HERE'S THE LIST OF WEAK-KNEED RINO SENATORS THAT NEED TO UNDERSTAND THIS IS NOT ABOUT GUNS, IT'S ABOUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT!

---

TO: The Republican Members Of The United States Senate: The Hon. Mitch McConnell, The Hon. John Cornyn, The Hon. John Thune, The Hon. John Barrasso, The Hon. Roy Blunt, The Hon. Lisa Murkowski, The Hon. Jeff Sessions, The Hon. Richard Shelby, The Hon. John Boozman, The Hon. Jeff Flake, The Hon. John McCain, The Hon. Marco Rubio, The Hon. Johnny Isakson, The Hon. Saxby Chambliss, The Hon. Chuck Grassley, The Hon. James E. Risch, The Hon. Mike Crapo, The Hon. Mark Kirk, The Hon. Dan Coats, The Hon. Jerry Moran, The Hon. Pat Roberts, The Hon. Rand Paul, The Hon. David Vitter, The Hon. Susan Collins, The Hon. Roger Wicker, The Hon. Thad Cochran, The Hon. Richard Burr, The Hon. John Hoeven, The Hon. Deb Fischer, The Hon. Mike Johanns, The Hon. Kelly Ayotte, The Hon. Dean Heller, The Hon. Rob Portman, The Hon. Tom Coburn, The Hon. James M. Inhofe, The Hon. Pat Toomey, The Hon. Tim Scott, The Hon. Lindsey Graham, The Hon. Bob Corker, The Hon. Lamar Alexander, The Hon. Ted Cruz, The Hon. Mike Lee, The Hon. Orrin G. Hatch, The Hon. Ron Johnson, The Hon. Mike Enzi

Pay attention, you RINO waffling, weaklings...

You  screw over the American citizen on this monstrous decision which is not about guns or magazines - but about TOTALITARIAN GOVERNMENT AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT - YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE YOUR HANDS FULL.

THE SECOND AMENDMENT - IT'S A RIGHT TO SHOOT TYRANTS, DICTATORS, KINGS WITH IRON FISTS...AND POWER CRAZED DEMAGOGUES

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/its-a-right-to-shoot-tyrants/

US TOTALITARIANISM JUST AN ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN

http://www.dailycensored.com/2012/09/02/u-s-totalitarianism-just-an-accident-waiting-to-happen/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Dailycensored+%28Daily+Censored%29

THE NEW ADDITIONAL LIST OF DHS'S "DIRTY" WORDS, AND THAT'S ONE OF THEM.

http://www.dailycensored.com/2012/05/29/new-list-of-words-used-online-that-will-make-you-a-target-for-dhs/

The second dirtiest word in the English language after Barack Obama is Janet Napolitano/DHS.

LOVE BEING SURVEILLED? ALL YOUR RECORDS BELONG TO THE GOVERNMENT

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/all-your-records-are-belong-to-u-s/#utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Cato-at-liberty+%28Cato+at+Liberty%29

DRONES WILL FILL THE SKY AND MAY FLY INDEFINITELY...DON'T YOU FEEL WARM AND COZY NOW?

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/07/18/drones-that-may-fly-indefinitely-can-be-recharged-by-lasers/

We chose to live in Obamaland...we didn't make enough of a ruckus, we didn't collar our Congresscretins and tell them they will suffer the consequences of losing office, of losing business when they come home, of shunning...of such angry confrontations, they'd better do what's right for America and do their jobs, which is to protect the Constitution.  After all, that's all we asked.

WE DIDN'T TELL THEM TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY!

They have failed in totality.

All of them are disgusting, cloying, little men and women with no souls and no patriotism, who don't know good from evil.

OBAMA'S MAKING A LIST AND CHECKING IT TWICE - AND WE WILL BE THE ONES TO SUFFER

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/obamas-making-a-list-checking-it-twice

THE EPA'S ABUSIVE AUTHORITY

http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/04/the-environmental-protection-agencys-arrogant-abusive-authority/

WHAT IS OBAMACARE? PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/04/10/what-is-obamacare/

JUDGE NAPOLITANO: i THINK THE PRESIDENT IS DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO TOTALITARIANISM...BETTER LISTEN TO THIS JUDGE!

http://noisyroom.net/blog/2012/04/04/judge-napolitano-i-think-the-president-is-dangerously-close-to-totalitarianism/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Noisyroomnet+%28NoisyRoom.net%29

FORGERYGATE: MEDIA THREATENED W/FEDERAL INVESTIGATIONS IF OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE STORY IS REPORTED

http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/forgerygate-media-threatened-with-federal-investigations-if-obama-birth-certificate-story-reported/

Your "king", or rather, "The Emperor without Clothes" does not want you looking up his invisible "papers".

Wait until one of the libs in the media gets thinking about this and in the name of the Firt Amendment and righteous and passionate indignation speaks.

Who'll be first? Nah - the libs are cowards. Maher will be kissing ass all over this. Won't be chocolate on his face.

You could get Breitbarted!

OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE ORDER: US CAN SEIZE ANY PERSON, ANY RESOURCE, ANY TIME...AN OP-ED PIECE.

http://dailycensored.com/2012/03/18/obama-executive-order-us-can-seize-any-person-any-resource-anytime/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Dailycensored+%28Daily+Censored%29

With links.

IMPORTANT ALEX JONES INTERVIEW ON GM FOODS AND CROPS

All four parts will be found here.

THE SEVEN VARIETIES OF GUN CONTROL ADVOCATE

The Seven Varieties of Gun Control Advocate

by
By Gus Cotey, Jr.

A Publication of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
"Intellectual Ammunition to Destroy Gun Control"

The right of decent private citizens to personally possess, transport, and responsibly use arms without government interference is the ultimate freedom and the main pillar supporting all other liberties. Few cultures have allowed their general population access to weapons, the tools of power, to the same degree as the United States. Instead, most societies have restricted the keeping and bearing of arms to a select few power brokers and their agents, often resulting in oppression on a grand scale.

Despite a massive amount of historical evidence to the contrary, there is a substantial body of Americans, many occupying positions of influence, who contend that the abrogation of the Second Amendment is the quickest path to domestic tranquility. Since this is as absurd as advocating blood-letting as a cure for anemia, it would seem advisable to question the motives and mentalities of the gun control advocates themselves.

In my observation, weapon prohibitionists can be broken down into seven major categories. Even though their motives may vary they all pose a mortal threat to liberty.

ELITISTS

Many of those in favor of oppressive firearms legislation are are best classed as elitists. Elitists frequently identify with a peer group based on wealth, power, rank, social status, occupation, education, ethnic group, etc. and perceive themselves and their peers as inherently superior to and more responsible than the "common people", thus more deserving of certain rights. Since elitists practically consider those outside their class or caste as members of another species, that most anti-elitist list of laws, the Bill of Rights is viewed by them as anathema. Naturally, the Second Amendment is their first target as it serves as the supporting structure for the other nine amendments.

AUTHORITARIANS

Another type of individual who favors the restriction of private gun ownership is the authoritarian. Authoritarian personalities are characterized by their belief in unquestioning obedience to an authority figure or group and a disdain for individual freedom of action, expression, and judgement. Those with authoritarian personalities function well in symbiosis with elitists occupying positions of power. Because authoritarians repress their desires for autonomy they harbor a deep resentment toward free and independent thinkers. Of course authoritarians do not want firearms in the hands of the general population as this constitutes a major obstacle to fulfilling their pathological and obsessive desire to control people.

CRIMINALS

It goes without saying that career criminals would like to see the public disarmed for obvious reasons. A well-armed population makes crimes such as assault, robbery, and burglary hazardous for the perpetrator and this is bad for "business." Also, it would seem that even non-violent or "white collar" criminals live in constant fear of retribution from the public that they financially bleed and would therefore prefer that the public be disarmed. Evidence supporting this hypothesis can be gathered by studying the Second Amendment voting records of those legislators who have been convicted of willful misconduct.

THE FEARFUL

Cowards by definition are easily or excessively frightened by things and situations that are recognized as dangerous, difficult, or painful. It therefore stands to reason that the mere thought of guns and the circumstances in which they are employed causes them abnormal amounts of stress. Rather than admit their weakness to themselves or others, some fearful types jump on the anti-gun bandwagon and purport moral superiority to those "barbaric"enough to employ lethal force against armed assailants by claiming various humanitarian and pragmatic motives for allowing evil to remain unchecked. In reality, many of these individuals harbor an envy induced resentment toward anyone with the means, skill, and will to successfully stand up to criminal aggression.

The desire to assert oneself exists in nearly everyone, wimps included, so cowards seek out tame enemies against whom they can ply their pitiful brand of machismo. Instead of the sociopaths who commit acts of wanton aggression with guns, guns themselves and responsible gun owners are the main targets of their attacks. After all, real criminals are dangerous, so cowards prefer doing battle with inanimate objects that do not have a will of their own and decent law-abiding people whose high level of integrity and self discipline prevent them from physically lashing out against mere verbal assailants, however obnoxious they may be.

IDEOLOGICAL CHAMELEONS

Ideological chameleons follow the simple social strategy of avoiding controversy and confrontation by espousing the beliefs of the people in their immediate vicinity or advocating the philosophy of those who scream the loudest in a debate. Quite a few supposedly pro Second Amendment public officials have shown themselves to be ideological chameleons when they supported restrictions on the private possession of military style semiautomatic rifles following recent atrocities in which such firearms were employed. Like their reptilian namesake, people who merely blend in with the ambient philosophical foliage seem to have little insight into the moral and social ramifications of their actions. Political and/or economic gain along with avoidance of confrontation are their only goals.

SECURITY MONOPOLISTS

Security monopolists are those members and representatives of public and private security providing concerns who want the means of self protection out of private hands so that they can command high fees for protecting the citizenry against the rising tide of crime. These profiteers stand to loose a great deal of capital if citizens can efficiently defend themselves. To the security monopolist, each criminal who enters and exits the revolving door of justice is a renewable source of revenue providing jobs for police, social workers, victim counsellors, judges, prison employees, security guards, burglar alarm installers, locksmiths, and others employed by the security monopolies or their satellite organizations. No wonder it is so common for an honest citizen to be more ruthlessly hounded by the authorities when he shoots a criminal in self defense than a criminal who shoots honest citizens.

THE DYSFUNCTIONALLY UNWORLDLY

Just as a limb will weaken and atrophy if not used, so will aspects of the mind fail to develop if nothing in one’s environment exists to challenge them. People who have led excessively sheltered lives tend to have a difficult time understanding certain cause and effect relationships and an even harder time appreciating just how cruel the world can be. These dysfunctionally unworldly types are truly perplexed at the very notion of firearms ownership with regard to defense. To them, tyranny and crime are things that happen in other places far removed from their "civilized" universe. Also, they do not understand the value of private property and why some people would fight for theirs since they never had to work hard to acquire what they possess. While those suffering from dysfunctional unworldliness are most often people who have been born into considerable wealth, this condition is also common in members of the clergy, academicians, practioners of the arts, and others who have spent much of their lives cloistered in a safe and pampering environment. While many of these people may be quite talented and intelligent in some ways, their extreme naivety makes them easy prey for the tyrants who use them for the financial support and favorable advertisement of their regimes. Needless to say, the anti-gun movement is well represented and financed by the dysfunctionally unworldly.

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, and it behooves all vigilant lovers of liberty to know and be able to recognize the various types of arms prohibitionists and understand their differing but equally dangerous motives. Acquiring knowledge of one’s foes is the first step toward defeating them. We must never forget that a threat to private firearms ownership is a threat to all freedoms.

The inalienable and fundamental right to keep and bear arms which is enumerated by (but actually predates) the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is not about hunting, gun collecting, or target shooting. Its purpose is to insure that every responsible American personally possesses the means to defend the Republic from all forms of tyranny, within and without. It is what permits the other nine Amendments in the Bill of Rights to be more than mere hollow phrases on a piece of paper. Its free exercise is the antithesis of serfdom and the only meaningful form of holocaust insurance known to man.

We must never insult and degrade the spirits of our Founding Fathers by permitting the Second Amendment, the pillar of freedom, to be destroyed by the cold flame of legislative ink.

Original material on JPFO is copyright, and so it cannot be used or plagiarized as the work of another. JPFO does however encourage article reproduction and sharing, providing full attribution is given and a link back to the original page on JPFO is included.

Back to Top

Copyright © JPFO 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.

ATTACK ON 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OR GOEBBELS STYLE PROPAGANDA AT WORK VIA MEDIA MATTERS

http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2012/02/15/attack-on-first-amendment-rights-or-goebbels-style-propaganda-at-work-via-media-matters/

RON PAUL SAYS DEFENSE BILL ASSURES DESCENT INTO TOTALITARIANISM

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/201335-rep-paul-says-defense-bill-assures-descent-into-totalitarianism

HR 1505 OR THE DHS IS HAVING A LAND GRAB - FILE UNDER VERY BAD BILL

And wonder of wonders, my Representative Steve Southerland is co-sponsoring it.
And he's a Republican, voting for the DHS to take away our security and our rights.

Toll-free to your Reps and Senators: 1-877-851-6437

My friends in a Montana Tea Party sent this to me tonight. I hope you will make a call or send an email or fax. DHS has too much power already, and was created to take our rights away as you well know.

HR 1505 National Security and Federal Lands Protection Act

Thompson Falls lies 5 miles OUTSIDE the 100 mile zone

http://www.northernborderpeis.com/images/stories/docs/04-west-of-rockies-region.pdf

Complete with maps and images - 148 pages

PIES web site http://www.northernborderpeis.com/resources-and-documents/materials.html

I’m not sure that Denny Rehberg knows the full impact of the bill he is co-sponsoring. However, if he is aware and co-sponsoring on purpose then he should be held accountable.

TEXT:

HR 1505 IH

112th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1505

To prohibit the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture from taking action on public lands which impede border security on such lands, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 13, 2011

Mr. BISHOP of Utah (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. SMITH of Texas, and Mr. CARTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture and Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture from taking action on public lands which impede border security on such lands, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `National Security and Federal Lands Protection Act'.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPEDING CERTAIN ACTIVITIES OF THE SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY RELATED TO BORDER SECURITY.

(a) In General- The Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture shall not impede, prohibit, or restrict activities of the Secretary of Homeland Security on land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture to achieve operational control (as defined in section 2(b) of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1701 note; Public Law 109-367)) over the international land and maritime borders of the United States.

(b) Authorized Activities- The Secretary of Homeland Security shall have immediate access to any public land managed by the Federal Government (including land managed by the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture) for purposes of conducting activities that assist in securing the border (including access to maintain and construct roads, construct a fence, use vehicles to patrol, and set up monitoring equipment).

(c) Clarification Relating to Waiver Authority-

(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including any termination date relating to the waiver referred to in this subsection), the waiver by the Secretary of Homeland Security on April 1, 2008, under section 102(c)(1) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note; Public Law 104-208) of the laws described in paragraph (2) with respect to certain sections of the international border between the United States and Mexico and between the United States and Canada shall be considered to apply to all sections of the international land and maritime borders of the United States within 100 miles of the international land and maritime borders of the United States for the activities of the Secretary of Homeland Security described in subsection (b), including the construction of infrastructure, to achieve the operational control described in subsection (a).

(2) DESCRIPTION OF LAWS WAIVED- The laws referred to in paragraph (1) are the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.), the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 U.S.C. 470aa et seq.), the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.), the Noise Control Act of 1972 (42 U.S.C. 4901 et seq.), the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), Public Law 86-523 (16 U.S.C. 469 et seq.), the Act of June 8, 1906 (commonly known as the `Antiquities Act of 1906') (16 U.S.C. 431 et seq.), the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.), the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.), the Farmland Protection Policy Act (7 U.S.C. 4201 et seq.), the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.), the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742a et seq.), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the `Administrative Procedure Act'), the Otay Mountain Wilderness Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-145, 113 Stat. 1711), sections 102(29) and 103 of California Desert Protection Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 410aaa et seq.), the National Park Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-1 et seq.), sections 401(7), 403, and 404 of the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-625, 92 Stat. 3467), the Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; Public Law 101-628), section 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), the Act of June 8, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), Public Law 95-341 (42 U.S.C. 1996), Public Law 103-141 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.), the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.), and the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 (16 U.S.C. 528 et seq.).

END

Co-sponsors:

COSPONSORS(51), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)

Rep Bachus, Spencer [AL-6] - 6/3/2011
Rep Blackburn, Marsha [TN-7] - 6/1/2011
Rep Brooks, Mo [AL-5] - 7/7/2011
Rep Broun, Paul C. [GA-10] - 5/26/2011
Rep Burton, Dan [IN-5] - 6/3/2011
Rep Calvert, Ken [CA-44] - 9/12/2011
Rep Canseco, Francisco "Quico" [TX-23] - 5/4/2011
Rep Carter, John R. [TX-31] - 4/13/2011
Rep Chaffetz, Jason [UT-3] - 5/26/2011
Rep Coffman, Mike [CO-6] - 5/4/2011
Rep Crawford, Eric A. "Rick" [AR-1] - 6/13/2011
Rep Duncan, Jeff [SC-3] - 9/19/2011
Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. [TN-2] - 6/3/2011
Rep Ellmers, Renee L. [NC-2] - 6/1/2011
Rep Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" [TN-3] - 7/25/2011
Rep Fleming, John [LA-4] - 6/1/2011
Rep Flores, Bill [TX-17] - 7/25/2011
Rep Franks, Trent [AZ-2] - 7/26/2011
Rep Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] - 6/3/2011
Rep Gibson, Christopher P. [NY-20] - 10/4/2011
Rep Gohmert, Louie [TX-1] - 7/26/2011
Rep Goodlatte, Bob [VA-6] - 6/13/2011
Rep Gosar, Paul A. [AZ-1] - 5/13/2011
Rep Hall, Ralph M. [TX-4] - 7/14/2011
Rep Hastings, Doc [WA-4] - 4/13/2011
Rep Herger, Wally [CA-2] - 6/14/2011
Rep Jenkins, Lynn [KS-2] - 6/1/2011
Rep Johnson, Bill [OH-6] - 6/22/2011
Rep King, Peter T. [NY-3] - 4/13/2011
Rep King, Steve [IA-5] - 6/1/2011
Rep Labrador, Raul R. [ID-1] - 6/21/2011
Rep Lamborn, Doug [CO-5] - 7/25/2011
Rep Lankford, James [OK-5] - 6/13/2011
Rep Luetkemeyer, Blaine [MO-9] - 6/14/2011
Rep Lummis, Cynthia M. [WY] - 5/26/2011
Rep McClintock, Tom [CA-4] - 5/13/2011
Rep McMorris Rodgers, Cathy [WA-5] - 5/26/2011
Rep Miller, Candice S. [MI-10] - 5/26/2011
Rep Miller, Gary G. [CA-42] - 6/21/2011
Rep Miller, Jeff [FL-1] - 7/13/2011
Rep Myrick, Sue Wilkins [NC-9] - 6/13/2011
Rep Nunes, Devin [CA-21] - 7/6/2011
Rep Posey, Bill [FL-15] - 6/22/2011
Rep Rehberg, Denny [MT] - 5/4/2011
Rep Royce, Edward R. [CA-40] - 5/26/2011
Rep Smith, Lamar [TX-21] - 4/13/2011
Rep Southerland, Steve [FL-2] - 7/26/2011
Rep Westmoreland, Lynn A. [GA-3] - 6/13/2011
Rep Wittman, Robert J. [VA-1] - 7/26/2011
Rep Woodall, Rob [GA-7] - 6/14/2011
Rep Young, Don [AK] - 6/21/2011

GULAG USA - TAKE HEED

OUR GOVERNMENT -FIGHT OR FLIGHT - WHICH DO YOU CHOOSE

http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/government/fight-or-flight-which-do-you-choose/?eiid=&rmid=2011_08_12_PLA_[P11998888]&rrid=307102185

RIOTING IN UK - CAMERON SUGGEST PURPLE RAIN AND OTHER UGLY THINGS...

http://www.infowars.com/cameron-suggests-purple-rain-for-rioters/

http://www.infowars.com/uk-riots-govt-mulls-kill-switch-for-twitter-facebook-army-on-streets/

UK cops mulling over face recognition technology for rioting mobs...

If you don't take a look at Alex Jones' Prison Planet tonight, you are being foolish. There are ghoulish things afoot, and those things have government tentacles, all over the world. Don't make me work so hard.

Go here. Now.

http://www.prisonplanet.com