http://minutemennews.com/2013/05/bloomberg-obama-and-liberal-media-muzzled-about-gun-crime-decline/
THEY WOULD EAT SHIT AND RISK DEATH IF THEY HAD TO TO CONVINCE US THAT CRIME IS ALWAYS LOWER WHERE THE CITIZEN IS ARMED.
SHIT FOR BRAINS. ALL OF THEM.
Showing posts with label biased media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biased media. Show all posts
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Saturday, May 11, 2013
ANOTHER INCESTUOUS OBAMA DEAL - CBS NEWS PREZ IS BROTHER OF OBAMA NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICIAL -
http://visiontoamerica.com/14902/cbs-news-president-brother-of-obama-national-security-official/
And you really expect truth in reporting from CBS? JUST FLUCKING CLICK THE CHANNEL OFF!
And you really expect truth in reporting from CBS? JUST FLUCKING CLICK THE CHANNEL OFF!
Saturday, February 23, 2013
ARE BECKEL AND MATTHEWS BROTHERS? BOTH ARE IGNORAMUSES IN LOCKSTEP (OR GOOSESTEP)
Bob Beckel: Women Don’t Need Guns Because Rape on College Campuses Doesn’t Happen
During a discussion on Fox News’ The Five about concealed carry on
campus, liberal co-host Bob Beckel demonstrated his complete ignorance
regarding the sexual violence women face, particularly on college
campuses.
“When was the last time you heard about a rape on campus?”
Just because each and every rape on campus does not receive
widespread media attention does not mean it’s not happening. Here are
just a few statistics from NYU’s Student Health Center, Mr. Beckel:
- One in 5 college women are raped during their college years.
- Most survivors of sexual assaults are full-time
students. Approximately one-third of them are first year students
between 17-19 years old.
- In a recent study by the National Institute of Justice, survivors of rape knew their attackers as:
o Fellow classmates (35.5%)
o Friends (34.2%)
o Boyfriends or ex-boyfriends (23.7%)
o Acquaintances (2.6%)
- 81% of on-campus and 84% of off-campus sexual assaults are not reported to the police.
- 35% of men report some likelihood that they would rape if they could be assured they wouldn't be caught or punished.
Also disturbing was the fact that Beckel seemed to downplay a
woman’s right to self-defense in cases of date rape. Regardless of who
is attempting to rape a woman on a college campus, or anywhere, she
should be entitled to defend herself, and university policies ought to
reflect as much. As Katie reported yesterday, an emergency call box and safe zones do nothing to help victims of rape.
Update: Beckel issued this “apology”:
"It's a horrible, horrendous issue. And it's simply put, this, rape is rape. Whether it's date rape or it's somebody coming in off the campus trying to rape somebody else. I very strongly feel that way. And so, I just want to straighten the record out on that. I simply was trying to make -- there was not a distinction to make here. It simply was that date rape is rape. And that is, by any other definition, rape is rape."
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
YOU CAN LIVE WITHOUT COMCAST; TRULY YOU CAN. YOU CAN LIVE WITH ONE STATION (I GET FOX AND NOT THE "WHOLE" FOX) BY ANTENNA.
http://visiontoamerica.com/14026/comcast-cable-says-it-is-dropping-all-ads-promoting-guns/
My decision was prompted because the bills were so high. Did I need that? A gazillion channels to seduce my brain into jelly? No. I didn't want to hear the propaganda from biased media, watch endless commercials (did you know in the beginning there weren't any on cable), telling me what to buy. I was already weaned off foreign made products.
So up went the antenna and I get one entertainment channel, and I don't listen much to that. I confess my
addiction to Big Bang Theory, Who's That Girl, and that gruesome "The Following", only because it reminds me of Stephen King novels. Be that as it may, I get my news on the internet from sources I believe report the news we don't get on tv.
Think about this article. They are taking away your right for information and guiding you to the left to skewer your intellect and make you forget you have a right to watch.
.
That's all you have to know.
My decision was prompted because the bills were so high. Did I need that? A gazillion channels to seduce my brain into jelly? No. I didn't want to hear the propaganda from biased media, watch endless commercials (did you know in the beginning there weren't any on cable), telling me what to buy. I was already weaned off foreign made products.
So up went the antenna and I get one entertainment channel, and I don't listen much to that. I confess my
addiction to Big Bang Theory, Who's That Girl, and that gruesome "The Following", only because it reminds me of Stephen King novels. Be that as it may, I get my news on the internet from sources I believe report the news we don't get on tv.
Think about this article. They are taking away your right for information and guiding you to the left to skewer your intellect and make you forget you have a right to watch.
.
That's all you have to know.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
MIKE WALLACE, MARCO RUBIO, WATER AND SCRAPING THE BOTTOM OF THE BARRELI
I half listened to Obama and his false promises which cannot be accomplished without the money presses roaring or taxing us finally, to death.
Rubio's speech was "nice guy". Too much nice guy. Never once did impeachment come up to nail the lying madman in the White House.
But when Mike Wallace criticized Rubio, the liberal left media bias came through with a clarion call to find the most infinitesimal neutrino he could find fault with the water, that pesky thing that keeps us healthy and alive.
Everyone who gives a speech has water somewhere within close reach. Even Mike Wallace.
Wallace is an idiot - an Obama water carrier, which is literally obvious now.
You know what? Rubio's thirst was the most "real, human" part of the two speeches. But he should not have let it bothered him so much that he even defended himself to the press. And the press showed its stupidity in asking him about it.
Rubio's speech was "nice guy". Too much nice guy. Never once did impeachment come up to nail the lying madman in the White House.
But when Mike Wallace criticized Rubio, the liberal left media bias came through with a clarion call to find the most infinitesimal neutrino he could find fault with the water, that pesky thing that keeps us healthy and alive.
Everyone who gives a speech has water somewhere within close reach. Even Mike Wallace.
Wallace is an idiot - an Obama water carrier, which is literally obvious now.
You know what? Rubio's thirst was the most "real, human" part of the two speeches. But he should not have let it bothered him so much that he even defended himself to the press. And the press showed its stupidity in asking him about it.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Friday, February 1, 2013
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Thursday, September 27, 2012
PREZ EYE CANDY CAVES IN LIKE A CHEAP TENT WHEN LIBERAL MEDIA GETS ON HIS CASE ABOUT BENGHAZI
By The Way, Have You Noticed How President Eye-Candy Caves In Like A Cheap Tent When The Liberal Media Gets On His Case?
September 27, 2012 — The Rat
FROM HIS FAILURE TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCES TO NO-SHOWS AT INTEL BRIEFINGS TO THE LIBYA ATTACK
“What the hell kinda question is that? You guys are ‘sposed to be on my side!”
If there’s one thing President Eye-Candy can count on, it’s the Herculean effort generally put forth by his lapdogs in the media to not
hold him accountable. For anything. Ever. However, in the rare case
when the Obama Media Group fails in its cult-like duty and temporarily
switches sides and calls him out – which doesn’t happen often -what does
O do? Caves in like a cheap tent. You see, O’s political compass isn’t
effected by public opinion or the will of the American people (See:
ObamaCare.), but by the behavior of the sock puppets of the liberal
media.
Take the hubbub that erupted not only over his failure to appear
before White House correspondents for six months or thereabouts, but
also over his refusal to even answer questions from reporters covering
his campaign – all the while having no trouble finding time to sit down
with People Magazine, Entertainment Tonight and “Pimp With The Limp.”
What did O do? He raced to the White House briefing room for a quick
Q&A on the Monday following a weekend of heightened criticism over
the whole thing.
Then we had the revelation that President Genius has skipped over
half his daily intelligence briefings (PDBs), choosing instead to “read
the memos.” You know, he’s so damn superior in intellect to mere mortals
– why on earth would he need to actually meet with
intelligence officials, ask questions or listen to the give-and-take of
his advisors? Hell – he’s above all that, right? Except that once the
story got out and began to gain traction in the media, guess what? Now
word comes from the Regime that O’s intel-briefing attendance is nearly 100%.
(Wow – sounds like “gold star” time, huh?) Amazing transformation? Of
course not – he once again caved to criticism from his normally-loyal
minions in the media.
The latest example – and most troubling – was the Regime’s
coordinated attempt – from a nanosecond after the event occurred – to
claim that the attack that on the Libyan Consulate that killed
Ambassador Stevens was “spontaneous.” O trotted out UN Ambassador Susan
Rice to
liemake a fool of herself on the Sunday morning talk
shows; Hillary immediately described the attack as spontaneous.
Astonishingly, O even stood before the United Nations this week and embarrassingly spent 5 1/2 minutes lying about the anti-Mohammad film to the world.
But – as the Obama Media Group began to consider its own credibility –
vs. that of the Regime – the support for “O’s Big Lie” eroded. As a
result, not only does Hillary now admit the attack was indeed
pre-planned and carried out by al Qaeda operatives – the White House has
finally – albeit reluctantly – fessed up too.
The bottom line is what I said at the top: This pretender-to-the
throne thrives on blind-eyed sycophantic protection from the sock
puppets of the Obama Media Group. When – in those rare instances – the
OMG goes over to the dark side, O rushes at breakneck speed to put his
finger in the hole of the dike.
The other bottom line is this, America: The ability of the media to
not only shape public opinion – but to influence the actions of a
narcissistic shallow president whose paramount objective is reelecting
himself – is still profound. Scary too.
Can you imagine where this election would stand right now if we had an unbiased media?
Friday, August 31, 2012
MEDIA STRIKES BACK AFTER DIRTY HARRY DARES TO MOCK OBAMA
http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2012/08/31/media-strikes-back-after-dirty-harry-dares-to-mock-obama/
Put their shorts and panties in a knot, did he?
Put their shorts and panties in a knot, did he?
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Saturday, August 18, 2012
PROGRESSIVE-LEANING PANEL PICKS MODERATORS FOR PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES (FAIR AND BALANCED...BWAH-HAH-HAH)
The Romney/Ryan debates are set, and as usual, the liberals have had their way and will do all the can to give an advantage to Obama, without overtly appearing to do so...
While many focus on combating liberal voter fraud in the upcoming election as the means to ensure we have a fair election, the sad reality is that even if that were accomplished, we will never have a truly fair election until we demand a fair and balanced media. This stacked deck shows we are nowhere near that goal yet. Whoever can do that for the American people deserves the Nobel prize given to Obama.
While many focus on combating liberal voter fraud in the upcoming election as the means to ensure we have a fair election, the sad reality is that even if that were accomplished, we will never have a truly fair election until we demand a fair and balanced media. This stacked deck shows we are nowhere near that goal yet. Whoever can do that for the American people deserves the Nobel prize given to Obama.
Newt could have done it, but he'll be sitting stage right.
~ J
P.S. Jim Lehrer, really?
The moderators for the nation’s 2012 presidential debates were picked
by a progressive liberal panel of Washington establishment figures, dubbed the
Commission on Presidential Debates.
The four debates are important because they can shape opinions among
the late-deciding voters whose ballots will likely decide the election
in swing-states, including Florida, Virginia and Ohio.
Each of the chosen moderators work for establishment media outlets or for government-funded media operations.
The establishment journalists are CNN’s Candy Crowley, ABC News’
Marth Raddatz and CBS’ Bob Scheiffer. Jim Lehrer works for PBS, which is
supported by the government.
The locations were also chosen by the progressive-skewed commission.
Three debates will include President Barack Obama and Republican
candidate Mitt Romney. One debate will feature Vice President Joe Biden
and Rep. Paul Ryan.
The commission’s nine-member board include Antonia Hernandez, a
former president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Eduction Fund
and a member of the progressive American Constitutional Society, and
Howard Buffett, the son of billionaire Obama-booster Warren Buffett.
The group also include Richard Parsons, a former chief of Citigroup
and a long-standing friend of Obama, and John Jenkins, the president of
Notre Dame who invited Obama to speak at the university in 2009 despite a
firestorm of criticism from orthodox Catholics.
The commission’s members also include Dorothy Ridings, president of
the progressive-leaning Council on Foundations, and Newton Minow, the
progressive-leaning former chairman of the Federal Communications
Commission.
The two most prominent Republican members of the board are both
social liberals — former Sens. John C. Danforth and Alan K. Simpson.
The executive director is Janet H. Brown, a former White House official.
The two co-chairs are Michael D. McCurry, the former spokesman for
President Bill Clinton, and Frank J. Fahrenkopf, the current president
of the casino trade group, the American Gaming Association. Fahrenkopf was chairman of the Republican National Committee a quarter of a century ago, from 1983 to 1989. Both Fahrenkopf and McCurry work for lobbying firms.
Romney’s campaign declined to comment about the political tilt of the
reporters. “Debate moderators are selected by the Commission on
Presidential Debates,” said a statement from Ryan Williams. “You should
check with them for questions.”
Commission director and spokeswoman Janet H. Brown declined to respond.
Lehrer will moderate the first presidential debate on Oct. 3, from
Denver. CNN’s Crowley will moderate a town-hall style event on Oct. 16
in the very blue state of New York and CBS’ Schieffer will run the third
debate on Oct. 22, from Florida.
Raddatz will moderate the vice presidential debate on Oct. 11, from Danville, Kentucky.
H/T TO "MERLIN"
WE'RE ON TO THEM, AREN'T WE?
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Friday, June 15, 2012
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)