When
WWII begins make sure you remember that you stood mute.
In
other words, absolutely everything we were told by our government -- by
President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, Ambassador Susan Rice. White House
Spokesman Jay Carney, and any number of staffers and surrogates -- was 100%
false.
There were no protests, no benign crowds
exploited by local militias, and nothing had anything to do with a video. Our
Ambassador, another diplomat, and two Navy SEALs were murdered in a
brutally efficient and coordinated terrorist attack.
Period.
End of story.
In other words, just days after the president
declared al-Qaeda all but obliterated at his convention in Charlotte, and
because no one took direct threats and pleas
for added security seriously, on the anniversary of September 11, four
Americans were assassinated in Libya by al-Qaeda associates. And for days and
days and days afterward, the Obama Administration covered this fact up with lies
of omission, half-truths, double talk, and
outright lies.
By keeping our focus and anger on a completely
fabricated fable about a stupid video and a "spontaneous" protest gone bad, the
White House could pretend the lack of security or the lack of turning a pile of
intelligence into something "actionable," wasn't their fault.
What I would like to know is where was the
evidence for this "spontaneous protest?" What was this nonsense based on?
Because since day one, every piece of concrete evidence pointed to a coordinated
terror attack. In fact, the only evidence I know of of a spontaneous protest
gone bad was what our dishonest government was telling us.
And they told us this all the way through
September 19.
When Ambassador Rice did the Sunday Show
round-robin FOUR
days after the attack, and told America…
We do not-- we do not have information at
present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.
…she lied.
During a White House briefing, when Jay Carney
told this to the White House Press Corps a full SEVEN
days after the attack….
All I can tell you is that based on the
information that we had then and have now we do not yet have indication that it
was pre-planned or pre-meditated.
…he lied.
If the corrupt media were to give this
unraveling scandal a tenth of the attention it deserves, Obama's reelection
chances would be non-existent. Libya isn't just a scandal about criminally lax
security, it's also a cover up committed by a White House betting on the media
to be a co-conspirator.
And thus far, with rare exception, that's been a
pretty safe bet.
And if Obama does win reelection, that's when
the media will finally stop protecting him and we can all expect his second term
to be completely crippled by this scandal for years.
You know, had Obama been half as concerned with
the security of overseas assets in the form of personnel and intelligence as he
is with securing more welfare for Big Bird, the world would look a whole lot
different today.
But Big Bird is Big Bird and Libya was just a
"bump in the road."
===========================================================================================================
Ponder this: If all 535 in the American
congress were removed tomorow and you hand picked their successors and you put
your first born children in as federal reserve board members and Ronald Reagan
came back from the dead and you got Arch Angel Michael and all the Saints in
Heaven to count the votes would anything
change with the Wall Street mafia owning the federal government?
Give this question you're best Mensa Socratic shot.
DECENTRALIZE NOW
No comments:
Post a Comment