Of The US Act” (S-2245)*

Below are action items to protect your water and your land as well as
roads on Federal land. But first, read this:
* *
-----The EPA wants to lift the ban that prevents Washington , DC
bureaucrats from regulating non-navigable waters.

-----Lifting the navigable ban, passed by Congress to protect
families, small businesses and farmers from federal bureaucrats
seizing their water or their land, would devastate economic and
recreational activity as well as small communities across the U.S.

------You need to insist that Congress not remove the requirement set
by Congress in the original Clean Water Act that said the EPA and
Corps *can only regulate “navigable waters”*. The EPA and Corps
want to eliminate the word “navigable” and give the EPA and Corps
jurisdiction over “all waters of the United States and all
activities affecting all waters of the United States .”

-----If the ban is lifted, when it rains, your backyard or farm
becomes a minefield of Washington red tape and taxes.

-----If you’re a farmer, when it rains, your backyard becomes a
bonanza for Washington , DC bureaucrats to go on your property to
force you from doing activities like building a swimming pool,
installing a bird bath, running rainwater away from your home,
irrigating your fields, installing stock watering ponds and many
more.

-----If you’re a suburban homeowner, when it rains, the water in
your backyard allows Washington , DC bureaucrats on your property to
block you from doing basic things without a permit that can cost
thousands of dollars and long delays causing great damage.

-----Congress blocked attempts by former Congressman James Oberstar
(D-MN) and former Senator Russ Feingold (R-MN) from passing the Clean
Water Restoration Act, which would have lifted the “navigable”
ban. As with the EPA and Corp, Oberstar and Feingold tried to remove
the word “navigable” from the Clean Water Act.

-----Despite Congress not changing the law, the Obama EPA and Army
Corps of Engineers are attempting to remove this key protection for
families, small business and farmers by issuing an internal guidance
document to agency bureaucrats telling them it is now OK to regulate
non-navigable waters on people’s property throughout the United
States. The Obama folks seem to care less
about how they are ignoring two Supreme Court decisions.

-----The Preserve The Waters of the US Act (S-2245) would stop
Washington overreach and block any further attempt to issue
“guidance” to agency bureaucrats that says it is OK to regulate
non-navigable water in people’s backyards and farms.

*Preserve the waters of the u.s. Act (S-2245)*

*Purpose:* To preserve existing rights and responsibilities with
respect to waters of the U.S.
* *
*Background:* In May 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) issued draft guidance on
“Identifying Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act.”

This guidance document, which was sent in final form to OMB on
February 21, 2012, significantly changes and expands what features
are considered protected under the Clean Water Act and makes
substantial additions, such as a first time inclusion of ditches and
other water features that may flow, if at all, only after a heavy
rainfall.

EPA and the Corps received over 230,000 comments from the public on
their guidance, discussing the potential consequences of the draft
guidance to governments, businesses, and landowners. They have not
responded to the comments.

EPA and the Corps estimate that between 2 – 17% percent of
non-jurisdictional determinations under current practice would be
jurisdictional using the expanded tests of the new guidance.[1]
<#_ftn1>
This guidance has clear regulatory consequences and goes far beyond
being simply advisory guidelines.

*The legislation (S-2245) prevents EPA and the Corps from using this
/guidance/ to change legal responsibilities under the Clean Water
Act.*

*-----Regulation through Guidance:* By issuing a guidance document as
opposed to going through the rulemaking process, EPA and the Corps are
bypassing the necessary public outreach required under the
Administrative Procedures Act and failing to fully consider the
legal, economic, and unforeseen consequences of their actions.
* *
*-----Applies to all Clean Water Act (CWA) Programs:* In addition to
the Corps §404 dredge and fill permits, the guidance applies to all
CWA programs including §303 water quality standards, §401 state
water quality certifications, §311 Oil Pollution Act (including
SPCC), and §402 program (including NPDES permits, pesticide general
permit, and storm water).

*-----Increasing Permits: *EPA and the Corps affirm that this
guidance will result in an increase in jurisdictional determinations
that will result in an increased need for permits. In addition to
more Corps §404 permits, State-permitting authorities will be faced
with more NPDES permits and more entities will be subject to CWA
requirements.

*-----Economic and Job Impacts:* Additional regulatory costs
associated with changes in jurisdiction and increases in permits will
erect bureaucratic barriers to economic growth, negatively impacting
farms, small businesses, commercial development, road construction
and energy production, to name a few.

*-----Impact on State on Local Governments:* Changes to the “waters
of the U.S. ” definition may have far-reaching effects and unintended
consequences on a number of state and local programs. The guidance
creates significant unfunded mandates and preempts state and local
authority.

*-----Conflicts with Supreme Court Rulings:* The guidance uses an
overly broad interpretation of the /Rapanos /decision. The effect is
virtually all wet areas that connect in any way to navigable waters
are jurisdictional. Both the plurality opinion and Kennedy rejected
this assertion in /Rapanos/.
* *
*-----Private Property Rights:* Expanding federal control over
intrastate waters will substantially interfere with the ability of
individual landowners to use their property.
* *
*-----Action Items:*
* *
*-----1. It’s critical to get some of the Senators below as
co-sponsors of the Preserve The Waters Of The US Act (S 2245). *You
need to call, fax and e-mail your Senator (s) listed below to urge
them to cosponsor the Preserve The Waters Of The US Act.

-----2. For more information about S 2245 type in to Google the
following search term: Preserve The Waters Of The US Act.

-----3. Please forward this message to at least 10 other people. Your
whole list if possible.

The best thing to do is write a letter with your letterhead and
either fax it or e-mail it to your Senator (s). They don’t like
attachments so call ahead to ask for the staff person who handles the
Clean Water Act and Wetlands issues. Ask for his personal e-mail and
send him your letter.
* *
We’ve listed the fax of each Senator along with one or more staff
with their e-mail address. You may phone any Senator at (202)
224-3121. If the e-mail or fax does not go through, call the Senator
at the number above to ask for the correct information. Be sure to
pass any corrections along to American Land Rights.

Be sure to note that there is an underscore between the first and
last name of each staff person listed below. For example:
paul_wilkins@.
* *
Kelly Ayotte (D-NH) -- F-(202) 224-2952 E-mail:
adam_hechavarria@ayotte.senate.gov
adam_hechavarria@ayotte.senate.gov>

Max Baucus (D-MT) – F-(202) 224-9412 E-mail:
paul_wilkins@baucus.senate.gov
paul_wilkins@baucus.senate.gov>

Scott Brown (R-MA) -- F-(202) 229-2646 E-mail:
nat_hoopes@scottbrown.senate.gov
nat_hoopes@scottbrown.senate.gov>

Susan Collins (R-ME) -- F-(202) 224-2693 E-mail:
rob_epplin@collins.senate.gov rob_epplin@collins.senate.gov>

Kent Conrad (D-ND) –F-(202) 224-7776 E-mail:
tom_mahr@conrad.senate.gov tom_mahr@conrad.senate.gov>

Al Franken (D-MN) –F-(202) 224-0044 E-mail:
Benjamin_olinsky@franken.senate.gov
Benjamin_olinsky@franken.senate.gov>

Lindsey Graham R-SC) – F-(202) 224-3808 E-mail:
sergia_sarkany@lgraham.senate.gov
sergia_sarkany@lgraham.senate.gov>

Kay Hagan (D-NC) – F-(202) 228-2563 E-mail:
mike_harney@hagan.senate.gov mike_harney@hagan.senate.gov>

Tim Johnson (D-SD) –F-(202) 228-5765 E-mail:
todd_stubbendieck@johnson.senate.gov
todd_stubbendieck@johnson.senate.gov>

Mark Kirk (D-IL) – F-(202) 228-4611 E-mail:
Patrick_magnuson@kirk.senate.gov
Patrick_magnuson@kirk.senate.gov>

Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) –F-(202) 228-2186 E-mail:
travis_talvitie@klobuchar.senate.gov
travis_talvitie@klobuchar.senate.gov>

Mary Landrieu (D-LA) – F-(202) 224-9735 E-mail:
Elizabeth_craddock@landrieu.senate.gov
Elizabeth_craddock@landrieu.senate.gov>

Joe Manchin (D-WV) –F-(202) 228-0002 E-mail:
Patrick_hayes@manchiin.senate.gov
Patrick_hayes@manchiin.senate.gov>

Claire McCaskill (D-MO) – F-(202) 228-6326 E-mail:
Stephen_hedger@mccaskill.senate.gov
Stephen_hedger@mccaskill.senate.gov>

Ben Nelson (D-NE) – F-(202) 228-0012 E-mail:
kate_gotsdiner@bennelson.senate.gov
kate_gotsdiner@bennelson.senate.gov>

Rob Portman (R-OH) – F-(202) 224-9558 E-mail:
Steve_kittredge@portman.senate.gov
Steve_kittredge@portman.senate.gov>

Mark Pryor (D-AR) – F-(202) 228-0908 E-mail:
Kristin_sharp@pryor.senate.gov
Kristin_sharp@pryor.senate.gov>

Olympia Snowe (R-ME) – F-(202) 224-1946 E-mail:
don_green@snowe.senate.gov don_green@snowe.senate.gov>

Jon Tester (D-MT) – F-(202) 224-8594 E-mail:
james_wise@tester.senate.gov james_wise@tester.senate.gov>

Mark Warner (D-VA) – F-(202) 224-6295 E-mail:
neeta_bidwai@warner.senate.gov
neeta_bidwai@warner.senate.gov>

Jim Webb (D-VA) – F-(202) (202) 228-6363 E-mail:
david_bonine@webb.senate.gov david_bonine@webb.senate.gov>

These Senators are already co-sponsors of
The Preserve The Waters Of The US Act (S 2245).

Sen Barrasso, John [R-WY] (sponsor)
Sen Alexander, Lamar
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Alexander++Lamar%29%29+01695%29%29>
[R-TN] - 5/10/2012

Sen Blunt, Roy
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Blunt++Roy%29%29+01464%29%29>
[R-MO] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Boozman, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Boozman++John%29%29+01687%29%29>
[R-AR] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Chambliss, Saxby
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Chambliss++Saxby%29%29+00188%29%29>
[R-GA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Coats, Daniel
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Coats++Daniel%29%29+00209%29%29>
[R-IN] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Coburn, Tom
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Coburn++Tom%29%29+00212%29%29>
[R-OK] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Cochran, Thad
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Cochran++Thad%29%29+00213%29%29>
[R-MS] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Corker, Bob
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Corker++Bob%29%29+01825%29%29>
[R-TN] - 3/29/2012

Sen Cornyn, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Cornyn++John%29%29+01692%29%29>
[R-TX] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Crapo, Mike
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Crapo++Mike%29%29+00250%29%29>
[R-ID] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen DeMint, Jim
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+DeMint++Jim%29%29+01605%29%29>
[R-SC] - 5/16/2012

Sen Enzi, Michael B.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Enzi++Michael+B.%29%29+01542%29%29>
[R-WY] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Grassley, Chuck
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Grassley++Chuck%29%29+00457%29%29>
[R-IA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Hatch, Orrin G.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Hatch++Orrin+G.%29%29+01351%29%29>
[R-UT] - 5/15/2012

Sen Heller, Dean
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Heller++Dean%29%29+01863%29%29>
[R-NV] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Hoeven, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Hoeven++John%29%29+02079%29%29>
[R-ND] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Hutchison++Kay+Bailey%29%29+01368%29%29>
[R-TX] - 3/29/2012

Sen Inhofe, James M.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Inhofe++James+M.%29%29+00583%29%29>
[R-OK] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Isakson, Johnny
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Isakson++Johnny%29%29+01608%29%29>
[R-GA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Johanns, Mike
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Johanns++Mike%29%29+01899%29%29>
[R-NE] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Johnson, Ron
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Johnson++Ron%29%29+02086%29%29>
[R-WI] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Kyl, Jon
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Kyl++Jon%29%29+00655%29%29>
[R-AZ] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Lee, Mike
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Lee++Mike%29%29+02080%29%29>
[R-UT] - 3/29/2012

Sen Lugar, Richard G.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Lugar++Richard+G%29%29+01387%29%29>
[R-IN] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen McCain, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+McCain++John%29%29+00754%29%29>
[R-AZ] - 5/15/2012

Sen McConnell, Mitch
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+McConnell++Mitch%29%29+01395%29%29>
[R-KY] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Moran, Jerry
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Moran++Jerry%29%29+01507%29%29>
[R-KS] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Murkowski, Lisa
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Murkowski++Lisa%29%29+01694%29%29>
[R-AK] - 5/10/2012

Sen Paul, Rand
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Paul++Rand%29%29+02082%29%29>
[R-KY] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Risch, James E.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Risch++James+E.%29%29+01896%29%29>
[R-ID] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Roberts, Pat
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Roberts++Pat%29%29+00968%29%29>
[R-KS] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Rubio, Marco
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Rubio++Marco%29%29+02084%29%29>
[R-FL] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Sessions, Jeff
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Sessions++Jeff%29%29+01548%29%29>
[R-AL] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Shelby, Richard C.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Shelby++Richard+C.%29%29+01049%29%29>
[R-AL] - 5/16/2012

Sen Thune, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Thune++John%29%29+01534%29%29>
[R-SD] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Toomey, Pat
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Toomey++Pat%29%29+02085%29%29>
[R-PA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Vitter, David
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Vitter++David%29%29+01609%29%29>
[R-LA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Wicker, Roger F.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Wicker++Roger+F.%29%29+01226%29%29>
[R-MS] - 3/28/2012 *

Thank you for your help.
Chuck Cushman, American Land Rights
ccushman@pacifier.com ccushman@pacifier.com>

Look Chuck Cushman and American Land Rights up on Google by typing in
the following search terms: Chuck Cushman, Charles Cushman, Charles S.
Cushman, American Land Rights Association, National Inholders
Association and League of Private Property Voters.

*Social Networking Update: * The American Land Rights Association has
a Page on Facebook. Please be sure to hit the Like button. Also
Executive Director Chuck Cushman is on Facebook.com.

You can also find American Land Rights Association and Chuck Cushman
on LinkedIn.com. We are especially active on LinkedIn.com so send an
invitation to connect and sign up.

American Land Rights is on Twitter as AmLandrights.
Chuck Cushman is also on Twitter under ccushman98604

To unsubscribe please send an email with “Unsubscribe” in the
Subject Line to ALRA@pacifier.com.

Please forward this urgent message widely.

[1] <#_ftnref1>
“Potential Indirect Economic Impacts and Benefits Associated with
Guidance Clarifying the Scope of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction.”
April 27, 2011
http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/wetlands/upload/cwa_guidance_impacts_benefits.pdf



--
If you do not want to receive any more newsletters,
http://maillist.landrights.org/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=146018af23e8d2021abd10d093b93669

To update your preferences and to unsubscribe visit
http://maillist.landrights.org/lists/?p=preferences&uid=146018af23e8d2021abd10d093b93669
Forward a Message to Someone
http://maillist.landrights.org/lists/?p=forward&uid=146018af23e8d2021abd10d093b93669&mid=301

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Senate Bill 787 - "Clean Water" may steal your well, your irrigation ditch, your municipal wells, your wetlands, creeks, etc.

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s787/show

Senate is about to pass this bill. It's another wolf (my apologies to the wolves - they are as dangerous as cotton balls compared to our Congress).

I got called out on this locally by an activist acquaintance because of an unneeded airport built on thousands of acres of pristine wetlands. I agree in this case. But this is federal control of ALL WATER. Federal control of anything is a bad thing.

Assuming that all family farmers/ranchers know how to manage their land better than big agra or the government, it has far reaching implications for them. Also, the feds can come into your property without a warrant and do whatever they want to do. It's all in there. Read it.

Here's the toll-free if you want to give your Congresscritter a call - works for Senate or the House of Representatives. 877-851-6437.



Bookmark and Share