http://tomohalloran.com/2012/04/26/want-to-know-just-how-close-the-muslim-brotherhood-is-to-the-obama-admin/
And never EVER forget Huma Abedin and her close "association" with Hillary, who, if she becomes prez as the CFR, Trilateral Commission, etc want, she will be probably get Secretary of State job.
Showing posts with label Sharia law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sharia law. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Friday, May 10, 2013
LOOK WHO'S NEW IN THE WHITE HOUSE? THE SQUEEZE IN YOUR HEAD IS YOUR BLOOD PRESSURE!
Look who's new in the white house! 
Arif
Alikhan - Assistant Secretary for Policy Development
for the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Mohammed
Elibiary - Homeland Security Adviser
Rashad
Hussain - Special Envoy to the (OIC)
Organization
of the Islamic Conference
Salam
al-Marayati - Obama Adviser –
founder
Muslim Public Affairs Council
and its
current executive director
Imam
Mohamed Magid - Obama's Sharia Czar –
Islamic
Society of North America
Eboo
Patel - Advisory Council on Faith-Based
Neighborhood
Partnerships
This is
flat out scary!!!!
The foxes
are now living in the hen house...
Now ask
me why I am concerned!!!
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
ISLAMIC FLAG TO FLY OVER THE WHITE HOUSE...SO...IT ISN'T JUST ME, IS IT?
http://godfatherpolitics.com/10509/islamic-flag-to-fly-over-white-house/
http://godfatherpolitics.com/10487/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-not-most-dangerous-criminal-in-us-obama-is/
http://godfatherpolitics.com/10487/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-not-most-dangerous-criminal-in-us-obama-is/
Monday, February 18, 2013
Thursday, January 17, 2013
MAKING ISLAMIC SENSE OF FREE SPEECH
Making Islamic sense of free speech
By Harris Zafar
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/guest-voices/post/making-islamic-sense-of-free-speech/2013/01/14/95fc0b5a-5ec0-11e2-90a0-73c8343c6d61_blog.html
While many celebrated the winter holidays, news broke of the arrest in Saudi Arabia of liberal writer Turki Al Hamad for allegedly insulting Islam on Twitter. We also heard of another Saudi activist, Raif Badawi, who was arrested in June and will now continue with his trial, accused of apostasy for ridiculing Saudi Arabia’s religious police and making other comments that officials found insulting. These incidents have re-ignited the age old debate about the use of freedom of speech, especially with regards to Islam.
The difference between Islam’s view on free speech and the view promoted by free speech advocates these days is the intention and ultimate goal each seeks to promote. Whereas many secularists champion individual privileges, Islam promotes the principle of uniting mankind and cultivating love and understanding among people. Both endorse freedom for people to express themselves, but Islam promotes unity, whereas modern-day free speech advocates promote individualism.
Let me explain.
The ultimate goal of Islam is to unite mankind under a single banner of peace. The Koran– Islam’s holy scripture – says God created everyone in unity, but our own man-made differences has compromised our unity (2:214). In order to unite mankind, Islam instructs to only use speech to be truthful, do good to others, and be fair and respectful. It attempts to pre-empt frictions by prescribing rules of conduct which guarantee for all people not only freedom of speech but also fairness, absolute justice, and the right of disagreement.
The Koran instructs people to speak the truth (33:71), to speak in a manner that is best (17:54), to speak to others kindly (2:84) and to refrain from inappropriate speech (4:149). With Islam’s guidance to purify our intentions, it promotes free speech when our intention is to serve a good purpose, promote peace, bring people closer to God and unite mankind. If, however, our intentions are to insult others or promote disorder or division, we should refrain.
The most vocal proponents of freedom of speech, however, call us towards a different path, where people can say anything and everything on their mind. With no restraint on speech at all, every form of provocation would exist, thereby cultivating confrontation and antagonism. They insist this freedom entitles them the legal privilege to insult others. This is neither democracy nor freedom of speech. It fosters animosity, resentment and disorder.
Rather than focusing on privileges, Islam focuses on the principle to avoid speech that causes separation and conflict. Our words should have a positive impact on people’s lives, promote truth and promote justice. We agree with former U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower, who once said: “A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both.” Treating speech as supreme at the expense of world peace and harmony is an incredibly flawed concept. No matter how important the cause of free speech, it still pales in comparison to the cause of world peace and unity.
Opponents of Islam claim it denies freedom of speech and censors those who insult Islam. This is factually incorrect. Islam does not prescribe any worldly punishment for unseemly speech. So people who insult should not be persecuted. Islam grants everyone the right to express disagreements with others. After all, the Prophet Muhammad called differences of opinion a blessing in society and never sought to censor or threaten those who verbally attacked him.
[Editor’s note: Zafar is either ignorant of accepted Islamic history, including authoritative Islamic sources, or he is practicing taqiyya (deception.) Muhammad dealt harshly with those who dared to mock or criticize him, including ordering their assassination.]
According to the Koran, disbelievers called him “a mad man,” “a victim of deception,” a “fabricator” and treated him as a liar. Some claimed he was taught by another person instead of receiving revelations from God. They called the Koran “confused dreams” and “mere stories of the past” and even tore it into pieces.
Through this all, he courageously endured all verbal assaults. Rather than calling for any punishment, the Koran instructs us to “overlook their annoying talk” and “bear patiently what they say.” The lesson here for all Muslims is that we are not to be afraid of insults. Rather, we must have the same courage as our Prophet to face such insults in the eye and respond with forbearance and calm, righteous speech. Muslims must learn how their faith instructs them to respond when they are verbally attacked. No riots; no violence. We respond to speech with speech, but our speech is to be better and more dignified.
So while antagonists and enemies of peace create slanderous videos, cartoons or advertisements – like the “Innocence of Muslims” film, Pamela Geller’s new ignorant NYC subway ads and Charlie Hebdo’s cartoon about Prophet Muhammad – let us not fall for their claim that an individual’s privilege to say whatever they want is more important than the higher principle of uniting people and saving this planet from a path of animosity, hatred and destruction. Rather than falsely accusing Islam of censorship, let us understand the beauty of giving higher consideration to mankind over our own personal privileges. And let us listen to the wisdom of the Khalifa of Islam, His Holiness Mirza Masroor Ahmad, who said: “Let it not be that in the name of freedom of speech the peace of the entire world be destroyed.”
Harris Zafar is National Spokesperson for Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA - among the eldest Muslim organizations in America - and a frequently lecturer about Islam throughout the country.
By Harris Zafar
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/guest-voices/post/making-islamic-sense-of-free-speech/2013/01/14/95fc0b5a-5ec0-11e2-90a0-73c8343c6d61_blog.html
While many celebrated the winter holidays, news broke of the arrest in Saudi Arabia of liberal writer Turki Al Hamad for allegedly insulting Islam on Twitter. We also heard of another Saudi activist, Raif Badawi, who was arrested in June and will now continue with his trial, accused of apostasy for ridiculing Saudi Arabia’s religious police and making other comments that officials found insulting. These incidents have re-ignited the age old debate about the use of freedom of speech, especially with regards to Islam.
The difference between Islam’s view on free speech and the view promoted by free speech advocates these days is the intention and ultimate goal each seeks to promote. Whereas many secularists champion individual privileges, Islam promotes the principle of uniting mankind and cultivating love and understanding among people. Both endorse freedom for people to express themselves, but Islam promotes unity, whereas modern-day free speech advocates promote individualism.
Let me explain.
The ultimate goal of Islam is to unite mankind under a single banner of peace. The Koran– Islam’s holy scripture – says God created everyone in unity, but our own man-made differences has compromised our unity (2:214). In order to unite mankind, Islam instructs to only use speech to be truthful, do good to others, and be fair and respectful. It attempts to pre-empt frictions by prescribing rules of conduct which guarantee for all people not only freedom of speech but also fairness, absolute justice, and the right of disagreement.
The Koran instructs people to speak the truth (33:71), to speak in a manner that is best (17:54), to speak to others kindly (2:84) and to refrain from inappropriate speech (4:149). With Islam’s guidance to purify our intentions, it promotes free speech when our intention is to serve a good purpose, promote peace, bring people closer to God and unite mankind. If, however, our intentions are to insult others or promote disorder or division, we should refrain.
The most vocal proponents of freedom of speech, however, call us towards a different path, where people can say anything and everything on their mind. With no restraint on speech at all, every form of provocation would exist, thereby cultivating confrontation and antagonism. They insist this freedom entitles them the legal privilege to insult others. This is neither democracy nor freedom of speech. It fosters animosity, resentment and disorder.
Rather than focusing on privileges, Islam focuses on the principle to avoid speech that causes separation and conflict. Our words should have a positive impact on people’s lives, promote truth and promote justice. We agree with former U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower, who once said: “A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both.” Treating speech as supreme at the expense of world peace and harmony is an incredibly flawed concept. No matter how important the cause of free speech, it still pales in comparison to the cause of world peace and unity.
Opponents of Islam claim it denies freedom of speech and censors those who insult Islam. This is factually incorrect. Islam does not prescribe any worldly punishment for unseemly speech. So people who insult should not be persecuted. Islam grants everyone the right to express disagreements with others. After all, the Prophet Muhammad called differences of opinion a blessing in society and never sought to censor or threaten those who verbally attacked him.
[Editor’s note: Zafar is either ignorant of accepted Islamic history, including authoritative Islamic sources, or he is practicing taqiyya (deception.) Muhammad dealt harshly with those who dared to mock or criticize him, including ordering their assassination.]
According to the Koran, disbelievers called him “a mad man,” “a victim of deception,” a “fabricator” and treated him as a liar. Some claimed he was taught by another person instead of receiving revelations from God. They called the Koran “confused dreams” and “mere stories of the past” and even tore it into pieces.
Through this all, he courageously endured all verbal assaults. Rather than calling for any punishment, the Koran instructs us to “overlook their annoying talk” and “bear patiently what they say.” The lesson here for all Muslims is that we are not to be afraid of insults. Rather, we must have the same courage as our Prophet to face such insults in the eye and respond with forbearance and calm, righteous speech. Muslims must learn how their faith instructs them to respond when they are verbally attacked. No riots; no violence. We respond to speech with speech, but our speech is to be better and more dignified.
So while antagonists and enemies of peace create slanderous videos, cartoons or advertisements – like the “Innocence of Muslims” film, Pamela Geller’s new ignorant NYC subway ads and Charlie Hebdo’s cartoon about Prophet Muhammad – let us not fall for their claim that an individual’s privilege to say whatever they want is more important than the higher principle of uniting people and saving this planet from a path of animosity, hatred and destruction. Rather than falsely accusing Islam of censorship, let us understand the beauty of giving higher consideration to mankind over our own personal privileges. And let us listen to the wisdom of the Khalifa of Islam, His Holiness Mirza Masroor Ahmad, who said: “Let it not be that in the name of freedom of speech the peace of the entire world be destroyed.”
Harris Zafar is National Spokesperson for Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA - among the eldest Muslim organizations in America - and a frequently lecturer about Islam throughout the country.
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make sure you receive all of your messages from ACT for America. Add actforamerica@donationnet.net to your address book as an approved email sender. If you found this message in your "Bulk" or "Spam" folder, please click the "Not Spam" button to notify your provider that these are emails you want to receive. |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org
ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org
Monday, January 14, 2013
Sunday, December 23, 2012
MUSLIME BROTHERHOOD IN EGYPT APPROVES CONSTITUTION - SOMEONE SAID "WE WON"...
http://rt.com/news/egypt-referendum-approves-constitution-670/
Do I say what's on the tip of my tongue?
Never mind. If you read this blog, you know.
Do I say what's on the tip of my tongue?
Never mind. If you read this blog, you know.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Monday, October 29, 2012
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Sunday, October 21, 2012
EGYPT: NEW MUSLIM BROHOOD SEZ YOU WILL LIVE UNDER SHARIA LAW
http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=288551
A big hand to the liberator, Barack Hussein Obama, the Muslim in the White House.
(Oh, and you Jewish liberals out there? This guy also claims to have a Jihad in Jerusalem - so doesn't that make you feel warm and cozy?)
A big hand to the liberator, Barack Hussein Obama, the Muslim in the White House.
(Oh, and you Jewish liberals out there? This guy also claims to have a Jihad in Jerusalem - so doesn't that make you feel warm and cozy?)
Monday, October 15, 2012
FOR EVERYTHING ELSE, THERE'S AL-MASTERCARD
For Everything Else, There's al-MasterCard
MasterCard's dalliance with shariah finance plays into the hands of Islamist terror  Actual photo of shariah-compliant MasterCard -- complete with compass pointing to Mecca (source: NBC News) The concept of shariah-finance is pretty simple. Muslims are forbidden to charge on interest -- the lifeblood of any credit card. So instead of interest, shariah-finance charges an upfront fee while simultaneously donating some of the proceeds to charity. Win-win-win for all involved. This system of finance today holds about $1.5 trillion in assets, ultimately using a system that before 9/11 was difficult to track and bled into Islamist terror networks such as Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood -- all under the guise of charitable giving. So with a bit of marketing magic (and you have to admit, the compass is a nice touch) and some kowtowing to the strictures of shariah finance, MasterCard has gone green. A nice, bright, Islamic Jihad sort of green. There's no question that shariah finance has some fairly direct problems when it comes to the inevitable connection to financing Islamist terrorism. The Holy Land Foundation is a classic example of this dalliance with Islamist terror. In 2007, federal authorities brought charges against this organization as a major funding source for Islamic terrorism. In an 11-page document, 305 unindicted co-conspirators were identified as having funneled money to either Hamas or the Muslim Brotherhood. By 2008, the federal government landed convictions against five of these individuals, ultimately funneling over $12 million to Hamas since 1995. Among the groups that were complicit in this scheme were the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), and the North American Islamic Trust. The method of financing Hamas? Through shariah finance, who funneled the money through zakat committees ostensibly designed to be charity front groups, but in reality were laundering the money to Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas terrorists in the Israeli West Bank and Gaza Strip. ...money that was used to kill Israelis and promote Islamic terrorism. 
What's
more interesting is that on the personal level in terrorist-sponsoring
regimes such as Iran, the new MasterCards are a concerning new conduit
for higher ups in the Iranian regime to skirt sanctions.
MasterCard clearly sees the dollars for their end of the "win-win" scenario, but utterly fails to see the moral dimension of participation in the system of shariah finance. It is a simple equation of greed countermanding common sense. This isn't to argue MasterCard should be charging interest rates to terrorists -- the means of MasterCard's dalliance with the conduits of Islamic terrorism is not what at are issue. What is at stake are the ends of shariah finance; results that are ultimately measured in Israeli or American lives. Is that really worth an entry into the marketplace of shariah financing?  |
If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here.  |
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
OBAMA'S SHARIAH-INSPIRED WAR ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT - CLIFF KINCAID/PAM GELLER
Dear Friend of America's Survival, Inc.:
Pamela Geller has an important column at World Net Daily: OBAMA'S SHARIAH-INSPIRED WAR ON 1ST AMENDMENT
This issue is far more important that what Romney said months ago about the 47 percent. It is far more important than what Obama said years ago about redistribution of income. We know Obama is a Marxist. What's new?
What's new is that our First Amendment rights are under attack. Obama has sold us out and Romney isn't saying a word. He must speak out.
Geller writes that "...the riots have everything to do with America and U.S. policy. They are about freedom of conscience and freedom of speech: they're an attempt to get the U.S. to shut down free speech and criminalize criticism of Islam, in accord with Shariah blasphemy laws. And the Obama administration is responding by putting a huge target on the head of the First Amendment (and on that of every U.S. citizen who exercises that constitutional right). This is a constitutional coup."
This is what we should be talking about. This is what Romney should be talking about.
The latest "incident" is that a satirical Parisian weekly called Charlie Hedbo has published what the media call "crude caricatures" of the Prophet Muhammad. Once again, the Islamic fanatics have their underware in a twist. This magazine had its offices firebombed last year after it published an edition entitled "Sharia Hebdo" and described it as "guest edited" by the Prophet Mohammed.
Today, its offices are surrounded by police, fearful of more violence against the publication.
The AP says there is a "debate about the limits of free expression" that is underway around the world.
That is what the Islamists want. I say to hell with the Islamists. We must stand up for freedom of speech.
Here is the "offensive" cover:
Can you believe violence is being threatened over THAT? The headline
is, "You mustn't mock," a barb at the Islamic thought police. Muhammad
is the old man in the wheel chair.
Can you believe they call it a "religion of peace?"
Do we have the freedom to criticize this violence-prone religion? Our rights are hanging in the balance.
Send me your thoughts at Kincaid@comcast.net
For America's Survival,
Cliff Kincaid, President
Was this message forwarded to you by a friend? You can sign up for our Newsletter for FREE! Go here: http://www.usasurvival.org/mailing_list/
Pamela Geller has an important column at World Net Daily: OBAMA'S SHARIAH-INSPIRED WAR ON 1ST AMENDMENT
This issue is far more important that what Romney said months ago about the 47 percent. It is far more important than what Obama said years ago about redistribution of income. We know Obama is a Marxist. What's new?
What's new is that our First Amendment rights are under attack. Obama has sold us out and Romney isn't saying a word. He must speak out.
Geller writes that "...the riots have everything to do with America and U.S. policy. They are about freedom of conscience and freedom of speech: they're an attempt to get the U.S. to shut down free speech and criminalize criticism of Islam, in accord with Shariah blasphemy laws. And the Obama administration is responding by putting a huge target on the head of the First Amendment (and on that of every U.S. citizen who exercises that constitutional right). This is a constitutional coup."
This is what we should be talking about. This is what Romney should be talking about.
The latest "incident" is that a satirical Parisian weekly called Charlie Hedbo has published what the media call "crude caricatures" of the Prophet Muhammad. Once again, the Islamic fanatics have their underware in a twist. This magazine had its offices firebombed last year after it published an edition entitled "Sharia Hebdo" and described it as "guest edited" by the Prophet Mohammed.
Today, its offices are surrounded by police, fearful of more violence against the publication.
The AP says there is a "debate about the limits of free expression" that is underway around the world.
That is what the Islamists want. I say to hell with the Islamists. We must stand up for freedom of speech.
Here is the "offensive" cover:
Can you believe they call it a "religion of peace?"
Do we have the freedom to criticize this violence-prone religion? Our rights are hanging in the balance.
Send me your thoughts at Kincaid@comcast.net
For America's Survival,
Cliff Kincaid, President
| Share |  |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)