Search This Blog

Showing posts with label gag the internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gag the internet. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

RUSH LIMBAUGH - DEMONRATS WANT NEW CONTROLS ON JOURNALISTS - YOU WILL NEED A LICENSE FOR TWITTER, FACEBOOK IF YOU ARE A CITIZEN JOURNALIST.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/rush-dems-want-new-controls-on-journalists/

These despicable, pieces of shit that some of us reading this elected to office to uphold and defend our inalienable rights, and one of them is truth by way of the press, now want to shut us up and bury truth.

If this is so, you will have state information.  You will not get the truth.  You will get fed propaganda, 24 hours a day, and  you're going to believe it or go to a re-education camp, get tortured, or be murdered if you are lucky. 

This little vampire has to be stabbed in the heart with a stake before it rises another night. 

These are nothing but dictators-in-waiting.  Let me tell you something - if you take away our freedom of speech, we will go underground.  You are fomenting a war here on our soil, and we will win and all the ammo in Obama's private army will not stop the flood.  You have no idea how we will rise up in a tide and take care of the business of OUR AMERICA!  YOU CAN'T HAVE IT.

THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE, AND IT ALREADY IS WORKING.  YOU CAN'T STOP IT.
IF IT HAD, YOU WOULD BE GETTING AWAY LITERALLY WITH MURDER WITH THE SCANDALS THAT HAVE BEEN LEAKED IN DC.  NOT ONE OF YOU IS SAFE FROM THE CLEANSING OF THE LIGHT OF TRUTH.  WE WILL PUT YOU IN JAIL AND LET THE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT WE INSTALL METE OUT THE SENTENCE. 

THERE IS NO PLACE FOR COMMUNIST TRAITORS IN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.




Friday, November 2, 2012

Monday, August 20, 2012

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AMMO BUY: 589 BULLETS PER AGENT IS NORMAL

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/social-security-administration-ammo-buy-589-bullets-agent-normal

You mean that if I go the SS office, each agent has a weapon, armed with 589 bullets rolling around in the drawer, and I have to go into a federal building to sit there and be a target without my gun?

What if one of the agents goes "SS" instead of "postal" and kills me sitting at his or her desk?

When the government is better armed than you - there is something very evil about it - remember the Second Amendment and NEVER allow it to be torn from the Constitution.


TODAY'S DHS CENSORED WORD - THE ONE YOU SHOULD THROW INTO THE MEMORY HOLE FOR FEAR OF BEING SMOKED BY BIG SIS, IS "DRILL", AS IN ELECTRIC DRILL.

I'll be going to the dentist soon.  I lost part of an amalgam filling...it will require a dental DRILL!

I went to school and learned by spelling "drills" (oops, more than one drill).

Why aren't we drilling more oil in this country?

OMG!  I said "drill" four times!!!!!  Must've thrown four red tags on my blog.

Saturday, April 21, 2012


Campaign for Liberty


This coming week, Congress is set to take up another so-called "cybersecurity" bill, H.R. 3523, the "Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011" (CISPA).

And this time, many of those who joined us to stop SOPA and PIPA are supporting this legislation.

So only the immediate action of you and your fellow C4L members can help protect our privacy from the government's ever-expanding reach.

After our victory over SOPA/PIPA, I wrote to you in late February about the need to stay vigilant against Congress' attempts to assert more control over the Internet.

Well, since then, Republicans and Democrats have introduced at least four major "cybersecurity" bills.

Expanding government power is always bipartisan.

CISPA, sponsored by Rep. Mike Rogers (MI-8), is promoted as a harmless bill that will enable voluntary "information sharing" between private corporations and government agencies in the name of "cybersecurity."

Unfortunately, it would allow the transfer of vast amounts of data, including information like your Internet browsing history or email content, to any agency in the federal government, including non-civilian agencies such as the National Security Agency or the Department of Defense Cyber Command.

One major problem with these alleged "cybersecurity" bills is their overly broad focus on what information private companies are encouraged to share with federal agencies.

CISPA currently contains no incentive for private companies like Facebook or Google to remove personally identifiable information from data they share.

In addition, the way this legislation is drafted, it currently overrides privacy presumptions found in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Communications Act regarding the privacy of an individual's online communications and related records.

Essentially, CISPA would deem all existing privacy laws null and void for "cybersecurity" purposes.

Once the government has this information, there are no meaningful restrictions on its use, as its only qualifier is that it must be related to "cybersecurity" or to protect "national security."

As C4L members know too well, "national security" has become a catch-all excuse for government powergrabs since 9/11.

Finally, while the bill includes a requirement for the Director of National Intelligence's Inspector General to issue annual reports on how the government is using the information shared under the bill, such reports would only be provided to congressional intelligence committees.

These reports would not constitute meaningful restrictions or do anything to dissuade the misuse of personal information shared under CISPA.

As I hinted at earlier, unlike the January 18 "Internet blackout" over SOPA and PIPA, this time Internet giants like Facebook and Twitter are openly supporting CISPA, along with powerful special interest groups like the US Chamber of Commerce.

In other words, don't expect the cavalry to back us up on this one.

And House Leadership is currently engaged in a full-court press effort to get your representative to support H.R. 3523.

Sources on the Hill have informed us of "members only" meetings, where representatives are being encouraged to vote for CISPA as a "national security" issue addressing a "credible" "cybersecurity threat."

I'm sure it's only a coincidence that this briefing comes conveniently just ahead of when the establishment wants to ram something through.

In the face of such longshot odds, without your immediate action, I can't promise that we have even the slightest chance of beating back this egregious invasion of your privacy.

But, I've seen the power the liberty movement can have when it speaks out with a unified voice.

And you better believe members of Congress have taken notice, too.

That’s why I hope you’ll contact Congress right away.

Click here to find your representative’s information.

And after you’ve contacted Congress, please forward this email to at least five friends or family members encouraging them to do the same.

Finally, your chip-in contribution of at least $10 or $25 will help Campaign for Liberty mobilize as many Americans as possible to take action on critical issues like CISPA and other so-called "cybersecurity" bills that would strip more privacy away from Americans.

This fight won't have the glamour or media attention that SOPA and PIPA received, so please take action immediately and show Congress the liberty movement is serious about defending our constitutionally protected rights no matter the odds.

In Liberty,

Campaign for Liberty

Matt Hawes
Vice President


P.S. Internet giants like Facebook and Twitter are openly supporting H.R. 3523, the "Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011" (CISPA) - the latest plan from Congress to further infringe on Americans' privacy.

It’s up to the liberty movement to take action and stop CISPA in its tracks! Please contact your representative immediately and demand a "NO" vote on H.R. 3523 and any similar legislation!

1-866-220-0044 AND 1-866-338-1015 GETS YOU TOLL FREE TO REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS!

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

STOP SOPA! LIGHTS OUT ON THE CREEK ON JANUARY 24 FROM 8 A.M. TO 8 P.M.

http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=ira8vadab&v=001v2ezZPmZ_iuCKMtq-HZwrusj9pFz83Ap66w5SmuZJ2fRCBYvaCIdlyCaoh0MIQgOKpNyrcLsqI4u9t_j-0bd_HLtYYxXnaHSAtCkhBkig_I%3D

We need to keep the internet free, so please support me and my fellow bloggers by not using the internet at all.

No bill paying.
No messaging.
No tweeting.
No Facebook.
No MySpace.
No texting.
NO Social Networking.
No buying.
No selling.
NO EMAIL!

Not even Skype.

Just say NO and don't turn it on for 12 hours.

Just 12 HOURS!

This is dangerous legislation, and if you get internet withdrawal and use the net, you will pay, literally, for your dismissal of the warnings.

So please support your free internet and stop SOPA in its tracks!

Thank you!

Saturday, December 31, 2011

FACEBOOK, GOOGLE, AMAZON PLANNING INTERNET BLACKOUT TO PROTEST BIG BROTHER SOPA BILL

http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/756459/google%2C_facebook%2C_amazon_planning_internet_blackout_to_protest_%22big_brother%22_sopa_bill/

Why don't we do it, too? Let it go dead for 24 hours. We listen to nothing; we buy nothing. We exchange no information. We don't pay bills, we do no banking, we don't eBay. Nothing.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Dems write to FCC supporting net throttling by Verizon, ATT and Comcast.

74 Democrats signed a joint letter to the FCC supporting internet throttling by Verizon, ATT and Comcast. Throttling lets carriers slow or block internet traffic. This is a clear attack on net neutrality.

http://dailycensored.com/2010/06/05/benedict-arnold-dems-betray-net-neutrality/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Dailycensored+%28Daily+Censored%29

There's a letter to send them. The nerve of those bastards.

Yeah. Today I'm really angry.
And itchy.
I think I have poison ivy.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Letter from Sen. George LeMeuix re keeping the internet free and unfettered (reply to my note)

Thank you for contacting me regarding net-neutrality. I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue, and I would like to respond.

Americans have benefited greatly from access to the Internet. It has revolutionized both communication and commerce in our country, and the benefits for education and health care are growing daily. To increase Internet access, Congress has taken a number of steps to promote broadband deployment through tax incentives, grants, and loan programs. Expanding the availability of broadband and ensuring unfettered access to the Internet are critical for the future of our country.

The information that is transmitted over the Internet travels via infrastructure owned and operated by a variety of public and private entities, or network operators. These network operators are responsible for the security and maintenance of their networks, which often represent a significant financial investment. With the growth in demand of broadband content, network operators have relied on systems of prioritization and deep packet inspection to manage the flow of information over their networks. This ability to distinguish and prioritize information allows network operators to guard their networks from potential harm while attempting to maximize service to customers. However, this practice has given rise to concerns about potential market abuses and anti-competitive behavior if network operators use this ability to discriminate against competitors.

As you may know, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) adopted a notice of proposed rule-making on October 22, 2009 seeking comments on “the best means of preserving a free and open Internet.” I support a free and open Internet, but I also believe that network operators should be able to manage their networks to ensure efficiency and avoid harm. This will require a careful balance between assuring access and allowing network operators to manage their networks. Clearly, any anti-competitive behavior or market manipulation needs to be prohibited to ensure a competitive environment, but the regulations should not be so intrusive as to dissuade necessary private investment in broadband infrastructure or telecommunications innovation.

This is a complex issue, and I intend to monitor this rulemaking process closely to ensure that the dual goals of increased availability and unfettered access to the Internet are protected. Additionally, I will carefully review any legislation that comes before the Commerce Committee or the full Senate to ensure that the interests of Floridians are represented.

It is an honor and privilege to serve the people of the great State of Florida in the United States Senate. I take great pride in being a native Floridian, and I look forward to the tremendous opportunity to better the lives of all Floridians. I assure you I will work hard to represent our state to the best of my ability in the U.S. Senate. If I can be of any help to you, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,

George S. LeMieux
United States Senator