WRONG COURT RULED ON ARIZONA IMMIGRATION LAW!

http://www.patriotthoughts.com/2010/09/03/wrong-court-ruled-on-arizona%E2%80%99s-immigration-law/

And a new blog - www.patriotthoughts.com

d the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute
attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the
ruling against the State of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning
its new immigration law is illegal.
The attorney in question submitted her
assertion in a special article in the Canada Free Press. Her argument
states in part, "Does anyone read the US. Constitution these days?
American lawyers don't read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton
apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney
General Eric Holder.

But this lawyer has read it and she is going
to show you something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose
on your face.


"Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: "In all
Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and
those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have
original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the
supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction."


In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case
has absolutely no Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon
which she ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the
U.S. Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state. This means
that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San
Francisco , to which the case is being appealed, have any legal
standing whatsoever to rule on the issue. Thus, U.S. Attorney-General
Eric Holder filed the federal government's lawsuit against the state of
Arizona in a court that has no authority to hear the case.

In a related development, another explosive
discovery was made by those who actually take the Constitution
seriously. The Constitution specifically allows an individual state to
wage war against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion,
should there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the
federal government.


From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S.
Constitution, we find these words: No State shall, without the Consent
of Congress, engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such
imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."

No one who is actually familiar with the
crisis at the southern border can deny that Arizona is endangered by
the relentless assault of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws,
inundate our schools and medical facilities with unpaid bills, and even
endanger the very lives of citizens with criminal drug cartels that
engage in kidnapping, murder, human trafficking, and other mayhem,
including aiming missile and grenade launchers directly at U.S. border
cities from just across the Mexican border. This is every bit as much
of an invasion as the nation of Iran sending in a fleet of warships to
the Port of Charleston.
The Constitution that forms the basis of the
rule of law in this country says that Arizona has legal right to
protect itself in the case of inaction or delay on the part of the
federal government, including waging war in its self-defense.

This, when coupled with the clear
Constitutional mandate that only the Supreme Court hear cases involving
the states, should be ample legal basis for attorneys representing
Arizona to go after the federal government with a vengeance.

Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members
of the Arizona legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm
against the illegal bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal
government. And there are established procedures by which Federal
Judge Susan R. Bolton can be removed from her position as a result of
her violating her oath of office to uphold and defend the Constitution
for the United States of America ..