Life on Sleepy Creek in Words and Images: love and approval

Showing posts with label love and approval. Show all posts

Thursday, May 9, 2013

WHILE WE ARE DISTRACTED BY BENGHAZI - WE GET THIS: NEW BILL GIVES BIG SIS OF DHS VIRTUALLY UNLIMITED DISCRETION TO WAIVE ANY MANNER OF CRIME OR CRIMINALS AT ICE AND THIS IS BIG. PLEASE MAKE IT GO VIRAL.

http://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/bill-gives-dhs-sec-virtually-unlimited-discretion-waive-any-manner-crimes-ice

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

RAND PAUL THINKS IT'S OK TO KILL US CITIZENS WITH DRONES ON AMERICAN SOIL - HE SHOULD SPEAK TO HIS FATHER...

http://ncrenegade.com/editorial/rand-paul-thinks-its-ok-to-kill-u-s-citizens-with-drones-on-american-soil

Just goes to show you, you can't trust any of them. They're either crooks, thieves, murderers, or con artists.
Gangs of them.
Each with a little niche.

It's time for a purge. We sent them there. They have failed us. They have turned against us. They have become our enemy. How can we let this continue?

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

COLORADO BAN ON CAMPUS CONCEALED WEAPONS DEFEATED - GREAT NEWS

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/03/08/colorado-ban-on-campus-concealed-weapons-defeated/

Saturday, February 16, 2013

OBAMA DOJ: WE DON'T NEED CLEAR EVIDENCE TO KILL AMERICANS WITH DRONES...DID WE COVER THIS LAST WEEK? I DON'T THINK SO -

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/02/obama-doj-we-dont-need-clear-evidence-to-kill-americans-with-drones/

That's a broad brush threat, isn't it?

Obama's DOJ (Eric Holder who some say may be making a bid for the presidency next time) says "we" don't need clear evidence to kill Americans...and what about on American soil?

Friday, February 1, 2013

OBAMA AND TEH COMMUNISTS: THEY CENSORED THEIR OWN WEBSITE TO PROTECT THE PRESIDENT

http://www.trevorloudon.com/2013/01/obama-and-the-communists-they-censored-their-own-website-to-protect-the-president/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NewZeal+%28New+Zeal+Blog%29

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

IRAN ENDORSES OBAMA PICK - WELL ISN'T THAT SPECIAL?

http://conservativebyte.com/2013/01/iran-endorses-obama-pick/

Sunday, December 2, 2012

9TH CIRCUIT GIVES THE A-OK FOR WARRANTLESS HOME VIDEO SURVEILLANCE

From the same set of “judges” that said the government can attach GPS transponders to automobiles without warrants to track “people of interest.” It took the Supremes to rescind that one.

According to this, if you let anyone into your house, even if you do not know they are a government agent, you are risking a government search without a warrant. Talk about taking a tip from the old KGB and NKVD in the Soviet Union.

Welcome to America, land of the free and the home of the brave.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33191.htm

Ninth Circuit Gives the A-OK For Warrantless Home Video Surveillance

By Hanni Fakhoury

November 30, 2012 "Information Clearing House" Can law enforcement enter your house and use a secret video camera to record the intimate details inside? On Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unfortunately answered that question with "yes."

U.S. Fish and Wildlife agents suspected Ricky Wahchumwah of selling bald and gold eagle feathers and pelts in violation of federal law. Equipped with a small hidden video camera on his clothes, a Wildlife agent went to Wahchumwah's house and feigned interest in buying feathers and pelts. Unsurprisingly, the agent did not have a search warrant. Wahchumwah moved to suppress the video as an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment, but the trial court denied his motion. On appeal before the Ninth Circuit, we filed an amicus brief in support of Wahchumwah. We highlighted the Supreme Court's January 2012 decision in United States v. Jones -- which held that law enforcement's installation of a GPS device onto a car was a "search" under the Fourth Amendment -- and specifically focused on the concurring opinions of Justices Alito and Sotomayor, who were worried about the power of technology to eradicate privacy.

In our brief we argued that although a person may reveal small bits of information publicly or to a house guest, technology that allows the government to aggregate that data in ways that were impractical in the past means that greater judicial supervision and oversight is necessary. After all, a video camera can capture far more detail than the human eye and is specifically designed to allow the government to record, save and review details for another day, bypassing the human mind's tendency to forget. That means police need a search warrant to engage in the type of invasive surveillance they did in Wahchumwah's house.

Unconvinced, the Ninth Circuit instead relied on a case from 1966, Hoffa v. United States, ruling that Wahchumwah forfeited his privacy interest when he "voluntarily" revealed the interior of his home to the undercover agent. But its conclusion contradicts not only the Supreme Court's decision in Jones, but also earlier Ninth Circuit caselaw as well.

In Jones, the Supreme Court made clear that a law enforcement trespass onto private property for the purpose of obtaining information was a "search" under the Fourth Amendment. Under common law, a defendant was not liable for trespass if their entry was authorized. But the Ninth Circuit previously made clear in Theofel v. Farey-Jones that a person's consent to a trespass is ineffective if they're "mistaken as to the nature and quality of the invasion intended." In fact, Theofel cited another Ninth Circuit case where the court found a "police officer who, invited into a home, conceals a recording device for the media" to be a trespasser.

What that means here is that when the undercover agent concealed his identity and purpose, making Wahchumwah "mistaken as to the nature and quality" of the home visit, the government trespassed onto Wahchumwah's property. Since that trespass was done for the purpose of obtaining information -- to get evidence of bald and gold eagle feather and pelt sales -- the government "searched" Wahchumwah's home. And it needed a warrant to do that; without one, the search was unconstitutional.

Its troubling that the Ninth Circuit did not see it this way (nor are they the only one). Because the sad truth is that as technology continues to advance, surveillance becomes "voluntary" only by virtue of the fact we live in a modern society where technology is becoming cheaper, easier and more invasive. The Wahchumwah case exemplifies this: on suspicion of nothing more than the benign misdemeanor of selling eagle feathers, the government got to intrude inside the home and record every intimate detail it could: books on a shelf, letters on a coffee table, pictures on a wall. And we're entering an age where criminal suspicion is no longer even necessary. Whether you're calling a friend's stolen cell phone and landing on the NYPD massive database of call logs, driving into one of the increasing number of cities using license plate scanners to record who comes in or out, or walking somewhere close to hovering drones, innocent people are running the risk of having their personal details stored in criminal databases for years to come.

The only way to avoid pervasive law enforcement monitoring shouldn't be to make the choice to live under a rock in the wilderness somewhere. Instead, the Fourth Amendment means today what it meant in 1787: that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects" shouldn't be violated unless the government comes back with a warrant.

This article was originally posted at Electronic Frontier Foundation

Scroll down to add / read comments

Thursday, October 25, 2012

TED TURNER: I THINK IT'S GOOD US TROOPS ARE COMMITTING SUICIDE

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/10/25/Ted-Turner-I-Think-Its-Good-US-Troops-Are-Commiting-Suicide

Never mind that he looked like the stand in for "Weekend with Bernie" for the body, but he's a well known
eugenicist.

He and his ex-wife Jane Fonda must've made quite a pair.

Do not watch CNN anymore. He owns it and a good chunk of media as in Turner Broadcasting, lots of land in the American west, lots of bison.

Now we need to take his money away or give him a rifle and camo and let him go to Afghanistan.