HERE IT COMES AGAIN! OBAMA'S EPA SCANDAL BEGINS TO SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/05/obamas-epa-scandal-begins-to-see-the-light-of-day/

EPA EMAIL SCANDAL WORSE THAN ORIGINALLY THOUGHT

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/27/EPA-email-Scandal-worse-than-originally-thought

OH, FOR GOD'S SAKE! THE IDIOTS AT THE EPA ARE GOING TO USE THE CLEAN WATER ACT TO PROTECT US FROM WATER

http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/feds-clean-water-act-protects-u-s-from-water/

TIME FOR THE HOUSE TO SAVE US FROM THE EPA - DEFUND IT!  NOW!

PUT ON YOUR BIG PANTIES (YEAH, YOU GUYS, TOO - YOU KNOW, THE ONES WITH THE LACE TRIM YOU'RE AFRAID TO FLY ON A CLOTHESLINE) AND START SAVING US FROM NINCOMPOOPS, OUTLAWS AND RENEGADES. START HERE.  TOMORROW DO IN THE DHS AND THE NEXT DAY, THE TSA.

 

 

TO COAL MINING FAMILIES IN PA, WV,OH,VA TAKE NOTICE: EPA PLANNING SURPRISE IN MAJOR POST-ELECTION ANTI-COAL REGULATION SO TOMORROW YOU NEED TO CONSIDER VOTING FOR MITT ROMNEY. HE LOVES COAL!

http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/to-the-coal-mining-families-of-pennsylvania-west-virginia-ohio-and-virginia-take-notice-november-surprise-epa-planning-major-post-election-anti-coal-regulation/

Just like Obama's plan to eradicate 123,000 Lockheed-Martin and contract jobs in the defense industry after the election (covered yesterday, scroll down), he's going to make you bend over and take it, too.

EPA REGULATIONS WREAK HAVOC ON OHIO COAL/ELECTRIC COMPANIES - AND YOU ARE CONSIDERING VOTING FOR OBAMA?

http://www.redstate.com/jasonahart/2012/11/01/epa-regulations-wreak-havoc-on-ohio-coal-electric-companies/

IF YOUR POWER PLANTS WERE COAL FED, YOU'D HAVE HEAT TONIGHT.  IF YOU'RE A COAL MINER OR DEPEND ON COAL FOR ELECTRICITY, YOU'D BETTER HOPE OBAMA DOESN'T WIN.

OBAMA AND THE EPA WANTS TO SHUT THE MINES.

Maybe he should stand on the Capitol done and huff and puff - part that water, and heat your homes with his hot air.

SEND HIM PACKING - 

MACT - THE END OF AFFORDABLE COAT - THANK YOU YOU POS PRESIDENT!

http://www.redstate.com/2012/10/31/mact-the-end-of-affordable-coal/

NEWSMAX - GREAT NEWS SITE - TAKE A LOOK AT YOUR BURDEN UNDER EPA, POSTPONED BY THE FRAUD-IN-CHIEF UNTIL AFTER ELECTION

http://news.newsmax.com/?ZKO6aWGZEq2Cy8C0zS66whg-DXlkxfRAZ

NEWS FROM NEWSMAX: CHECK OUT NO. 1, ON THE EPA

http://news.newsmax.com/?ZKO6aWGZEq2Cy8C0zS66whg-DXlkxfRAZ

O is postponing any controversial tax burdens on our already stooped shoulders until AFTER the election.

Send him back to Chicago.

UNDERSTANDING AGENDA 21 - THE MORE YOU KNOW THE MORE POWER YOU HAVE

http://commandmentsandconstitution.wordpress.com/2012/10/12/agenda-21/

YOUR PUBLIC SCHOOL ENCOURAGING "HITLER YOUTH" STYLE STUDENT ENERGY PATROLS

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/epa-celebrates-children-health-month-encourages-recruiting-students-energy-patrols

FARMERS! HAVE YOU HEARD (GASP!) THE EPA FAILS TO REGULATE LIVESTOCK POLLUTION - SEZ A REPORT

http://cowboybyte.com/10886/epa-fails-to-regulate-livestock-pollution-report-says/

HEARTLAND INSTITUTE'S PETITION TO RESTORE RULE OF LAW TO EPA. HERE'S HOW TO SIGN...

The HEARTLAND INSTITUTE is circulating a citizens’ petition to restore the Rule of Law to EPA .

Details and how to sign --

Thousands Sign Heartland Institute Petition
to Rein in the EPA

More than 5,000 people have signed a petition crafted by The Heartland Institute demanding that Congress “rein in the Environmental Protection Agency” through deep cuts in the size, power, and cost of the agency.

According to the Citizen’s Petition to Rein in the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA has “lost its war to scare America into giving [it] legislation that would allow [it] to seize control of virtually all energy production and use, [and is] perverting the Clean Air law to give [itself] unprecedented powers to regulate American society.”

Heartland says it will publicly present the petitions to Congress once the drive hits 10,000 signatures.

Joseph Bast, president of The Heartland Institute, says that in the name of fighting global warming, EPA has become a “rogue agency,” spending $9 billion in 2012 alone to shackle individuals and businesses with expensive and wasteful compliance orders and mandates without the consent of Congress. According to Bast:

“The toll EPA is now taking on our country is staggering, putting hundreds of thousands of Americans out of work at a time when millions of people are out of work and our reliance on foreign sources of energy threatens to compromise the nation’s security. The solution is to rein in EPA through deep cuts in the size, power, and cost of the agency. This can be done by Congress, through its control over the government’s purse, or by a president willing to put sound science and a strong economy ahead of the demands of environmental extremists.”

Read the petition and background essay by The Heartland Institute here. For more comments or to book a Heartland guest on your program, please contact Tammy Nash at tnash@heartland.org and 312/377-4000. After regular business hours, contact Jim Lakely at jlakely@heartland.org and 312/731-9364.

The Heartland Institute is a 28-year-old national nonprofit organization headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. Its mission is to discover, develop, and promote free-market solutions to social and economic problems. For more information, visit our Web site or call 312/377-4000.

James V. DeLong

http://www.specialintereststate.org/

    jvdelong@comcast.net

    SpecialInterestState@gmail.com

Author:  Ending 'Big SIS' (The Special Interest State) and Renewing the American Republic

THE REAL FACE OF ECO-TERRORISM

[http://oversight.house.gov/]

Mandate Madness: When Sue and Settle Just Isn’t Enough

June 28, 2012

The new face of eco-terrorism is Barack Obama.

9:00am in 2203 Rayburn House Office Building

The Oversight and Government Reform Committee has focused a significant amount of attention this Congress on the red tape that is strangling economic growth and holding us back from prosperity.

At today’s hearing, we will continue this inquiry by examining the highly questionable practice perfected by the Environmental Protection Agency – known as “Sue and Settle,” which has emboldened the Administration to pursue an aggressive green agenda while escaping political accountability for the cost and burdens these regulations impose on job creators.

The process is rather simple: environmental groups will sue the EPA, demanding the agency issue a regulation on an accelerated timeframe.  Rather than fighting the lawsuit, EPA quickly agrees to the special interest demands. 

These settlement agreements are reached after closed-door negotiations between EPA and environmental groups where other interested parties are excluded. 

Once the settlement is approved by a federal court in a consent decree, the EPA is legally bound to engage in the rulemaking. 

It is important to note that when a court approves a consent decree, it does not consider the merits – the court is merely accepting and ratifying what the parties agreed to.

In the past 3 years, the Administration has concluded approximately 60 settlements with special interest – 29 of these agreements bound EPA to make major policy changes.  The plaintiffs in these cases are often the very same reoccurring players – the Sierra Club, NRDC, Defenders of Wildlife, Wild Earth Guardians, and Center for Biological Diversity.  

These special interest groups not only hold a special seat at the table with Obama’s EPA – EPA effectively pays them to sue the agency!  In 2011 alone, taxpayers reimbursed these groups millions to participate in cozy sue and settle arrangements. 

In addition to examining this outrageous practice, we will hear today about two particularly egregious cases where EPA defied all norms of transparency, sidelined interested parties, and is now in the process of imposing extraordinarily burdensome regulations. 

These two case studies are EPA’s Regional Haze Regulations and its’ Greenhouse Gas Standards for Power Plants.

In the case of Regional Haze – Congress was crystal clear that this purely aesthetic visibility program is to be administered by the states and not by EPA.  Through Sue and Settle, EPA is attempting to federalize the program; and imposing costs well beyond what the state had determined was necessary or justified.  Ultimately, EPA’s proposal will costs billions of dollars for visibility improvements that are undetectable to the human eye.   

In the second case study – New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Electric Utilities, EPA concluded settlement negotiations on December 23, 2010, and agreed to promulgate NSPS for greenhouse gases for BOTH new and existing electric generating units under Sections 111(a) and 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. 

At the time the settlement was reached, EPA was not in violation of any mandatory duty and as such, the litigants didn’t have a legal leg to stand on.  And yet the agency settled, committing the agency to make major policy changes, without interested parties at the table, and rewarding litigants with a cash prize they never were entitled to.

These two case studies are but two examples of the dozens of policy changes EPA has committed to in sweetheart sue and settle arrangements with special interests.  Time and again, when EPA is criticized for the excessive burden imposed by their agency – whether it be Utility MACT, Boiler MACT, Florida Water Quality Standards, Regional Haze, NAAQS or NSPS – EPA’s response is suspiciously similar – The agency has no discretion to extend the timeline to hear additional points of view – it is under court order to finalize the regulations by a date certain.

But let us be clear – What EPA claims the law requires them to do is nothing more than what EPA has agreed to do in a collusive arrangement with special interest allies.  These arrangements are fundamentally unfair, lack transparency, are designed to circumvent other regulatory checks Congress has put in place.  Environmental regulations only work when they are made in an open process that involves all stakeholders.  Sue-and-settle rulemaking is an affront to that process.

Finally, I want to note that I very much wanted a representative from the EPA to be here today to respond to the concerns that our panelists will be raising.  However, despite adequate notice, EPA has refused to provide a witness for today’s proceedings.  I am hopeful that we can find a date in the near future when they can make an appropriate witness available to respond and add detail.

Witnesses

 

Witnesses

The Honorable E. Scott Pruitt (testimony)

Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma

---

Mr. Roger Martella (testimony)

Partner

Sidley Austin LLP

---

Mr. William Kovacs (testimony)

Senior Vice President

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

---

Mr. William Yeatman (testimony)

Assistant Director of the Center for Energy and Environment

Competitive Enterprise Institute

 The Honorable E. Scott Pruitt (testimony)

Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nUBainl97M&feature=player_embedded


 http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/48749?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=c1fd180b8a-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email

NEXT FROM THE EPA - 4 GALLON MINIMUM GAS PURCHASES

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/08/09/next-from-the-epa-four-gallon-minimum-gas-purchases/

And they know ethanol destroys the internal combustion engine.  And they also know we need food for livestock and the return to REAL gasoline in our vehicles, but OBAMA AND THE OUT OF CONTROL EPA AND THE REST OF THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT ALLOW IT!

TALK ABOUT TYRANNY?

OUTRAGEOUS EPA FINES OIL REFINERS FOR FAILING TO USE NONEXISTENT BIOFUEL

http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/outrageous-epa-fines-oil-refiners-for-failing-to-use-nonexistent-biofuel/

YES!  You read that right. 

They're messing with our minds and our lives.  The EPA has to go.  Throw them out with trash...(fill in the blanks).

EPA DEFINES THE DITCH AS NAVIGABLE WATERWAY - TIME TO FIGHT BACK

http://visiontoamerica.org/10377/epa-defines-ditch-as-navigable-waterway-in-attempt-to-grab-power-over-land-owners/

We still have a Constitution and a Declaration of Independence.  The remedies, and the guarantees of our rights especially here regarding private property is clear.

EPA is going to start a crisis - before the election and it will be backed up by DHS.  You wait. 

BLOCK EPA & CORPS WETLANDS JURISDICTION OVER YOUR WATER AND LAND

Land Rights Network
American Land Rights Association
PO Box 400 – Battle Ground , WA 98604
Phone: 360-687-3087 – Fax: 360-687-2973
E-mail: alra@pacifier.com
Web Address: http://www.landrights.org
Legislative Office: 507 Seward Square SE – Washington , DC 20003
* *
Block EPA & Corps Wetlands Jurisdiction Over Your Water & Land

*Do You Want The EPA &Corps In Your Backyard?*

Do you want the EPA & Corps jurisdiction over all forest roads?

If Not, Here’s Why You Need The
*“Preserve The Waters Of The US Act” (S-2245)*

Below are action items to protect your water and your land as well as
roads on Federal land. But first, read this:
* *
-----The EPA wants to lift the ban that prevents Washington , DC
bureaucrats from regulating non-navigable waters.

-----Lifting the navigable ban, passed by Congress to protect
families, small businesses and farmers from federal bureaucrats
seizing their water or their land, would devastate economic and
recreational activity as well as small communities across the U.S.

------You need to insist that Congress not remove the requirement set
by Congress in the original Clean Water Act that said the EPA and
Corps *can only regulate “navigable waters”*. The EPA and Corps
want to eliminate the word “navigable” and give the EPA and Corps
jurisdiction over “all waters of the United States and all
activities affecting all waters of the United States .”

-----If the ban is lifted, when it rains, your backyard or farm
becomes a minefield of Washington red tape and taxes.

-----If you’re a farmer, when it rains, your backyard becomes a
bonanza for Washington , DC bureaucrats to go on your property to
force you from doing activities like building a swimming pool,
installing a bird bath, running rainwater away from your home,
irrigating your fields, installing stock watering ponds and many
more.

-----If you’re a suburban homeowner, when it rains, the water in
your backyard allows Washington , DC bureaucrats on your property to
block you from doing basic things without a permit that can cost
thousands of dollars and long delays causing great damage.

-----Congress blocked attempts by former Congressman James Oberstar
(D-MN) and former Senator Russ Feingold (R-MN) from passing the Clean
Water Restoration Act, which would have lifted the “navigable”
ban. As with the EPA and Corp, Oberstar and Feingold tried to remove
the word “navigable” from the Clean Water Act.

-----Despite Congress not changing the law, the Obama EPA and Army
Corps of Engineers are attempting to remove this key protection for
families, small business and farmers by issuing an internal guidance
document to agency bureaucrats telling them it is now OK to regulate
non-navigable waters on people’s property throughout the United
States. The Obama folks seem to care less
about how they are ignoring two Supreme Court decisions.

-----The Preserve The Waters of the US Act (S-2245) would stop
Washington overreach and block any further attempt to issue
“guidance” to agency bureaucrats that says it is OK to regulate
non-navigable water in people’s backyards and farms.

*Preserve the waters of the u.s. Act (S-2245)*

*Purpose:* To preserve existing rights and responsibilities with
respect to waters of the U.S.
* *
*Background:* In May 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) issued draft guidance on
“Identifying Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act.”

This guidance document, which was sent in final form to OMB on
February 21, 2012, significantly changes and expands what features
are considered protected under the Clean Water Act and makes
substantial additions, such as a first time inclusion of ditches and
other water features that may flow, if at all, only after a heavy
rainfall.

EPA and the Corps received over 230,000 comments from the public on
their guidance, discussing the potential consequences of the draft
guidance to governments, businesses, and landowners. They have not
responded to the comments.

EPA and the Corps estimate that between 2 – 17% percent of
non-jurisdictional determinations under current practice would be
jurisdictional using the expanded tests of the new guidance.[1]
<#_ftn1>
This guidance has clear regulatory consequences and goes far beyond
being simply advisory guidelines.

*The legislation (S-2245) prevents EPA and the Corps from using this
/guidance/ to change legal responsibilities under the Clean Water
Act.*

*-----Regulation through Guidance:* By issuing a guidance document as
opposed to going through the rulemaking process, EPA and the Corps are
bypassing the necessary public outreach required under the
Administrative Procedures Act and failing to fully consider the
legal, economic, and unforeseen consequences of their actions.
* *
*-----Applies to all Clean Water Act (CWA) Programs:* In addition to
the Corps §404 dredge and fill permits, the guidance applies to all
CWA programs including §303 water quality standards, §401 state
water quality certifications, §311 Oil Pollution Act (including
SPCC), and §402 program (including NPDES permits, pesticide general
permit, and storm water).

*-----Increasing Permits: *EPA and the Corps affirm that this
guidance will result in an increase in jurisdictional determinations
that will result in an increased need for permits. In addition to
more Corps §404 permits, State-permitting authorities will be faced
with more NPDES permits and more entities will be subject to CWA
requirements.

*-----Economic and Job Impacts:* Additional regulatory costs
associated with changes in jurisdiction and increases in permits will
erect bureaucratic barriers to economic growth, negatively impacting
farms, small businesses, commercial development, road construction
and energy production, to name a few.

*-----Impact on State on Local Governments:* Changes to the “waters
of the U.S. ” definition may have far-reaching effects and unintended
consequences on a number of state and local programs. The guidance
creates significant unfunded mandates and preempts state and local
authority.

*-----Conflicts with Supreme Court Rulings:* The guidance uses an
overly broad interpretation of the /Rapanos /decision. The effect is
virtually all wet areas that connect in any way to navigable waters
are jurisdictional. Both the plurality opinion and Kennedy rejected
this assertion in /Rapanos/.
* *
*-----Private Property Rights:* Expanding federal control over
intrastate waters will substantially interfere with the ability of
individual landowners to use their property.
* *
*-----Action Items:*
* *
*-----1. It’s critical to get some of the Senators below as
co-sponsors of the Preserve The Waters Of The US Act (S 2245). *You
need to call, fax and e-mail your Senator (s) listed below to urge
them to cosponsor the Preserve The Waters Of The US Act.

-----2. For more information about S 2245 type in to Google the
following search term: Preserve The Waters Of The US Act.

-----3. Please forward this message to at least 10 other people. Your
whole list if possible.

The best thing to do is write a letter with your letterhead and
either fax it or e-mail it to your Senator (s). They don’t like
attachments so call ahead to ask for the staff person who handles the
Clean Water Act and Wetlands issues. Ask for his personal e-mail and
send him your letter.
* *
We’ve listed the fax of each Senator along with one or more staff
with their e-mail address. You may phone any Senator at (202)
224-3121. If the e-mail or fax does not go through, call the Senator
at the number above to ask for the correct information. Be sure to
pass any corrections along to American Land Rights.

Be sure to note that there is an underscore between the first and
last name of each staff person listed below. For example:
paul_wilkins@.
* *
Kelly Ayotte (D-NH) -- F-(202) 224-2952 E-mail:
adam_hechavarria@ayotte.senate.gov
adam_hechavarria@ayotte.senate.gov>

Max Baucus (D-MT) – F-(202) 224-9412 E-mail:
paul_wilkins@baucus.senate.gov
paul_wilkins@baucus.senate.gov>

Scott Brown (R-MA) -- F-(202) 229-2646 E-mail:
nat_hoopes@scottbrown.senate.gov
nat_hoopes@scottbrown.senate.gov>

Susan Collins (R-ME) -- F-(202) 224-2693 E-mail:
rob_epplin@collins.senate.gov rob_epplin@collins.senate.gov>

Kent Conrad (D-ND) –F-(202) 224-7776 E-mail:
tom_mahr@conrad.senate.gov tom_mahr@conrad.senate.gov>

Al Franken (D-MN) –F-(202) 224-0044 E-mail:
Benjamin_olinsky@franken.senate.gov
Benjamin_olinsky@franken.senate.gov>

Lindsey Graham R-SC) – F-(202) 224-3808 E-mail:
sergia_sarkany@lgraham.senate.gov
sergia_sarkany@lgraham.senate.gov>

Kay Hagan (D-NC) – F-(202) 228-2563 E-mail:
mike_harney@hagan.senate.gov mike_harney@hagan.senate.gov>

Tim Johnson (D-SD) –F-(202) 228-5765 E-mail:
todd_stubbendieck@johnson.senate.gov
todd_stubbendieck@johnson.senate.gov>

Mark Kirk (D-IL) – F-(202) 228-4611 E-mail:
Patrick_magnuson@kirk.senate.gov
Patrick_magnuson@kirk.senate.gov>

Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) –F-(202) 228-2186 E-mail:
travis_talvitie@klobuchar.senate.gov
travis_talvitie@klobuchar.senate.gov>

Mary Landrieu (D-LA) – F-(202) 224-9735 E-mail:
Elizabeth_craddock@landrieu.senate.gov
Elizabeth_craddock@landrieu.senate.gov>

Joe Manchin (D-WV) –F-(202) 228-0002 E-mail:
Patrick_hayes@manchiin.senate.gov
Patrick_hayes@manchiin.senate.gov>

Claire McCaskill (D-MO) – F-(202) 228-6326 E-mail:
Stephen_hedger@mccaskill.senate.gov
Stephen_hedger@mccaskill.senate.gov>

Ben Nelson (D-NE) – F-(202) 228-0012 E-mail:
kate_gotsdiner@bennelson.senate.gov
kate_gotsdiner@bennelson.senate.gov>

Rob Portman (R-OH) – F-(202) 224-9558 E-mail:
Steve_kittredge@portman.senate.gov
Steve_kittredge@portman.senate.gov>

Mark Pryor (D-AR) – F-(202) 228-0908 E-mail:
Kristin_sharp@pryor.senate.gov
Kristin_sharp@pryor.senate.gov>

Olympia Snowe (R-ME) – F-(202) 224-1946 E-mail:
don_green@snowe.senate.gov don_green@snowe.senate.gov>

Jon Tester (D-MT) – F-(202) 224-8594 E-mail:
james_wise@tester.senate.gov james_wise@tester.senate.gov>

Mark Warner (D-VA) – F-(202) 224-6295 E-mail:
neeta_bidwai@warner.senate.gov
neeta_bidwai@warner.senate.gov>

Jim Webb (D-VA) – F-(202) (202) 228-6363 E-mail:
david_bonine@webb.senate.gov david_bonine@webb.senate.gov>

These Senators are already co-sponsors of
The Preserve The Waters Of The US Act (S 2245).

Sen Barrasso, John [R-WY] (sponsor)
Sen Alexander, Lamar
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Alexander++Lamar%29%29+01695%29%29>
[R-TN] - 5/10/2012

Sen Blunt, Roy
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Blunt++Roy%29%29+01464%29%29>
[R-MO] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Boozman, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Boozman++John%29%29+01687%29%29>
[R-AR] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Chambliss, Saxby
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Chambliss++Saxby%29%29+00188%29%29>
[R-GA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Coats, Daniel
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Coats++Daniel%29%29+00209%29%29>
[R-IN] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Coburn, Tom
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Coburn++Tom%29%29+00212%29%29>
[R-OK] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Cochran, Thad
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Cochran++Thad%29%29+00213%29%29>
[R-MS] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Corker, Bob
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Corker++Bob%29%29+01825%29%29>
[R-TN] - 3/29/2012

Sen Cornyn, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Cornyn++John%29%29+01692%29%29>
[R-TX] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Crapo, Mike
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Crapo++Mike%29%29+00250%29%29>
[R-ID] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen DeMint, Jim
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+DeMint++Jim%29%29+01605%29%29>
[R-SC] - 5/16/2012

Sen Enzi, Michael B.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Enzi++Michael+B.%29%29+01542%29%29>
[R-WY] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Grassley, Chuck
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Grassley++Chuck%29%29+00457%29%29>
[R-IA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Hatch, Orrin G.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Hatch++Orrin+G.%29%29+01351%29%29>
[R-UT] - 5/15/2012

Sen Heller, Dean
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Heller++Dean%29%29+01863%29%29>
[R-NV] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Hoeven, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Hoeven++John%29%29+02079%29%29>
[R-ND] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Hutchison++Kay+Bailey%29%29+01368%29%29>
[R-TX] - 3/29/2012

Sen Inhofe, James M.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Inhofe++James+M.%29%29+00583%29%29>
[R-OK] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Isakson, Johnny
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Isakson++Johnny%29%29+01608%29%29>
[R-GA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Johanns, Mike
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Johanns++Mike%29%29+01899%29%29>
[R-NE] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Johnson, Ron
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Johnson++Ron%29%29+02086%29%29>
[R-WI] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Kyl, Jon
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Kyl++Jon%29%29+00655%29%29>
[R-AZ] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Lee, Mike
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Lee++Mike%29%29+02080%29%29>
[R-UT] - 3/29/2012

Sen Lugar, Richard G.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Lugar++Richard+G%29%29+01387%29%29>
[R-IN] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen McCain, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+McCain++John%29%29+00754%29%29>
[R-AZ] - 5/15/2012

Sen McConnell, Mitch
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+McConnell++Mitch%29%29+01395%29%29>
[R-KY] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Moran, Jerry
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Moran++Jerry%29%29+01507%29%29>
[R-KS] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Murkowski, Lisa
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Murkowski++Lisa%29%29+01694%29%29>
[R-AK] - 5/10/2012

Sen Paul, Rand
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Paul++Rand%29%29+02082%29%29>
[R-KY] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Risch, James E.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Risch++James+E.%29%29+01896%29%29>
[R-ID] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Roberts, Pat
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Roberts++Pat%29%29+00968%29%29>
[R-KS] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Rubio, Marco
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Rubio++Marco%29%29+02084%29%29>
[R-FL] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Sessions, Jeff
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Sessions++Jeff%29%29+01548%29%29>
[R-AL] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Shelby, Richard C.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Shelby++Richard+C.%29%29+01049%29%29>
[R-AL] - 5/16/2012

Sen Thune, John
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Thune++John%29%29+01534%29%29>
[R-SD] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Toomey, Pat
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Toomey++Pat%29%29+02085%29%29>
[R-PA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Vitter, David
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Vitter++David%29%29+01609%29%29>
[R-LA] - 3/28/2012 *

Sen Wicker, Roger F.
<http://www.congress.gov/cgi-lis/bdquery/?&Db=d112&querybd=@FIELD%28FLD004+@4%28%28@1%28Sen+Wicker++Roger+F.%29%29+01226%29%29>
[R-MS] - 3/28/2012 *

Thank you for your help.
Chuck Cushman, American Land Rights
ccushman@pacifier.com ccushman@pacifier.com>

Look Chuck Cushman and American Land Rights up on Google by typing in
the following search terms: Chuck Cushman, Charles Cushman, Charles S.
Cushman, American Land Rights Association, National Inholders
Association and League of Private Property Voters.

*Social Networking Update: * The American Land Rights Association has
a Page on Facebook. Please be sure to hit the Like button. Also
Executive Director Chuck Cushman is on Facebook.com.

You can also find American Land Rights Association and Chuck Cushman
on LinkedIn.com. We are especially active on LinkedIn.com so send an
invitation to connect and sign up.

American Land Rights is on Twitter as AmLandrights.
Chuck Cushman is also on Twitter under ccushman98604

To unsubscribe please send an email with “Unsubscribe” in the
Subject Line to ALRA@pacifier.com.

Please forward this urgent message widely.

[1] <#_ftnref1>
“Potential Indirect Economic Impacts and Benefits Associated with
Guidance Clarifying the Scope of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction.”
April 27, 2011
http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/wetlands/upload/cwa_guidance_impacts_benefits.pdf



--
If you do not want to receive any more newsletters,
http://maillist.landrights.org/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=146018af23e8d2021abd10d093b93669

To update your preferences and to unsubscribe visit
http://maillist.landrights.org/lists/?p=preferences&uid=146018af23e8d2021abd10d093b93669
Forward a Message to Someone
http://maillist.landrights.org/lists/?p=forward&uid=146018af23e8d2021abd10d093b93669&mid=301

EPA ADMINISTRATOR: OBAMA COAL RULES PAINFUL EVERY STEP OF THE WAY

http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/04/region-1-epa-administrator-obama-coal-rules-painful-every-step-of-the-way/

EPA DEFENDS USE OF SPY PLANES OVER IOWA, NEBRASKA CATTLE RANCHES - HOW DARE WE ALLOW THIS!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/epa-defends-use-of-spy-planes-over-iowa-neb-cattle-ranches.html

EPA SPILLS BEANS AND TELLS TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA WHITEHOUSE'S ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/painful-every-step-of-the-way-top-epa-official-inadvertently-tells-the-truth-about-the-white-houses-environmental-agenda/