Search This Blog

Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

COMMENT ON "WHITE PRIVILEGE CONFERENCE" FROM OUR FRIEND MERLIN

....financially supporting nonwhites.

Looks more and more like I was right all along.

Mark my words, the new/coming "R" word is "Reparations"
or perhaps, the more apropos  "Rape-arations"


M!

P.S. Please share with your uninformed white friends.

“White Privilege Conference” Proposes Government Guaranteed Jobs and Reparations


If on April 14th, you find yourself standing on the edge of a bridge looking down into the swift waters wondering whether you should jump or go to the White Privilege Conference at the University of Colorado… you should probably jump.

Anyone who invokes a claim of White Privilege is already a racist. Holding a conference on the topic of why some people are evil based on the color of their skin with the backing of the University of Denver and Goddard College is like a Klan rally being held at MIT. The White Privilege Conference is predictably backed by the Seattle Housing Authority, which has been going rather crazy lately. And even more predictably, most of these social justice projects are really about the money.
The theme of the White Privilege Conference is “The Color of Money: Reclaiming our Humanity.” It’s the money part that really matters because 99% of these racial social justice gimmicks are about ways to drag more money out of the government for the benefit of hucksters running social justice organizations.
There’s a reason that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will never have to work for a living and they have a legion of imitators promising social justice at cut rate prices.
The White Privilege Conference stays true to its name by offering the next generation of radical money grabs for social justice.
And what does that mean? Government guaranteed jobs.
That’s right. They’re guaranteed. They’re from the government. How can this go wrong?
The federal government should establish a National Investment Employment Corps offering all citizens 18 years of age and above an employment guarantee at a minimum salary of $20,000 with $10,000 in benefits, including medical coverage and retirement support. An upper bound estimate of the expense of the program can be established by putting all 15 million persons unemployed at the peak of this crisis at a mean salary of $40,000, inclusive of materials and equipment per worker, with $10,000 in benefits. The total compensation package would amount to $750 billion,
Well that’s great. Only 3/4 of a trillion a year at a time when we’re already running trillion dollar deficits each year. And we can’t afford to subsidize the guaranteed jobs at the Post Office anymore.

But what would the people at these Guaranteed Government Jobs do? Besides take money from people who actually go to work.
This could include the construction, staffing and provision of high quality preschools, computer repair, upgrade and maintenance,  sanitation workers, flood and other disaster service workers in hospitals and schools, and the extension, repair and maintenance of the public transportation infrastructure
So we’re going to put 15 million people to work renovating preschools, providing disaster relief and fixing roads?
Even though Obama has spent the last four years shrieking that all our bridges are about to fall down, I really think 15 million people are a bit much for that.
With 15 million people we could build a build a bridge to China.
And at some point all the preschools will be finally renovated. The infrastructure will be in decent enough shape that the existing maintenance crews can take care of it and there won’t be a large enough disaster that 15 million people will be needed to clean up for it.
And then what will that 15 million people do?
But think of it as an investment
Furthermore, the income paid to the employees of the National Investment Employment Corps would restore tax bases at the state and municipal levels, alleviating their current budget crises
So the taxpayers will pay 3/4 of a trillion dollars to people to renovate preschools and these people will barely make enough money from the government to pay taxes on… but this will somehow restore the tax base?
I’m not sure that even Paul Krugman could get behind this math.
But if Gov.Jobs.Bankruptcy doesn’t thrill you, there’s a Baby Bond, which I would be very surprised if Obama didn’t propose in a future State of the Union address, to redistribute wealth over to minority children from birth.
We are not optimistic about the public will to directly address the racial wealth gap. Indeed, the surge in the post-racial perspective has moved the public sentiment strongly away from race specific social policies. But all is not lost. Since the distributions of white and non-white wealth are so disparate—85% of black families have wealth holdings below the median white family—wealth can be an effective non-race based instrument to eliminate racial inequality. A shift from an income based means test to a wealth based means test for transfer programs.
The Savings for Education, Entrepreneurship, and Down-payment (SEED) initiative which establishes Children’s Development Accounts (CDA) (what Manny Marable refers to as “Baby Bonds”) to create endowed trusts for children at birth.
The United Kingdom has moved beyond the demonstration stage. Beginning in 2005, every newborn in the UK receives a trust ranging from 250 to 500 pounds depending on familial resources.
Every year since 2004 the American Savings for Personal Investment Retirement and Education (ASPIRE) is introduced in congress to established universal CDAs in the U.S. (see Sherraden2009 for more details). Since the nation’s black president eschews race specific policies, perhaps a strongly amended ASPIRE bill designed to progressively distribute funds based on familial net worth can be the policy that enables him to “bind…[black America’s] grievances … to the larger aspirations of all Americans.”
We envision a “baby bond” plan of much greater scale and magnitude—progressively rising to $50,000 or $60,000 for children in families in the lowest wealth quartile and accessible once the child turns 18 years of age.
…the baby bond program would cost about $60 billion per annum
No reason this can’t work. I mean most lottery winners do well with their money. Dumping 60 grand on an 18-year-old kid whose big dream until this point was to be a rap star can’t possibly go wrong.
For anyone keeping track, we just passed 800 billion dollars in social justice spending.
And if blowing 60 billion a year, that we don’t have, so a bunch of 18 year olds can have the best summer of their lives doesn’t appeal to your deep sense of white guilt, how about attacking the axes of ability?
The White Privilege Conference journal will be taking an axe to all the axes of privilege. That includes ability. What, you didn’t know your ability was an axe, you ax?
Like the WPC, the journal is committed to examining not only white privilege and oppression, but the intersections of systems of privilege based on race, gender, sexuality, class, religion, ability, nationality, and other axes of inequality.
I want to hear about more religious privilege, but I want to hear even more about ability privilege.  And if you want to learn more about why you should feel ashamed at your skin color, religion, gender, nationality, sexuality, ability to get up out of bed in the morning…
… come to the White Privilege Conference and Matrix Center at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs. It’s got the word Matrix in it, so it’s bound to be good.

If you don’t go, you’re racist.

lol

Monday, March 11, 2013

IN WISCONSIN (WHAT'S HAPPENED TO YOU?) WHITES HAVE TO WEAR WRISTBANDS (TEENAGERS) TO SHOW THEY'RE WHITE. THIS IS VERY SICK.

http://themadjewess.com/2013/03/11/usas-society-of-black-brown-privilege-nazi-wristbands-worn-by-teens-in-wisconsin-to-show-theyre-white/

At first glance, this blog post, when you read it, may upset you.  But I'm asking you to read it again.
Something's happening that I knew all the time and I've written about it here.  Since Obama took office we have been polarized by one man.  We were doing fine, but sowing seeds of doubt are his speciality.  Divide and conquer.  If you're black, brown, anything but white, please know he's deceiving you, and you will find out soon enough. 

When "they" come, color will mean nothing.  Remember that.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

IT'S UNFAIR TO BE BLACK, TALL AND GOOD LOOKING...RACIST TEACHING AT UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/02/its-unfair-to-be-black-tall-and-good-looking/

What is happening to our taxpayer funded schools that this is even thought of?

I have friends from my high school days who are black, tall, good looking, successful AND CONSERVATIVE!  What are we to do with people "like THAT" (and two or three used to play basketball).


Thursday, January 17, 2013

CHARLIE RANGEL THE RACIST - "SOUTHERN STATES HAVE CULTURES THAT WE HAVE TO OVERCOME TO PUSH NEW GUN LAWS" - OH REALLY?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/01/16/rangel_southern_states_have_cultures_that_we_have_to_overcome_to_push_new_gun_laws.html

Charlie my boy, we're about the same age, kiddo - you gonna take away 2x4s, broken concrete, nailguns,
screwdrivers, paper clips, pens, pencils, chopsticks?  How about, electric drills, chainsaws, baseball bats,
toothbrushes, pipe, electric conduit, rocks?

We know you've wanted our guns from day 1.  You'd probably be so scared to death sitting next to someone who was a current veteran, your heart would stop without your bodyguards (armed) around, wouldn't it?

I've been a southerner for a couple of decades - and I've not met more fair minded people anywhere.  The stereotypes are gone and Obama brought divisiveness into an art form.  Like in all nations, it isn't the people against each other, it's that the government sets us against each other.

Bear in mind, and be fair about it Charlie, that Obama is half white, half black.  That means bi-racial.  Had he chosen his Caucasian side over his black side (which he favors in appearance), would you have called him a honky?  Just asking.

But one more thing, Charlie with your pomaded hair that you must hate because, you're a black man, right?

You need your bodyguards to keep your worthless body safe.

We don't need bodyguards. And we don't invite trouble in.  Stop your racist mouth from running.  You offend me.  You are humiliating every black person in this country by putting them down instead of elevating them into employment.  You've made them your slaves.

OBAMA'S WHITE SCAPEGOATS...JUST LIKE HITLER DID TO THE JEWS AND OTHER MINORITIES

Hitler scapegoated the Jews; now, public schools in America scapegoat white children.
It may be sick, but it's effective, as so many white
people in this nation now feel guilty for who
they are, though they had no input into who they are.

The truth is, the left in its most metatastic virulent ugly progressive cannot survive without
straw men and bogey men; which reduces to "white men" because women of all races, and
minorities of all descriptions are 'okay' and need not feel guilty for losing (or winning) some fantasy obstetrical lottery......

While it's truly ridiculous and seemingly diabolical, it does win presidential elections, as we just saw.

H/T to Merlin with his commentary.

V    B



Wisconsin High School Teaches ‘White Privilege’ Class

by Rat
students_classroom
At a Wisconsin high school 40 miles southwest of Milwaukee, students are learning geometry, chemistry and, of course, that white people in America have oppressed minorities for hundreds of years - and continue to do so to this very day.
No word on whether Louis Farrakhan and New Black Panther leader Malik Zulu Shabazz have been scheduled as guest lecturers.
The curriculum on “American Diversity” at Delavan-Darien High School teaches students that white skin confers a set of unfair privileges, the Daily Mail reports:
According to handouts obtained by Fox News, "white privilege" in the class is defined as a "set of advantages that are believed to be enjoyed by white people beyond those commonly experienced by non-white people in the same social, political, and economic spaces (nation, community, workplace, income-level, etc.)." Said one parent:
"They’re teaching white guilt. They’re dividing the students. They’re saying to non-whites: ‘You have been oppressed and you’re still being oppressed.'’'
Sounds like they're using the Barack Obama Election Campaign Strategy Playbook as the class textbook.
The parent, who asked not to be named,  became alarmed after seeing the handouts provided to her 18-year-old son who was enrolled in the class:
“I felt it was indoctrination. This is a radical left agenda and ideology that is now embedded in our school. If you’re white, you’re oppressing. If you’re non-white, you’ve been a victim."
Look at the "bright side," concerned parents: Barack Obama has been dividing and indoctrinating America for four years - with four more to come. Can you imagine what this country will look like by 2016?
Like any good interactive class, "American Diversity" includes at least extracurricular activity: a trip to Walmart. Students are instructed to count the number of white dolls on the shelves as opposed to the number of black dolls - an exercise clearly designed to make non-white students feel inferior (victimized) - and white students feel superior (guilty as charged).
No word if counting Muslim dolls, Chinese dolls, Indian dolls and Mexican dolls is worth extra credit.
Brendan Pringle of the Young America’s Foundation, who first shed light on the controversial course, calls the course "race-baiting":
“This course offers a snapshot of a larger trend that has plagued university curriculum for years and has only recent crept into high school classrooms. Professors and teachers are increasingly telling white students that they are part of the problem of racism, and are telling black students that they are second-class citizens. This race-baiting technique is an attack on American values and can only breed bitterness and envy.”
Exactly - with the keywords being "an attack on American values and can only breed bitterness and envy." Moreover the "larger trend" of which Pringle speaks is in itself part of an even larger trend.
Radical leftists - in and out of Academia - work in concert with the Democratic Party to perpetuate bitterness and envy in America. (See: Barack Hussein Obama; class warfare)
Race-hustlers like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson make their living baiting America's blacks.
Smug, guilt-ridden white liberals (Think: "wealthy Hollywood-types") feel good about themselves for standing with the "oppressed among us" - among us white people, that is.
But most of all - the primary objective of the left - is to keeps blacks (and other minorities) down on the liberal plantation. Minorities must be taught (indoctrinated) that were it not for the compassion, largesse and protection of the Democratic Party, they would suffer a fate worse than death at the hands of evil, selfish, white (conservative) America.

That fate? Self-reliance, responsibility and mutual respect - qualities which are anathema to the Democratic Party, particularly when possessed by minorities.
After all, why would self-reliant responsible people need the Democrats?

Friday, October 12, 2012

BAD NEWS! AT HARVARD IN 1991, OBAMA APPROVED OF RESTRICTING SPEECH TO PROTECT MINORITIES

http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/08/at-harvard-law-school-in-1991-obama-approved-of-restricting-speech-to-protect-minorities/


When I was growing up, we were called Guineas, Negroes, Spics, Chinks, Polacks, ad nauseum.

SO WHAT?!!!!

We grew up, learned our manners, and that was it.

No one got angry - you got called a name, you engaged your mouth and gave it right back.

Tomorrow was another day.

FORGEDDABOUTIT....

Friday, October 5, 2012

BROOKLYN HEIGHTS, NY - SUBWAY GRAFITTI - JEWS BETTER OFF BEING LAMPSHADES

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/160543#.UG7k9K6a2Bc

If New Yorkers don't remove those anti-Second Amendment zealots that are in power like Schumer and Mayor Bloomberg, they don't deserve better.  When you have so much hate, the Second Amendment and your right to own a weapon cools that right down.

A gun wasn't called "The Great Equalizer" for nothing.

When there is doubt among the thugs that you might be armed, you'll be able to walk the streets freely again.

When you know how to use a weapon and understand what you were given under the Second Amendment, you will hold your head up high, and never be afraid.

It's the old story - if you don't know about your rights (that God gave you), you don't have any.  And then you can be nice and compliant when you are mugged or worse, or when the renegade government sickos that you elected remove your rights and you just sigh....

If you refuse to elect a Republican president, to replace the corrupt, lying POS Muslim you helped get into office with your contributions, you might as well put your own chains on your ankles and clank yourselves to work. 

I have no patience with New Yorkers - and that includes my wonderful first generation Italian father, who willingly gave up his arms when the city demanded he do so under a law that was illegal to begin with.  But being the quiet, good, law-abiding citizen he was, he did as he was told.  He followed orders and we were left unprotected, and his right to own a shotgun to hunt rabbits, was gone.

Here is a link to the Bill of Rights.  If you live in New York or Ohio, or anywhere you are being told you have none, you'd better learn them PRONTO.

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html



Thursday, September 6, 2012

"VOTE BLACK" RACIST BUTTONS AT THE DNC

http://visiontoamerica.com/12023/vote-black-buttons-at-the-dnc/

So which side of Obama do you vote for then...I guess the black side?  I'm old and confused.  This is racism plain and simple.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

PROOF THAT OBAMA HATES BLACKS - IF I WERE BLACK I WOULD BE SO INSULTED BY THIS.

http://www.amren.com/news/2012/07/obama-asks-public-schools-to-ignore-bad-behavior-by-black-students/
This lying, racist clown is doing nothing to push black students to excellence! 

The man is repulsive.  If you are black and you think this is a good thing, you have our attention!

This is gross stupidity and ignorance, and a ploy for votes.


Friday, July 20, 2012

WHY ISN'T ANYONE ASKING OBAMA TO PROVE HE'S NOT A RACIST? FAIR QUESTION - I'VE THOUGHT ABOUT THIS, TOO. HAVE YOU?

Why Isn't Anyone Asking Obama To Prove He's Not A Racist?
GrassTopsUSA Exclusive Commentary
By Don Feder
07/18/2012


According to conventional wisdom, Mitt Romney’s pilgrimage to the NAACP convention last week wasn’t a futile attempt to win a larger share of the black vote. Obama pulled 95% of the African-American vote in 2008 – doubtless due to the fact that 95% objectively determined that the man who served less than two years in the U.S. Senate and had zero real-world experience was best qualified for the job.

Instead, we are told, Mitt’s obeisance to the race-hustlers was an attempt to convince white suburban voters that he’s not a racist by doing the inclusiveness mambo. Not surprisingly, the hand Romney reached out with was promptly spat on.

NAACP Chairman Ben Jealous observed that by pledging to repeal Obamacare, Romney proved he has a “fundamental misunderstanding of the needs of many African-Americans” – which needs clearly consist of more government. Helping to destroy the black family and (under Obama) generating a 14.4% black unemployment rate are just a few of the many benefits Washington has lavished on African-Americans.

Why is it that the Republican nominee is always assumed to be a racist (especially if he’s a rich businessman) until proven otherwise? Why isn’t Obama expected to prove that he’s not a race-obsessed ideologue – Al Sharpton with a better haircut?

If Romney has to address the NAACP to show he’s not a racist, why doesn’t Obama have to court the NRA, to prove that he respects the Second Amendment (He doesn’t, by the way) or address the Zionist Organization of America to show he isn’t anti-Israel, or go to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to let entrepreneurs know that he isn’t trying to socialize the economy? None of these groups is any more partisan than the NAACP.

The media reverently describes the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People as “the nation’s oldest civil rights group,” which is akin to calling the mafia a civic association. Like the Anti-Defamation League, the National Organization for Women and the League of United Latin American Citizens, the NAACP is a leftist lobby masquerading as a civil right group.

Whatever the issue, the NAACP’s position is as predictable as a New York Times’ editorial: the Tea Parties tolerate bigotry and bigoted statements (according to a resolution adopted by its 2010 convention), voter ID laws are a “new poll tax,” the 1992 LA riots were a “people’s rebellion” (said then NAACP Executive Director Benjamin Chavis), racism “informs every aspect of policing” in the United States, and “America reeks of racism” (claimed former NAACP Chair Myrlie Evers-Williams).

While calling on the Tea Parties to renounce alleged racism in their ranks, under Chavis, America’s “oldest civil rights group” formed a “sacred covenant” with the rabidly anti-white and virulently anti-Semitic Nation of Islam.

The NAACP’s views on race coincide perfectly with those of our 44th president. Barack Obama is the biggest racist to occupy the White House since Woodrow Wilson.

In 2008, when candidate Obama spoke condescendingly of those who, in times of trouble, bitterly cling to guns, Christianity or “antipathy to people who aren’t like them,” he was depicting working-class whites in small-town America as Bible-banging, gun-toting haters.

When the lovely Michelle said that “the realities are that, you know, as a black man, Barack can get shot going to a gas station,” the unstated premise was because whites are such homicidal racists that they’ll shoot a black man on sight. But what would you expect in a country that’s “just downright mean”?

The reality is that the greatest danger to middle-aged black men pumping gas is young black men raised in families without fathers.

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright was Obama’s mentor, confidant and spiritual and political advisor for almost two decades. But, I kid you not, “Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms,” the future president assured us – with a straight face.

Obama never heard Wright say white racism “runs this country,” or that on 9/11 “White America and the Western world” “got a wake-up call” about “ignoring black concerns.” And he most certainly never heard the Reverend G-D America say, “America is still the No. 1 killer in the world,” “whites and Jews are controlling the flow of information worldwide and oppressing blacks in Israel and America,” and “You are not now, nor have you ever been, nor will you ever be a brother to white folk.”

In an association spanning two decades, Obama swears he never once heard Wright say anything remotely resembling the foregoing. The moon is made of Stilton and pigs have their own air force.

What the reverend obviously didn’t say clearly made an impression on the president. In the past 3 ½ years, the carefully crafted post-racial mask continually slips to reveal the Wright disciple beneath.

In March, when neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman shot and killed black teen Trayvon Martin, Obama made the insightful observation (totally unprompted) that if he had a son “he’d look like Trayvon.” The president was saying that the single most important aspect of the case was that Martin was black and Zimmermann was a “white Hispanic,” leading him to suspect that it was a hate-crime.

“All of us have to do some soul-searching,” Obama intoned. Did we also have to search our souls when 49 people were shot in Chicago one weekend in April (10 fatally) – almost all black, as were the shooters?

Be serious. It’s only crimes that can be ascribed to white racism (for the president, the only kind that exist) which occasion an exploration of the soul. Obama may be obsessed with the way Trayvon looked, but last week the FBI concluded, based on an extensive investigation, that there was no evidence that Zimmerman was a racist.

When 13 soldiers were murdered at Fort Hood, Texas by a holy warrior shouting “Allah is great,” Obama wasn’t about to rush to judgment. “We don’t know all the answers yet. And I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts,” the president warned us.

Here the motivation was clear, but recognizing reality would be (gasp, oh no!) “Islamophobic” – so reality would be ignored, souls would not be searched and conclusions would be studiously avoided.

In 2009, there was conclusion-jumping galore when a man who looked like the father the president never knew (if his sire had been a Harvard professor) had a run-in with the Cambridge police. According to the president, the cops “acted stupidly,” when they arrested his friend Henry Louis Gates, after Gates became belligerent with an officer investigating a possible break-in, in what turned out to be the professor’s own home.

Regarding the arrest, Bill Cosby commented: “If I’m the president of the United States, I don’t care how much pressure people want to put on it about race, I’m keeping my mouth shut.”

Not this president, who – besides indicting the police – told us how angry we were (or should be) over the incident, because “there’s a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately. That’s just a fact.” Like the fact that minorities disproportionately commit the crimes police are investigating?

Attorney General Eric Holder is the only one in this administration who can out guilt-trip the president. On February 18, 2009, the attorney general was in rare racial-resentment form addressing Justice Department employees for Black History Month.

“In things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways essentially a nation of cowards,” Holder scolded. The American people “simply do not talk enough to each other about race.”

Unlike Holder’s BFF, Reverend Sharpton, another neo-Nazi of color. “I am especially grateful … for your partnership, your friendship, and your tireless efforts to speak out for the voiceless, to stand up for the powerless, and to shine a light on the problems we must solve, and the promises we must fulfill,” the nation’s attorney general gushed on April 11, 2012, speaking at the Reverend Mayhem’s National Action Network.

In 1991, Sharpton’s powerful voice helped spark the Crown Heights pogrom, which led to the lynching of rabbinical student Yankel Rosenbaum. Perhaps our national conversation about race could include a discussion of taking responsibility for the consequences of anti-Semitic rhetoric. (Sharpton called Hasidic Jews “diamond merchants.”)

Anyway, Holder and Obama aren’t interested in a conversation – a frank exchange of ideas – but a lecture, where some of us bow our heads respectfully and allow ourselves to be harangued about our collective sins, while periodically murmuring mea culpas.

A genuine conversation about race would raise too many uncomfortable questions about things like the incidence of black-on-white crime or the rate of out-of-wedlock births among minorities.

Or it could wander onto really dangerous ground, like the administration’s embrace of race-based “justice,” epitomized by DOJ’s refusal to prosecute the New Black Panther Party over voter intimidation at a Philadelphia polling place on Election Day, 2008, involving two of its leaders in military garb, armed with nightsticks, menacing voters with racial slurs.

A former civil-rights lawyer in Robert F. Kennedy’s Justice Department said it was “the most blatant form of voter intimidation” he had ever seen.

Despite a default judgment, the Obama Justice Department (at the urging of “America’s oldest civil rights group”) dismissed the case, prompting J. Christian Adams, a five-year DOJ veteran, to resign in protest. Adams said that many in DOJ (presumably, including Holder) believed that “civil rights laws should not be enforced against blacks or other racial minorities.”

But, hey, why get exercised over miscarriages of justice when the victims don’t look like the son Obama never had?

Filling in for his boss at the NAACP convention last week (to thunderous applause), Holder told “my people” why he was gunning for voter ID laws in 11 states, promising that he “will not allow political pretexts to disenfranchise Americans citizens of their precious rights.”

Holder would have us believe that it’s perfectly reasonable to be asked to show a valid photo-ID to cash a check, board a plane or sign up for food stamps, but not to vote. Again, it’s all about race – fraudulently increasing a vote the Democrats can count on 95% of the time, at the expense of the democratic process.

While Obama and his underlings make justice and democracy victims of a reverse racism, Romney has to prove he’s not a racist. In his NAACP speech, the governor said: “I hope to represent all Americans.”

That would be a welcome change.

Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a political/communications consultant. He also maintains his own website, DonFeder.com.