Search This Blog

Showing posts with label government regulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government regulation. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

OBAMA AND HIS 6,000 PLUS NEW REGULATIONS IN JUST 90 DAYS...

Thanks to RD from the AMOJ list on yahoo.

He doesn't think the fraud-in-chief isn't really that smart - but he's smart as a fox.  He hoodwinked most of you by lies, deceits, smoke and mirrors, by bribes...that said, have a look.

 

 

Obama’s Latest Attempt To Overwhelm The System

November 23, 2012 By Thomas Paine
Obama Feeds America SC Obamas Latest Attempt To Overwhelm The System
 
If you are a business owner, you are well aware that President Obama has imposed over 6,000 new regulations on businesses in just 90 days. This doesn’t even begin to address the massive amount of regulations imposed over the last 4 years. The bigger picture is that it’s all part of his plan to “OVERWHELM” the system.
 
Karl Marx said that capitalism will eventually fail and that communism is the solution and end game. He says you can wait for that to happen, or you can accelerate the process by overwhelming the system and destroying capitalism. There will be so much chaos that it is easy to take away rights and take control as the government savior.
 
Once that occurs, you implement communism. This process can only be understood by the “enlightened” government leaders (Obama and the like). The masses are too stupid and ignorant to understand how good communism will be for them, so they need to be forced down that path, by any and all means possible. Lie, deceive, create class and race warfare issues, and use catastrophes (and if there are none, make some up; the ends justify the means.) That is why every time Obama speaks about anything, you will notice that it is always very dramatic (and the world will end if we don’t do it right away.)
Examples include Obamacare and his “Jobs bill.”
 
If the progression is not fast enough, then Karl Marx says you need to kill people to help the greater good achieve “enlightenment”. That is why in Russia, they killed 60 million of their own people, for the greater good. Of course, the greater good is so the top 3% in government leadership can have all power and wealth and remove all means for the masses to ever be able to topple them, including taking all rights, removing all weapons, and eliminating religion.
 
To deflect those who say that Obama is not a Marxist.
 
His favorite college professors are Marxists, his favorite books were written by Marxists, his parents and grandparents were Marxists, their friends were Marxists, and his administration is full of Marxists. I know they don’t like that term; it is “progressives” now.
 
As dumb as he seems, I actually believe he knows what he is doing. The unfortunate part is that we don’t think it could ever happen here, and we don’t know enough about communism to realize what is happening.
 
Most of us don’t even know much about our own Constitution and the reasoning and brilliance behind its development.
 
Read the Federalist Papers and other writings from our Founders; they knew we would want to move towards socialism, and so they wrote the Constitution the best they could to prevent that.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

PAY ATTENTION, AMERICA: WE ARE ON THE ROAD TO STATE-OWNED COMMUNICATIONS

http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/pay-attention-america-are-we-on-the-road-to-state-owned-communications/

And CONGRESS SAYS NOTHING?!!!!!!!

1-866-220-0044 toll-free to your Congressmen and Senators!

And don't be too nice. Nice gets us nowhere. Nice got us here: At the edge of the precipice! They need to start feeling how we're feeling "out here", damn it!

In about 15 minutes, the FCC will come down on ham radio communications. Wait and see.

Monday, March 26, 2012

HOW ABOUT THE EXCESS IN GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS...

I came across an interesting job posting; it got me to thinking about excess in government... Link

One of the listed job requirements is:

Must be able to lift 75 lbs. on a continuous basis

Contrary to popular belief, there is no specified, defined, or absolute weight limit for a “one-man lift” in current Federal code or OSHA standards. Link


On the other hand, OSHA/NIOSH specifies a formula for lifting. From what I understand, as a practical matter, it is impossible to exceed 45 lbs. as the upper limit for a “one-man lift” without violating guidelines. At least, 45 lbs. is what is universally taught when taking approved HAZMAT or HAZWOMPER (OSHA 1910.120/40 Hour) certification classes

NIOSH has come up with a formula to calculate the recommended weight limit.

RWL=LC x HM x VM x DM x AM x FM X CM

LC is the load constant or the fixed weight to be lifted. HM is the horizontal multiplier or the distance the weight will be moved from left to right. VM is the vertical multiplier or the height the weight will be lifted. DM is the distance multiplier and is taken from a table provided by NIOSH. AM is asymmetric multiplier and is based on how close the load is to the center of the body. It is also taken from a table supplied by NIOSH. FM is the frequency multiplier and based on the number of times the lift is performed per minute and the length of time the lift takes and is also taken from a NIOSH table. CM is the coupling multiplier and is based on the type of grip the person doing the lifting can get on the package and is taken from a NIOSH table.

Isn’t this another case of silly government regulation with no fixed standards and no fixed penalty that needs to be stricken from the books? OSHA mandates teaching a fixed weight for “one-man lift” when there is no such standard, then publishes an inadequate and incomplete standard for which there is an unspecified penalty for violating. Several thought come to mind.

· The formula fails to address critical environmental and physical factors:

o Are the muscles warmed and limber when performing the lift?

o Is the floor level, dry, and solid with adequate friction to prevent slippage?

o Is protective/restrictive gear involved which impacts overall lifting performance? Coated, impermeable HAZMAT suits with gloves are inherently slippery and unreliable—even more on the inside after perspiration accumulation.

o I could add several other common-sense thoughts, but why bother? OK, I can’t resist inserting a basic inquiry pertaining to structural integrity and brittleness of bones, which changes with age and health—why not factor that into the equation as well?

· Some jobs will never qualify as “safe”. During my Navy time we were routinely required to participate in ammo reloads wherein we manually passed live ammunition between persons in a human conveyor belt. The bullets were quite heavy (>50 lbs.), which did not factor the equally heavy explosive charge or the shell casing. Making things worse, we were on a wet, moving deck. (Duh! Navy=ships at sea, the ship moves though the water, the water has waves…) Isn’t this hazardous in several senses of the term? I guess we need forego bullets and load sponges in those guns to satisfy OSHA weight limits. Maybe we could add environmentally safe, non-toxic watercolors to get the satisfaction of simulating a blast area and “seeing” what we could have destroyed if we used real ammo?

· Does this formula contain inherent sexual bias? There is no factor distinguishing male/female structural differences. Similarly, there are no distinguishing size differentials accounting for male and female genders. If we gender-adjust physical training norms to permit females to compete with males, why not adjust this formula to permit females to proportionately compete with males while performing less actual work?

· Finally: How many mothers are unknowingly violating workplace laws when, in the course of their daily interaction with children, they pick up and hug youngsters? Is this something we need to investigate as an indication of spousal abuse forced on the female by the dominant, absent husband who perpetuates the “Lord and Master” myth of home economics? When will we recognize that the home is a workplace, that stay-at-home mothers are underpaid, and grant these economic slaves benefits and protection commensurate with full employment?

When will the government learn that they need to stay out of things not authorized in the Constitution, to which they have no answers and no standards, and in which they have no business meddling?

H/To RL

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

THOSE SILLY GOVERNMENT REGS - AND THE EFFECT ON SMALL BUSINESS

This video is a specific example of how silly government requirements can stifle the growth of small business and take away one man's economic liberties.  Though it is a specific example, the problem is systematic and widespread. It's happening all around us and only the big business companies can afford to comply with bizarre and useless requirements, and often THEY are given exemptions.  I'd imagine, big companies must love this sort of thing. How better to stifle your competition than to let the government to do it for you?  Video:  http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/9118.html  Goodman Green - Brasscheck  P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and videos with friends and colleagues.   That's how we grow. Thanks. 

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

DOWN WITH THE EPA! REGULATIONS WILL RESULT IN 1.44 MILLION JOB LOSSES

http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2011/09/20/epa-regulations-will-result-in-1-44-million-job-losses/

WHAT IF WE TOTALLY IGNORE THEM?

WHAT IF WE STAND TOGETHER SHOULDER-TO-SHOULDER AT THE LOCAL LEVEL AND TELL THEM...YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED IN OUR COMMUNITY.

AND IF THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND OUR VOICES...WELL...WHAT'S THE NEXT STEP. YOU TELL ME!

WILL YOUR SHERIFF KEEP THEM OUT OF YOUR COMMUNITY? HE HAS THE RIGHT TO, YOU KNOW.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

SUFFOCATING GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS: TOO BIZARRE TO BELIEVE

http://www.investinganswers.com/a/suffocated-red-tape-12-ridiculous-regulations-too-bizarre-believe-1975?utm_source=NL-IA&utm_medium=EMAIL&U=1412582&utm_campaign=IA_InvestingAnswers_Investor_Advocate_2-16-

"WE", as in "We the people", need to fix things like this immediately. Raise a little hell, folks - this isn't just bizarre, but stupid and in some cases, unconstitutional. Puts government above the people AND the Constitution.

Friday, March 12, 2010

SALT IN NY RESTAURANTS - SEARCH THIS. THIS IS INCREDIB LE

http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1835618/proposed_ny_salt_ban_leaves_bad_taste_in_chefs_mouths/

Salt, and iodized salt is necessary to life.

But in NY, legislators don't want any added to restaurant food.

Just wait. When you get your national biometric ID card, you will do "their" bidding.
What you eat; what you buy; where you drive; how much you can drive and travel; they will tax you momumentally; disallow your using vitamins (see Canada). In other words, you will be under absolute and total government control.

Search Codex Alimentarius.

Everything related to health will be tracked, produced only pharmaceuticals, so that the big pharms will reap the benefit.

SWAT Teams, armed police looking for contraband (like aloe vera?), beer, liquor, sugar, desserts - you name it - you will pay with fines and arrests. Terrorism is terrifying the people - like the ones who sit in Washington, agencies in government and any law enforcement agency. You will be terrorized to be brought into submission so you will submit to one world government.

BE CAREFUL, PREPARE AND GET READY FOR YOUR COUNTRY WILL NEED YOU SOMEDAY.

I'm not kidding. Start searching.

Technocracy...Start doing some research on that new word - Look 50 years back into the Council of Foreign Relations....

Sunday, November 30, 2008

US food supply - Food for very serious thought.

http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?t=313057


This is an EXCELLENT blog about surviving a food shortage that is on its way to every home in America.



Bookmark and Share