Search This Blog

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Lou Dobbs on Melamine in Chinese Food Products

You can go to Lou Dobbs at the CNN site, but I did a search and came up with this. Eurosurveillance is like a public health site - but it covers Europe. Consider this: Melamine (Dobbs quoted a Chinese source saying it's an "open secret" there) is in the food chain because it is in animal feed; it is added to milk, to protein powders, baking mixes, candy. What you're eating may have an imported ingredient. There are always 800 numbers on the boxes, cans and wrappers. Call them if you have a doubt. Let them know you don't want a US product to import Chinese components in our food supply.

Dobbs said a certain kind of "gold coin" (foil wrapped chocolate coins) popular around this time have been pulled from Canada's shelves.

Please be careful.

Why do we need Chinese products that poison, that make us ill, in our food, in our toys, in our pet food at all? We are not third world yet. Why are we putting up with this?



Eurosurveillance, Volume 13, Issue 40, 02 October 2008
Rapid communications
Melamine contamination of dairy products in China – public health impact on citizens of the European Union
  1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. Contaminants Unit, European Food Safety Authority, Parma, Italy
  3. Data Collection and Exposure Unit, European Food Safety Authority, Parma, Italy
  4. International and Tropical Department, Institut de Veille Sanitaire (French Institute for Public Health Surveillance, InVS), St Maurice, France
  5. Environmental Health Department, Institut de Veille Sanitaire (French Institute for Public Health Surveillance, InVS), St Maurice, France
  6. Emerging Risks Unit, European Food Safety Authority, Parma, Italy

Citation style for this article: Coulombier D, Heppner C, Fabiansson S, Tarantola A, Cochet A, Kreidl P, Reintjes R. Melamine contamination of dairy products in China – public health impact on citizens of the European Union. Euro Surveill. 2008;13(40):pii=18998. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=18998
Date of submission: 01 October 2008

On 10 September 2008, ProMED issued a request for information concerning 14 cases of kidney stones in infants hospitalised in Gansu province, China, in the previous two months [1]. On 21 September, Chinese authorities reported 39,965 cases of kidney stones in infants, including three deaths related to the consumption of melamine-contaminated powdered infant formula. On that day, 12,892 of them were hospitalised, 104 with severe illness. Most of these cases (82%) affected children under two years of age.

A large melamine contamination of milk-containing products, including infant formula, was reported from China. The level of contamination is variable but reaches high levels among certain producers. Contaminated food items include infant formula, liquid milk, frozen yoghurt dessert, coffee creamer, ice-cream, chocolate cookies and candies [2,3].
Food safety agencies in Hong Kong and Taiwan as well as in several other countries and locations have identified locally sold contaminated products originating from China, including: Singapore, New Zealand, Indonesia, South Korea, Vietnam and Canada [4]. Contaminated products were also exported to Bangladesh, Burundi, Myanmar, Gabon and Yemen. Media in the European Union (EU) have reported that milk products originating from China had been found in Spain and Portugal [5,6]. Ireland has withdrawn confectionary from sales outlets that had been identified by New Zealand health authorities as contaminated [7]. On 17 September, China recalled tons of milk powder produced by Sanlu Group Co since March 2008.

The importation in the EU of milk products from China has been prohibited under EU legislation since 2002. However, certain amounts of composite products (i.e. products which contain a processed product of animal origin and a product of non-animal origin) containing processed milk components may have reached the EU in the past, including confectionary, biscuits, chocolate, toffee or cakes.
On 26 September 2008, the European Commission extended this ban to all Chinese composite products containing milk or milk products, primarily intended for infants and young children, which could contain traces of milk powder [8]. As a result, systematic tests (threshold 2.5 mg/kg) will be performed on Chinese products containing more than 15% of milk products, and on all consignments of such composite products whose amount of milk product content cannot be established. The tolerable daily intake (TDI) of melamine is 0.5 mg/kg body weight in the EU [9]. Repeated exposures above the TDI require a more detailed assessment of all the data to determine the possibility of adverse effects on health.

Effects of melamine on health
Melamine, when associated with cyanuric acid [10], can cause renal failure by the formation of insoluble melamine cyanurate crystals in renal tubules and/or the formation of calculi in kidneys, ureter, urethra or the urinary bladder. These calculi are a mixture of melamine, protein, uric acid and phosphate and as such are distinct from other kidney stones. They are radiolucent and give a negative image on urinary tract X-ray. Usually both kidneys and ureters are affected. In severe cases, ultrasound investigation reveals bilateral renal enlargement (due to renal tract obstruction) with increased echogenicity. Furthermore, the urine sediment crystals may contain material with a characteristic double refraction in microscopy. Further details on differential diagnosis and ultrasound and x-ray findings can be found on the WHO webpage (http://www.who.int/csr/don/2008_09_29a/en/index.html)

Although there is evidence for the carcinogenicity of melamine under conditions that produce bladder calculi in animals, this evidence is still lacking in humans [11].

The following symptoms have been observed in infants affected by the melamine-contaminated infant formula in the current outbreak in China [12]:

  • Unexplained fever arising from urinary tract infections/bacteraemia secondary to urine stasis resulting from urinary tract obstruction;
  • Unexplained crying in infants, especially when urinating, possible vomiting;
  • Macroscopic or microscopic haematuria;
  • Acute obstructive renal failure: oliguria or anuria;
  • Dysuria (pain on urinating) and passage of stones while urinating (for example, a baby boy with urethral obstruction with stones normally has dysuria);
  • High blood pressure, oedema, pain over the kidneys.

Urolithiasis (kidney stones) in infants is a very uncommon disease. However, the information available in the EU indicates that although several hundred cases of urinary stones possibly occur every year in the EU in children under the age of five years, these are almost certainly unrelated to melamine exposure.

Assessment for exposure of EU citizens through food products
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published a statement on 24 September [13] indicating that the estimated exposure does not raise concerns for the health of adults in Europe should they consume chocolates and biscuits containing contaminated milk powder. Children with an average consumption of biscuits, milk-toffee and chocolate made with such milk powder would generally not exceed the tolerable daily intake (TDI), either. However, in a worst case scenario, with the highest level of contamination, children with high daily consumption of milk-toffee, chocolate or biscuits containing high levels of milk powder would exceed the TDI. Children who consume both such biscuits and chocolate could potentially exceed the TDI by more than three-fold. However, EFSA noted that it is presently unknown whether such high level exposure scenarios may occur in Europe.

In the view of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the risk would be higher for children if counterfeit or illegally imported milk products were present in the EU. The risk for humans with compromised renal function or haemo-concentration associated with absorbing ”acceptable” melamine doses, i.e. at the TDI, is unclear. Such individuals would be advised to avoid consumption of suspect products.

In particular, specific groups of EU citizens may have been and/or still be at higher risk of having been exposed to contaminated products:

  • Visitors to China in the recent months;
  • Citizens of overseas territories, to which contaminated products have been exported;
  • Children who have been recently adopted from China and were exposed to contaminated infant formula of Chinese origin provided they are still exposed to infant formula originating from China;
  • Travellers to and residents in China; they should currently be aware of the possibility of contamination of dairy products still sold in China, including milk, milk products and infant formula until the extent of the contamination is fully ascertained by Chinese authorities.

Assessment of public health impact of potential exposure
Even though there were indications of potential contamination already in late 2007, the period of potential exposure can be considered to have started in March 2008, when the contaminated batches were produced which triggered the alert. The assessment of the public health impact of potential exposure of EU citizens to melamine-contaminated food products during this period should therefore focus on children under the age of 10 years (the oldest case reported in Hong Kong) even though most of the cases were younger than three years. The ECDC suggests the assessment to be done as follows:

  • Retrospectively, by checking hospital discharge data (or other appropriate sources e.g. emergency consultation registers) for ICD 10 codes related to renal failure and urolithiasis, for infants under the age of 10 years, as most cases in China were in this age group. The relevant ICD 10 codes include N17, N19, N20, N21 and N23. This review should cover the period from March 2008 onwards. Data retrieved should be compared to historical baseline data;
  • Prospectively, by informing health care providers in paediatric wards of the clinical presentation of the disease. Children, under the age of 10 years, who present with symptoms or signs of urolithiasis or acute renal failure and for whom other potential causes of kidney stones have been excluded by differential diagnosis, should be tested for melamine exposure using a food exposure questionnaire and, if appropriate, by testing for melamine; confirmed cases should be notified to the health authorities.




Digg!

Break time with George Parr on the Credit Crunch - You'll enjoy this.

George and buddy explain it all in typically British fashion.

Voting machine woes in US just before election says CNN

(CNN) -- Eight years after Florida's hanging chads exasperated voters and helped usher in sweeping changes in voting technology, many election observers remain concerned about the accuracy of the electronic voting systems most Americans will use November 4.

Early voters cast ballots on touch-screen machines Wednesday in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Early voters cast ballots on touch-screen machines Wednesday in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Touch-screen machines can occasionally fail or register votes for unintended candidates. Optical-scan systems can have trouble reading paper ballots that are too long or marked with the wrong ink. At least one study suggests that electronic voting machines can be easily hacked.

And some 9 million voters, including many in the battleground states of Ohio and Florida, will use equipment that has changed since March, increasing concerns about errors next Tuesday.

"You can be almost certain that there will be irregularities in some places around the country," said Rep. Rush Holt, D-New Jersey. "The problem now is that roughly a third of voters nationwide will use unverifiable electronic machines. So if there are uncertainties, there will be no way to resolve them."

With early voting under way in 31 states, these problems have already surfaced. In recent weeks, voters in West Virginia, Colorado, Tennessee and Texas have reported that touch-screen machines registered their votes, at least initially, for the wrong candidate or party. Video Watch video about voting-machine concerns »

CNN Voter Hotline

If you have a problem voting or see a problem, call the CNN Voter Hotline at 1-877-GOCNN08 (1-877-462-6608); CNN will report on some of your calls and our partner, InfoVoter Technologies, can help get you in touch with your election board or find your voting location.

This scenario even turns up in Sunday's episode of "The Simpsons," already leaked on the Internet, in which Homer's electronic vote for Barack Obama is recorded for John McCain by a sinister machine that then devours him. Cast a vote with our interactive ballots »

"There are going to be places where voting machines break down. It happens every time there is an election," said Susan Greenhalgh, spokeswoman for Voter Action, a nonpartisan organization dedicated to integrity in elections. "We have to hope that there aren't problems with the accuracy."

For this presidential election, 55 percent of American voters are casting ballots via optical-scan systems, up from 49 percent two years ago. One-third of Americans are voting by electronic touch screen. The state of New York still votes largely by mechanical lever machines -- those curtained relics from the 1960s -- while several small counties in Maine and Vermont still use old-fashioned paper ballots, counted by hand. Video Learn more about balloting problems »

And those infamous punch-card systems? They're still used in a handful of counties in Idaho, the last state in the nation to do so.

Some observers believe this patchwork quilt of electronic, mechanical and paper balloting from state to state -- even county to county -- makes it more difficult to regulate voting systems. According to a joint report released this month by three nonprofit democracy groups, including Common Cause, 22 states use electronic voting machines that produce no voter-verifiable paper record.

"It's a huge mess," Greenhalgh told CNN. "This is the most important fundamental characteristic of our country. It is our democracy ... and our votes need to be recorded and counted in a way we can trust."

Holt, the New Jersey congressman, has unsuccessfully sought legislation that would establish national standards of verifiable elections. A recent House bill that would reimburse states and counties for backup paper ballots also was defeated. iReport.com: Tell us about your early voting experiences

Election officials nationwide rushed to embrace new voting technology after the disputed 2000 presidential election, in which Florida's punch-card balloting system was blamed for thousands of miscast votes. Congress in 2002 passed the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) to replace punch-card systems with newer, upgraded equipment. The act also created a bipartisan agency, the Election Assistance Commission, to oversee and certify voting systems.

Flush with federal money, many states and counties purchased shiny touch-screen, or direct-recording electronic (DRE) machines. Their simple interface, similar to an ATM's, allow voters to cast votes by pressing a colored area on a display screen.

A University of Missouri study of 2004 voting results found that newer touch-screen machines had an error rate of 1 percent, compared with 1.7 percent for punch-card ballots. But the Election Assistance Commission has yet to certify any of these machines. And election watchdog groups complain many of the machines do not produce a paper record of votes cast, making it difficult to verify disputed results.

"The lessons that some people took away from Florida in 2000 weren't necessarily the right lessons," said Pamela Smith, president of the Verified Voting Foundation, a nonprofit group that advocates for reliable elections. "There was this sense that paper must be bad because of the problems people had with the hanging chads.

"But you need a hard copy record so you can go back and confirm the results," Smith added. "The issue really is about the public having justifiable confidence in the outcome."

Most concerns about electronic voting have focused on touch-screen machines. Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner sued the maker of the touch-screen equipment used in half of Ohio's 88 counties in August after an investigation showed the machines "dropped" votes in recent elections when memory cards were uploaded to computer servers.

Critics also say the machines can be easily manipulated.

Andrew Appel, a professor at Princeton University's Center for Information Technology, issued a report earlier this month that said the touch-screen machines used in 18 of New Jersey's 21 counties can be hacked into in as little as seven minutes. Appel said that someone could replace a voting machine's memory chip with one containing a fraudulent computer program that tweaks the results.

The machines' manufacturer, Sequoia Voting Systems, has disputed Appel's findings. Appel and his team were given the source code to the machines, said New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells. In a prepared statement, Wells said New Jersey state election officials have "expressed complete confidence in the state's voting process and the security of its voting machines."

Ken Fields, spokesman for ES&S Inc., another major provider of electronic voting systems in the United States, insists that his company's touch-screen machines have enough safeguards. ES&S machines operate on a closed computer network and contain three independent memory chips that can be cross-referenced against one another to confirm balloting results, he said.

"I assure you the technology is tested rigorously and has to demonstrate that it's precisely accurate and secure," he said. "We can't speak for anybody else. But the experience we have seen is that the equipment works as it's designed, and works well."

Most electronic voting machines are equipped to produce paper records if required by an audit, said David Beirne, executive director of the Election Technology Council, a trade association for voting-system vendors. Recent reports of "vote-flipping" on touch-screen machines -- when a vote for one candidate is recorded as a vote for another -- can be explained by voter error or election workers not properly calibrating the machines, Beirne said.

By 2006, some jurisdictions around the country were mothballing their DRE equipment in favor of optical-scan machines. Voters use a pen or pencil to mark paper ballots, in the way that students fill standardized tests, which are then fed into scanners that record the results.

Many observers believe that optical scanners -- especially ones that count the ballots at the election precinct, not at a central office -- are the most reliable voting method. Those systems' error rate in 2004, according to the University of Missouri study, was 0.7 percent.

If a voter has made a mistake filling out his or her ballot, the optical scanner will spit out out the ballot and give the voter a chance to correct the error before leaving the polling place, Appel said.

"This not a silver bullet. No technology is perfect," Appel told CNN. "But at least the optical scan ballots have a better resistance to [inaccuracies]."

advertisement

So how can voters on Tuesday be absolutely sure that their ballots are being recorded with 100 percent accuracy? They can't, most election observers say. But election watchdogs and voting-system industry officials agree on one thing: People voting on touch-screen machines should take their time, read the ballot instructions carefully and not be afraid to ask for help.

"If the equipment is not participating the way you think it should be, don't hit the 'cast vote' button," said Rosemary Rodriguez, chair of the federal Election Assistance Commission. "Call an election official, a poll worker for help. Get it addressed immediately and on the spot. There is no going back if you hit the 'cast vote' button."


Digg!

Dr. M. Sidney Wallace on Fabianism and this election

Fabianism
by Dr. M. Sidney Wallace
Picture in your mind a mighty river running to the sea. In the early stages it is created by melting of snow capped mountain peaks into small streams. As these small streams collect together they create small creeks that again merge into small rivers. As rain waters slake the lands hungry for moisture and create green productive farms the excess water continues to flow to the oceans. In the later stages the small tributaries merge together to form mighty rivers. Like the Mississippi River at New Orleans these watersheds are over a mile wide at the most narrow point.
Individuals can use these flowing waters to improve their lives. Farmers use the moisture to irrigate their farm lands and grow crops for the betterment of all mankind. Builders use the waters to help them economically move their completed works to individuals who need them in other parts of the nation. Some individuals use the waterways for pleasure and relaxation. Some build small fast boats to go in all directions while the river’s current steadily moves to the sea.
Wild life sporadically builds blockages to small tributaries to try and capture some of the river's waters. These blockages are usually very small and have little impact on the overall water volume in the river. Occasionally man may try to use a little of the mighty river's excess power by building dams and canals to improve small local areas. However, only a fool would try to dam the Mississippi River at its mouth to the Gulf of Mexico.
Now let’s compare the American dream to a mighty river. In the beginning we had small settlements of immigrants from Europe, Africa, and Asia. Most came to the new world fleeing societies that wanted to dominate their economic life. The early Americans saw that the individuals that worked for a goal were more successful than those that waited for someone else to decide what was best for them. As more and more American saw that individual initiative worked, they used their personal freedom in the new land and started dreaming and growing for themselves. Time after time when old world ideas of collectivism were attempted they always ended in dismal failure.
As the number of entrepreneurs grew in the new nation the quantity and quality of the goods and services produced started to surpass even their wildest dreams and the American standard of living started leaving the rest of the world in the dust. America has grown and prospered on individual enterprise. Socialism has never been and will never be successful in the United States or anywhere else in the world.
A respected economist, Dr. Richard Rahn, once said: Examples go beyond the US. It can be seen in the growing economic dysfunctionalism of France, Sweden, Germany, Great Britain and Canada are only a few of the worst offenders. The European Union's real Gross Domestic Product per capita has remained at approximately 70% of the United States' since 1970. Its growth in productivity has remained below the United States’ since 1995 with high unemployment, stagnant economies and massive unfunded liabilities. Given that 2 centuries of socialist experiments, whether by utopians, Marxists, or Fabians, always ended in economic failure and a loss of personal liberty, why are people around the globe still proudly proclaiming themselves socialists?
Now we come to American individuals. There are three types.
  1. An individual that has no reservation about his own ability. He simply wants others, and government to get out of his way and let him attempt to solve his own problems. He is willing to fail in his attempt to succeed.
  2. An individual that has no personal enterprise to attempt anything on his own. He simply wants others to tell him what to do. These make great government wards and workers because the fear of failure is their greatest motivation.
  3. An individual that wants power over others and knows that government is the easiest way to gain that control. He simply wants to manage others and knows that he has little to nothing to offer on his own.
As we come to the present we find Obama is a radical Marxist that wants to control everything he sees. John McCain is a Fabian that believes in free enterprise; however he is willing to accept creeping socialism for peace and harmony.
Which individual do you think will be the best for America in the long run? One that wants to decide what you need for your life, or one that still thinks that you make the best decisions for yourself?
If you wish to write a letter to the Editor please use: http://www.gulf1.net/letters/NewLetter.htm
If you wish to send a comment or ask a question of Dr. Wallace please use: msw@gulf1.com
If you wish to read other columns by Dr. Wallace please see: http://www.gulf1.com/columns/msw/mswframe.htm

Andrew C. McCarthy on Obama's Khalidi Bash Tape







The L.A. Times Suppresses Obama’s Khalidi Bash Tape
Obama, Ayers, and PLO supporters toast Edward Said’s successor, but the press doesn’t think it’s quite as newsworthy as Sarah Palin’s wardrobe.

By Andrew C. McCarthy

Let’s try a thought experiment. Say John McCain attended a party at which known racists and terror mongers were in attendance. Say testimonials were given, including a glowing one by McCain for the benefit of the guest of honor ... who happened to be a top apologist for terrorists. Say McCain not only gave a speech but stood by, in tacit approval and solidarity, while other racists and terror mongers gave speeches that reeked of hatred for an American ally and rationalizations of terror attacks.

Now let’s say the Los Angeles Times obtained a videotape of the party.

Question: Is there any chance — any chance — the Times would not release the tape and publish front-page story after story about the gory details, with the usual accompanying chorus of sanctimony from the oped commentariat? Is there any chance, if the Times was the least bit reluctant about publishing (remember, we’re pretending here), that the rest of the mainstream media (y’know, the guys who drove Trent Lott out of his leadership position over a birthday-party toast) would not be screaming for the release of the tape?

Do we really have to ask?

So now, let’s leave thought experiments and return to reality: Why is the Los Angeles Times sitting on a videotape of the 2003 farewell bash in Chicago at which Barack Obama lavished praise on the guest of honor, Rashid Khalidi — former mouthpiece for master terrorist Yasser Arafat?

At the time Khalidi, a PLO adviser turned University of Chicago professor, was headed east to Columbia. There he would take over the University’s Middle East-studies program (which he has since maintained as a bubbling cauldron of anti-Semitism) and assume the professorship endowed in honor of Edward Sayyid, another notorious terror apologist.

The party featured encomiums by many of Khalidi’s allies, colleagues, and friends, including Barack Obama, then an Illinois state senator, and Bill Ayers, the terrorist turned education professor. It was sponsored by the Arab American Action Network (AAAN), which had been founded by Khalidi and his wife, Mona, formerly a top English translator for Arafat’s press agency.

Is there just a teeny-weenie chance that this was an evening of Israel-bashing Obama would find very difficult to explain? Could it be that the Times, a pillar of the Obamedia, is covering for its guy?

Gateway Pundit reports that the Times has the videotape but is suppressing it.

Back in April, the Times published a gentle story about the fete. Reporter Peter Wallsten avoided, for example, any mention of the inconvenient fact that the revelers included Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, Ayers’s wife and fellow Weatherman terrorist. These self-professed revolutionary Leftists are friendly with both Obama and Khalidi — indeed, researcher Stanley Kurtz has noted that Ayers and Khalidi were “best friends.” (And — small world! — it turns out that the Obamas are extremely close to the Khalidis, who have reportedly babysat the Obama children.)

Nor did the Times report the party was thrown by AAAN. Wallsten does tell us that the AAAN received grants from the Leftist Woods Fund when Obama was on its board — but, besides understating the amount (it was $75,000, not $40,000), the Times mentions neither that Ayers was also on the Woods board at the time nor that AAAN is rabidly anti-Israel. (Though the organization regards Israel as illegitimate and has sought to justify Palestinian terrorism, Wallsten describes the AAAN as “a social service group.”)

Perhaps even more inconveniently, the Times also let slip that it had obtained a videotape of the party.

Wallsten’s story is worth excerpting at length (italics are mine):

It was a celebration of Palestinian culture — a night of music, dancing and a dash of politics. Local Arab Americans were bidding farewell to Rashid Khalidi, an internationally known scholar, critic of Israel and advocate for Palestinian rights, who was leaving town for a job in New York.

A special tribute came from Khalidi's friend and frequent dinner companion, the young state Sen. Barack Obama. Speaking to the crowd, Obama reminisced about meals prepared by Khalidi's wife, Mona, and conversations that had challenged his thinking.

His many talks with the Khalidis, Obama said, had been "consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases. . . . It's for that reason that I'm hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation — a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid's dinner table," but around "this entire world."...

[T]he warm embrace Obama gave to Khalidi, and words like those at the professor's going-away party, have left some Palestinian American leaders believing that Obama is more receptive to their viewpoint than he is willing to say.

Their belief is not drawn from Obama's speeches or campaign literature, but from comments that some say Obama made in private and from his association with the Palestinian American community in his hometown of Chicago, including his presence at events where anger at Israeli and U.S. Middle East policy was freely expressed.

At Khalidi's 2003 farewell party, for example, a young Palestinian American recited a poem accusing the Israeli government of terrorism in its treatment of Palestinians and sharply criticizing U.S. support of Israel. If Palestinians cannot secure their own land, she said, "then you will never see a day of peace."

One speaker likened "Zionist settlers on the West Bank" to Osama bin Laden, saying both had been "blinded by ideology."

Obama adopted a different tone in his comments and called for finding common ground. But his presence at such events, as he worked to build a political base in Chicago, has led some Palestinian leaders to believe that he might deal differently with the Middle East than … his opponents for the White House....

At Khalidi's going-away party in 2003, the scholar lavished praise on Obama, telling the mostly Palestinian American crowd that the state senator deserved their help in winning a U.S. Senate seat. "You will not have a better senator under any circumstances," Khalidi said.

The event was videotaped, and a copy of the tape was obtained by The Times.

Though Khalidi has seen little of Sen. Obama in recent years, Michelle Obama attended a party several months ago celebrating the marriage of the Khalidis' daughter.

In interviews with The Times, Khalidi declined to discuss specifics of private talks over the years with Obama. He did not begrudge his friend for being out of touch, or for focusing more these days on his support for Israel — a stance that Khalidi calls a requirement to win a national election in the U.S., just as wooing Chicago's large Arab American community was important for winning local elections.

So why is the Times sitting on the videotape of the Khalidi festivities? Given Obama's (preposterous) claims that he didn’t know Ayers that well and was unfamiliar with Ayers’s views, why didn't the Times report that Ayers and Dohrn were at the bash? Was it not worth mentioning the remarkable coincidence that both Obama and Ayers — the “education reform” allies who barely know each other … except to the extent they together doled out tens of millions of dollars to Leftist agitators, attacked the criminal justice system, and raved about each others books — just happen to be intimate friends of the same anti-American Israel-basher? (Despite having watched the videotape, Wallsten told Gateway Pundit he “did not know” whether Ayers was there.)

Why won’t the Times tell us what was said in the various Khalidi testimonials? On that score, Ayers and Dohrn have always had characteristically noxious views on the Israeli/Palestinian dispute. And, true to form, they have always been quite open about them. There is no reason to believe those views have ever changed. Here, for example, is what they had to say in Prairie Fire, the Weather Underground’s 1974 Communist manifesto (emphasis in original):

Palestinian independence is opposed with reactionary schemes by Jordan, completely opposed with military terror by Israel, and manipulated by the U.S. The U.S.-sponsored notion of stability and status-quo in the Mideast is an attempt to preserve U.S. imperialist control of oil, using zionist power as the cat's paw. The Mideast has become a world focus of struggles over oil resources and control of strategic sea and air routes. Yet the Palestinian struggle is at the heart of other conflicts in the Mideast. Only the Palestinians can determine the solution which reflects the aspirations of the Palestinian people. No "settlements" in the Mideast which exclude the Palestinians will resolve the conflict. Palestinian liberation will not be suppressed.

The U.S. people have been seriously deceived about the Palestinians and Israel. This calls for a campaign to educate and focus attention on the true situation: teach-ins, debates, and open clear support for Palestinian liberation; reading about the Palestinian movement—The Disinherited by Fawaz Turki, Enemy of the Sun; opposing U.S. aid to Israel. Our silence or acceptance of pro-zionist policy is a form of complicity with U.S.-backed aggression and terror, and a betrayal of internationalism.

SELF-DETERMINATION FOR THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE!

U.S. OUT OF THE MIDEAST!

END AID TO ISRAEL!

Barack Obama wouldn’t possibly let something like that pass without a spirited defense of the Israel he tells us he so staunchly supports … would he? I guess to answer that question, we’d have to know what was on the tape.

But who has time for such trifles? After all, isn’t Diana Vreeland about to critique Sarah Palin’s sartorial splendor?

National Review’s Andrew C. McCarthy chairs the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies’s Center for Law & Counterterrorism and is the author of Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad (Encounter Books 2008).


National Review Online - http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZDFkMGE2MmM1M2Q5MmY0ZmExMzUxMWRhZGJmMTAyOGY

Bernanke: The USA is Japan!

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/bernanke-makes-official-we-japan/story.aspx?guid={F8AC589F-2F94-478D-9C54-0E4F6BD52F95}&dist=TNMostRead

Obama cartoon - redistribution of wealth

Obama - The Red Diaper Baby

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/barack_obama_red_diaper_baby_1.htm




Digg!

Bloodbath at Gannett Media - Or - Getting ready for Obama

http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.san&s=93665&Nid=48867&p=961420

Gannett's laying off like crazy. Our local newspaper has dwindled physically to a ghost of what it used to be. It's part of Freedom News.

Bow to Obama and the coming suppression of truth, guys. The writing's on the wall.

Maybe if you printed the truth; maybe if your reporters weren't under gag orders; maybe if editors weren't afraid to put their jobs on the line for revealing truth, then maybe your readers would use your papers for more than fishwrappers. Well, in truth, I used to use mine to line birdcages; now I have two pups that are not quite housebroken. I pick the paper apart and use them for soppy up the piddles.


Digg!

Andy Martin files lawsuit in Hawaii for Obama's proof of live birth

ANDY MARTIN
Post Office Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
Toll-free tel. (866) 706-2639
Toll-free fax (866) 707-2639
Temporary Hawai'i
tel. (917) 664-9329
Plaintiff pro se



CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII


ANDY MARTIN, ) CIVIL NUMBER: 08-1-2147-10
) (Declaratory Judgment)
Plaintiff, ) Judge Ayabe
)
vs. ) COMPLAINT FOR
) DECLARATORY JUDGMENT;
LINDA LINGLE, in her ) EXHIBIT 1: SUMMONS
Official capacity as Governor )
Of the State of Hawai'i, )
DR. CHIYOME FUKINO, in her )
official capacity as Director )
of the Department of Health, )
)
Defendants. )
_________________________________



COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff ANDY MARTIN ("Plaintiff"), pro se, alleges in his Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against the Defendants as follows:

PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Plaintiff ANDY MARTIN is the author of a book on Senator Barack Obama ("Senator Obama"). He has also been writing columns and commentary about the senator for over four (4) years.
Defendants LINDA LINGLE and DR. CHIYOME FUKINO are Governor and Director of the Department of Health, respectively.
This Complaint for Declaratory Relief and these proceedings are instituted pursuant to § 632-1, Hawai'i Revised Statutes.
Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to § 603-36, Hawaii Revised Statutes.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM

1. Plaintiff requested a certified copy of the birth certificate of Senator Obama from the Department of Health and tendered the requisite fee.
2. Defendants refused to provide a copy of said certificate, invoking the confidentiality statutes of the State.
3. The issue of the Senator's birth certificate has become a controversial topic of intense national speculation.
4. As an author who strives for factual accuracy and attempts to conduct thorough research Plaintiff wants a copy of the Senator's birth certificate attested to by the State and not a "certificate" which is posted on a web site and which has been debunked as possibly having been altered.
5. One of the more literate and temperate analyses of the unlawfulness of the Defendants' refusal to issue certified copies of the birth certificate is contained in Exhibit 1 attached hereto.
6. To the extent that the Defendants' files contain or retain original supporting data for the birth certificate, Plaintiff asks that he also be supplied with that information and/or material as well.
7. It is axiomatic that the birth certificate of a presidential candidate is a document of crucial public concern and significance.
8. While Hawai'i statutes call for a balancing or weighing test where production is considered by a court, most respectfully Plaintiff submits that the balance falls entirely on the side of disclosure where the original birth certificate of a presidential candidate is concerned.
DECLARATORY RELIEF SOUGHT
9. Based on the relevant statutes and constitutional law, including Article One, Section 4 ("freedom of the press") and § 92F-15 (e) and § 338-18 (a) (9), Plaintiff asks that the Court direct and order defendants to turn over forthwith a copy of Senator Obama's birth certificate and related files and records, and without any delay.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Andy Martin prays for relief as follows:
A. For a declaration by this Court that Plaintiff is an author and writer and is a person to whom the birth certificate of Senator Obama can and should properly be delivered forthwith;
B. For such other relief as this Court deems just and equitable.
Dated: Honolulu, Hawai'i, ______________________

Respectfully submitted,

ANDY MARTIN
Plaintiff Pro se

US Congress Rich and Fat -

Maybe Obama should start his redistribution of wealth in the Congress!
Article from Information Clearing House.


Tough times: Congress Grew 13 Percent Richer In 2007

By Rob Hotakainen

October 27, 2008 "McClatchy Newspapers" -- - WASHINGTON — Times are tough, but don't worry about most members of Congress making ends meet.

Their collective wealth grew by 13 percent last year, leaving them in better shape than most Americans to make it through an economic downturn, according to a new analysis of personal financial reports.

Overall, nearly two of every three senators are millionaires. That includes presidential candidates Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. In the House, 39 percent of all members belong to the exclusive club.

Only 1 percent of all Americans are considered millionaires.

"With a median net worth of $746,000, most members of Congress have a comfortable financial cushion to ride out any recession," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, which conducted the study.

In the House of Representatives, Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., ranks No. 1, with $397 million, followed by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., with $343 million. Rep Robin Hayes, R-N.C., ranks third, with $173.4 million. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., ranks sixth, with $62 million.

In the Senate, the two Democrats from Massachusetts claimed two of the top three spots.

Sen. John Kerry led the pack, with $336 million, while Sen. Edward M. Kennedy ranked third, with $104 million. Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wis., ranked second, with $241.5 million. Overall, senators had a median net worth estimated at $1.7 million.

The 535 members of Congress, who earn average annual salaries of $169,000 and receive cost-of-living pay increases, had a total net worth of $3.7 billion last year. Although some are likely to take a hit from Wall Street's woes, their average net worth soared by 61 percent from 2004 to 2007.

However, not all members are wealthy and some appear to be bankrupt. The study found that 16 House members and three senators had an average net worth of less than zero.

Obama ranked as one of the biggest financial winners, with his net worth increasing from $800,000 in 2006 to $4.7 million last year, thanks mainly to royalties from his two best-selling books. McCain had a net worth estimated at $28.5 million, with most of the wealth attributed to his wife Cindy's family fortune.

Authors of the study said it's impossible to give a precise net worth for members of Congress because their individual assets and liabilities are disclosed in broad ranges. To conduct the study, the Center for Responsive Politics determined a member's minimum net worth and maximum net worth and then calculated an average, which was used to rank the members.

Because the law does not require them to do so, members of Congress don't disclose the value of their homes unless they produce income. As a result, a member's true net worth is likely to be much higher than what gets reported.

"Members of Congress don't make it easy for the public to keep tabs on their personal holdings and any conflicts of interest those holdings present," said Dan Auble, who manages the center's database of lawmakers' financial information.

Who's the wealthiest of them all?

A new study suggests that members of Congress are in much better shape than most Americans to make it through an economic slowdown.

Here's a list of the members who had the highest average net worth last year:

Senate

1 John Kerry (D-Mass.)........$336,224,883

2 Herb Kohl (D-Wis.)........$241,545,513

3 Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.)........$103,560,020

4 Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.)........$93,715,011

5 Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.)........$89,509,099

6 Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)........$84,171,162

7 Gordon Smith (R-Ore.)........$46,127,014

8 Olympia Snowe (R-Maine)........$33,308,537

9 Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.)........$32,428,089

10 Elizabeth Dole (R-N.C.)........$31,421,472

House of Representatives

1 Jane Harman (D-Calif.)........$397,412,077

2 Darrell Issa (R-Calif.)........$343,457,521

3 Robin Hayes (R-N.C.)........$173,409,173

4 Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.)........$165,748,714

5 Michael McCaul (R-Texas)........$64,073,077

6 Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)........$62,468,047

7 Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.)........$50,297,547

8 Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.)........$47,350,092

9 Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.)........$43,716,445

10 Gary Miller (R-Calif.)........$39,978,021

Source: Center for Responsive Politics

Pumapac - an interesting blog...political? Of course!

http://blog.pumapac.org

Andy Martin's release for today - Predicts McCain win by whisker and violence at Obama's tent party

Andy Martin calls the election for Senator John McCain
He says if present trends continue, it's McCain by a whisker
Andy will be staying away from the $2 million "Temple of Obama" in Grant Park, Chicago on election night


ANDY MARTIN
Executive Editor
ContrarianCommentary.com

"Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct"

ATTENTION: DAYBOOK/ASSIGNMENT EDITORS

ANNOUNCEMENT OF NEW YORK NEWS CONFERENCE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Internet powerhouse Andy Martin says Senator John McCain is going to win the presidency, by a whisker.

"McCain has finally shown who he is," Martin says. "McCain took command."

"Forty-two years of politics at the national and state level convince me John McCain is going to squeak in," Andy says.

"McCain is a warrior, and warriors perform at their best with their backs to the wall. McCain's campaign—if it continues—has hit its stride at the opportune moment."

Andy asks Sam Zell to order release of the secret L. A. Times tape.

Martin predicts the Los Angeles Times' manipulation will backfire on Obama.

(NEW YORK)(October 30, 2008) Let me make my prediction. John McCain wins the White House by a whisker. The race could admittedly go either way. But if present trends continue, McCain will squeak through to victory. He is not George Bush, heaven forefend, and he is not Bob Dole.

I was offered tickets to the "Temple of Obama" in Grant Park Tuesday night. Thanks but no thanks. I would not go near the place. There could easily be a riot, and violence. Forty years after the first Grant Park riots, one writer was expecting a victory celebration next week: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/28/AR2008102802954.html

Maybe Bill Ayers will show up and reprise his "Days of Range" if Obama loses. There may not be a riot. But Obama's "victory" celebration will be an unhappy congregation.

My opinion is contrarian. I saw McCain finally take off the gloves Wednesday. He started hammering at Obama's secret cash and the mendacity and manipulation of the Los Angeles Times. Sarah Palin did the same. Finally they are fighting.

First, the Times kerfluffle. The Los Angeles Times dust up is a metaphor for the media arrogance and manipulation that have characterized the entire campaign. The Times refuses to release a tape of Obama at a controversial dinner in Chicago. The paper claims that a confidentiality agreement exists. Where is it? Is the agreement in writing? Have they asked to be relieved of the confidentiality restriction? Doubtful. Instead of working for the full truth, the Times claims a "right" to manage the news so as to conceal firsthand evidence from the public. Is that what journalistic "ethics" have come to?

I am asking Tribune Company majordomo Sam Zell to override the L. A. gang and order release of the tape.

Most of Obama's Hyde Park barons were apparently on the tape, and all at once: Ayers and Dohrn to be sure. The "guys in the neighborhood" were having a neighborhood dinner. And trashing Israel. Such a nabe.

Now I do not want to misrepresent my own views. I have been a critic of the Israeli regime. My views are no secret in the Middle East. But what I am respected for there, and here, is being open and honest about my views, and telling the truth as I see it, qualities that are sorely lacking in Mr. Obama.

Obama on the other hand, knows nothing, sees nothing and hears nothing. Hmm. A man who is so perceptually challenged should not be in the Oval Office. I have a close friend who says Obama should be elected even if he is a crook. I do not agree.

I do not want to return the Daley machine to the White House ever again. I saw how they operated in Washington 42 years ago.

And so the tape stands as a symbolic example of how and why people no longer trust the mainstream media. "It's mine," cry the Times editors. "And you won't see it." When has that behavior ever engendered friendship, or support, on the playground? The Times is hurting Obama worse by concealing the tape than if it released the material and let the chips fall.

McCain and Palin have correctly seized on the tape for its symbolic value. Trust me, it works. Finally, someone in their entourage is thinking, watching, analyzing and acting.

I watched McCain on Larry King Live. McCain looked great, spoke well and gave me assurance that he is ready for the final bombing run. I have been flying in formation with McCain for months, swearing at the guy, throwing beer bottles at him, and telling him I am going kick his butt after the next mission.

Maybe he's finally ready to be a warrior again. Perhaps the mealy-mouthed campaign he has been running embarrassed him.

Dan Rather was also on Larry King, and curiously subdued. Rather knows a lot about close finishes and I think he senses McCain is going to surprise.

McCain has been under attack with every dollar Obama could scrounge from his anonymous supporters, a veritable blitzkrieg of clandestine cash directed at the American people and our democracy. And McCain held up. He is making small strides even under Obama's fire.

A campaign that is that resilient signals two critical factors: McCain is ready to come out of his bunker and spearhead the counterattack. He has taken command.

And, the other army, the Obama Gang, has not been able to win the support of the populace even while passing out inordinate amounts of cash and inundating the airwaves with propaganda.

Obama may even become a negative poster boy for unlimited fundraising. He may have inadvertently fallen into an advertising trap. Sometimes, even in advertising, you can overspend. You can overdo the advertising until it turns customers against you. Obama may have reached, and passed, that point. People do not want to feel they are under assault.

McCain has to keep hammering away from now until Election Day. He has to stay on the attack, playing on all the issues that define Obama as a cipher, a mystery, an alien. He might even demand that Obama produce a birth certificate to show who he really is. It may be impolitic, but it will work.

I make my prediction with full confidence that it reflects a trend in McCain's favor, but with some fear that he could revert to mush again. I hope not.

Personally, I like both men. Hatred is not in my toolbox. I don't mind bashing Obama, because I sincerely believe he does not belong in the White House. At least not until we beat his silly socialist nostrums out of him and tease some of the bitterness and anger out of Michelle. Still, I don't hate the man.

McCain I understand. He comes from a Navy family. My father and grandfather served King and country. I received a few "dreams" from my dad. I see McCain cooling down as the race heats up. That's the way they act in the cockpit. No place for fear or queasiness when you drop you nose and point down towards the target. McCain comes from a generation of flyers that actually saw their targets; today pilots stand off the target and direct guided bombs. I don't think McCain will disappoint me.

I chose February 22nd, Hillary Clinton's early low point, to rouse her to action. She started to fight, and she almost won the prize. I picked all but one of her primaries correctly.

And now I sense that the squadron commander is going to lead the attack on Festung Obama. Obama has a strong team, no doubt about that. But all of his supporters are moral mercenaries, from Axelrod on down. They all want to win to grab the spoils. Obama wants to be emperor. It is a classic Chicago combination, almost Daleyesque in its dimensions.

McCain is a patriot and so am I. We want to win for country, flag and Constitution. Nothing more than that.

In six days we are going to find out whether the mercenaries or the patriots carry the day. Me? I'll bet on Old Glory any day.

McCain in a whisker, and not much of a whisker at that.

NEWS CONFERENCE DETAILS:

WHO:

Internet powerhouse and Obama Author Andy Martin

WHAT:

Internet warrior Andy Martin predicts a McCain victory on November 4th, by a "whisker."

WHERE:

909 Third Avenue, public sidewalk in front of FDR Station, New York

WHEN: Thursday, October 30, 4:00 P. M.

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639; CELL (917) 664-9329

TO PURCHASE BOOK: http://www.OrangeStatePress.com

ANDY E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com

TownHall's article from Ken Blackwell on...

Obama's dangerous alignments. Following is the first few paragraphs. This is a dangerous policy. We have never had a President who counts terrorists as his friends and allies. Ken Blackwell happens to be a black man.

Last week an enemy of the United States spoke out and endorsed an American presidential candidate – Senator Barack Obama. Taken with other recent developments, voters should be deeply disturbed with this embrace of Mr. Obama’s campaign to become the U.S. commander- in-chief.

Ali Larijani is the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, and was Iran’s representative to the United Nations who kept that international body from taking action regarding Iran’s program to expand its nuclear capabilities. On October 22, Speaker Larijani said that the regime in Iran would like to see Mr. Obama elected president.

Mr. Larijani is not the first hostile foreign leader to endorse or be aligned with Mr. Obama. In April, top Hamas advisor Ahmed Yousef also endorsed Mr. Obama. Mr. Obama’s long-time associate and self-described Marxist, Bill Ayers, actively backs him. Mr. Obama’s mentor and two-decade long spiritual leader, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, traveled to Libya to meet with the controversial Moammar Gadhafi. His church published a pro-Hamas piece on Rev. Wright’s “Pastor’s Page.” The article defended terrorism against Israel and denied Israel’s right to exist.

Mr. Obama’s political alignments are alarming.

The article continues at the link above.


Note: I am having a lot of trouble posting this entry. It keeps bouncing back for probably obvious reasons.






http://townhall.com/columnists/KenBlackwell/2008/10/30/obamas_dangerous_alignments



Digg!

Australia to impost Chinese style internet censorship

http://www.prisonplanet.com/australia-to-enforce-mandatory-chinese-style-internet-censorship.html

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24568137-2862,00.html



The global grab for your search for information and freedom. Governments just HATE liberty, don't they?

I cannot believe that the strong people of Australia are allowing this...The government took your firearms, and now they're after your thoughts and quest for information.





Digg!

US government funds social network snooping


WAIT TILL OBAMA GETS IN!


US government funds social network snooping

UK Register | July 3 2006

The US government is funding research into social networking sites and how to gather and store personal data published on them, according to the New Scientist magazine.

At the same time, US lawmakers are attempting to force the social networking sites themselves to control the amount and kind of information that people, particularly children, can put on the sites.

Social networking sites have enjoyed phenomenal recent success. Industry leader MySpace has attracted 85m members with new members joining at a rate of 250,000 per day. Users, most often young people, use their own pages to swap information about themselves, their hobbies, their friends and their favourite music and films.

That kind of information is the subject of a research paper by a team from the University of Maryland in Baltimore. The paper, Semantic Analytics on Social Networks, proposes methods for combining the data posted on social networking sites and other computer databases to reveal information about individuals.

The New Scientist discovered that ARDA (Advanced Research Development Agency), credited in a footnote with part-funding the research paper, is a branch of the National Security Agency, the US government body responsible for surveillance and code breaking.

The news follows recent revelations about secret surveillance of US citizens by other US security agencies. The New York Times recently revealed that the US government is tracking financial transactions of some citizens and non-citizens, while it has also emerged in recent weeks that the government has tracked phone call activity of some citizens since the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001.

In 2003 US Congress stopped Pentagon projects being operated by retired admiral John Poindexter which aimed to mine public and private records for information on individuals suspected of terrorist activity.

Congress ended the programmes because they were worried that they might put innocent Americans under suspicion, according to a February 2004 Associated Press report. That report identified ARDA as the office which would carry out software development in the gathering of information from disparate sources.

The New Scientist report said a Congressional Research Service report identified ARDA, since renamed the Disruptive Technologies Office, as a body which funds research into issues of use to the intelligence community.

Meanwhile, social networking sites have hit the headlines for other reasons. The US Congress is attempting to limit the ways in which young people use the sites in order to protect young people and children. The Energy and Commerce subcommittee has just finished a series of hearings on pornography and plans to issue legislation to protect children online. The plans will contain some measures to force social network sites to protect its users, said US press reports.





Digg!

Time for a trip to the Chihuahuan Desert in MX for a real treat...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1081072/Pictured-The-Cave-Crystals-discovered-1-000ft-Mexican-desert.html

This is an article from the UK Daily Mail on a National Geographic exploration in the Mexican desert. You won't believe this crystal cave. It's worth a look.


Digg!

World Net Daily today has too many articles

on this election, particularly about Obama that will make your skin crawl...

I can't list them all because I'm busy researching for you.

Here's the link: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/

You need to browse it quickly. Something's going to compel you to read it.

REMEMBER: OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A LEGAL REQUIREMENT FOR THE PRESIDENCY AND HE NEEDS TO SHOW IT!


Digg!

Whistleblower Magazine - The Year the Media Died

We are being given tools to fight for our liberty and freedom. We need to take heed of this.


WHISTLEBLOWER MAGAZINE
THE YEAR THE MEDIA DIED
How 2008 presidential election demolished credibility of 'mainstream' press
Posted: October 02, 2008
11:31 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

The mask is off. The pretense over.

After decades of pretending they're not biased leftward – even though everyone else knew it – America's "mainstream media" have finally, during 2008, dropped the façade of fairness and impartiality.
# The big media openly worship Barack Obama. MSNBC's Chris Matthews, upon listening to Obama speak, says almost mystically, "I felt this thrill going up my leg." Rolling Stone magazine rhapsodizes, "There is a sense of dignity, even majesty, about him …

# For its October cover, The Atlantic magazine hires a photographer who intentionally photographs John McCain to look ugly and threatening. ("I left his eyes red and his skin looking bad," she later admits, adding, "maybe it was somewhat irresponsible for [the Atlantic] to hire me."

# The New York Times publishes Barack Obama's op-ed on Iraq policy, but refuses to run McCain's op-ed. At the same time, all three network's news anchors tag along with Obama like groupies on his overseas stump tour, while McCain receives scant media coverage.

# The pregnancy of Sarah Palin's teen daughter is national news, as is the presence in the Alaska governor's mansion of a tanning bed (which Palin paid for herself). But Obama being mentored and nurtured for years by terrorists (William Ayers), communists (Frank Marshall Davis) and America-hating racists (Rev. Jeremiah Wright), which helped shape him into the most left-wing, America-blaming, radically pro-abortion and tyrant-appeasing presidential candidate in U.S. history, is not news.

Yes, the media have long been biased to the left. But this year it's different. This year, the mask has come off and the real face of the mainstream media – or MSM as they're popularly called – has been revealed for all to see. And it ain't pretty.

Documenting this stunning transformation of the American news media – and pointing to amazingly positive changes now occurring in the evolution of the free press – is the October edition of WND's elite monthly Whistleblower magazine, titled "THE YEAR THE MEDIA DIED."


"It doesn't matter how dangerous the reality of Obama is – a hardcore leftist whose intended tax-and-spend policies would, experts say, plunge American into a full-bore depression," said WND Managing Editor and best-selling author David Kupelian. "It doesn't matter how surreal and creepy his campaign gets – enlisting sheriffs and prosecutors to intimidate voters, exploiting children into singing 'Obama's gonna lead us' songs stunningly reminiscent of Chinese Maoist indoctrination. The mainstream press ignores it all, because, very simply, they just really want Obama to be president."

However, adds Kupelian, regardless of who wins the election, the "mainstream press" will never be the same.

"This is, as Sean Hannity has been saying for months, 'the year journalism died.' By pushing so unashamedly and openly for Obama, the Old Media are throwing away what little is left of their credibility. Maybe they sense the era when they could fool most Americans is coming to an end, and thus are going all-out to get Obama elected as their last desperate mission."


The good news, says Whistleblower, is that while the Old Media are rapidly waning (the New York Times Company is worth only half of what it was a year ago), the New Media – talk radio, Internet news, bloggers, cable news (well, some cable news) and more – are growing exponentially in readership and influence.

Highlights of "THE YEAR THE MEDIA DIED" include:
# "The sad state of the media" by Joseph Farah

# "Study: ABC, NBC, CBS strongly support Obama" by Bob Unruh, concluding that "mainstream" media covered has "bordered on giddy celebration of a political rock star"

# "Magazine photographer shoots McCain to look like monster," documenting how a self-described 'hard-core Democrat' boasted how she tricked Republican presidential candidate into participating in horror pic

# "Stunning proof of mainstream bias" by Chelsea Schilling, on how the weekly celebrity magazine "Us" smeared Sarah Palin while unabashedly praising Obama

# "Gingrich verbally incinerates MSNBC reporter"

# "CNN reporter falsely claims Palin posed in bikini with rifle" – just one in a string of sensational but untrue claims against Alaska governor

# "McCain rumors big news, Edwards adultery no news" – a stunning contrast between media coverage of the two candidates' alleged "scandals"

# "Is the press evil?" by David Kupelian, who surveys the death throes of the Old Media – and the birth pangs of the New Media

# "The Old Gray Lady's mind-numbing bias" by David Limbaugh, show how the New York Times "arrogance and unprofessionalism" have hit a new low

# New York Times worth half what it was last year

# "New York Times vs. Helms, part 529,876" by Ann Coulter, who excoriates the Times' journalistic spitting on the grave of a great statesman

# "He's one of them – she's one of us" by Patrick J. Buchanan, on what the media firestorm over Sarah Palin is really all about

# … and much more.

"I've often said that no group in America is more responsible for making evil look good and good look evil than the news media," said Kupelian. "This issue of Whistleblower documents something truly astounding – the death of the Old Media before our very eyes, and the rapid growth of the New. In my view, it's the single most positive trend in America today. Without a truly free press, it's really hard to have a free country."
Palin book cover

SPECIAL DISCOUNT OFFER! For a limited time, subscribe to Whistleblower, renew your subscription or give a gift subscription for one year for only $39.95 – a $10 discount off the normal $49.95 price! In addition, with your one-year subscription or renewal we'll send you a FREE copy of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's authorized biography, "Sarah: How a Hockey Mom Turned Alaska's Political Establishment Upside Down" by author Kaylene Johnson. Drawing on personal interviews with Palin, her family and other highly placed sources – and featuring dozens of family and political photos – "Sarah" explores Palin's family life, her upbringing in a devout Christian home, her political rise, her values and beliefs, and how she went from being a long-shot candidate to – very possibly – one of the world's most powerful women and political figures.

Or, subscribe to Whistleblower, renew your subscription or give a gift subscription for two years and you'll pay only $74.95 – that's a $10 discount off the already discounted two-year rate! Plus with your two-year subscription or renewal, you'll get a FREE copy of "The Audacity of Deceit: Barack Obama's War on American Values," by Brad O'Leary, just published by WND Books.


Other books, such as the No. 1 best-seller "The Obama Nation" by WND's Jerome Corsi, have focused on Obama's past; but in "The Audacity of Deceit" O'Leary looks to Obama's proposed future, detailing what America would look like if Obama were elected president and actually made good on his campaign promises.

This special discount offer may end without notice. Free book offer good in the U.S. only.



RENEW YOUR WHISTLEBLOWER SUBSCRIPTION.GIVE A GIFT WHISTLEBLOWER SUBSCRIPTION.

If you prefer, you may order a single copy of the October issue, "THE YEAR THE MEDIA DIED."

NOTE: When shopping in WND's online store you have the option of paying with either a credit card or a check.

If you wish to order by phone, call our toll-free order line at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).
WHISTLEBLOWER MAGAZINE
THE YEAR THE MEDIA DIED
How 2008 presidential election demolished credibility of 'mainstream' press
Posted: October 02, 2008
11:31 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

The mask is off. The pretense over.

After decades of pretending they're not biased leftward – even though everyone else knew it – America's "mainstream media" have finally, during 2008, dropped the façade of fairness and impartiality.
# The big media openly worship Barack Obama. MSNBC's Chris Matthews, upon listening to Obama speak, says almost mystically, "I felt this thrill going up my leg." Rolling Stone magazine rhapsodizes, "There is a sense of dignity, even majesty, about him …

# For its October cover, The Atlantic magazine hires a photographer who intentionally photographs John McCain to look ugly and threatening. ("I left his eyes red and his skin looking bad," she later admits, adding, "maybe it was somewhat irresponsible for [the Atlantic] to hire me."

# The New York Times publishes Barack Obama's op-ed on Iraq policy, but refuses to run McCain's op-ed. At the same time, all three network's news anchors tag along with Obama like groupies on his overseas stump tour, while McCain receives scant media coverage.

# The pregnancy of Sarah Palin's teen daughter is national news, as is the presence in the Alaska governor's mansion of a tanning bed (which Palin paid for herself). But Obama being mentored and nurtured for years by terrorists (William Ayers), communists (Frank Marshall Davis) and America-hating racists (Rev. Jeremiah Wright), which helped shape him into the most left-wing, America-blaming, radically pro-abortion and tyrant-appeasing presidential candidate in U.S. history, is not news.

Yes, the media have long been biased to the left. But this year it's different. This year, the mask has come off and the real face of the mainstream media – or MSM as they're popularly called – has been revealed for all to see. And it ain't pretty.

Documenting this stunning transformation of the American news media – and pointing to amazingly positive changes now occurring in the evolution of the free press – is the October edition of WND's elite monthly Whistleblower magazine, titled "THE YEAR THE MEDIA DIED."


"It doesn't matter how dangerous the reality of Obama is – a hardcore leftist whose intended tax-and-spend policies would, experts say, plunge American into a full-bore depression," said WND Managing Editor and best-selling author David Kupelian. "It doesn't matter how surreal and creepy his campaign gets – enlisting sheriffs and prosecutors to intimidate voters, exploiting children into singing 'Obama's gonna lead us' songs stunningly reminiscent of Chinese Maoist indoctrination. The mainstream press ignores it all, because, very simply, they just really want Obama to be president."

However, adds Kupelian, regardless of who wins the election, the "mainstream press" will never be the same.

"This is, as Sean Hannity has been saying for months, 'the year journalism died.' By pushing so unashamedly and openly for Obama, the Old Media are throwing away what little is left of their credibility. Maybe they sense the era when they could fool most Americans is coming to an end, and thus are going all-out to get Obama elected as their last desperate mission."

(Story continues below)




The good news, says Whistleblower, is that while the Old Media are rapidly waning (the New York Times Company is worth only half of what it was a year ago), the New Media – talk radio, Internet news, bloggers, cable news (well, some cable news) and more – are growing exponentially in readership and influence.

Highlights of "THE YEAR THE MEDIA DIED" include:
# "The sad state of the media" by Joseph Farah

# "Study: ABC, NBC, CBS strongly support Obama" by Bob Unruh, concluding that "mainstream" media covered has "bordered on giddy celebration of a political rock star"

# "Magazine photographer shoots McCain to look like monster," documenting how a self-described 'hard-core Democrat' boasted how she tricked Republican presidential candidate into participating in horror pic

# "Stunning proof of mainstream bias" by Chelsea Schilling, on how the weekly celebrity magazine "Us" smeared Sarah Palin while unabashedly praising Obama

# "Gingrich verbally incinerates MSNBC reporter"

# "CNN reporter falsely claims Palin posed in bikini with rifle" – just one in a string of sensational but untrue claims against Alaska governor

# "McCain rumors big news, Edwards adultery no news" – a stunning contrast between media coverage of the two candidates' alleged "scandals"

# "Is the press evil?" by David Kupelian, who surveys the death throes of the Old Media – and the birth pangs of the New Media

# "The Old Gray Lady's mind-numbing bias" by David Limbaugh, show how the New York Times "arrogance and unprofessionalism" have hit a new low

# New York Times worth half what it was last year

# "New York Times vs. Helms, part 529,876" by Ann Coulter, who excoriates the Times' journalistic spitting on the grave of a great statesman

# "He's one of them – she's one of us" by Patrick J. Buchanan, on what the media firestorm over Sarah Palin is really all about

# … and much more.

"I've often said that no group in America is more responsible for making evil look good and good look evil than the news media," said Kupelian. "This issue of Whistleblower documents something truly astounding – the death of the Old Media before our very eyes, and the rapid growth of the New. In my view, it's the single most positive trend in America today. Without a truly free press, it's really hard to have a free country."
Palin book cover

SPECIAL DISCOUNT OFFER! For a limited time, subscribe to Whistleblower, renew your subscription or give a gift subscription for one year for only $39.95 – a $10 discount off the normal $49.95 price! In addition, with your one-year subscription or renewal we'll send you a FREE copy of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's authorized biography, "Sarah: How a Hockey Mom Turned Alaska's Political Establishment Upside Down" by author Kaylene Johnson. Drawing on personal interviews with Palin, her family and other highly placed sources – and featuring dozens of family and political photos – "Sarah" explores Palin's family life, her upbringing in a devout Christian home, her political rise, her values and beliefs, and how she went from being a long-shot candidate to – very possibly – one of the world's most powerful women and political figures.

Or, subscribe to Whistleblower, renew your subscription or give a gift subscription for two years and you'll pay only $74.95 – that's a $10 discount off the already discounted two-year rate! Plus with your two-year subscription or renewal, you'll get a FREE copy of "The Audacity of Deceit: Barack Obama's War on American Values," by Brad O'Leary, just published by WND Books.


Other books, such as the No. 1 best-seller "The Obama Nation" by WND's Jerome Corsi, have focused on Obama's past; but in "The Audacity of Deceit" O'Leary looks to Obama's proposed future, detailing what America would look like if Obama were elected president and actually made good on his campaign promises.

This special discount offer may end without notice. Free book offer good in the U.S. only.



RENEW YOUR WHISTLEBLOWER SUBSCRIPTION.GIVE A GIFT WHISTLEBLOWER SUBSCRIPTION.

If you prefer, you may order a single copy of the October issue, "THE YEAR THE MEDIA DIED."

NOTE: When shopping in WND's online store you have the option of paying with either a credit card or a check.

If you wish to order by phone, call our toll-free order line at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).