Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Barack Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barack Obama. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

BOSTON BOMBING SUSPECT NOT PUT ON TERRORIST WATCH LIST AS CIA REQUESTED (HMMM SOUNDS A LITTLE LIKE BENGHAZI)

 No wonder why Bush's popularity is now starting to exceed Obama's..........Biden?  WTH?

Boston bombing suspect not put on terrorist watch list as CIA requested

Video: Speaking at the memorial service of slain MIT police officer Sean Collier, who was killed while pursuing the Boston bombing suspects, Vice President Biden praised Collier as "a wonderful kid" and promised, “we will not yield to fear.”
The CIA asked the main U.S. counterterrorism agency to add the name of one of the suspected Boston Marathon bombers to a watch list more than a year before the attack, according to U.S. officials.
The agency took the step after Russian authorities contacted officials there in the fall of 2011 and raised concerns that Tamerlan Tsarnaev — who was killed last week in a confrontation with police — was seen as an increasingly radical Islamist and could be planning to travel overseas. The CIA requested that his name be put on a database maintained by the National Counterterrorism Center.
Boston bombings victims
See the names and stories of the victims of the Boston Marathon bombings.
Gallery


That database, the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment, or TIDE, is a data storehouse that feeds a series of government watch lists, including the FBI’s main Terrorist Screening Database and the Transportation Security Administration’s “no-fly” list.
Officials said Tsarnaev’s name was added to the database but it’s unclear which agency added it.
The CIA’s request came months after the FBI had closed a preliminary inquiry into Tsarnaev after getting a similar inquiry about him from Russian state security, according to officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.
The new disclosure suggests that the U.S. government may have had more reason than previously known to scrutinize Tsarnaev in the months leading up to the bombings in Boston.
Law enforcement officials said that the request to the FBI in 2011 originated from fears by the Russian government that Tamerlan was a threat to Russia and would commit a terrorist act in Russia -- not the United States. The request came from Russian federal police to the U.S. Embassy in Moscow.
“There was a concern he might have some kind of ties to terrorism,” said FBI spokesman Paul Bresson. “We did everything legally that we could do with the little bit of information we had. After we did, we found no derogatory information.”
The FBI gets hundreds of similar requests a year from foreign governments, said a law enforcement official. The findings were reported back to Russia and Russian authorities were asked if they had any more information for the United States to investigate about Tamerlan and they did not.
“They were satisfied,” said the official. “We had checked on their information. And no further information was provided.”
In Russia, meanwhile, representatives of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow were in Dagestan to interview the parents of the Tsarnaev brothers, an embassy official said in an e-mail. The mother was interviewed Tuesday by Russian security officials, according to one of her representatives, but the father was ill and remained at home.
A police source in Makhachkala, the capital of the Dagestan region that borders Chechnya, the homeland of the Tsarnaev family, told the RIA Novosti agency that the parents told U.S. officials they would go to the United States soon.
“During the talks it was decided to take the Tsarnaev parents to the United States. The parents have given their consent to this, they will be involved in the U.S. investigation,” the source told RIA Novosti.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

RON PAUL: THE SEQUESTER 'CRISIS' AND WHAT SHOULD BE DONE

The Sequester ‘Crisis’ And What Should Be Done


Despite what the media and politicians would have us believe, the United States did not collapse last Friday when the package of spending reductions known as “sequestration” went into effect. The financial markets hardly blinked, as they have come to be more skeptical about these periodic government-hyped “crises.”
What had been portrayed as a drastic reduction in government spending was merely a decrease in the projected rate of increase in government spending over the next decade. Under sequestration, government spending increases by $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years rather than $2.5 trillion without it.
So we are speeding toward collapse at only 100 miles per hour instead of 110 miles per hour.
Some in Congress are using the panic over sequestration to justify another surrender of legislative authority to the executive branch. These members want to “pass the buck” on prioritizing federal programs by giving the president, cabinet officials, and high-level bureaucrats authority to set spending priorities. However, it is Congress’s job to set priorities in federal spending.
The drafters of the Constitution give the legislature the authority over spending because they recognized it was a threat to liberty to allow this power to be concentrated in the executive branch. Congress’s willingness to cede more authority to the executive should be opposed by everyone who values liberty and limited government.
Some of the loudest objections to sequestration have come from the champions of the military-industrial complex. Yet under sequestration defense spending will still increase by 18 percent over 10 years as opposed to 20 percent without sequestration.
There are claims that the military will face a one-time real reduction back to 2007 levels of spending, before beginning to climb again next year. That remains to be seen. However, few claimed at the time that 2007 levels of military spending, occurring as they did during the huge post 9/11 build-up, were inadequate.
But despite the fact that the US spends more on military than the rest of the world combined, we are told that even this modest, short-term reduction would be, in the words of outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, “shameful” and “irresponsible.” A return to 1980’s levels of military spending in real dollars – a time of significant military build-up – is considered outrageous even though the US faces no Soviet Union or equivalent threat.
In fact, the entire $1.2 trillion dollars that the sequester is supposed to save could be realized by cutting one unneeded, wasteful boondoggle: the $1.5 trillion F-35 fighter program. The F-35, billed as the next generation all-purpose military fighter and bomber, has been an unmitigated disaster. Its performances in recent tests have been so bad that the Pentagon has been forced to dumb-down the criteria. It is overweight, overpriced, and unwieldy. It is also an anachronism: we no longer face the real prospect of air-to-air combat in this era of 4th generation warfare. The World War II mid-air dogfight era is long over.
As defense analyst Winslow Wheeler wrote last year:
“It's time for Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the U.S. military services, and Congress to face the facts: The F-35 is an unaffordable mediocrity, and the program will not be fixed by any combination of hardware tweaks or cost-control projects. There is only one thing to do with the F-35: Junk it.”
We should not look for cancellation of the F-35 program any time soon, however. The military industrial complex understands the political necessity of spreading its military Keynesianism as widely across Congressional districts as possible.
That is why F-35 manufacturer Lockheed-Martin can boast on its website that “the F-35 provides 127,000 direct and indirect jobs in 47 states and Puerto Rico.” What is unfortunately not understood is that these 127,000 workers would be far better utilized producing needed goods and services rather than treated as a jobs program disguised as national defense.
Despite the alarm over cuts that are not real cuts, it is clear that the US government is not serious at all about changing its ways. In a recent tour of the Middle East, newly-confirmed Secretary of State John Kerry announced that the US would be sending another $60 million to the rebels seeking to overthrow the Syrian government – in the midst of the sequester “crisis”!
Despite the rhetoric, there appears no intention on the part of the government to take our fiscal crisis seriously or abandon the idea that we should run the rest of the world.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

DO SOME WEED, SOME COKE AT COLUMBIA, BARRY, AND YOU GET A 2.6 GPA! KNOW WHAT? YOU'RE NO SO SMART!

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/04/obama-had-a-mediocre-2-6-gpa-at-columbia-u/


You weren't the bright star in the heavens, and you were pushed through by political "friends" of your relatives.

You were groomed for this job.

Time to let you go.

Bye, Bye, Barry


Friday, April 6, 2012

WHY I DO NOT LIKE THE OBAMAS BY MYCHAL MASSIE

http://mychal-massie.com/premium
Categorized | Daily Rant, Featured
Why I Do Not Like The Obamas

23 February 2012

The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed their Christmas family pic."

The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation.

I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.

I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.

I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagans made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?

Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama's have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry and they display an animus for civility.

I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able too be proud of America. I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world. Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites, because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.

I have a saying, that "the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide." No president in history has spent over a million dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.

And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother's death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family. He has lied about his father's military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nauseum. He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today. He has fought for abortion procedures and opposed rulings that protected women and children, that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel. His wife treats being the First Lady, as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement - as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.

I don't like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.

Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin, it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies. And I have open scorn for their playing the race card.

It is my intention to do all within my ability to ensure their reign is one term. I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color. As I wrote in a syndicated column titled "Nero In The White House" - "Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood . Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement - while America's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed." (WND.com; 8/8/11) Oh, and as for it being personal, you tell me how you would feel if a senator from Illinois sent you a personally signed card, intended to intimidate you and your family. Because you had written a syndicated column titled "Darth Democrat" that was critical of him. (WND.com 11/16/04)

Saturday, November 12, 2011

OBAMA'S NEW JOB PLAN KILLS 40K JOBS IMMEDIATELY

http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2011/11/12/obamas-new-job-plan-kill-400000-jobs-immediately/

Saturday, October 22, 2011

REPUBLICANS WILL NEVER ADDRESS OBAMA'S CRIMES AND THIS IS WHY (BESIDES THEY'RE CORRUPT AND EVIL COWARDS)

http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2011/10/22/why-republicans-will-never-address-obama%e2%80%99s-crimes/

WE, AS A PARTY SHOULD BE SO ASHAMED.

I'm about ready to register independent orLibertarian. I am beginning to absolutely HATE AND DISTRUST ANY REPUBLICAN; ESPECIALLY THOSE WE SENT TO WASHINGTON WITH OUR HOPE AND OUR CAMPAIGN MONEY IN THEIR POCKETS. THEY WERE SOON TAINTED AND FORGOT WHO WAGS THE DOGS, SO THEY JOINED THE REST OF THE SLIMEBAGS.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

HB1505 - THE REAL STORY IN BACK OF THE DHS LAND GRAB.

So let's walk this issue back and look at what's really going on. The DHS wants to lop off the top 1/3 of Montana , the top half of Washington and North Dakota as well as a similar take over of New York , Vermont , New Hampshire and Maine ostensibly to protect us from all of the drug cartels, crazed fast and furious gun runners and border jumpers coming in from peaceful Canada . What, you say?

Why is the Obama administration so aggressively attempting to secure our peaceful northern border while continuing to allow our fast and furious wide open southern border to remain an open crime and drug door into our country?
Remember when Obama said we have to get away from using fossil fuels and become a green fuels America ? Well, along this swath of our northern border lies the world's latest oil boom, the Bakken Range. Is this why these people now are demanding to stop the access of Americans to their own land to drill for their own energy independence? You think? Eric Dany, noted stock prospector editor, is quoting Investors Business Daily thusly: "There may be more oil under Montana and North Dakota ranchland than under all of Alaska !" Dany goes on to say The Bakken could go a long way toward assuring American energy independence with as much as a potential field of 503 billion barrels. He estimates even if The Bakken only contained 200 billion barrels of sweet light crude drillers could bring oil to Americans for as little as $16 per barrel, thus making us energy independent and bringing in an $18 trillion dollar economy surplus!
Reportedly, the local McDonald's near the booming North Dakota oil fields could be offering prospective employees $300 signing bonuses. So does the Obama land grab now explain itself? So now, do efforts by our Queens and Kings in Congress to shut off our ability to email them about this outrageous HB 1505 reveal their real raison d'etre? Unnerved Montana activists trying to stop this enormous proposed school trust land swap are saying this really is all about locking up extensive US lands from resource development throughout America . They are calling this the greatest federal land grab in US history. And you have to pay to tell our Queens and Kings to stop it now.
Eric Dany"s Stock Prospector, P.O. Box 1081, Moline, IL 61266, toll free Ph# 866-541-5200
http://www.conservativeusa.org/mega-cong.htm

And I am most horrified that MY FLORIDA REPRESENTATIVE, STEVE SOUTHERLAND HAS CO-SPONSORED THIS BILL. WE DIDN'T SEND HIM THERE FOR THIS.

Thursday, September 29, 2011

LIBERAL NEWSWEEK EDITOR: OBAMA WAS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT

http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2011/20110928042445.aspx

Ahhh - nice to see an admission of being hoodwinked.

Or lied to.

Or blinded by "his" light.

How neat is this?