AWWW...THE PATRICK ADMINISTRATION (BOSTON) REFUSES TO RELEASE TSARNAEV BROTHERS WELFARE INFO CITING PRIVACY

http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/04/patrick_administration_refuses_to_release_tsarnaev_brothers

Do you not, Boston, have the collective IQ of a gnat that you will let this go?  We paid for terrorists to commit a crime and let private citizens cower like cornered dogs at paramilitary law enforcement in a 100 square mile radius, get frisked at gunpoint forced out of their homes?  This is your insanity!  The federal government is financing people like this through the welfare system.  And instead of you screaming WTF HAPPENED TO MY RIGHTS, AND RESISTING THIS INVADING FORCE WITH NO AUTHORITY, YOU JUST BECAME MELTING ICE CREAM CONES. 

Where's your outrage? 

Had this happened in my neck of the woods, the remaining Tsarnaev would have been shot, no questions asked saving time and money.  You are fools and cowards.

THE WORLD'S GREATEST WELFARE RECIPIENTS: BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA

http://www.westernjournalism.com/the-worlds-greatest-welfare-recipients-barack-and-michelle-obama/

HOW TO BUY VOTES - US SPENT A WHOPPING $2.2 BILLION LAST YEAR ON OBAMAPHONES AND YOU PAID FOR THEM!

http://minutemennews.com/2013/02/u-s-spent-a-whopping-2-2-billion-last-year-on-obama-phones/

DHS ADMITS IT DOES NOT TRACK IMMIGRANTS WHO BECOME WELFARE DEPENDENT - PURSUED ZERO CASES LAST YEAR

http://patriotupdate.com/2013/02/dhs-admits-it-does-not-track-immigrants-who-become-welfare-dependent-pursued-zero-cases-last-year/

It appears to me that the DHS doesn't give a shit about security on the border or illegal immigrants.
Therefore, the DHS needs to be defunded AND Napolitano put in jail for dereliction of duty.  And the ammunition and weaponry distributed among the gun owners of the United States. 

Why?

Why you ask?

BECAUSE WE BOUGHT EVERY ROUND OF AMMO, EVERY FIREARM, EVERY ARMORED VEHICLE, EVERY BULLETPROOF KIOSK, EVERY UNIFORM.  THAT'S WHY!

FOR YOUR WTF FILE! HOUSE GUN TASK FORCE CHAIR: I'M NOT INTERESTED IN GIVING UP MY FIREARMS...

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/house-gun-task-force-chair-i-m-not-interested-giving-my-firearms

PIGS ROLLING IN SHIT AND HAVING A GOOD TIME, HUH?

FROM THE BARNYARD, TOO:  WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER.

I'm sorry - these lousy bastard control freaks don't care about anything about power and control.  The rise of the Fourth Reich is unfolding before our eyes, and we think that the FEMA camps (on the radio this a.m. I was reminded of one in Alaska able to hold 2 million people), aren't concentration camps? 

Do you think comrades Pelosi, Feinstein, Schumer, Reid and Obama, the devil-in-chief wouldn't take an orgiastic delight in shoving you and I into the ovens?  Into the cyanide showers?  WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH US THAT SO MANY WOULD SELL THEIR SOULS FOR A GOVERNMENT CHECK INSTEAD OF EMBRACING THE DIGNITY OF A JOB OF ANY KIND?  Do they like the humiliation or think that they are safe from having their entitlements removed at the whim of anyone in government?

Oh, and the remark that was made about me yesterday was not exactly true:
I was described as a "foaming at the mouth, rabid right wing extremist".

And the one who made it is taking his illegal and unqualified share of the pie at our expense with a total SSI disability for a non-service related injury while he rides his motorcycle and his tractor and receives income from his rentals. 

And so it goes, people, until we stop it.

Stop it.

Anyway we can.

WELFARE SPENDING = $168/DAY/EVERY HOUSEHOLD IN POVERTY: MEDIAN INCOME $137/DAY

Welfare Spending Equates To $168 Per Day For Every Household In Poverty: Median Income $137 A Day

Posted: 08 Dec 2012 08:56 AM PST

By Susan Duclos

Welfare benefits can and should be available to help those unable to work, but is meant as a temporary measure for those able to work but have fallen on hard times, but what happens when the government makes it more profitable for those living in poverty to receive welfare benefits than it is to go out and work?

Answer: Out of control government spending that equals more than Social Security, Medicare, or national defense.

Senate Budget Committee Ranking Member, Jeff Sessions has released a chart that calculates data from CRS, the Census Bureau and the Oxford Handbook of State and  Government Finance, that shows that total welfare spending equates to nearly $168.00 per day for every household in poverty and if converted to cash payments, the hourly rate exceeds median income by 20 percent. (That is before the median income workers pay taxes!) - H/T TWS

 Based on data from the Congressional Research Service, cumulative spending on means-tested federal welfare programs, if converted into cash, would equal $167.65 per day per household living below the poverty level. By comparison, the median household income in 2011 of $50,054 equals $137.13 per day. Additionally, spending on federal welfare benefits, if converted into cash payments, equals enough to provide $30.60 per hour, 40 hours per week, to each household living below poverty. The median household hourly wage is $25.03. After accounting for federal taxes, the median hourly wage drops to between $21.50 and $23.45, depending on a household’s deductions and filing status. State and local taxes further reduce the median household’s hourly earnings. By contrast, welfare benefits are not taxed.

The universe of means-tested welfare spending refers to programs that provide low-income assistance in the form of direct or indirect financial support—such as food stamps, free housing, child care, etc.—and which the recipient does not pay into (in contrast to Medicare or Social Security). For fiscal year 2011, CRS identified roughly 80 overlapping federal means-tested welfare programs that together represented the single largest budget item in 2011—more than the nation spends on Social Security, Medicare, or national defense. The total amount spent on these federal programs, when taken together with approximately $280 billion in state contributions, amounted to roughly $1 trillion. Nearly 95 percent of these costs come from four categories of spending: medical assistance, cash assistance, food assistance, and social / housing assistance. Under the President’s FY13 budget proposal, means-tested spending would increase an additional 30 percent over the next four years.

In 1996 President Bill Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. Under the act, the federal government gives annual lump sums to the states to use to assist the poor. In turn the states had to adhere to certain criteria to ensure that those receiving aid are being encouraged to move from welfare to work. While criticized at the time, the measure was a resounding success as welfare rolls decreased and employment increased.

Recently Barack Obama gutted Clinton's welfare reform by issuing a new directive stating that the traditional TANF work requirements can be waived or overridden by a legal device called the section 1115 waiver authority under the Social Security law.

Through a number of actions by the Obama administration over the last four years, more people are now on foodstamps and receiving welfare benefits than has been seen in recent history.

Those numbers are about to get larger.

The American economy is like a pie that gets bigger when investors invest their money, businesses start, grow, and employ more workers, thereby putting more taxpayers into the system and less on welfare.

Let's look at what is happening instead, Barack Obama wants to raise taxes on the so-called rich, which includes 24 percent of small businesses, 2.1 million of them, which employ 93 percent of all workers that work in small businesses. Added to that, more of the taxes written into Obamacare are about to go into effect.

Businesses owners across the country have confirmed that they are planning to hire less in 2013, fire more people and others have cut worker's hours to under 30 hours a week to avoid the additional costs of having to provide healthcare for full time workers, which under the Obamacare law, is now workers that work more than 30 hours.

Wisconsin and Iowa business owners have cited taxes, Obamacare, and regulations, as the reasons for the decrease in planned hirings and the increase in planned firings. Gallup has confirmed that it is a nationwide trend.

How many of those planned layoffs will result in workers no longer earning a paycheck and instead being forced to apply for welfare benefits?

One would think if unemployment went down, more people would be working and less would need welfare, right?

Wrong. The exact opposite is happening. Unemployment is going down but foodstamp enrollment is surging.

The recent unemployment report by the labor department shows why what should be happening is not. Unemployment dropped to 7.7 percent, not because more people are working, but because 350,000 have completely dropped out of the workforce.

The result? The topline unemployment numbers decreases, yet welfare usage increases.

The real kicker here is that Obama knows what his policies have done and what his proposed policies will do, as evidenced by his budget proposal which would increase welfare spending by 30 percent over the next four years.

Who does Obama want to pay that extra 30 percent? Businesses owners and the so-called rich and if they are paying that money to the government, it is that much less they have to spend on their businesses, invest and hire more workers. It is a viscous circle.

The American economy, that pie, is getting smaller yet there are more people lining up to get a slice.

What happens when the pie is gone?

Answer: You have Obama's economy, where it pays better to not work and go on welfare than it does to work to support yourself and your family.

WHY NOT GIVE US OUR BACON, OSLIMA - WE VOTED FOR YOU!

http://conservativevideos.com/2012/12/detroit-councilwoman-to-obama-we-voted-for-you-now-give-us-some-of-that-govt-bacon/



And overwhelmingly, too!  I mean...over 100 per cent in many districts...payback time!

Imagine what they'll do if he doesn't deliver.

Free pizza
Obamaphoooonnnnessss
Manis and pedis

JOBLESS NUMBERS SURGE BY 78,000 PER WEEK AFTER OBAMA'S ELECTION - HIGHEST NUMBER IN OVER A YEAR

http://frontporchpolitics.com/2012/11/jobless-numbers-surge-by-78000-week-after-election-highest-number-in-over-a-year/

CATCHY LITTLE VIDEO, AMERICA - YOU OUGHT TO WATCH IT....HERE COMES THE BOHICA COURTESY OF OBAMA

https://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=wq_lhlIn1e0

VERY INTERESTING READING HERE AT RESPONSE BEACON

http://sm2.responsebeacon.com/track?t=v&enid=ZWFzPTImbWlkPTE2MTkwMSZtc2dpZD0xNDAyMTMmZGlkPTEzNjAzJmVkaWQ9MTM2MDMmc249MzM1NjUwNTImZWlkPWlua3NsaW5nZXJAYmVsbHNvdXRoLm5ldCZlZWlkPWlua3NsaW5nZXJAYmVsbHNvdXRoLm5ldCZ1aWQ9Ml8xNjkyMjMmcmlkPTE2OTIyMyZlcmlkPTE2OTIyMyZmbD0mbXZpZD0mdGdpZD0mZXh0cmE9&&&2025&eu=3001&&&http://MinuteMenNews.com/viewbrowser/

WE SPEND HOW MUCH ON WELFARE?

http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/lt1800/we-spend-how-much-on-welfare

OBAMACARE EXEMPTS MILLIONS OF PRISONERS, ILLEGALS, AND WELFARE RECIPIENTS

http://www.prisonplanet.com/obamacare-exempts-millions-prisoners-illegals-welfare-recipients.html

LET'S SAY YOU'RE AN OBAMABOT. MAYBE YOU'RE ON ENTITLEMENTS. MAYBE YOUR KID DROPPED OUT OF SCHOOL, WEARS PANTS DOWN ON HIS THIGHS, AND IS THINKING OF JOINING A GANG - BUT YOU ARE FIRM IN YOUR BELIEVE THAT OBAMA IS THE ANSWER (TO WHAT?) . YOU NEED TO WATCH THIS.

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/can-an-8th-grader-be-smarter-than-an-msnbc-hack/

A BILLBOAR WARNING THAT VOTER FRAUD IS A FELONY IS DEEMED INTIMIDATING, DISCRIMINATING, AND MUST BE REMOVED

OHIO - ARE YOU THIS CONFUSED THAT YOU CAN'T SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING?

THIS IS THE RACE CARD.  DEMONS (OR DEMONRATS) COME IN ALL COLORS.  THEY SOMETIMES HAVE SCALES.  OR FUR.  OR ARMANI SUITS WHICH AREN'T KNOCKOFFS, WHILE YOU WEAR IMITATION DESIGNER HOODIES.  COME ON!  WHERE ARE YOUR DREAMS?  HAVE YOU GIVEN THEM UP TO GET A FLOGGIN' OBAMAPHONE?  YOU ARE SELLING YOUR SOULS AND BEING USED.  DO YOU THINK OBAMACARE WILL BE FIRST CLASS HEALTH CARE? 

WHEN WE RUN OUT OF MONEY, AND MONEY HAS NO VALUE, AND YOUR EDT CARDS BUY LESS, AND YOUR HOUSING CAN'T BE FUNDED ANYMORE UNDER OBAMA YOUR SAVIOR, YOU'RE GOING TO BE HUDDLED AROUND A FIRE MADE FROM YOUR POOR QUALITY FURNITURE IN THE YARD WHEN IT'S COLD.

WE CAN'T AFFORD THIS AS A NATION.  THINK BEFORE YOU DECIDE TO CAST THAT VOTE.  YOU WILL HAVE NO FUTURE WITH OBAMA. 



http://patriotaction.net/forum/topic/show?id=2600775:Topic:5969700&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

The politics of racial pressure being applied...

"Clear Channel Outdoor will remove 30 billboards across the city that drew complaints of racism and intimidation with their message of "Voter fraud is a felony," the company said Saturday night. The company has said it has a policy against putting anonymous political messages on its billboard and that it erred in agreeing to that contract."

There goes another bit of free speech.....

~ J
H/T TO OUR "MERLIN"

A Billboard Warning that Voter Fraud is a Felony is deemed intimidating, discriminating, and must be removed!

• Posted by Darla Dawald, National Director on October 22, 2012 at 1:13am in Patriot Action Alerts

Earlier this month it was Reported by the Plain Dealer in Cleveland Ohio:

An election-related billboard in Cleveland's Ward 5 has caused a stir, prompting some complaints that it discriminates against minority groups and felons.

The advertisement, posted at the intersection of Community College Avenue and East 35th Street, warns that "voting fraud is a felony" in bold lettering. It also states that the penalty is punishable by up to three and a half years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

The ad also shows a gavel and sound block and lists that it was paid for by a private family foundation. The billboard is operated by Clear Channel Outdoor.

Several politicians said the ad's placement, which is near Tri-C and directly across the street from the Arbor Park 600-family development and other public housing, intimidates minority voters, students and felons who may not know their rights.

Cleveland City Councilwoman Phyllis Cleveland, who publicly complained about the billboard on Tuesday, posted a picture of the advertisement to her Twitter account. She said a resident complained to her about the sign. Cleveland wants it out of her ward.

"Some people in my ward have had issues with the criminal justice system and could feel like they're not able to vote," Cleveland said. "This could be confusing to them."

According to state law, a felon can register to vote after they have served their sentence in prison.

State Sen. Nina Turner, who drove by the billboard on Thursday, likened the advertisement to intimidation tactics used to keep blacks from voting in the times of Jim Crow. Turner said voter fraud is not a problem in the state.

"It does not exist," she said. "For them to target people in the black community is immoral."

Yesterday a follow up article on the story reported:

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Clear Channel Outdoor will remove 30 billboards across the city that drew complaints of racism and intimidation with their message of "Voter fraud is a felony," the company said Saturday night

The company has said it has a policy against putting anonymous political messages on its billboard and that it erred in agreeing to that contract.

On Saturday, Clear Channel still declined to reveal the name of its client, but said it wanted to correct the error.

"We reviewed the situation, and in light of the fact that these billboards violate our policy of not accepting anonymous political ads, we asked the client how they would prefer to work with us to bring the boards into conformance with our policy," Cullinan said in an email to The Plain Dealer. "The client thought the best solution was to take the boards down, so we are in the process of removing them."

The new billboards designed to counter the ones that will be removed will be up and visible on Monday. Pat Galbincea, The Plain Dealer

Opponents had already negotiated with Clear Channel to have the company donate use of 10 billboards that will be visible Monday and carry the message

"Voting Is a Right. Not a Crime!" Cleveland City Council will pay for five more to carry the same message.

The Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law has also paid for about 36 billboards that went up Thursday in Cleveland and Milwaukee in predominantly Latino and black neighborhoods that read, "Stand up and have your say -- Vote. When we vote, we are all equal."

Additional billboards with the same message will be posted next week in Columbus and Cincinnati, the group said.

Cleveland said the decision to remove the billboards is "a great example of free speech in action."  The original billboards were free speech she said, and so was the community's response.

It appears intimidation from the City Council is acceptable. Voter fraud is a felony and signs such as these should be placed around the country, not just in the Cleveland area. It's apparent that Clear Channel Outdoor succumbed to the intimidation and pressured the foundation to remove their signs.

Is voter fraud an issue? USA Today Reports: 

Underestimating our voter fraud vulnerability.

Earlier this year, James O'Keefe released a video of a 22-year-old undercover reporter who obtained Attorney General Eric Holder's ballot in Washington, D.C., and could easily have voted if he had chosen to.

Easy to commit fraud

Chaotic voter registration rolls make it too easy to commit voter fraud. A February study by the non-partisan Pew Center on the States found one in eight voter registrations were inaccurate, out-of-date or duplicates. Nearly 2.8 million people were registered in two or more states, and perhaps 1.8 million registered voters are dead.

Critics of voter ID laws also fail to note they are designed not just to stop voter impersonation but also multiple voting, non-citizen voting, people voting in the wrong precinct, out-of-state voting and voting in the names of fictitious people.

Examples of fraud are plentiful. Three non-citizens were arrested in Iowa last month for voting illegally in the 2010 general election and 2011 city election. A Democratic nominee for Congress resigned in Maryland last month after allegations that she had voted in two states at the same time. A 2004 New York Daily News study found that 46,000 people were registered to vote in both New York City and Florida, and that 400 to 1,000 had voted in both states in the same election. Florida decided the 2000 presidential election by 537 votes.

African-American support

Former congressman Artur Davis says he stopped opposing photo ID laws because of too many instances of voter fraud in his Alabama district, some of which have been prosecuted. "The most aggressive voter suppression in the African-American community ... is the wholesale manufacture of ballots," he says.

A 2012 Rasmussen poll found that 64% of Americans think voter fraud is "very" or "somewhat" serious. Blacks (64%) and those earning under $20,000 a year (71%) agreed.

Voter fraud is a huge issue and needs to be addressed. The current administration including Attorney General, Eric Holder have fought every state that has passed laws cracking down on Voter Fraud by instituting Voter Photo ID.

The Supreme Court has backed that concern. In 2008, it found states have the right to pass photo ID laws; the majority included liberal Justice John Paul Stevens. In a unanimous 2006 decision reinstating Arizona's voter ID law, the court stated: "Voter fraud drives honest citizens out of the democratic process. ... Voters who fear their legitimate votes will be outweighed by fraudulent ones will feel disenfranchised."

We can make it easy to vote and hard to cheat. We should keep trying.

The New York Times:

Supreme Court will decide on Arizona voter ID law

The Supreme Court will weigh in on an anti-fraud provision that was adopted by the state in 2004 but struck down by a federal court.

• 

          The Supreme Court will weigh in on the

          controversy over voter fraud when…

          (Saul Loeb, AFP/Getty Images )

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will weigh in on the controversy over voter fraud and decide early next year whether Arizona can require residents to show proof of their citizenship before they register to vote.

The justices agreed to hear Arizona's appeal of an anti-fraud provision that was adopted as a ballot initiative in 2004, but was struck down by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Unfortunately, they won't hear the case until next year and that won't be an answer for this election.... But we must keep trying.

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IGNORING LAWS THAT PROHIBIT VISAS FOR LIKELY WELFARE RECIPIENTS! IMAGINE HOW THAT'S GOING TO IMPACT THE TAXPAYER AND THE EXISTING RECIPIENTS!

http://conservativebyte.com/2012/10/senator-sessions-administration-ignoring-laws-that-prohibit-visas-for-likely-welfare-recipients/

When their benefits dry up because we can't pay for them, what are our own teat-suckers going to do?

2,000 DEAD PEOPLE GOT FOOD STAMPS!

http://visiontoamerica.com/12576/2000-dead-people-got-food-stamps/

WHY ON EARTH WOULD OBAMA SUPPORTERS WANT TO MURDER ROMNEY OVER FOOD STAMPS?

http://godfatherpolitics.com/7571/obama-supporters-want-to-murder-romney-over-food-stamps/

These are very sick people, and the DHS and the FBI should be investigating them immediately.  They are a threat - they have threatened MURDER. 

WTF is wrong with these morons?

I just wonder how many people are cheating you and I, taxpayers, by being on disability, on food stamps, child care, etc.  I know at least two.

OBAMAPHONES PROFITING OBAMA DONORS

http://freebeacon.com/obamaphones-profiting-obamadonors/

A RIDDLE? I DON'T KNOW, BUT WHY DID THE LADY BUY ONE GRAPE WITH FOOD STAMPS?

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/10/05/why-woman-bought-one-grape-with-food-stamps/

FIRST THEY DID IT TO RATS: CREATING THE WELFARE CLASS

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/08/26/first-they-did-it-to-rats-creating-the-welfare-class/