Search This Blog

Showing posts with label bad news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bad news. Show all posts

Friday, March 29, 2013

MT GOVERNOR LIES AB OUT THE CONSTITUTION, VETOES 2ND AMENDMENT PROTECTION BILL - (HEY STEVE, YOU WON'T BE RE-ELECTED 'CAUSE MY FRIENDS WILL NEVER LET YOU FORGET ABOUT THIS!)

Montana Governor Lies About the Constitution, Vetoes 2nd Amendment Protection Bill
Posted by Michael Boldin, founder of the Tenth Amendment Center
Here's a surprise for you; some Governors have absolutely zero understanding of the Constitution.  None, whatsoever. Montana Governor Steve Bullock seems to fit that description quite nicely.
Yesterday, he vetoed Montana House Bill 302 (HB302).  The bill would require the state to refuse to enforce or assist the enforcement of any federal bans on semiautomatic weapons or large capacity magazines.  The bill states, in part:
A peace officer, state employee, or employee of any political subdivision is prohibited from enforcing, assisting in the enforcement of, or otherwise cooperating in the enforcement of a federal ban on semiautomatic weapons or large magazines and is also prohibited from participating in any federal enforcement action implementing a federal ban on semiautomatic weapons or large magazines.

Here's why Bullock is clueless about the Constitution.  In his veto message he wrote that the bill would put "law enforcement in the position of violating laws they have sworn to uphold" and "subject our peace officers to criminal sanctions for upholding the oath we ask that they take."
Here's a message for you, Steve.  You're a liar, and we know it.
There is absolutely ZERO serious discussion from anyone beyond a 4th grade education about the fact that the federal government cannot "commandeer" the states to carry out its laws.  None.
Even the Supreme Court has affirmed this multiple times.
In the 1992 case, New York v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress couldn't require states to enact specified waste disposal regulations.
In the 1997 case, Printz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could not command state law enforcement authorities to conduct background checks on prospective handgun purchasers.
In the 2012 case, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, the Supreme Court ruled that a significant expansion of Medicaid, was not a valid exercise of Congress's spending power, as it would coerce states to either accept the expansion or risk losing existing Medicaid funding.
In each of these cases, the Supreme Court made is quite clear that their opinion is that the federal government cannot require the states to act, or even coerce them to act through a threat to lose funding.  Their opinion is correct.  If the feds pass a law, they can sure try to enforce it if they want.  But the states absolutely do NOT have to help them in any way. This is really basic stuff that no one disagrees with, except people like Steve Bullock when their trying to mislead people.
So to say that Montana law enforcement would be "violating laws" or "subject...to criminal sanctions" for not carrying out federal law FOR the feds is a bald faced lie.  And Steve Bullock knows it.
The people of Montana should be disgusted.
On the right, those who support the right to keep and bear arms know that no matter what gun laws are ever passed in DC - this year or in the future - Steve Bullock will require the state of Montana to enforce them.
On the left, those who support the medical marijuana program that voters approved years ago, know that Bullock will continue to be an embarrassment to progressives, requiring local law enforcement to continue working with the DEA when they don't even have to.
Now if Bullock would have skipped this part of the veto message and just focused on the political statement that he also included, that would be more...acceptable.  Still wrong-headed and dangerous, but not as bad as his lie that the state needs to carry out and enforce every federal law.  He wants your local law enforcement to take all the risk, and to bear all the cost, while the feds sit back and do nothing or take the credit where the local law enforcement carries all the water.
His veto message continues:
Further, HB 302 is unnecessary. To date, there has been no action in Congress to enact a ban on semiautomatic weapons. Moreover, recent news reports have indicated that a majority of Congress does not support such legislation.
That may be the case for 2013, and it's certainly decent news for the short term.  But, anyone thinking that this is over with because it won't pass in 2013 is mistaken.  Anyone saying "there's nothing to worry about" is a liar.   If you don't believe me, maybe you'll believe Joe Biden:
"Let me say this as clearly as I can: this is just the beginning," he said just this week. "We believe that weapons of war have no place on our streets. That's the message that retired admirals and generals have spoken to us about. The comment one of them used was if you want to learn how to use a semiautomatic weapon, join the United States military. But these are weapons of war."
The attempts to ban semiautomatic weapons and high capacity magazines are just beginning  and making sure that the federal government knows that they'll get no support enforcing such a ban from the State of Montana, is a good first step in rendering any such ban ineffective.
As Judge Andrew Napolitano has said recently, such widespread noncompliance can make a federal law "nearly impossible to enforce." 

Steve Bullock is a joke, and while we realize that no one is going to vote this bum out of office anytime soon, the People of Montana can certainly pressure their state senators and representatives to override his veto and render worthless his constitutional-idiocy.
For Bullock to say such garbage about Montana being required to enforce federal law, we say "Bollocks!"


ACTION ITEMS for Montana
1.  Contact your state representative.  Strongly, but respectfully urge him or her to OVERRIDE the Veto on HB302
Contact info here:
2.  Contact your state senator.  Strongly, but respectfully urge him or her to OVERRIDE the Veto on HB302
Contact info here:
  

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

LIPSTICK ON A PIG - THE FIRST LADY AND HER POLE DANCE MOVES IN PUBLIC

http://noisyroom.net/blog/2013/03/13/you-can-put-lipstick-on-a-pig-and-its-still-a-pig-and-now-we-see-michelle-obama-doing-a-pole-dance-before-an-audience/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Noisyroomnet+%28NoisyRoom.net%29

Saturday, November 10, 2012

YOU NEED TO READ COWBOY BYTE TODAY - LIKE REID RAISING THE DEBT CEILING AND OBAMA STANDING FIRM ON HIGH TAX RATES

http://sm.responsebeacon.com/track?t=v&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWlkPTE2MTYxNiZtc2dpZD0xNDAwMDcmZGlkPTUzMDEmZWRpZD01MzAxJnNuPTE2Nzg4NjY2JmVpZD1pbmtzbGluZ2VyQGJlbGxzb3V0aC5uZXQmZWVpZD1pbmtzbGluZ2VyQGJlbGxzb3V0aC5uZXQmdWlkPTFfMTE5ODkxJnJpZD0xMTk4OTEmZXJpZD0xMTk4OTEmZmw9Jm12aWQ9JnRnaWQ9JmV4dHJhPQ==&&&2039&eu=1101&&&

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

ARIZONA - YOU CAN'T ELECT THIS HAND-PICKED FLUNKY OF OBAMA'S FOR SENATOR - WATCH THE VIDEO

President Obama’s handpicked choice to run for Senate in Arizona, Richard Carmona, has an extremely troubled past­­– specifically his treatment towards female coworkers.
We always think it’s important to take into consideration the political records of each candidate when voting for Senate. But we think this goes much further than typical voting records, Richard Carmona has a history of disturbing behavior. Here are the facts:
  • Sworn Congressional testimony of Carmona’s former female colleague: “He’s a very angry man and he has problems with women.”
  • He showed up at mother’s home in the middle of the night banging on her door.
  • Antagonism and a threat to another female coworker who tried to do the right thing by reporting a doctor abusing drugs.

Monday, October 1, 2012

IS OBAMA HINDERING OUR TROOPS' EFFECTIVENESS IN AFGHANISTAN? OBAMA'S NEW STRATEGIES AGAINST OUR TROOPS

http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/is-obama-hindering-our-troops-effectiveness-in-afghanistan-obamas-new-strategies-against-our-troops/





Someone PLEASE find that idiotic Obamabot woman who had an orgasm about Obamaphones for everyone and read this to her.  What if her son came home in a bodybag, ambushed by Afghanis.  Would she still want Obama's freebies or would she want her beloved son back...or is she too ignorant to feel?

Monday, October 31, 2011

NEWT GINGRICH - I GUSHED ABOUT THE SPEECH AND I APOLOGIZE...SEE BELOW. MY MEMORY IS SHORT - HE WAS A TERRIBLE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.

http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/08/07/the-real-newt-gingrich-new-world-order-globalist/

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/59919.html

http://reddogreport.com/2011/07/gingrich-flip-flops-on-climate-change/

http://gunowners.org/gingrich-mixed-record.htm


http://www.nationalgunrights.org/potus2012/

http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/08/07/the-real-newt-gingrich-new-world-order-globalist/



My apologies.

A few days ago I gushed about a speech Newt Gingrich ran in 5 parts from the Restoration Weekend bash, a conservative event.

Well, I am listening to Alex Jones this morning, and he suggested we do our own research, and I found out that he was right, like he always is.
Newt Gingrich is a globalist, a new world order guy, member of the CFR. He is NOT fit to be president because of his stance on gun control and our Second Amendment rights.
He also flip-flopped on climate change.

It was an inspiring, clear speech, but he can't be trusted. The tyranny that is being planned is very sophisticated, and we have to be suspicious of all the hype.

So I am apologizing. The choices are being narrowed for us with the Herman Cain "sex" incident, even though it was 20 years ago. There is only one choice.

I am a proud Ron Paul supporter. And he will get my vote. There's no one better.

m