Showing posts with label Sotomayor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sotomayor. Show all posts
Saturday, March 31, 2012
JUSTICE SONIA SOTOMAYOR'S SHOCKING IGNORANCE IS JUST TOO MUCH. THE GIRL KNOWS ZIP, BUT SHE'S ON THE HIGH COURT...HMMM...PRODUCT OF US PUBLIC SCHOOLS?
http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2012/03/31/justice-sonia-sotomayors-shocking-ignorance/
Monday, June 29, 2009
Washington Post:: White Firemen win reverse job discrimination case...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/29/AR2009062901608.html?hpid=topnews
And Sotomayor, Obama's pick for Supreme Court Justice was against them!
In my opinion, she's a racist!
!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
And Sotomayor, Obama's pick for Supreme Court Justice was against them!
In my opinion, she's a racist!
!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
Friday, June 5, 2009
Sotomayor: Owning a gun is NOT a fundamental right!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/28/sotomayors-gun-control-positions-prompt-conservative-backlash/?test=latestnews
So, my town can suppress my right to own a firearm for self-protection against those who would kill me or do me harm?
LET FREEDOM RING THOSE PHONES IN WASHINGTON, DC!
So, my town can suppress my right to own a firearm for self-protection against those who would kill me or do me harm?
LET FREEDOM RING THOSE PHONES IN WASHINGTON, DC!
Thursday, June 4, 2009
From the Redpills blog on Sotomayor and Schumer
http://www.redpills.org/?p=4513
and,
one on Schumer and the immigration bill:
SCHUMER AT CENTER OF THE ILLEGAL ALIEN AMNESTY CONTROVERSY
and,
one on Schumer and the immigration bill:
SCHUMER AT CENTER OF THE ILLEGAL ALIEN AMNESTY CONTROVERSY
DR. JERRY C. FRADY, MINUTEMAN CIVIL DEFENSE WRITER
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N. Y., has done it again! He has managed to arouse public awareness about "amnesty for illegal aliens" and
augument a current Conservative backlash against that disastrous effort. With no disrespect to the Pope, Schumer was doubtless basking in the glow
of the twin majorities Democrats have in Congress when he delivered a pope-like pontification, A recent May New York Times article reported he
asserted that "Now voters should be ready to accept a law that legalizes illegal immigrants (aliens) and rewrites immigration rules." Don't you just love
it when the political elites make their generalizations about us as though "once they have spoken, we must obey."
He also said, "We can pass strong, fair, practical and effecitve reform this year." Note his self-confident attitude and his word choices which are code words. The "strong" is code for comprehensive, wide-ranging and all inclusive. So, if his amnesty bill becomes law, it will contain an open invitation for every Third World type to flock into this country, thus, importing mutiple health risks, illiteracy and billions more in welfare. The "fair" means that all illegal aliens, including criminals, gangs, and terrorists, will be welcome and forgiven for their past illegal activities. Oh, that includes rapes, murders, bombings--the whole range. It also includes the notion of "wealth redistribution" as summed in the catch-phrase, "Su casa, mi casa." "Practical" simply means whatever the Democrat elites believe is good for everyone. Schumer and his ilk take pride in their "pragmatism"--just doing whatever works, without allowing any Constitutional, religious, ethical standards, or "the expressed will of the people" to affect their actions. The "effective" code word means "doing whatever it takes" to turn the USA into a socialistic, multi-cultural haven for the world's misfits under the control and direction of the United Nations.
The immigration subcommittee chairman offered this disingenuous, false and calculating assessment of the present national security with reference to
our borders at a hearing devoted to bolstering his viewpoint. He "argued tht the demands of securing the nation's borders have been met, including the
hiring of 20,000 border patrol agents." Schumer added that, " now is the right time for amnesty...the U. S. borders are more secure than ever, which is
the first step to overhauling the current immigration system." He received dutiful "yes" answers when asking "if the steps taken had slowed the
flow of 'illegal entries into the United States" from officials from Homeland Security, the Border Patrol and Customs Enforcement. One should ask how
many of those new border patrol agents have already been deployed since each of them have to spend several months in training before attaining that
eligibllity. Also, one must factor-in the retirements and resignations to get the true picture. Schumer seems to prefer usuing "generalities" rather
than "specifics" in his reports. He likes percentages over actual numbers. And he often omits important data. While promoting the idea that
Congress is serious about "border security," he noted a 27 percent increase in border arrests this year yet ignored "the impact the
declining economy has had on illegal border crossings" according to NumbersUSA. Hidden in all of his rhetoric is the false notion that the 2007
defeats of the amnesty bills then were "merely because our Southern border with Mexico was not secure." Now the mantra is that a decline in
arrests on that border is all the proof needed to renew a vigorous campaign to give amnesty to all of the illegal aliens already in the U. S. Only
HIspanic/Latino/Chicano advocates and sycophants, elitiist globalists, the National Chamber of Commerce, and politicial hacks seeking the Hispanic
vote would fall prey to such shallow thinking. Schumer must think that the rest of us are ignorant, gullible, or both. No independent thinking person
accepts the premise that "fixing one part of a 'comprehensive' problem' is all one need do to correct the problem."
Schumer's "credibility" is an issue which has been tested previously as well as in this case. Californians may well remember the
key role he played in the disastrous failure of the INDYMAC Bank. The Los Angeles Times reported that "federal regulators" blamed Schumer for
a "run on the bank." The Office of Thrift Supervision's press release said, "The OTS has determined...The immediate cause of the closing was a
deposit run that began and continued after the PUBLIC release of a June 26, 08, letter to the OTS and the FDIC from Senator Charles Schumer of
New York." That letter included statements about the bank's solvency and "viability" or chances of success. That initiated a "run on the bank" that lasted
for the next eleven business days. More than $ l.3 billion were withdrawn by depositors and the bank failed. John Reich, OTS Director, noted the
bank's "distressed" state but added, "I am troubled by any interference in the regulatory process." Schumer's response was simply to blame
the OTS for not doing its job by allowing "IndyMac's poor and loose lending practices." His intrusion was dishonorable, and the bank paid the price.
That incident clearly reveals his refusal to be held "accountable" for any disastrous thing he does. Too, there seems to be no limits to his
ambition or insolence. NewsMax reported Schumer plans to ask the Justice Department "to sue states that do not offer voter registration at public
assistance agencies and welfare offices." A form and assistance to complete it must be included. Schumer's complaint is about the "rogue behavior
of a large batch of states" whom he claims have complicated the simple process. One might wonder if the real problem is that workers at those
locations do not speak Spanish or "street language"? Of course, to any member of the "blame America first crowd," the workers must be the problem.
Four final questions. As their amnesty champion, how many "former illegal aliens" do you suppose Schumer will welcome to live
Four final questions. As their amnesty champion, how many "former illegal aliens" do you suppose Schumer will welcome to live
near him and his family in his neighborhood? And, how many "former illegal criminal aliens" do you suppose he will add to his senatorial staff, hire to
work odd jobs and share a meal at his home? Sound ridiculous. Why should Obama and his "amnesty point man" be isolated from the negative
actions they seek to legally impose on the rest of Americans just so they can gain and maintain their votes? The final question: has Schumer ever left his beltway ivory tower to go to the Southwestern Border to see the situation for himself? if so, why have we not heard of it? To the more than 75 percent of
of Americans NewsMax reports continue to oppose amnesty for illegal aliens, his vision for America is not "hope and change" but DOPE and DERANGE!
--
"We are less hurt by the contempt of fools than by the lukewarm approval of men of intelligence."
~ Luc de Clapiers de Vanvenargues ~
** In GOD We Trust **
Monday, June 1, 2009
Saturday, May 30, 2009
MORE ON SOTOMAYOR - THIS SHOULD BE ENOUGH FOR ANYONE!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124364571646268287.html
Obama Picks Anti-gun Judge for the Supreme Court
-- Time to start contacting your Senators right away
Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org
Friday, May 29, 2009
Unless you've taken a very long Memorial Day vacation, you've no doubt
heard the big news.
President Obama has picked an anti-gun radical to replace Justice David
Souter on the Supreme Court.
Obama's pick is Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who is currently on the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Second District. There she has racked up an
anti-Second Amendment record and has displayed contempt for the rule of
law under the Constitution.
The Heller decision put the Supreme Court in support of the
Constitutional protection of the individual right to keep and bear arms.
Sotomayor, a politically correct lover of centralized government power
(as long as she is part of the power elite), immediately went into
counter-attack mode against the Heller decision.
Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which ruled
in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to the
states. As she and her cohorts claimed, the Supreme Court has not yet
incorporated the states under the Second Amendment. Until then, she
believes, the Second only applies to the District of Columbia.
This is pure judicial arrogance -- something Sotomayor relishes (as long
as she is one of the ruling judges). In fact, protection of the right
to keep and bear arms was a major objective for enactment of the
Fourteenth Amendment, as recently freed slaves were being disarmed and
terrorized in their neighborhoods.
But Sotomayor disdains this important right of individuals, as indicated
by an earlier opinion from 2004. In United States v. Sanchez-Villar,
she stated that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental
right."
Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
Fox Cable News reported yesterday that in her senior thesis at Princeton
University, she wrote that America has a "deadly obsession" with guns
and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
firearms ownership.
Sotomayor's Second Amendment views go hand in hand with her politically
correct views on the law and the role of judges.
In a speech given at Duke University in 2005, she made it abundantly
clear that judges are involved in making policy. Realizing that this
did not sound very judicial (even though most judges act on this basis),
Sotomayor tried to laugh off her brazen admission: "I know this is on
tape and I should never say that, [audience laughing], because we don't
make law -- I know. Um, okay. I know, I'm not promoting it, I'm not
advocating it." The audience continued to laugh. They got the joke.
But Sotomayor's joke will be on us and our liberties if she gets
confirmed to the Supreme Court. And that is why we need to start
contacting our Senators early and often, urging them to vote against
this dangerous nomination.
ACTION: Please contact your two Senators and urge them to oppose the
nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court. You can
go to the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the
pre-written e-mail message below.
----- Pre-written letter -----
Dear Senator:
If you cherish the Second Amendment and agree that it protects an
individual right to keep and bear arms -- as stated by the recent Heller
decision -- then you must vote against Judge Sonia Sotomayor.
This choice for the Supreme Court is totally unacceptable! Consider a
partial rendering of her anti-gun record:
* Sotomayor ruled in United States v. Sanchez-Villar (2004) that "the
right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right."
* Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which
ruled in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to
the states. This makes her more liberal than the Ninth Circuit, which
stated in April that the Second Amendment does apply to the states.
* Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
Fox Cable News reported on May 28 that in her senior thesis at Princeton
University, she wrote that America has a "deadly obsession" with guns
and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
firearms ownership.
I will consider a vote in favor of Sotomayor as the most anti-gun vote a
Senator could cast. To send an anti-gun liberal judge to the Supreme
Court for the rest of her life is to establish "legislation without
representation." After all, she says that the courts are where policy
is made, and once she's there, we'll never be able to vote her out.
Again, please vote against this dangerous nomination.
Sincerely,
****************************
"Live Fire" radio with Larry Pratt is broadcast by the Information
Radio Network on Saturdays at 12:00 Noon Eastern. "Live Fire" is
simulcast on the web at http://inforadionet.com and previous episodes
are archived at http://irnusaradio.com/our-programs/live-fire with a
number of listening formats, including podcasts, supported.
Recent guests, among many others, have included:
* Charl van Wyk -- Gun Control in Africa
* GOA's Mike Hammond -- Socialized Medicine and Gun Control
* Dave Hardy -- Ranchers, Illegal Immigrants, and Guns
http://www.jeremiahfilms.com/BlogWatch/Guns-and-Bibles/905291440
Obama Picks Anti-gun Judge for the Supreme Court
-- Time to start contacting your Senators right away
Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org
Friday, May 29, 2009
Unless you've taken a very long Memorial Day vacation, you've no doubt
heard the big news.
President Obama has picked an anti-gun radical to replace Justice David
Souter on the Supreme Court.
Obama's pick is Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who is currently on the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Second District. There she has racked up an
anti-Second Amendment record and has displayed contempt for the rule of
law under the Constitution.
The Heller decision put the Supreme Court in support of the
Constitutional protection of the individual right to keep and bear arms.
Sotomayor, a politically correct lover of centralized government power
(as long as she is part of the power elite), immediately went into
counter-attack mode against the Heller decision.
Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which ruled
in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to the
states. As she and her cohorts claimed, the Supreme Court has not yet
incorporated the states under the Second Amendment. Until then, she
believes, the Second only applies to the District of Columbia.
This is pure judicial arrogance -- something Sotomayor relishes (as long
as she is one of the ruling judges). In fact, protection of the right
to keep and bear arms was a major objective for enactment of the
Fourteenth Amendment, as recently freed slaves were being disarmed and
terrorized in their neighborhoods.
But Sotomayor disdains this important right of individuals, as indicated
by an earlier opinion from 2004. In United States v. Sanchez-Villar,
she stated that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental
right."
Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
Fox Cable News reported yesterday that in her senior thesis at Princeton
University, she wrote that America has a "deadly obsession" with guns
and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
firearms ownership.
Sotomayor's Second Amendment views go hand in hand with her politically
correct views on the law and the role of judges.
In a speech given at Duke University in 2005, she made it abundantly
clear that judges are involved in making policy. Realizing that this
did not sound very judicial (even though most judges act on this basis),
Sotomayor tried to laugh off her brazen admission: "I know this is on
tape and I should never say that, [audience laughing], because we don't
make law -- I know. Um, okay. I know, I'm not promoting it, I'm not
advocating it." The audience continued to laugh. They got the joke.
But Sotomayor's joke will be on us and our liberties if she gets
confirmed to the Supreme Court. And that is why we need to start
contacting our Senators early and often, urging them to vote against
this dangerous nomination.
ACTION: Please contact your two Senators and urge them to oppose the
nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court. You can
go to the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the
pre-written e-mail message below.
----- Pre-written letter -----
Dear Senator:
If you cherish the Second Amendment and agree that it protects an
individual right to keep and bear arms -- as stated by the recent Heller
decision -- then you must vote against Judge Sonia Sotomayor.
This choice for the Supreme Court is totally unacceptable! Consider a
partial rendering of her anti-gun record:
* Sotomayor ruled in United States v. Sanchez-Villar (2004) that "the
right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right."
* Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which
ruled in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to
the states. This makes her more liberal than the Ninth Circuit, which
stated in April that the Second Amendment does apply to the states.
* Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
Fox Cable News reported on May 28 that in her senior thesis at Princeton
University, she wrote that America has a "deadly obsession" with guns
and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
firearms ownership.
I will consider a vote in favor of Sotomayor as the most anti-gun vote a
Senator could cast. To send an anti-gun liberal judge to the Supreme
Court for the rest of her life is to establish "legislation without
representation." After all, she says that the courts are where policy
is made, and once she's there, we'll never be able to vote her out.
Again, please vote against this dangerous nomination.
Sincerely,
****************************
"Live Fire" radio with Larry Pratt is broadcast by the Information
Radio Network on Saturdays at 12:00 Noon Eastern. "Live Fire" is
simulcast on the web at http://inforadionet.com and previous episodes
are archived at http://irnusaradio.com/our-programs/live-fire with a
number of listening formats, including podcasts, supported.
Recent guests, among many others, have included:
* Charl van Wyk -- Gun Control in Africa
* GOA's Mike Hammond -- Socialized Medicine and Gun Control
* Dave Hardy -- Ranchers, Illegal Immigrants, and Guns
http://www.jeremiahfilms.com/BlogWatch/Guns-and-Bibles/905291440
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Wake Up America is too good today NOT to read the whole offering...
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/
Everything from Pelosi imploding to Sotomayor's arrogance.
That appointment was so obviously racial/sexist, I can't believe it. Get the Hispanic vote, and all women. Are we so stoopid we can't see through this with illegal immigrants panting in the sun at the border?
Oh come on, O. You can do better than that.
Don't forget to email or call your elected officials...tell them we're alive and we VOTE!
Everything from Pelosi imploding to Sotomayor's arrogance.
That appointment was so obviously racial/sexist, I can't believe it. Get the Hispanic vote, and all women. Are we so stoopid we can't see through this with illegal immigrants panting in the sun at the border?
Oh come on, O. You can do better than that.
Don't forget to email or call your elected officials...tell them we're alive and we VOTE!
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
More vomitus - Sotomayor
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Sotomayor_statements/2009/05/26/218143.html?s=al&promo_code=8061-1
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/sotomayor_ricci_case/2009/05/26/218173.html?s=al&promo_code=8061-1
Oh boy - this is going to make illegal immigration a non-issue. I'm going to puke.
What a stupid move. The train is going to crash. Soon.
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/sotomayor_ricci_case/2009/05/26/218173.html?s=al&promo_code=8061-1
Oh boy - this is going to make illegal immigration a non-issue. I'm going to puke.
What a stupid move. The train is going to crash. Soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)