Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Progressives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Progressives. Show all posts

Saturday, August 18, 2012

PROGRESSIVE-LEANING PANEL PICKS MODERATORS FOR PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES (FAIR AND BALANCED...BWAH-HAH-HAH)

The Romney/Ryan debates are set, and as usual, the liberals have had their way and will do all the can to give an advantage to Obama, without overtly appearing to do so...

While many focus on combating liberal voter fraud in the upcoming election as the means to ensure we have a fair election, the sad reality is that even if that were accomplished, we will never have a truly fair election until we demand a fair and balanced media. This stacked deck shows we are nowhere near that goal yet.  Whoever can do that for the American people deserves the Nobel prize given to Obama.

Newt could have done it, but he'll be sitting stage right.

~ J

P.S. Jim Lehrer, really?


The moderators for the nation’s 2012 presidential debates were picked by a progressive liberal panel of Washington establishment figures, dubbed the Commission on Presidential Debates.
The four debates are important because they can shape opinions among the late-deciding voters whose ballots will likely decide the election in swing-states, including Florida, Virginia and Ohio.
Each of the chosen moderators work for establishment media outlets or for government-funded media operations.

The establishment journalists are CNN’s Candy Crowley, ABC News’ Marth Raddatz and CBS’ Bob Scheiffer. Jim Lehrer works for PBS, which is supported by the government.
The locations were also chosen by the progressive-skewed commission.
Three debates will include President Barack Obama and Republican candidate Mitt Romney. One debate will feature Vice President Joe Biden and Rep. Paul Ryan.
The commission’s nine-member board include Antonia Hernandez, a former president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Eduction Fund and a member of the progressive American Constitutional Society, and Howard Buffett, the son of billionaire Obama-booster Warren Buffett.

The group also include Richard Parsons, a former chief of Citigroup and a long-standing friend of Obama, and John Jenkins, the president of Notre Dame who invited Obama to speak at the university in 2009 despite a firestorm of criticism from orthodox Catholics. 
 
The commission’s members also include Dorothy Ridings, president of the progressive-leaning Council on Foundations, and Newton Minow, the progressive-leaning former chairman of the Federal Communications Commission.
The two most prominent Republican members of the board are both social liberals — former Sens. John C. Danforth and Alan K. Simpson.
 
The executive director is Janet H. Brown, a former White House official.
The two co-chairs are Michael D. McCurry, the former spokesman for President Bill Clinton, and Frank J. Fahrenkopf, the current president of the casino trade group, the American Gaming Association. Fahrenkopf was chairman of the Republican National Committee a quarter of a century ago, from 1983 to 1989. Both Fahrenkopf and McCurry work for lobbying firms. 
 
Romney’s campaign declined to comment about the political tilt of the reporters. “Debate moderators are selected by the Commission on Presidential Debates,” said a statement from Ryan Williams. “You should check with them for questions.”
 
Commission director and spokeswoman Janet H. Brown declined to respond.
 
Lehrer will moderate the first presidential debate on Oct. 3, from Denver. CNN’s Crowley will moderate a town-hall style event on Oct. 16 in the very blue state of New York and CBS’ Schieffer will run the third debate on Oct. 22, from Florida.
 
Raddatz will moderate the vice presidential debate on Oct. 11, from Danville, Kentucky.


BTW, I couldn't help but notice some planned focus points for the Romney/Obama debates;
The first of the three debates features the economy, which Romney should be strong on, but ends with the third debate delving into foreign policy, the one area where Obama is perceived (wrongly) to have an advantage. Clearly, they want Obama to leave with his best foot forward. 

The "Debate Plan" is here.....
http://www.c-span.org/uploadedFiles/Content/Documents/CPD-Announces-Debate-Formats.pdf

H/T TO "MERLIN"

WE'RE ON TO THEM, AREN'T WE?

Sunday, January 29, 2012

IS NEWT REALLY A CONSERVATIVE - SOME VIDEOS YOU'LL WANT TO WATCH AND SHARE

http://noisyroom.net/blog/2012/01/29/is-newt-gingrich-really-a-conservative/

...because it's our country and our lives as Americans at stake in this election. This could be the last one. Listen to Marielena Stuart's words I've posted today. That's a conservative, Constitutional woman with passion.

I don't trust Newt any further than I can throw him.

Listen. Watch his expression. Like Obama, his eyes are vacant.

And I hope we can get a glimpse of Romney in one place like this because...

Ron Paul should be president!

HERMAN CAIN IS BACKING NEWT - GUESS THE LIAR'S CLUB IS IN SESSION...THE WOMANIZERS HAVE TO STICK TOGETHER!

http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2012/01/28/herman-cain-is-backing-newt/

Egotistical, narcissist, brash, snake oil salesman, too!

Friday, December 4, 2009

The worm is turning - Progressive leaders pan Obama's Afghanistan policy

http://www.alternet.org/story/144356/progressive_leaders_pan_obama%27s_decision_for_more_war_in_afghanistan_--_10_reactions

Wow! Tom Hayden - so far left he's about to kiss the pavement on his left side - he walks real funny. He's leaving the the USO (United States of Obama) Obama like rat. Wonder how many rats are going to leave when their lives are threatened by the climate change treaty in Copenhagen when they realize that they'll be among the global slaves.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

UN Reds and Progressives advising Obama...

http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff316.htm

Doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand and believe this.

You know what? Everybody out of the pool...There are other progressive socialist/communist countries. We'll take care of the USA - just get the hell outta the pool! And take the UN with it.



Bookmark and Share

Friday, October 10, 2008

Entitlements and the Constitution (and Obama's promises)

An essay just received -

Lowest Common Denominator
by Dr. M. Sidney Wallace
The United States of America was not founded on perfection. In fact the first sentence of the preamble to the Constitution stresses that the objective is an attempt to form a "more perfect Union."
The founders of the United States were not children who had no concept of what it meant to be a responsible adult. They were adult men who had had experienced sleeping in cold homes in the winter, eating only what they had managed to provide by the sweat of their labors, not having modern hospitals to treat their minor wounds which if left untreated would end their lives. A trip of forty miles was an all day adventure. News and information transfer was at the speed of horse and buggy. The original attempt at a national government was collapsing in dismal failure. So our founding fathers set out to improve the American government and thereby by provide equal opportunity for all of its citizens to strive for whatever goals they decided to set for themselves. It took another hundred years and five hundred thousand lives to get true freedom for all established.
The word entitled is use only in Article IV Section 2 where it states, "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." Absolutely no where in the original Constitution of the United States is any individual guaranteed that he or she will receive or be entitled to the resources of others simply to establish equality for all.
The Democrat Socialist Party believes that all citizens of the United States should be equal above all else, and the only way to achieve equality is to establish a common denominator for all of American society. The Democrat Socialist Party is using this concept to gain social and political power over their subjects, and former citizens of the United States.
They paint word pictures of inner city slums and tell the gullible masses that these conditions must be changed by the government. They show images of run down shacks with rain water leaking into the living area and tell the gullible masses that these conditions must be changed by the government. Next your Democrat Socialist Party displays pictures of suburban homes with manicured lawns, and tree lined sidewalks. They say that everyone in American should be allowed to live in homes like these with or without individual perspiration.
What they don't tell you is that the majority of these individuals living in these nice homes came from the lower quality sleeping spaces by using their God given talents and actually working for them. What each American needs to ask himself is, "Will the government allow me to keep the money I am saving and working for, in order that I might be able to purchase my dream home, or will my government purchase what they think is adequate housing for me and spend the rest for my less than deserving neighbor in the name of social equality?" If you believe that every man is equal in all respects, then sit back, chill out, and vote for the new messiah Obama and get ready to move into your neighborhood housing project.
If you wish to send a comment or ask a question of Dr. Wallace please use: msw@gulf1.com
If you wish to read other columns by Dr. Wallace please see: http://www.gulf1.com/columns/msw/mswframe.htm

If you wish to write a letter to the Editor please use: http://www.gulf1.net/letters/NewLetter.htm


Copyright © October 10, 2008, by Gulf1



Digg!