Search This Blog

Showing posts with label well kept secret. Show all posts
Showing posts with label well kept secret. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

BILDERBERGS MEET IN SWITZERLAND, SCRAMBLING FOR SECRECY. WILL CHOOSE NEW IMF HEAD TO...

FAST TRACK THE ENTIRE WORLD INTO SLAVERY...

FULL COVERAGE AT ALEX JONES' SITE, http://www.prisonplanet.com

While you are there, please, PLEASE view the interview with Gerald Celente - they are incredible.

I hope you listen or read Alex Jones every day. That's how you get your ammunition to fight for liberty and freedom. And it's free!

Sunday, May 8, 2011

RUMORS SWARM AROUND THAT STEALTH CHOPPER TAIL SECTION...

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-stealth-chopper-20110507,0,3245795.story

I've done an entry with a little personal story on this in the last week since the raid and "assassination" on this. Use the search bar above to find it, please.

Another thing...does the gubmint use holograms? I wonder...

Thursday, February 3, 2011

JANET NAPOLITANO AND MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AFFILIATES MET SECRETLY

http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2011/02/03/napolitano-and-muslim-brotherhood-affiliates-met-secretly/


BIG SIS - YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF. COLLUDING WITH THE ENEMY COMES TO MIND.

(And personally, every darn time I see your last name, you bring shame on the Italians of the USA - just saying. It's my blog.)

Monday, March 15, 2010

HILLARY'S NEW "GATE" - "CRYSTAL GATE"

In a "let them eat cake" maneuver, Hillary shuns Steuben crystal for Swedish crystal. $5.4 million contract. And Steuben manufactures it's magnificent crystal in New York State!

And in doing my search, look at this! What a shot in the arm for Steuben that megabucks deal would have given.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/hill_nub_of_ny_firm_is_crystal_clear_FYR65jDt5RHnO4X4CLOaFL

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

NASA'S CONTROVERSIAL NEW CLIMATE CHANGE DATA - CONFIRMING THE HOAX

Controversial New Climate Change Data

November 10, 2009

New data show that the balance between the airborne and the absorbed fraction of carbon dioxide has stayed approximately constant since 1850, despite emissions of carbon dioxide having risen from about 2 billion tons a year in 1850 to 35 billion tons a year now.

This suggests that terrestrial ecosystems and the oceans have a much greater capacity to absorb CO2 than had been previously expected.

The results run contrary to a significant body of recent research which expects that the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems and the oceans to absorb CO2 should start to diminish as CO2 emissions increase, letting greenhouse gas levels skyrocket. Dr Wolfgang Knorr at the University of Bristol found that in fact the trend in the airborne fraction since 1850 has only been 0.7 ± 1.4% per decade, which is essentially zero.

The strength of the new study, published online in Geophysical Research Letters, is that it rests solely on measurements and statistical data, including historical records extracted from Antarctic ice, and does not rely on computations with complex climate models.

This work is extremely important for climate change policy, because emission targets to be negotiated at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen early next month have been based on projections that have a carbon free sink of already factored in. Some researchers have cautioned against this approach, pointing at evidence that suggests the sink has already started to decrease.

So is this good news for climate negotiations in Copenhagen? “Not necessarily”, says Knorr. “Like all studies of this kind, there are uncertainties in the data, so rather than relying on Nature to provide a free service, soaking up our waste carbon, we need to ascertain why the proportion being absorbed has not changed”.

Another result of the study is that emissions from deforestation might have been overestimated by between 18 and 75 per cent. This would agree with results published last week in Nature Geoscience by a team led by Guido van der Werf from VU University Amsterdam. They re-visited deforestation data and concluded that emissions have been overestimated by at least a factor of two.

##

Contact:

Cherry Lewis
University of Bristol
44-117-928-8086
cherry.lewis@bristol.ac.uk

This text derived from:
http://www.bris.ac.uk/news/2009/6649.html