MYCHAL MASSIE WROTE THIS - A WRITER AND BLACK TALK SHOW HOST IN LOS ANGERLES

This man hit the nail on the head!!

 

 

Mychal Massie is a respected writer and black talk show host in Los Angeles.

The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obama's?   Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama's?   It seems personal, not policy related.   You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture."
The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation.   I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas.   As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.
I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America.  They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress.   I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same.   President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people.  The Reagan's made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish.   His arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable.   Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?
Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama's have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths.   They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.
I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able to be proud of America.   I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world.  Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.
I have a saying, that "the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide."   No president in history has spent over a million dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.
And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies.   He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother's death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family.   He has lied about his father's military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea.   He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address.   He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman.   He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today.   He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support.   He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel.   His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world).   I condemn them because, as people are
suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement - as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.
I don't like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies.   We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.
Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies.   And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.
I could go on, but let me conclude with this.  I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are.   There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.
As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, "Nero In The White House" - "Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader.  He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed.   Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled.  Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood...   Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders.   He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement - while America's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed.”

FINALLY, THE WAPO SPEAKS OUT ON OBAMA. BRUTAL AND TIMELY? HELL, NO! TIMELY WOULD HAVE BEEN THE MIDDLE OF HIS FIRST TERM!

the Washington Post . . .

Finally, the Washington Post speaks out on Obama! This is very brutal, timely though. As I'm sure you know, the Washington Post newspaper has a reputation for being extremely liberal. So the fact that its editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama in its newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his obvious socialist agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built around him by our liberal media.

I too have become disillusioned

By Matt Patterson (columnist - Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)

 

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job? Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

 

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

 

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.

 

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

 

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

 

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.

 

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

 

And what about his character?

 

Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

 

In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.

 

Please pass this on after you read this one. Suddenly people are getting wise to this enemy of our USA

 

 

"Make every day full of life rather than just another day lived

NY TIMES TURNS AGAINST OBAMA - SEARING INDICTMENT IN SUNDAY'S ISSUE - DID YOU MISS IT?

http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/searing-indictment-of-obama-in-the-sunday-new-york-times/

ARM OFFICIALLY REPRIMANDS SOLDIER WHO SPOKE AT RON PAUL RALLY - AND HE DOESN'T CARE ONE BIT! GOOD FOR HIM!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/army-officially-reprimands-soldier-who-spoke-at-ron-paul-rally.html

WHY IS OBAMA ALLOWING THE CHINESE WITH CHINESE FIRMS AS CONTRACTORS? BILLIONS ARE BEING SPENT AND OUR TAX DOLLARS ARE BEING FUNNELED TO CHINA

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/us-bridges-roads-built-chinese-firms-14594513?tab=9482930?ion=1206853&playlist=14594944

This should really tie a knot in your nose!

Remember...George Soros has endorsed Mitt Romney; Vote for Ron Paul for President.

ALLEN WEST CALLS OUT HOLDER AND OBAMA - FUNNY - BUT! YOU MUST READ THE COMMENTS.

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/11/16/allen-west-calls-out-holder-and-skippy-this-is-really-fun/

THANKS FOR THE LAUGHS, OBAMA!

http://trevorloudon.com/2011/09/attackwatch-humor/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NewZeal+%28New+Zeal+Blog%29

This turned out to be your best work, Fool!

LOUIE AND ZULU AND CYNTHIA ALL DISAPPOINTED IN OBAMA FOR MURDERING BLACKS AND BROWNS BUT NO WHITES...

http://constitutionclub.org/2011/07/10/meanwhile-back-at-the-non-war-in-libya-the-crazies-are-getting-crazier/

CATCHY NEW SONG FOR WE WHO WON'T VOTE obama IN 2012

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/06/12/obamas-legacy-campaign-song-for-2012/

Thanks, FOTM blog for this one. I just love it.

RAPPER CALLS obama A TERRORIST!

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/politics/123467904.html

Losing favor with your base, huh, Barry?

DEEP THROAT, THE WHITE HOUSE INSIDER SAYS OBAMA NOT A DEMOCRAT, MAYBE NOT AN AMERICAN

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

HAVE YOU SEEN JON VOIGHT CONDEMNING OBAMA?

The Ultimate Hijacking by Dr. Alan Bates, MD

The Ultimate Hijacking

By Dr. Alan Bates, M D.

If you would like to listen to an audio reading of this column click here.

The majority of Americans have now awakened to a nightmare unfolding. The naïve voted along side diehard liberals to elect a man who is probably not a U.S. citizen, is of Muslim upbringing, and who without a dime was put through Ivy League schools by funds raised through a prominent Arab sympathizer. He became a ‘community activist’ and represented the corrupt ACORN at one time as legal counsel and later ran successfully for Illinois State Senate where he rarely showed up. Then, he ran for President of the United States with the largest campaign treasure chest of anyone in history and won on an ideological platform called ‘change’, which he said would bring about transparency in government and a major transformation. The Federal Election Commission has audited every single presidential candidate since Watergate including the Bushes and John McCain except one---Barrack Obama! A petition is circulating to force the FEC to audit his campaign contributions since the majority has not been accounted for by Mr. Obama or his campaign even upon request. Sort of like asking for his birth certificate or proof that he attended Columbia where no one seems to recall him being there. Hmmm!

This ‘President’ has kept his promise to those who voted for him. He has ushered in a transformation; only it is one which fulfills the wildest dreams of radicals from the 1960s, the goals of whom are probably not known to younger voters today. But some of us grew up during and recall the sixties; we can see what Obama is doing is quite transparent to us! Mr. Obama is not an average American nor does he seem to respect the values set forth in the founding documents of our nation over 230 years ago. Ask yourself these questions and see if a pattern emerges:

Why did Mr. Obama condemn America’s past actions and our integrity during his visits to foreign nations after having been elected? Why is Mr. Obama pandering to radical Iran and its development of nuclear weapons while Iran threatens to annihilate Israel? Why is he now wanting to rid America of half its nuclear warheads and limit the nuclear strike option in cases of biologic or chemical attack on our nation? Does he implicitly trust Russia and China to follow the same disarmament path? Why is Mr. Obama determined to convey amnesty to illegal aliens when the laws clearly state otherwise? Why has he moved the 2010 census supervision into the White House?

Why does he pass a mammoth healthcare overhaul which basically emasculates the private healthcare system while driving states into bankruptcy if they are not already there? Why does the Administration use the ‘lamestreet’ media to batter the best auto manufacturer in the world while taking over GM? Why has this President created the largest current and future debt in the history of mankind--one which cannot be paid off? Why has this been the first President to appoint radicals, some of whom are professed Communists, as ‘czars’ in his administration to run the Departments of Energy, Education, Health, and Homeland Security amongst other agencies? Why has Mr. Obama decided to rid our national security strategy documents of references to ‘radical Islam’? And the list goes on. His actions are the antithesis of what one would expect of a leader who builds upon a strong America.

The pattern is consistent and the answer to all of these questions has finally been figured out by the majority who detest what this elected President and the Leftist leadership of Congress are doing, even by many of those who intentionally or naively elected him. Mr. Obama is schooled in radical thinking and ideology. Many of the people with whom he has associated in the past prove that. His actions also prove that. What more evidence do we need that he is methodically destroying America’s security, economy, and heritage? Make no mistake. America must remove this man and his circle of corrupt friends from office. Should the ‘conservative’ vote split, the transformation by the Leftwing radicals will be complete, and the strongest free country in the world will have been hijacked and transformed by a minority with evil intentions.

If you wish to send a comment or ask a question of Dr. Alan Bates please use: abb@gulf1.com

If you wish to write a letter to the Editor please use: http://www.gulf1.net/letters/NewLetter.htm

If you wish to read PREVIOUS ARTICLES by Dr. Bates please see: http://www.gulf1.com/columns/ABates/AbateslFrame.htm

HOW OBAMA AND THE DEMS PLAN TO STEAL THE NEXT ELECTION

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/03/07/how-obama-and-dems-plan-to-steal-the-next-election/

SO WE CAN'T LET THEM, CAN WE?

WE WON'T LET THEM, WILL WE?

Couric Rips Obama - the turning point?

The following comes from Newsmax.com.

1. Turning Point: Couric Rips Obama

Katie Couric may be best known for her unflattering interview with Sarah Palin. But her nightly news broadcast this past Monday night may be an indicator that the big liberal media are now turning their guns on Obama.

Couric said on “CBS Evening News” that Americans are growing “disenchanted” with Obama and are openly questioning his credibility.

“Is the honeymoon over?” anchor Couric said at the beginning of her correspondent’s report.

“Although President Obama has been in office less than a year, many Americans are growing disenchanted with his handling of the enormous problems he and the country are facing, from healthcare to unemployment to Afghanistan.

“His poll numbers are sliding, and at least one poll shows his job approval rating has fallen, for the first time, below 50 percent.”

Correspondent Chris Reid chimed in: “The president is getting battered on everything from the economy to foreign policy. Some polls show Americans are increasingly questioning his credibility.”

The report asserted that while Obama talks about dealing with unemployment, which is over 10 percent and expected to rise, he has developed “no new ideas” for dealing with the problem.

CBS also cited a poll showing that only 14 percent of Americans believe Obama’s claim that healthcare reform won’t add to the budget deficit, and only 7 percent believe that the stimulus has created any jobs at all.

The report also criticized the president for being “indecisive” on Afghanistan, and for returning from his recent Asian trip “with little to show for it.”

An expert was quoted as describing his trip as the “amateur hour,” as he did not line up agreements with foreign countries before venturing abroad.

Obama - future is not looking too well

http://voices.kansascity.com/node/5718

Bin Laden emerges: Obama antagonizing Muslims

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6426443.ece

and that's not all:

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/06/03/pakistan-taliban-swat-valley421.html?ref=rss